gendereddistribution”, International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(4): 400-408.[8] Kennedy, H. L. and Parks, J. (2000), “Society cannot continue to exclude women from the fields of science andmathematics”, Education, 120 (3):529-537.[9] ITU Archives, unpublished data.[10] Turkish Chamber of Engineers and Architects, http://www.tmmob.org.tr/yayin/bulten/bulten04/bulten04-11.htm[11] Akduman, İ. Ekinci, E and Özkale, N. L (2001) “Accreditation in Turkish universities” (2001) EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education Vol.26, No.3, 231-239.[12] Koushki,P.A.; Al-Sanad,H.A. and Larkin,A.M. (1999), “Women Engineers in Kuwait: Perception of GenderBias”, Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1):93-97.[13] Özkale, N. L and Küçükçifçi, S (2002) “The Ongoing Effects
the Mechanical Engineering Technology program thefirst-hand experience of working with practicing engineers and technicians in their work place. Page 9.180.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationCTC is organized as a non-profit educational corporation whose primary business activity is toperform engineering services work for the U. S. government. These services include informationtechnology and environmental services as well as problem solving in materials andmanufacturing. As part of its
like to acknowledge theNational Science Foundation for their support of the offering of several pilot courses in ourMulti-Disciplinary Engineering Foundation Spiral curriculum.8 References 1. Collura, M.A., B. Aliane, S. Daniels, and J. Nocito-Gobel, “Development of a Multi-Disciplinary Engineering Foundation Spiral”, Submitted to the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2004. 2. Mikic, B. and D. Grasso, “Socially-Relevant Design:the TOYtech Project at Smith College”, Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3):319-326, 2002. 3. John Hopkins Virtual Laboratory, Bridge Designer, http://www.jhu.edu
NetRNG; a templatized, thread-safe circular buffer structure whichimplements the Mesa monitor semantic. Its size is a construction-time parameter. When it is fullthe thread(s) calling put() is(are) blocked, and when the buffer empties the thread(s) calling get()is(are) blocked. This construct provides following services: Page 9.1098.8 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education BoundedBuffer(unsigned short) ~BoundedBuffer() get(T& ) : bool put(T ) : bool
projects to the students, so that teams can indicate on which project(s) they would like to work. • to participate (ask questions) in the two Design Reviews • on the last day of class, to hear the Final Reports of all the teamsOccasionally a sponsor representative will manage only the first and last of these. At the otherend of the spectrum, some sponsor representatives come to nearly every class. These peopleoften get drafted to make a presentation during the semester on some topic relevant toEngineering Design, such as describing the Product Realization Process used in their company,or speaking about Intellectual Property issues.The Projects ThemselvesProjects have mostly sought a design solution to a hardware problem. A few have
Session #1615 Making The Strange Familiar: Creativity and the Future of Engineering Education W. B. Stouffer, Jeffrey S. Russell, and Michael G. Oliva Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-MadisonIntroductionWhy does the perception persist that engineers are uncreative, or worse, do not need to tap intocreativity when most engineering projects demand creative or innovative approaches in thedesign of equipment, systems, and facilities? With the complexity surrounding everyengineering project mounting as natural resources dwindle, the world population
Education. We also gratefully acknowledge the donation of 2 kg ofcatalyst from Purolite.References1. H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering,3rd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.2. M. E. Davis and R. J. Davis, Fundamentals of Chemical Reaction Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2003.3. K. D. Dahm, R. P. Hesketh, M. J. Savelski, “Is Process Simulation Used Effectively in Chemical Engineering Courses,” Chemical Engineering Education, 36, 2, (2002).4. K. D. Dahm, “Process Simulation and McCabe-Thiele Modeling: Specific Roles in the Learning Process,” Chemical Engineering Education, 36, 4 (2002). Page
Pharmacological Sciences, 2001; 22:71-74.5) Macoviski A. Medical Imaging Systems, PrenticeHall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.6) Quinn GB, Taylor A, Wang HP and Bourne PE. “Development of Internet-based multimedia applications,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 1999; 24:8:321-324.7) Schmidt A, Brück R, Hahn K, Labeque A, Popovic G, Ohler M, Riedel H, Rizvi N, Stange T. “TRANSTEC - A new tool for online educational multimedia training on innovative high aspect ratio microtechnologies,” Microsystem Technologies, 2000; 6:109-112.8) Suetens P. Fundamentals of Medical Imaging, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.9) Webb S. (Ed.) The Physics of Medical Imaging, Institute of Physics Publishing, Philadelphia, PA, 1996
, as well as aesthetic considerations, asmotivating elements of social and intellectual life11.Technical rationality contributes to the well known “over the wall” problem in enginering.Here, the focus of the engineer designer is restricted to solving the problem according tocorrect theory as s/he understands it rather than developing a complete picture of the problem Page 9.630.4from a variety of different points of view. The assumption has been, as it is in the rational and Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society
Knowledge Curriculum EH&S Public AwarenessFigure 1. AIChE’s Historic Role as a Professional Society Page 9.296.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationFigure 2. Expanded Role of AIChE and Chemical Engineering Page 9.296.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
medical school(s) components, the ability to discussengineering professionalism in a multidisciplinary format, the ability to discuss safety asa generic rather than a disciplinary issue, etc. Page 9.432.1 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”This paper will discuss our development and first experience with a common designseminar, and will explicitly discuss feedback from the student body regarding the designseminar evaluation.IntroductionThe senior design courses at
Expert and novice conceptions of the design process: Developmental differences with implications for educators Joan M.T. Walker1, Paul H. King1, & David S. Cordray2 Biomedical Engineering1 / Psychology and Human Development 2 Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37203AbstractIf educators want students to learn to think like experts, then we need to learn howexperts think. Addressing this issue, we asked what is “the wisdom” of biodesign (i.e.,what are the key concepts)? How do people at different points of professionaldevelopment define biodesign? Both questions were intended to inform our efforts toestablish experiences that support students’ understanding of the design
reduction, etc. The choice of the proper mass-separating agent from a greenengineering standpoint for the particular industrial separation is a key criteria to be presented.Ultimately a separation course should present sound rationale for the “green” integration ofseparation technologies in a reuse/recovery mode where valuable material(s) may be recoveredand reused in the overall process. These approaches should be applied in the discussion ofdesign and application of the various separation methods to the system being purified,fractionated or concentrated. Separation processes courses also need to encompass a broad rangeof both traditional and novel unit operations such that a student can see the pros and cons in theirapplication from a green
Session 14552004 ASEE – Salt Lake CityGraduate Studies DivisionInvited Panel Session:Professional Graduate Engineering EducationRelevant to the Needs of IndustryInvited Panel Paper #3 Draft Enabling the U.S. Engineering Workforce to Perform: Developing Financial Sustainability to Ensure High-Quality in Professional Graduate Engineering Education D. R. Depew, 1 A. L. McHenry, 2 S. J. Tricamo, 3 D. H. Sebastian, 3 J. M. Snellenberger,4 D. H. Quick,4 I. T. Davis,5 J. P. Tidwell,6 D. D. Dunlap, 7 D. A. Keating, 8
Peer-Mentoring among Female Biomedical Engineering Students can be Extended to Other Engineering Disciplines Semahat S. DemirJoint Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Memphis & University of Tennessee 330 Engineering Technology Building, Memphis TN, 38152-3210, USA Adjunct Faculty of Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Işık University, Istanbul, Turkey Email: sdemir@memphis.edu Abstract— Mentoring is significant personal and professional assistance given by a moreexperienced person to a less experienced person during a time of transition. Transitions fromhigh school to
ofstudents, faculty, and the institution. He asserts, “it is unacceptable, we believe, to go onusing research and publication as the primary criterion for tenure and promotion whenother education obligations are required.” [3:34] Additionally, Boyer maintains faculty“are often not rewarded for teaching while being penalized if they fail to do research.”[3:33] Boyer found that “for 70 percent of today’s professors, teaching represents theirprimary interest”; [3:43] however, faculty are often held to narrow—even constraining—expectations that limit their ability to develop as teachers within their disciplines. [3:43]In engineering education, studies in the 1980’s and 1990’s indicated the critical need forchanges in engineering education. A
SESSION 1566 The Balanced Scorecard in a Capstone Design Course John I. Hochstein, Jeffrey G. Marchetta, William S. Janna Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Memphis Memphis, TennesseeAbstractIn response to a perceived need to improve the project management skills of program graduates,the authors introduced the general principles and structure of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC)system to seniors in a capstone design course. This paper briefly presents the principles of theBalanced Scorecard, describes how they were
thecompany.This programme was such a success that within a decade the majority of graduates werebeginning to occupy the middle and upper management & engineering positions within theCompany.Other oil companies, established in the 1980’s, followed suit in sending secondary schoolgraduates to continue their tertiary education abroad, this time to the U.S.The role played by the Bahrain Petroleum Company & the other oil companies in engineeringeducation, as the majority of those sent to study abroad came back as engineers, has been vital toBahrain as well as the engineering profession in particular. Getting their engineering educationabroad & combining it with on-the-job training programmes both at home & abroad producedtop quality, highly
K-12 arena is rarely a path to fame and riches. Even small rewards are appreciated, especially if teachers have to spend evening or weekend time in your program. We offered stipends, equipment, and Continuing Professional Education (CPE) credit. 3. Offer incentives to complete pr ogr am r equir ements. To assure that teachers implement our activities in class and to help us with data collection, we also offer a financial incentive at the end of the school year. 4. Listen to teacher s. Hold focus groups with teachers. Ask teachers what they need and want, but do not expect them to speak with one voice. Be prepared to get an earful about issues that are beyond the scope of your project. At the algebra I
” who is responsible for being sure thatthe assessment of the outcome is on track according to the timeline. S/he is also responsible forcollecting and analyzing the data on a systematic basis. The faculty member prepares a briefreport that includes a description of the method(s), where in the curriculum the outcome isassessed (for program assessment purposes), and a brief report of the findings. The report ispresented at a summer faculty ABET meeting and, based on the findings, recommendationsmade for program improvement. The faculty champion is responsible to follow-up and report onthe success of the improvements. With a small department there is the advantage that 100% ofthe faculty are involved in every step, as opposed to a smaller
Launch Environment Rocket Mass 48 g Initial Velocity 0 m/s Engine Mass_new 16.4 g Initial Height 0 m 3 Engine Mass_empty 13 g Air Density 1.17 kg/m Thrust Time 0.5 s Ejection Charge time
Computer-Rich School. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Papert, S. (2000). What’s the Big Idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, vol. 39, nos. 3 & 4, pp. 720-729.Papert, S. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In Constructionism, Harel, I. & Papert, S. (eds.), Ablex Publishing.Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.Sipitakiat, A., Blikstein, P., & Cavallo, D. (2002). The GoGo Board: Moving towards highly available computational tools in learning environments. Proceedings of Interactive Computer Aided
mushroom 215.42 jmpgate2 5.171 I S P 11 0 0 IS P 1 10 0 SGI 215.194 SmokeDetector 215.94 jmpgate5 Hub
the Future program funded by the GEFoundation.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantsHRD0001388 and. SBE-0318510. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation. Page 9.488.11 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”Bibliographic Information1. National Science Foundation, Women, Minorities, and Persons
SESSION 1566 A Useful Intersection: The Balanced Scorecard and EC2000 John I. Hochstein1, Teong E. Tan1, William S. Janna1, Jeffrey G. Marchetta1 Tommy Jamison2, Bruce Shrader3, Michael Bilderbeck4 1 2 3 4 U. of Memphis Mueller Industries Temple-Inland Pickering Firm Memphis, TN Memphis, TN West Memphis, TN Memphis, TNAbstractThe new requirements of ABET’s EC2000 have caused the authors’ academic department toundertake a significant restructuring of its internal functions. This restructuring was
-speed internet connections. All lectures,assignments, and solutions are posted in PDF format. Setting up the online quizzes inWebCT required about two weeks. Once the online materials are prepared, the timerequired to teach the online section is comparable to that for the conventional. Thecourse materials are available at http://www.che.utah.edu/~geoff/thermo1/index.html.References(1) Wallace, D.R. and P. Mutooni, “A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-Based and ClassroomTeaching,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 3, 1997, pp. 211-219.(2) Dutton, J., M. Dutton, and J. Perry, “Do Online Students Perform as Well as Lecture Students?”Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2001, pp. 131-136.(3) Haag, S. and J.C. Palais
intensiveand extensive properties. We provided students explicit guidance on the differences betweenintensive and extensive properties, and this is summarized in Table 2. Intensive properties Extensive properties Can be counted or experimentally measured Independent of sample size Dependent on sample sizeFluids T, P, ρ, v, u, ke, pe, s m, V, U, KE, PE, S, mvCircuits ρ, j, E, σ, q/m3 V, R, S, I, q, L, C, WWhereFluids CircuitsT = temperature ρ
Session 3115 From Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge To Civil Engineering Curricula Stuart G. Walesh Consultant and AuthorAbstractASCE’s Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice (CAP^3) is chargedwith developing, organizing, and executing a detailed plan for the full implementation of ASCEPolicy 465 (Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice). This paper presentsthe recommendations of CAP^3’s Body of Knowledge (BOK) Committee and introduces thesubsequent curricula design effort
ASEE AnnualConference. American Society of Engineering Education.[2] Khan, A.S. and Karim, A., Susan. S., & Mark, M. 2003. A Wireless Course Sequence DesignUsing Global Wireless Education Consortium. (GWEC) Curriculum Modules and Industry Tools.Proceedings, 2003 ASEE Annual Conference. American Society of Engineering Education.[3]Jui-Han Lu and K.L.Wong, 1998. “Slot-loaded meandered rectangular microstrip antenna withcompact dual frequency operation”, Electronics Letters, vol 34, No 11, pp 1048-1049, May 1998.[4]J.S.Kuo and K.L.Wong, 2001. “A Compact microstrip antenna with meandering slots in theground plane”, Microwave optical technology letters, vol 29, pp 95-97, April 2001.[5]Amit. A. Deshmukh and Girish Kumar, 2001. “Compact Broadband
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationdirectly require the scholarship of teaching, its adoption has led to a substantial increase in thenumber of engineering faculty members engaged in this form of scholarship, which has in turnled the engineering education journals to increase their sizes to accommodate dramatic increasesin the number of papers submitted.4The National Science Foundation has supported educational scholarship in engineering since thelate 1980's through the Division of Undergraduate Education and the Engineering EducationCoalitions program. Today, NSF support for engineering related education reform is in excess of$200M per year. Such support "has increased the status of educational research in