specific and complex challenges.8,10Inductive teaching methods truly cover a large variety of instructional methods, from inquirylearning, problem-based learning, and project based learning. Often, these methods are deemed“student centered”, as the mastery of the concepts falls on the students to understand theimportance of the material from the problems or projects.11 Overall, inductive teaching styleshave more student benefits than deductive teaching methods. Inductive teaching methods offermore combinations to reach the learning style needs of the classroom and engage students moreactively in the subject matter.Student Perceptions in the ClassroomSatisfaction, self-efficacy, motivation, and classroom environment are the main factors in
Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics and Control Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system technology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach
implementation project, the stress was building within the group, and the quality of our work was beginning to suffer. You noticed that we were not doing our best work and challenged us to rethink our approach. You reminded us of what we were capable of doing if we worked more together and this caused all of us to pause. No one else would have thought to intervene like you did and it made a real difference. In the end, we were all very proud of what we accomplished together and you played a big part in us getting there.The originators of the RBS exercise recommend that students receive stories from at least 10respondents and in my experience, most students
Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of the (Engineers in Technical Humanitarian Opportunities of Service-Learning) for approximately ten years. She has incorporated service-learning projects into her classes and laboratories since she started teaching in 2000. Her research interests include community engaged learning and pedagogy, K-12 outreach, biomaterials and materials testing and analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
Paper ID #23055Understanding the Investment of Underrepresented Minorities in DoctoralEngineering ProgramsMs. Mayra S. Artiles , Virginia Tech Mayra S. Artiles is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University with a focus on nanotechnology. Before her joining the Ph.D. pro- gram, she worked at Ford Motor Company as an Electrified Vehicles Thermal Engineer for four years. As a doctoral student, Mayra has collaborated in research projects on diversity in
Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incorporat- ing engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Dr. Geoff Potvin, Florida International UniversityDr. Adam
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include algorithmic fault-tolerant adaptive systems, software defined radio, multi-user cellular communication, electrically-small devices, and pedagogies of teaching and learning. An amateur beekeeper, he currently mentors a project for improving the plight of honeybees. He worked for TRW Space and Electronics Group from 1995 until 1997 and at the University of Illinois from 2002 to present. His research interests are in adaptive digital signal processing, digital communica- tions, and education pedagogy. He currently serves the ECE department of the University of Illinois as a Teaching Associate Professor and an undergraduate advisor and is working to
2017 North Carolina A & T State University (NCAT) Rookie Research Excellence Award. Under her mentorship, Dr. Ofori-Boadu’s students have presented research posters at various NCAT Undergraduate Research Symposia resulting in her receiving a 2017 Certificate of Recognition for Undergraduate Re- search Mentoring. In 2016, her publication was recognized by the Built Environment Project and Asset Management Journal as the 2016 Highly Commended Paper. Andrea has served as a reviewer for the National Science Foundation (NSF), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and several journals and conferences. In 2015, Dr. Ofori-Boadu established her STEAM ACTIVATED! program for middle-school girls. She also serves as the
. Researchers have noted the importance ofeffective ideation and demonstrated its influence on the success of the project (Nelson, Wilson,Rosen, & Yen, 2009).Second, we are interested in conceptual design phases because it is during this period that teamroles are formed and group norms are established (Butterfield & Pendegraft, 1996). Teaminteractions that are established early can set the tone for subsequent interactions and thereforedesign team effectiveness and success (Kolmos, Rump, Ingemarsson, Laloux, & Vinther, 2001;Liang & Lawrence, 2007; Roberts, 2012; Simmons, 2015; Yoon & Johnson, 2008). If ideationpractices can be developed to enhance both creative capacity and equitable interactions inengineering teams, understanding
. For faculty, the support for eachother and the sharing of the load makes things easier. For students, the academic interactions oncontent that they might not be familiar with initially stimulated questions and discussions, andultimately learning from brand new angles.One way to further deepen the collaboration is to do service-learning projects in the faculty-ledtrips, as our colleagues in health, education, etc. have done, with benefits stated in [18], althoughwe have not implemented any service-learning project yet, because our trips so far have been inmultiple cities without enough time at one place to finish a project. However, the incorporationof a service-learning project is expected to deepen the interdisciplinary collaboration
Paper ID #41461Board 33: Enhancing Self-Efficacy Among Transportation Engineering UndergraduatesUsing Hands-On Pedagogy.Mr. Adebayo Iyanuoluwa Olude, Morgan State University Adebayo Olude is a doctoral student and research assistant at Morgan State University’s Department of Civil Engineering in Baltimore, Maryland. Adebayo formerly worked as a Graduate Research Assistant at Eastern Mediterranean University in North Cyprus, where he earned his master’s degree in civil engineering. He also worked as a project Analyst with AgileP3 after graduating with a Bachelor of Engineering (B.Eng) in civil engineering from Covenant
Paper ID #41866Teaching Strategies that Incorporate Social Impacts in Technical Courses andEase Accreditation Metric CreationMs. Ingrid Scheel, Oregon State University Ingrid Scheel is a Project Instructor at Oregon State University in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. She teaches Electrical and Computer Engineering fundamentals and design courses, and as a graduate student in Education is focused on curriculum design. Scheel’s industry experience includes prototype development, test article instrumentation, data acquisition, data analysis, and reporting. She contributes to the International Society for Optics
students. The Engineering+program at Oregon State University exemplifies this approach by combining traditional lectureswith small-group studios and socially relevant projects. Previous research indicates that students'engagement correlates directly with academic progress. This is especially relevant in theEngineering+ setting, where students are in the process of choosing their majors and planningtheir futures. Students take three courses on varying topics to explore their interests and practicefundamental engineering skills during their first year. Therefore, enhancing student engagementin these courses not only aids in a deeper understanding of the offered materials but alsofacilitates social interactions that can inform better decision-making
understanding the characteristics of thosestudents who persist within their studies through graduation.The next stage of this project is to expand the use of the survey instrument to other PSIs within the BCTransfer System, including both those hosting engineering schools and those from which studentstransfer to engineering schools after their first year of studies. It is expected that the instrument willcontinue to evolve, and support work to develop resources for engineering programs that enhanceequity, allyship, and representation. Additionally, these tailored resources provide opportunities forlike-minded students to establish support systems, fostering a sense of belonging that produces aunified, resilient, and persistent student body.1.0
Paper ID #43868Tracing Black Transfer Students’ Success in Engineering: A ComparativeInsight into Transfer-Student Trends at Two State Minority-Serving InstitutionsMr. Daniel Ifeoluwa Adeniranye, Florida International University Daniel Adeniranye embarked on his academic journey with a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and dual master’s degrees in petroleum engineering and project development. He further enhanced his skills with a master’s in project (Engineering) Management. Daniel is currently a Research Assistant at the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education at Florida
(NIE) at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. He is an affiliated faculty member of the NTU Centre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE) and the NTU Institute for Science and Technology for Humanity (NISTH). Additionally, he is the Director of the World MOON Project, the Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education, and the upcoming Program Chair-Elect of the PCEE Division at ASEE. His current research interests include STEM+C education, specifically artificial intelligence literacy, computational thinking, and engineering.Dominick Fantacone ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exploring K-12 STEM Teachers’ Views of Nature of Engineering
and minority protégés participating in the LouisStokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) program in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) across four different universities within a statewideuniversity system, in the United States of America, to learn the following regarding mentoringrelationships for minority STEM students: (1) how students respond to ideas and projects, (2)how students conquer challenges and respond to setbacks, (3) how students set and pursue theiracademic goals, (4) how students describe their undergraduate research mentoring relationshipwith peers and professors, (5) how students maintain their focus in a professional developmentprogram such as LSAMP, (6) how students characterize and describe
real worldmuch more flexible than their artificial course deadlines, but by holding these rigid deadlinesthey were preventing students from learning to manage their time and projects [4]. Anotherauthor realized that being compassionate about deadlines builds community with the studentsand that some of the best work was turned in after the deadline [7]. Fairness was a concern, asstudents who turned in things late had more time to work on them and consider the problem.However, they conceded that few if any students complained about flexible deadlines beingunfair.Deadlines and DiversityIn a 2016 article, Boucher framed rigid deadlines as contributing to student stress and imposingunfair consequences on the most vulnerable students [8]. For
public, are recognizing the critical need for the ethical production andmanagement of AI. As a result, society is placing immense trust in engineering undergraduateand graduate programs to train future developers of AI in their ethical and public welfareresponsibilities.In this paper, we investigate whether engineering master’s students believe they receive thetraining they need from their educational curricula to negotiate this complex ethical landscape.The goal of the broader project is to understand how engineering students become public welfare“watchdogs”; i.e., how they learn to recognize and respond to their public welfareresponsibilities. As part of this project, we conducted in-depth interviews with 62 electrical andcomputer engineering
explores how the integration of school safety strategies with disciplinary practices, often under zero-tolerance policies, blurs the lines between them, suggesting that both are byproducts of the school-to-prison pipeline.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Roberta Rincon, Ph.D., is the Director of Research and Impact for the Society of Women Engineers. She is responsible for overseeing the research activities for the organization, including collaborative research projects with external researchers and dissemination of SWE research through academic conferences, the SWE Research website, and the annual SWE State of Women in Engineering magazine issue. She is the Principal Investigator for the NSF INCLUDES
research10. Making oral presentations. project. 11. Defending an argument when asked 3. Problem-solving in general. questions. 4. Formulating a research question that 12. Explaining my project to people outside my could be answered with data. field. 5. Identifying limitations of research 13. Preparing a scientific poster. methods and designs. 14. Keeping a detailed lab notebook. 6. Understanding the theory and 15. Conducting observations in the lab or field. concepts guiding my research project. 16. Using statistics to analyze data. 7. Understanding the connections among 17. Calibrating instruments needed for scientific disciplines
categories of schoolwork also indicates thewidespread usage of these tools.Respondents indicated they were aware of many different uses of GenAI in their computingcourses (Figure 5). However, knowledge of understanding/summarizing home or project promptsreceived the most responses. This result suggests that project or assignment prompts might bepoorly written or overly verbose to the point that students struggle to even understand them.Additionally, considering this usage of GenAI tools does not register as one that might breakacademic integrity rules, students could be the most aware of it because they either understandthemselves or have been told by an instructor that this is an accepted way to use Gen AI forschool.We then asked users if they used
Paper ID #45134WIP: investigate recruitment strategies used by engineering bridge and successprograms to recruit underserved studentsDr. Xinyu Zhang, Purdue University Dr. Xinyu Zhang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in Environmental and Ecological Engineering (EEE) at Purdue University’s College of Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, is a North Carolina-licensed Professional Engineer, and currently leads an NSF project on recruitment strategies for engineering bridge and success programs. Her research interests include engineering
funding. The fundedorganizations mentioned include the Project of Students Grant Agency, FIM, University ofHradec Kralove, Czech Republic [27], JST CREST Grant [61], the Erasmus+ Program of theEuropean Union through the Project EduTech under Grant [48], [62], Barrier-free communicationsystem for hearing-impaired people based on Chinese lip translation [43],and FAPERGS ARD[54]. This highlights a potential barrier to conducting robust accessibility research, as increasedfinancial support is necessary to enable more comprehensive studies, including long-termevaluations and real-world applications. Greater funding opportunities are crucial to advancingthe field of accessibility research and ensuring that solutions are effectively implemented
students identifyand correct errors early, reducing frustration and deepening their understanding of programmingconcepts.Leinonen and Vihavainen [27] demonstrated the positive effects of AI-driven automatedfeedback systems on students’ self-efficacy in large-scale programming courses. The work by[28] highlighted the role of formative feedback in online coding platforms, particularly inmaintaining engagement and retention during remote learning caused by the COVID-19pandemic.A study by [29] emphasized that code critiquers tailored to novice programmers can significantlyboost programming self-efficacy, which is critical to student success in engineering education.This aligns with findings from the RICA project, which focused on immediate
and high school teachers • Development of a multi-tiered advanced manufacturing program • Implementation of a program designed to promote increased awareness among underrepresented community college students regarding applying to medical and graduate school • Collaboration with federal labs and universities to prepare HCC students for summer research projects as part of a Homeland Security award • Development of specialized topic seminars in high-performance computing and programming • Numerous student and faculty research experiences at regional universities and federal agencies, and • Development and
exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences, and during Fall 2017 he taught at the Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor of mechanical engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford
having participants engage in a number ofexperiences, building their network and connecting to a variety of possible employers and careerpathways.3.3 Micro internshipsAmong the most intensive of WIL experiences offered were the micro-internships which pairedparticipants with industry employers to gain additional insight into and experience with theworkforce. The structure and organization of micro-internships varied across organizations andparticipants. For most, the micro-internship operated mainly as an intensive job shadowing andmentorship experience with participants virtually embedded in the mentor’s activities; for a fewparticipants, the micro-internship also involved working on small projects and presenting anddiscussing results with
emerged when our relationship flowed seamlessly. Dr. Meagan Ita is awhite woman postdoctoral associate from the Midwest. Dr. Ita was an undergraduate at theuniversity where she was hired to work on a project under the supervision of Dr. Monica Cox, aBlack tenured professor from the South. Given workplace issues and the racial trauma precedingand following the murder of George Floyd in 2020, Dr. Cox wasn’t involved in the immediatehiring of Dr. Ita for the project. Our supervisee/supervisory relationship could have beendisastrous given our backgrounds, remote working, and the rocky racial history of the unit wherewe work, but it wasn’t.We completed our assigned work tasks for an entrepreneurial engineering project with ease butsoon recognized that
programs. This line of research also seeks to understand the nuances and complexities of participation and persistence in these fields and develop new models for explaining such phenomena. Her secondary research strand focuses on the participation and achievement of Black students and professionals in higher education. She is the PI or co-PI on several grant-funded research projects including the national Black Doctoral Women Study (BDWS), the Women in Engineering Study (WIES), and Bulls-Engineering Youth Experience for Promoting Relationships, Identity Development, & Empowerment (Bulls-EYE PRIDE).Dr. Johnny C. Woods Jr., Virginia Tech Johnny C. Woods, Jr. is a Postdoctoral Associate in the School of Education at