of all committee members toindicate their approval. The final report should be submitted by the last day of the semester.The instructor may include the final report in their dossier for the annual review process andadopt the suggestions provided by the committee to improve their teaching practice in the future.The faculty member provides to the committee a written reflection report on the peerobservations including how they plan to make use of the suggestions/recommendations.The committee members review them for the next class visit and verify if the committeerecommendations are adopted by the instructor.Assessment Objectives and MethodologyThis work seeks to assess faculty perceptions of the efficacy of peer observation procedures
structural,process, and interpersonal dynamics that were resulting in different outcomes and experiencesfor participants in our workshops. In addition to enhancing inclusion for DHH participants, weacknowledged that slowing down and giving time for all participants to engage with theinformation presented in the slides and discussion would likely lead to better engagement andunderstanding for all.For the fall 2022 workshops, the leadership team continued to refine their thinking about howbest to support activities with mixed-hearing status groups. In alignment with our strategic goalsto ensure each campus team was making progress on their campus self-assessment andorganizational action plans, we moved towards longer campus-specific breakout rooms
grading approach, the author faced many obstacles andchallenges, which required extra thought and planning for the future semesters. For instance,many students procrastinated and only came for reassessments at the end of the semester,causing long lines outside the office during office hours. This was a heavy burden for theinstructor and left insufficient time for providing individualized feedback, which was the purposeof the office hour reassessments. The unlimited number of attempts did not sufficiently motivatestudents to perform better on their first tries. It also generated an excessive amount of grading.The author needs to reevaluate the number of reassessments allowed and encourage students toreflect and review before
to find innovative solutions in the problem space? 3 What excited you about the concept of edible entertainment? Did the project meet your expectations and why so? 4 Did the project structure and design process help you achieve the objective of: 1. Co-creating authentic experiences 2. Addressing food equity issues/taste diversity in additive manufacturing 5 What are the skills you learnt in this project that you plan to apply in your own professional practice and/or discipline of study? 6 Additional FeedbackA qualitative analysis of the survey responses led to the following discussion:Students were able to define, differentiate and appreciate the concepts of food equity, safety
that includes an essay. Thestudents are not reviewed on their academics, but on their motivation to become an engineer andtheir active participation in the Engineering LLC. This means the program focuses on the wholestudent, not just their academics. Essay Prompts in Application Why are you interested in an engineering degree, and what are your plans once you earn that engineering degree? What lessons have you personally learned from Engineering Concepts Institute and/or the Engineering LLC program?Program ElementsThe Educating Engineering Students Innovatively program, which spans the fall and springsemesters of
stimulate thought about theunique challenges encountered by Black students when navigating their engineeringenvironments. Furthermore, to maximize the impact of the work, we plan to partner with and leverage theexpertise of ethno-theater experts from academic cluster. If we wish to elevate the counternarratives ofpeople of color in ways that challenge the perpetuation of systemic racism, we must continue to find theseams of research and art to fully explore the true potential for impact. This work is a steppingstonetoward that goal.Most importantly, ethno-drama as a non-traditional mode of dissemination has the potential for morecritical engagement beyond academia. Microaggression, role negotiation, hypervisibility vs invisibilityand other
-basedinteractions. However, digital tools have been a good ally for community building andteamwork activities. Students were engaged with the activities in the classroom that includedguest lecture speakers, group discussions, and active participation toward a specific topic duringthe semester. However, data on Canvas shows that all students actively took part in creatingvideos, forum discussions, surveys online, and online group projects when they were asked touse digital tools. As their instructors, we could see their positive participation in digital and in-person modalities planned to increase classroom community and teamwork.We learned that while technology often gets blamed for reducing in person interactions, it canalso be used to facilitate them
: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02468-0[22] L. S. Sadler et al., “Community-university partnerships in community-based research,” vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 463–469, 2012, doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0053.[23] S. E. Curwood and M. Mackeigan, “Building Effective Community-University Partnerships: Are Universities Truly Ready?” American Psychological Association (APA), 2011.[24] R. E. Pizarro, “Challenges of implementing sustainable urban design plans through community– university partnerships: lessons from Colombia, China, and Germany,” vol. 17, pp. 48–56, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.005. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343515001402[25] N. O. Jelks, T. L. Hawthorne, D. Dai, C. H. Fuller
1. Introduction Morgan State University has received a grant of about 1.6 million dollars from BASE 11, a nonprofit 501 c3 STEMcompany whose mission is to provide access and awareness to women and minorities to pursue and succeed in careers in theareas of the Next Frontier Industries such as Aerospace, Life Sciences, Cyber Security, Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality,Data Analytics, Technology education, Advanced Manufacturing, and Autonomous Systems. BASE 11 plans to achieve thisgoal with their Next Frontier hands-on programs and events, mentoring programs, and additional resources and experiencesthat allow students the opportunity to learn from trained professionals in their respective fields. This funding will aid MorganState in
digitalstorytelling. In my classroom, I encouraged my students to use digital storytelling tocommunicate their findings and seek feedback on their engineering designs. The process ofredesigning curriculum gives engineering educators a space to critically reflect on how the taskpositions students in relation to their teacher and interrogate whether this snapshot of the learningenvironment and instructional planning is conducive to a liberatory education.Using a technology integration tool like a Google Document (Google Doc) can fall anywherefrom substitution to redefinition on the SAMR framework. One way to determine whether it is asubstitution, augmentation, modification, or redefinition is to decide the level of Bloom’s Proceedings of
or mindset with which individuals may approach problemswithin a specific domain” rather than something more related to innovation or the various otherconstructs described in the literature. Additionally, as we plan to use this survey to assess STEMstudents of multiple majors throughout their course of study, the exclusion of domain-basedknowledge as a component of AE is important - individuals may be adaptive and employadaptive approaches to problem solving without displaying strong content knowledge and thus,we can consider the adaptiveness of students at various levels of education as they progresswithin their program.Methodology and Survey DetailsAt Stevens, all first-year students are required to complete a number of subject pool
leaders inour group, but that's just more because they're already skilled with certain aspects, like CAD(Computer Aided Design).” The focus group participants identified that equal contribution of work performed by allteam members was key in keeping their teamwork projects in orbit, but they seemed to strugglewith implementing this in their own groups. They all agreed their teams had a plan to split theproject workload up, but so far some team members did not complete their parts. Participantsalso felt there was too much work to equally split between all of the team members. Otherimportant characteristics for successful teamwork mentioned in this discussion were efficiency,accuracy, and precision. The third focus group rounded off
engineering project in which deadlines, failures/setbacks, projectrevisions, client requested modifications, regular presentations/meetings, and other challengesare encountered. Through this experience, the students learned to plan, schedule, design, andimplement non-academic engineering solutions effectively.In doing so, the students also devised a unique solution for the vibration analysis problemdiscussed in the beginning of the paper. The solution can potentially help identify faults or detectfuture failures in rotating machinery on a real-time edge-analytics based system. This can beuseful in a wide variety of applications, such as those relevant to human safety, those in whichthe maintenance downtime for the equipment of interest is very long
a straight A student and she said I'm good at everything, but I don't really have a passion or anything and we started talking about you know her art and her interest in math and science and her abilities in it and engineering was one of the things that we talked about and she agreed to take the classAnn also reported that her conversations with students often began with connections to studentinterest, and would begin with broad connections to STEM fields and then narrow toengineering, saying she starts with “what are your career plans for the future, and we'll guidethem and we might make some changes.”Another theme that emerged was an evolution in their thinking of the field of engineering thatwas reported by both
-0.6 D2 369 4.92 1.47 -0.6 -0.55 D3 373 5.03 1.5 -0.63 -0.41 E1 375 4.9 1.76 -0.41 -0.89 E2 374 3.46 1.6 0.48 -0.43 E3 375 3.77 1.66 0.25 -0.81We initially conducted a model containing the five factors and all planned items. However oneitem (E4) had inadmissible negative variance [35], and so we removed it and respecified themodel.We examined goodness of fit indices, comparing a one-factor model to the theoretically-derivedfive-factor model. The fit indices are found in table 3. A significant χ2 indicates
of Engineering. This paperpresents the first-year development, implementation, and outcomes of the program with plans forfuture program improvement.First-Year Implementation of the S-SMART Summer Research Internship ProgramIn 2022, the S-SMART Summer Research Internship Program was piloted with a cohort of tenstudents participating in four research projects across three engineering disciplines - civilengineering, computer engineering, and mechanical engineering. Each project team wassupervised by at least one faculty advisor and one SFSU student peer mentor.Recruitment and Selection of Program ParticipantsThe S-SMART interns were selected through an online application process. The applicationform, created on Qualtrics, asked for information
paved and other impervious surfaces that prevent water from enteringthe soil. Each member of the team becomes an expert on one type of land use, investigating thesources of nutrients and the most effective strategies for managing them. Teams then worktogether to optimize their plans for the entire watershed, encompassing all types of land uses,negotiating tradeoffs, as needed, to optimize management strategies for overall effectiveness.MethodsWe piloted the curriculum in classrooms from May–June 2022. The pilot teachers were theteacher who had advised on the curriculum and her co-teacher who taught the same subject andgrade within the school. The school where the curriculum was piloted is located in a rural regionof the country that is directly
had acomplete program experience without a COVID-19 disruption. Moreover, each cohort has beenaffected differently and at different points in the Endeavour Program. Endeavour S-STEM wasdesigned to be an engagement-focused program and was severely limited in how it could engagewith its students. The disruptions have made the originally planned engagement study infeasible.However, COVID-19 was not the only obstacle in collecting engagement data. Initially,engagement data for two of the engagement dimensions (cognitive and affective) were to becollected through a validated survey. However, after conducting the survey multiple times in thefirst two years it was felt that the initial data failed to capture the high levels of engagement thatthe
collection, anexploratory factor analysis of the two pilot surveys. Additionally, we are developing a usermanual for this questionnaire, which we plan to disseminate in Year 3. In Year 3, we willconduct a full administration of this survey beside multiple previously published measuresincluding mental health distress symptoms [25], intention to persist [26], and potentially otherconstructs such as engineering culture, quality of life, and quality of social relationships.Analysis of Year 3 data will provide further, confirmatory validity evidence and establish thecorrelative or predictive power of measuring the stressors found in the SDSQ-E with relatedtopics.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation
importanceof building in some time for networking, both structured and unstructured. To facilitate this, wedrew from successful events from previous Summer Schools. There were informal buttopically-structured networking events on Monday and Thursday, after the last regular session ofthe day and before dinner. There were also two poster session events for new attendees onMonday and Tuesday evenings to allow participants to share their work, current or planned, aswell as interact with more senior members of the community. Finally, on Wednesday there wasan Industry Expo, which allowed participants to interact with corporate and academic partnersand sponsors, followed by a variety of social events, ranging from a Colorado Rockies Game towhitewater rafting
, environmental, and societal contexts. 5. an ability to function effectively on a PBL is often conducted in small teams team whose members together provide working collaboratively. leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. 6. an ability to develop and conduct PBL can be extended from conceptual to appropriate experimentation, analyze, and experimental, allowing students to evaluate interpret data, and use engineering their designs. judgment to draw conclusions. 7. an ability to acquire and apply new PBL does not follow textbook examples and knowledge as needed, using appropriate requires students to research
choosing a format, language, or graph that enhances meaning. Make clear the interdependence of language and meaning, thought, and expression. Envision a future self. Make plans that build on past experiences that have occurred across multiple and diverse contexts. Table 2 Likert Scale Values 1: Not at all - I am not aware of or do not recognize this behavior. 2: Low Degree - I am only aware of and recognize this behavior. 3: Somewhat Low Degree - I cooperate or comply with this behavior if required by others. 4: Somewhat High Degree - I recognize the value of and prefer this behavior. 5: High Degree - This behavior is an important priority to me. 6: Very High Degree - This behavior is natural to me, is habitual to me, and embodies who I am.In an
Blackfaculty [5]. Federally funded colleges and public institutions benefit from a more diverse faculty[5]. A higher likelihood of women faculty appears in research institutions with plans to focus onthe needs of women. The quantity of African American/Black women and Hispanic/Latinawomen faculty employed remains small among prestigious engineering and science researchinstitutions compared to other universities and colleges [5]. Women and multicultural facultybear little presence in selective universities as well [5]. Women of Color professors hold a scintilla of authority with less power and value thantheir cohorts [8]. Departments hire women of Color to instruct sizeable introduction and newpreparation courses [8], which leads to heavy
Paper ID #36945Teamwork as a Core Competence in Construction and Engineering Educa-tionSaeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University Saeed Rokooei is an assistant professor in the Building Construction Science program at Mississippi State University. His professional responsibilities include project planning and management as well as architectural design practice in private and public construction and engineering firms. He has taught in architecture and construction programs since 2006. Dr. Rokooei’s primary research interests include simulation and serious games, project management methodologies, construction education, data
should take (e.g., over email, in person, online chat,etc.), what additional training may be helpful for the faculty and peer mentors to be effectivementors to this population of students, and generally what aspects of the mentoring experience ismost impactful for the students. We plan to use these results to improve the existing scholarshipprogram and to share effective strategies with the engineering community on how to motivateand support engineering transfer students.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #1742627. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
. These include elements such as the quality of mentors [20], the ability toestablish trusting relationships between minority students and mentors across lines of difference [21], the limitedavailable time for mentoring activities [19], and engagement beyond departmental sanctions [22]. Literature shows alack of involvement of students and faculty in curricular or planning decisions [23] that could lead to disengagedparticipants [24]. In addition to the challenges of non-involvement, few programs look to improve the performanceof faculty mentors or cultivate a mentoring community [25]. Research suggests that effective involvement in suchdecisions could create a sense of community and perceptions of shared responsibility [26]. To reap the benefits
material, and feeling more confident in their knowledge. Female studentsresponded more positively than male students to nearly every question regarding communitybuilding except for whether group problem solving helped students feel a sense of community.All activities described in this study are easy to integrate into lectures, and given their potentialimpact on community building, learning, and comfort with active participation, they meritconsideration in all graduate courses. Consistent with other studies of a graduate level course,small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings and precludes disentangling factorswhich may impact student responses such as gender, time at this university, and internationalstudent status. We plan to
multidimensional. Thus,student STEM identity continues to be refined and influenced over the course of one’s entire collegeexperience. The model served as the foundation of the interview protocol as well as the deductivedata analysis plan and was used to consider the implications of the study. 5 PARTICIPANTS Pseudonym Year of Birth Gender Race/Ethnicity Engineering Discipline Faculty Rank Guara 1979 Woman White, Latinx Electrical, Computer, and Systems Assistant Rose 1983 Woman White Civil and Environmental Assistant Kelly 1983 Woman
lack offunding, proper equipment, lab space, and dedicated research faculty [3-5]. In addition, research is not akey component of community college educational master plans. Rather, the ultimate goal of communitycolleges is to prepare students for transfer or employment through certified technical educationprograms [6-8].Undergraduate research has proven to be a high impact practice that helps students increase theiracademic performance, build confidence, and develop critical thinking skills and STEM identity [9-11].These traits are necessary to become a successful scientist, engineer, or educator in these fields— thus itis imperative that research experiences are provided in the early stages of STEM students’ educationaljourneys [12, 13
) answered prompts in front of the entire class and were surveyedcomprehensively in the beginning, middle, and end of the semester. This course was held inSpring 2020, where students started the course fully in-person and shifted to synchronous virtualinstruction shortly after the mid-semester survey. The course was at the introductory level, and itwas the first major-specific course in the curriculum. The course is typically taken in the springsemester of the second year, so students may know each other and have some experience withcollege level instruction.The other cohort (Cohort B) started the course in Fall 2020 with synchronous virtual instructionwith plans for partial in-person instruction. Cohort B students completed a one-question