various gender, ethnic, and socioeconomicbackgrounds. A prospective power calculation was performed to ensure that the sample size foreach group was sufficient enough for significant differences to be detected. A P-value of8.2x10-16 was obtained for significant difference between the pre and post assessments. Thisindicates that the post scores were significantly higher than the pre scores, while adjusting for theother factors. The results suggest that the blocks are effective in improving scores on theModified Purdue Visualization of Rotation test regardless of a student’s gender, socioeconomicbackground, or language. IntroductionSpatial visualization is the ability to mentally rotate, manipulate, and flip visual objects. [1] It hasalso been
. Current interests include bone tissue mechanics, engineering pedagogy, and robotic football. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Improving Student Engagement in a Senior-level Manufacturing Course for Mechanical Engineering StudentsIntroduction:The mechanical engineering curriculum prepares students for employment in a broad range ofindustries [1]. In the Midwest, many graduating mechanical engineering students will findemployment in manufacturing-related fields. This is especially true in Ohio, where 17.8% of thetotal gross state product is accounted for by over 12,000 manufacturing firms [2]. For this reason,manufacturing courses play an important role in preparing mechanical
in engineering, and applying their ownwriting and communication skills.Keywords—writing; writing studio; writing centerIntroductionThe call for engineering students to develop skills as writers and communicators has becomecommonplace. Engineering programs hear from their advisory boards and professionalorganizations of the importance of improving the written communication of their graduates[1], [2]. Educating students to become engineering writers, however, cannot happen in anyone course. Given the complexities of disciplinary writing and the number of audiences astudent will be communicating with once they enter the profession, a single course in writingis not adequate for students to develop as writers. Instead, research in writing studies
on whiteboard withdissimilar variables than students. This demands for active discussion with their peers, teams andwith the instructor kept the whole class engaged. Traditional classroom teaching versus activelearning, student engagement outcome measured through in class work submission.1. IntroductionIn the past, there has been a high level of curiosity for new method of teaching at college leveleducation [1]. Among various teaching methods, such as cooperative learning, problem basedlearning and active learning, high volume of research established that, active learning edge overother instructional methods [2].Cooperative learning is an another category of active learning, wherein students work as a smallgroups of three to four, instead of
centric curriculum. The curriculum introduced students to theconstruction fields by giving the students weekly snapshots into construction careers, and alsorequired the students to learn about floor and elevation plans. Students were then taught andexpected to design a 3D computer model of a home using Minecraft and Sketchup. The studentswere provided 4 different models to choose from. The course used a competition based pedagogywhere the best home designs were awarded prizes. The results show that student interest afterthis single intervention (1 semester in length) increased student interest in careers associated toconstruction.IntroductionThere are severe labor shortages currently affecting the home building industry nationwide(Jones, 1990
of Washington. Her research is focused on the development of quantitative methodologies for the anal- ysis and sustainable management of sociotechnical systems, including supply networks and production systems. Her email address is caroline.krejci@uta.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Industrial Engineering Outreach to the K-12 CommunityIntroductionDespite the ubiquity of industrial engineers in the workplace, the K-12 community is relativelyunaware of this engineering discipline. Previous research has demonstrated that the identity ofindustrial engineering (IE) is ambiguous, and many K-12 educators are unaware that such adiscipline even exists [1]. As a result, few high school
not universally held and can be driven by attributes of the judger, the individualbeing judged, the relationship between the two, and/or the group at large. Furthermore,behaviors considered unacceptable to students come in a myriad of varieties – previous worklists eleven distinct types. [1] This study uses a newly-created survey called the TeamBehaviors and Attitudes Survey to assess the subjective perceptions of teammates’ behaviorsusing a Social Relations Model to explore the potential underlying sources of variance ofthese perceptions.BackgroundEducators’ care toward their students is exhibited not only by supporting a student’s learningand performance, but also by optimizing their experience within the classroom. In theirseminal work
environment, and they felt more strongly about the need for continuingenvironmental education to promote environmental stewardship.Introduction The need for an environmental ethic became evident in the 20th century due to a numberof high-profile environmental failures, including those documented in Silent Spring [1] andThomas Hardin’s paper on the tragedy of the commons [2]. The establishment of theEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) almost immediately following passage of the NationalEnvironmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the inaugural Earth Day of 1970 further increased publicawareness of the relationship between human activity and environmental quality [3]. This linkwas discussed as early as the 16th century by Malthus [4]. At the heart of
through enabling academically talented and financially needy studentsto transfer from two-year community colleges or four-year universities to TAMU to obtainbaccalaureate degrees in engineering or computer science. The goal was accomplished throughscholarship funding and engagement of ETS students in a complementary focused learningcommunity that included academic and social components to improve the students’ educationalopportunities and retention. Two focal points of this project were (1) linking and leveraging theTexas A&M University System (TAMUS) Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation(LSAMP) program’s community college partnerships and (2) complementing the TAMUSLSAMP and TAMU College of Engineering (COE) recruitment and
potentially inhibitoryor suppressive presence of boys. The activities are designed to leverage girls’ existing interestsby showing how STEM fields require creativity, can improve lives, or can make the world abetter place. Over one-thousand girls between the ages of 3 and 13 have participated in the lastthree years, and feedback demonstrates that the event has been successful at getting girlsinterested in engineering. This paper will detail how to plan and implement a successful event tointerest young girls in engineering utilizing industry partners, student organizations, and fungirls-only activities.IntroductionCareers in STEM-related fields will comprise much of the future job growth in the U.S. andworldwide [1]. Innovation in science and
wereanalyzed to better understand the mechanisms that prevent them from maximizing their potentialfor success in engineering and related STEM fields. Interviews revealed that students mustovercome institutional obstacles such as: (a) inadequate academic advising, (b) poor qualityteaching, (c) limited course offerings, and (d) insufficient financial aid. This paper includesrecommendations that are helpful to faculty, staff and administrators who are interested inincreasing the number of Black and Latino male graduates in engineering and related STEMfields.IntroductionBy 2022, the United States will need approximately 1 million more professionals in science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields (U.S. Department of Education, 2016).STEM
profession is that it defines and maintains aprofessional body of knowledge (BOK) [1]. A clear goal of any undergraduate educationprogram is to familiarize graduates to the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that serve as thefoundation for entry into a given field. Within engineering curriculum, each undergraduateprogram has an associated professional organization such as the American Academy ofEnvironmental Engineers and Scientists (AAEES) that maintains and widely publishes “TheEnvironmental Engineering Body of Knowledge (2009)[2]. For any given profession, the BOKserves as a focal point where students, educators, employers, and professional practitioners cangain an understanding of the breadth and depth of knowledge expected of its members. TheBOK
UniversityJonnell A. Robinson, Department of Geography, Maxwell School of Citizenship and PublicAffairs, Syracuse UniversityIntroductionAfter almost a decade of examining traditional textbook lecture oriented engineering educationthe call to embrace a greater emphasis on hands-on experiential learning is slowly being adopted[1] - [3]. This textbook based approach, emphasizing scientific analysis and mathematicalmodeling resulted in a decrease in design, build, and test hands-on engineering education [4].This post World War II standard pedagogical model of engineering education resulted in anincrease in lectures and the passivity of students in courses [5]. This emphasis on narrationcreated students who were alienated from the learning process [6]. The
courses for engineering students and leads study-abroad trips for students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integration of Global Competencies in the Engineering CurriculumKeywords: curriculum, study abroad, globalIntroductionThe need for developing global competency in engineering students has received considerableattention over the past several years and a number of high-profile reports [1] [2] have highlightedthis need. A variety of programs have emerged to address this need ranging from namedprograms like Purdue’s Global Engineering Programs [3], college programs focused on theEngineering Grand Challenges (see for example [4]), at least one “global competence certificate”program [5
self-efficacy and GTA perceptions of whether teaching skills transfer to otherprofessional contexts.IntroductionThe majority of graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) do not have prior teaching experience whenthey start their appointments. Although workshops offered by a campus-level teaching center area quick and efficient way to introduce new GTAs to their roles, follow-up programs are needed tofurther develop their teaching effectiveness and to train them properly in the specific teachingrequirements of their disciplines. Santhanam and Codner reported benefits to tailoring GTAtraining for particular academic disciplines. 1 Further, Nicklow et al. described some specificbenefits to discipline-specific GTA training for a Civil Engineering
are many variations of this cycle,design always begins with identifying user needs. However, while engineers are familiar withthe technical aspects of the engineering design cycle, they historically lack experience in needsidentification. This disconnect often results in designs which do not address the true needs ofusers [1]-[9]. Thus, it is imperative for engineers to be educated in both the technical aspects ofdesign and in needs identification. One method of identifying these needs is user-centereddesign. User-centered design (also referred to as human factors engineering or human-centereddesign) is a methodical approach to design and has been used extensively in the healthcareindustry [1]-[11]. The goal of this methodology is to design
program leaders observed that students gained a greatdeal, in particular learning to accept the differences from their own beliefs and values found inpeople of different cultures, races, and habits.IntroductionAt universities throughout the United States and in developed countries throughout the world,global experiences are recognized as having a positive benefit on students [1]. These students willbe working and interacting more globally than any other generation before them. Therefore, moreand more programs throughout higher education are incorporating a global requirement or aspectinto their programs. Studies have been published on the effects of global experience on students [2-4], although none was found to focus on engineering technology
research experience would increase students’ (1a) academic self-efficacy, (1b)research skills, (1c) research confidence, (1d) including confidence in leading and working witha team, and (1e) education and (1f) career intentions to pursue engineering. In addition, it washypothesized that the research experience would provide students with (2a) greater culturalawareness, (2b) global perspectives of water reuse challenges, and (2c) promote increasedinterest in pursuing an engineering career that can have a global impact.Methodology(1)ParticipantsBetween 2015 and 2017, a total of 14 students participated in the research experience. Allparticipants were recruited from two public, Hispanic Serving comprehensive state universitiesin southern California
with evaluating the relationships among differentvariables in the recruiting process. It is hypothesized that the analysis will reveal possible areasof improvements through the recruiting funnel that may lead to an increase in the retention of thestudent from application to matriculation. Once these relationships are established and evaluated,a set of recommendations will be given to increase international recruitment, improve theallocation of resources and boost features of the program that are appealing to prospectivestudents.1. IntroductionThe Master of Science in Operations Management (OMGT) is a 30 credit-hour programcontained within the Industrial Engineering department at the University of Arkansas. Theprogram was created in 1974 “to
as an explanation for the loss of women from STEM. The“chilly climate” is defined as women in the male dominated STEM fields feeling unwelcome 1 2 3or people of color experiencing a diminished sense of belonging within engineering profession 456 based upon daily social interactions that threaten the identity of females in STEM 7, men inSTEM settings who treat women in subtle sexist ways 8. However, interactions that allow the“chilly climate” to persist have yet to be characterized. This lack of understanding can inhibit theprofessional engineering identity construction of women. Additionally, postsecondary educationresearch typically focuses on a single identity dimension such as gender 9, which ultimatelyexcludes assessment or
growth following the lessons. Most students did not change their level ofinterest or self-efficacy after the lessons, and we observed mixed results among those that did:some students increased and a similar number decreased in engineering perceptions. We examinethe number of students with changing self-efficacy and interest and draw conclusions aboutcurriculum revisions.IntroductionAccording to the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), womenremain underrepresented in the science and engineering workforce [1], despite the breadth ofattention STEM demographics have received in the past several decades. Furthermore, femalesworking in the STEM disciplines are largely concentrated towards the social sciences andbiological
to increase their level ofengagement.Accordingly, there were two primary goals of this study. The first goal was to determine whethera partially new set of biomechanics-based activities were similarly impactful as a different set ofactivities used in a previous study. This goal would in fact test whether activity type (i.e.,biomechanical) or the actual activities themselves were impactful. The second goal was toinvestigate the impact of an intervention targeted at increasing interest in low-interest girls at acollege-wide engineering outreach event. 1 MethodsProtocolWe surveyed (Fig. 1)students attending anengineering outreach eventbefore
Carnegie Foundation [1], and we are a member of Ashoka's ChangemakerCampus Consortium [2]. From their first days on campus, students are told that they have thepotential to be changemakers who make the world better.Electrical engineering began in 1987, industrial engineering was added in 1996, and mechanicalengineering was added in 2003. In 2013 the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering wasestablished. A general engineering program was created in 2016. A unique characteristic of allengineering degree programs is that they include the same liberal arts core required of allundergraduates. This results in 147 semester-unit engineering curricula that culminates in a dualBachelor of Science/Bachelor of Arts degree. Computer science is also housed in SMSE
, particularly women and people of color, enter engineering at lower ratesand leave at substantially higher rates [1]-[3]. Several studies found that perceptions of anunwelcoming institutional climate can be detrimental to students’ sense of belonging andpersistence [3], [4]-[7]. Researchers have referred to this as the “chilly climate” [8]-[9] or“climate of intimidation” [10] members of these groups encounter in engineering. In the broaderundergraduate population, individual perceptions of the campus climate, including interactionswith peers, have been related to persistence [11]-[14]. More research is needed to understand thefactors that contribute to students’ perceptions of unwelcoming campus and/or disciplinaryclimates, particularly as those
Edwardsville, Aug 2005 - Aug 2015 Assistant Professor, California State University Chico, August 2015 - Present Journal Publications 1. Luo, Albert C.J. and O’Connor, Dennis (2014), ”On periodic motions in a parametric hardening Mathieu Duffing oscillator”, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 24, 1430004. 2. Luo, Albert C.J. and O’Connor, Dennis (2009), ”Periodic Motions with Impacting Chatter and Stick in a Gear Transmission System”, ASME Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 131, 041013. 3. Luo, Albert C.J. and O’Connor, Dennis (2009), ”Impact Chatter in a gear transmission system with two oscillators”, IMeChe Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, 223, 159-188. 4. Luo, Albert C.J. and O’Connor, Dennis
2.50 2.80 2.63 2.42 Perceptions (N=653) 2.66 2.77 2.58 2.67 2.57 2.49Figure 1: Personal interests and perceptions of engineering for all IRB approved students who completed all survey responsesFigure 1 displays the results for all students where we had complete data and consentingparents/students. In looking at the results, there are some distinct gaps between students’interests and their perceptions of engineering. In particular, we see students viewing engineeringas realistic and investigative, but they do not have as high interests in those dimensions. On theother hand, we see students with high interest in the social dimension, but the
the space are related. Using an in-depth phenomenologically based interviewingmethod, purposive sampling, and snowball sampling, six females, who have all made the consciousdecision to engage in a university makerspace(s), participated in a three-series interview process.The interviews were transcribed and analyzed via emerging questions for categorical metrics andinfographics of the student exposure and involvement in making and makerspaces. These findingsare used to demonstrate 1) how students who do, or do not, seek out making activities may end upin the makerspace and 2) how student narratives resulting in high-makerspace involvement areimpacted by prior experiences, classes, and friendships.IntroductionOn several college campuses
. Jamieson Director of the Women in Engineering Program (WIEP) in the College of Engineering at Purdue University. She is the current past chair of the Women in Engineering Division of ASEE. Holloway received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue University.Mrs. Susan R. Bayley, Purdue University, West LafayetteAnna Veronica Walter, Purdue University, West Lafayette c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Investigation of Pre-Service Teacher Self-Efficacy for Teaching Engineering Jessica L. Sargent,1,2 Anna V. Walter,1,2 Sue R. Bayley,1 Beth M. Holloway1 1 Women in
student bodies of differing demographicsand character: a regional university; a community college; and a technical college. Studies havepointed to the effect of the lack of belonging among the classrooms, majors, and the institution ingeneral on students’ retention rates and performance in future engineering classes. Sense ofbelonging has been identified as particularly important to the retention of underrepresentedminorities (URM) and women. In a multi-year study published in the 2012 ASEE conference [1]researchers at five institutions conducted an extensive research study of belonging among STEMstudents in four categories; belonging to the classroom, belonging to the major, belonging to theinstitution as a resource; and belonging to the
American communities andevaluates which outreach method might be best for corporations. To this end, the study focuseson responding to two research questions: 1) Which informal STEM education programs areused in African American communities? 2) Out of these outreach programs, which might bebeneficial for corporations to focus on to fully maximize time, money, and other resources?This study’s search results are directed by education, economic, humanities, and social sciencedatabases and restricted to peer-reviewed articles. This systematized review is based on 23peer-reviewed articles published between 1986 and 2015. From the 23 peer-reviewed articles,two topical categories emerged: pre-college minority STEM outreach efforts and pre-collegeand