listed as a component to their ideal career; (C) after being asked whatwould be rewarding, the student mentioned having a positive impact on society or people, or thattheir work would naturally help society because that is inherent in engineering; and (D) helpingpeople or improving society was not mentioned as part of their ideal career or an aspect thatwould be rewarding in their work as an engineer. Students in group A through C described thatthey would try to work on projects that improved the environment, local communities, andsociety at large. Group D students would not be looking for a particular engineering job thatwould help people and did not seem to be concerned with the impact of their job. Theyprioritized interesting work, location
outside thescience and technical literature. Technical reports are either generated by private enterprise andits research-and-development (R&D) component, or by governmental support of research.Contracts with the federal government almost always require a report summarizing the project(Walker, 1990).During the 1930s, technical reports were considered at the time furnishing “newer informationfaster” (Box 4, Series 2). Crosland understood the importance of technical reports and wasactively involved in acquiring them based on research needs. She was instrumental inparticipating in several depository programs. For instance, with the Library of Congress’sCooperative Plan, the Georgia Tech Library received valuable research reports from
role she supports and studies use of robotics in K-12 STEM education. Her other research interests include robotics, mechanical design, and biomechanics.Mrs. Veena Jayasree Krishnan, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Veena Jayasree Krishnan received a Master of Technology (M. Tech.) degree in Mechatronics from Vel- lore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India in 2012. She has two years of research experience at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. She is currently pursuing Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. She is serving as a research assistant under an NSF-funded DR K-12 re- search project to promote integration of robotics in middle school science and math education. For
responsible resource production, occupational health, and mine environmental monitoring. Dr. Sarver teaches about sustain- able development principles and practices for mineral and energy resource projects at the graduate and undergraduate levels.Dr. Linda A. Battalora, Colorado School of Mines Linda A. Battalora is a Teaching Professor in the Petroleum Engineering Department, a Payne Institute for Earth Resources Fellow, and a Shultz Humanitarian Engineering Fellow at the Colorado School of Mines (Mines). She holds BS and MS degrees in Petroleum Engineering from Mines, a JD from Loyola Uni- versity New Orleans School of Law, and a PhD in Environmental Science and Engineering from Mines. Prior to joining the Faculty at
portal frame subjected to both vertical and horizontal loads withvarious support configurations. This module focuses on students visualizing deflected shapesbased on the conditions and comparing the theoretical results to the observable deflected shapesin the classroom. Additionally, this module was used to further reinforce virtual work and theforce method. The following sections provide some background about the overall project along with thedesign and implementation of the experiential learning modules. There is also a brief discussionabout assessment efforts on the project and lessons learned by the project team thus far.Project Background The project as a whole includes several experiential learning modules covering fourcourses
Margherio, University of Washington Cara Margherio is a Senior Research Associate at the UW Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE). Cara serves as project manager for program evaluation on several NSF- and NIH-funded projects. Her research interests include community cultural wealth, counterspaces, peer mentoring, and institutional change.Prof. Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate degrees in EE from Stanford. Since 1990, she has been in the EE Department at the University of Washington where she is now Associate Dean of Diversity and Access in the College of Engineering, Professor of Electrical
of Me- chanical & Aerospace Engineering. Abell received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from Valparaiso University and a MFA in Design Research & Development from The Ohio State University with an em- phasis on Industrial Design. She teaches project-based, product design courses to senior-level and grad- uate engineering students, team-based capstone design courses for mechanical engineering students, as well as an interdisciplinary product development course for entrepreneurship students who come from across OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Characterizations and Portrayals of Intuition in Decision-Making: A Systematic Review of
university community. We concludethat the S-L opportunity forces our students out of their comfort zone, helping them to grow asengineers who are better prepared for future challenges.IntroductionAt Northeastern University, located in the heart of Boston, MA, first-year engineering studentsare required to take a series of two courses known as Cornerstone of Engineering. In thesecourses, students learn programming, graphical design, problem solving and follow theengineering design process to create final projects that integrate all of their newly learned skills.While there are many engineering skills directly taught in this course, there are many ‘soft skills’such as empathy, professionalism, and adaptability that are indirectly taught along the
psychological interiorisation and dysfunctioningpractical implementation”.While it is self-evident that among any random group of individuals there will be differentlevels of understanding of engineering issues the literature hardly considers this to beproblematic. There is one report of an examination that illustrates this point which is given infull in the appendix. Part of a trial in examination design, it tested for comprehension,engineering analysis, project design, and engineering reasoning. A difference in theknowledge required to comprehend and analyse the newspaper article that was provided iseasily discerned in the questions asked.Most of the commentaries however, do not focus on the fundamental purposes of engineeringor technological
Paper ID #17346Engineering Uncertainty: A qualitative study on the way middle school teach-ers incorporate, manage and leverage the uncertainty of engineering designtaskMr. Beau Vezino, University of Arizona Beau R. Vezino is a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona’s College of Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science/engineering methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several related research projects. Beau is certified teacher and holds a MS in Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a BS in Mechanical Engineering (2005). Beau’s research
and stakeholder audiences. Daniel has worked on research projects for the U.S. Department of Labor, the National Academy of Engineering, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Trea- sury Department, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, and several private foundations.Dr. Melvin L. Roberts P.E., Camden County College Melvin L. Roberts is an Associate Professor of Engineering and the immediate past Dean of the Division of Business, Computer and Technical Studies at Camden County College in Blackwood, New Jersey. He has also held the post of Dean of Occupational Skills & Customized Training at the college. Prior to his current
projects related to reducing turbine loads and increasing energy capture. She has applied experiential learning techniques in several wind energy and control systems classes and began engineering education research related to social justice in control systems engineering in fall 2014.Dr. Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines Jon A. Leydens is an associate professor in the Division of Liberal Arts and International Studies at the Colorado School of Mines, USA, where he has been since 1997. Research and teaching interests include communication, social justice, and engineering education.Dr. Barbara M. Moskal, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Barbara Moskal is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics and the Director of
project looking at non-normative engineering students and how they may have differing paths to success. His education includes a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Nevada, Reno.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada - Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in
Paper ID #14907Neuroscience 101: Might Your Teaching and Their Learning Benefit?Dr. Stuart G. Walesh P.E., S. G. Walesh Consulting Stuart G. Walesh, Ph.D., P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, and F.NSPE (stuwalesh@comcast.net, www.helpingyouengineeryourfuture.com) is an author; teacher; and an independent consultant providing leadership, management, and engineering services. Prior to beginning his consultancy, he worked in the public, private, and academic sectors serving as a project engineer and manager, department head, discipline manager, marketer, legal expert, professor, and dean of an engineering college. Walesh’s technical
contemporary issues and realism for therelevance that produces passion to learn. One needs multidisciplinarity and educational breadthto develop intellectual power and critical thinking. 42Perhaps the most unsurprising change to Criterion 3 is the removal of the word “political” and itsreplacement with the more palatable idea “policy.” Of course the two are not interchangeable.Political processes produce, enact, sustain, mediate, and change policies. 43 Political is the broaderterm, encompassing policy-making processes. By shifting to the term policy instead of political,ABET is shrinking the intended domain of action for engineers. Understanding the politicalcontexts that give rise to engineering projects, and analyzing potential political
Paper ID #24885Exploring Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Engineering Undergrad-uate Experiences through AutoethnographyAndrea Haverkamp, Oregon State University Andrea Haverkamp is a doctoral candidate in Environmental Engineering. She is also a student in the Queer Studies Ph.D. minor within the department of Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. Andrea’s research interests include broadening participation in engineering, feminist research methods, and en- gineering ethics. Her dissertation research project studies gender dynamics in engineering education informed by queer theory and collaborative community
leadership team of the Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. In her role as CIMER Investigator, she is leading a project as a part of the APS’s NSF INCLUDES Inclusive Graduate Education Network (IGEN). From 2014-2019 she also served as Co-Director of the NIH-supported National Research Men- toring Network’s Master Facilitator Initiative. From 2008-2012, McDaniels served as Director of Michi- gan State University’s NSF ADVANCE Grant where she spearheaded the institution’s efforts to diversify the faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. In this role she was responsible for the development and implementation of MSU’s new
engineering technologyfaculty may hold regarding their students' needs:Strong Technical Foundation: Faculty members often emphasize the importance of a solidunderstanding of core engineering principles and concepts. They believe that students shouldhave a strong foundation in mathematics, physics, and other relevant technical subjects.Practical Application: Practical application is often considered crucial in engineeringtechnology programs. Faculty members believe that students should have ample opportunities towork with equipment, conduct experiments, and engage in real-world projects to applytheoretical knowledge.Problem-Solving Skills: Engineering technology faculty often stress the development ofproblem-solving skills. They believe that students
education. The presented findings emanate from the fourth phase of anextensive multiphase mixed-method research project. The project seeks to elucidate theimpediments that underrepresented students, particularly women, face in pursuing graduateengineering degrees and the potential solutions to overcome those barriers.Our methodology in this phase encompassed a comprehensive mixed-method survey, garneringresponses from over 600 undergraduate and graduate engineering students within the Faculty ofEngineering. Preliminary analyses revealed that the decision to pursue graduate studies isinfluenced by intersectional identity variables.In the sphere of engineering education, the pursuit of diversity, inclusion, and equity has longbeen recognized as
quite a bit of knowledge on data science and machine learning, spurred by the wide range of emerging applications. Through various projects, he has gained extensive experience with deep learning models and data interpretation. As such, with an emphasis on theory and a strict adherence to the machine learning pipeline, he is always keen on delivering tried and tested products.Sarah Louise Langham, University of Florida Sarah Louise Langham is a graduate of the University of Florida with a Bachelors of Science in Materials Science and Engineering. She is a format and content reviewer for EQuIPD grant Data Science/AI curriculum development. She has researched polyelectrolytes and rheological behavior under Dr. Neitzel
research area. He is currently the academic and research coordinator with the African Center of Excellence on New Pedagogies in Engineering Education (ACENPEE), Ahmadu Bello University Zaria; a World Bank funded Development Impact project with the aim of scaling up post graduate education at the MSc/PhD levels through regional specialization and collaboration in the West African Sub-region. Adrian is a registered Engineer with Council for Regulation of Engineering Practice in Nigeria (COREN), a member of the Nigerian Society of Engineers, a member of the American Society for Civil Engineers as well as the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMG).Fatai Olukayode Anafi, Ahmadu Bello
specificuniversity [7]. \ Figure 2: Conceptual Framework, adapted from Goldschneider (2023)This study seeks to address the following research questions: 1. In what ways, if any, do students’ pre-college socialization experiences influence their anticipatory sense of belonging to both their chosen university and their chosen discipline? 2. How do students’ anticipatory senses of belonging impact their eventual enrollment decisions?Broader Project BackgroundThe data used in this study are drawn from a broader pool generated as part of the UnderstandingKnowledge and Student Agency (UKSA) project, a collaborative effort between six
. Clarification of teachingwith blended learning [20]. methods in engineering education based on the use of technology andThe intentional design of blended learning environments digital media.using evidence-based practices has the potential to greatlyimprove learning efficiency by combining online self-study with traditional classroom teaching[21]–[23]. Blended learning has been proven to be highly advantageous for the field of engineeringeducation, specifically in cases where learning is centered around project-based activities [24]. Inthe context of chemical engineering design, the implementation of blended learning has been
French in 2020 from the University of Rhode Island. Besides her academic duties, she also works as a Learning and Talent Coordinator and consultant in Providence, RI where she works on various projects on teacher’s loans forgiveness programs, curriculum improvement and case management. Dira’s current research interests align with diversity, equity, and inclusion, specifically for Women of color, as well as community building and involvement American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Thinking as Argument: A Theoretical Framework for Studying How Faculty Arrive at Their Deeply-held Beliefs about Inequity in
the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). His research and teaching interests include leadership, global agility, globalization, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places including North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a Global Medical Technology fortune 500 Company in various engineering and leadership positions. Gregg is cur- rently the program chair/chair elect
, since the participants were at different stages of their lives, adolescence as opposed tocollege students, there was divergence in the focus and types of data collected. The study on thethree adolescent boys created a scenario centered on engineering design, for which funds ofknowledge was drawn upon, while the study on college students pulled from their existingengineering-related experiences to elicit funds of knowledge. However, both studies supportedcommunity-based design projects as valuable methods for drawing on students’ funds ofknowledge.Referring back to our research question—How is the funds of knowledge framework being utilizedto understand engineering concepts at the secondary and post-secondary level? —both examplescentered on the
physical and material characteristics”[55](p. 227). In graduate school, the different settings students operate within as they develop contain microsystems that can include interactions with advisors and peers, departments, as well as activities like coursework, research projects, and extracurricular projects related or unrelated to their field of study; they can also include students’ relationships with family members within their home, as well as with coworkers and a supervisor within a place of employment[50], [53], [56], [57]. These different interacting settings (andtheir microsystems) contain various patterns of or expected, appropriate kinds of activities, roles, and
Pennsylvania Brett Frankel received his Ph.D. in mathematics in 2016 from the University of Pennsylvania. After an instructionally-focused postdoctoral position at Northwestern University, he returned to Penn as a senior lecturer. Dr. Frankel was a 2009-2010 Fulbright fellow to Budapest, Hungary studying mathematics and mathematics pedagogy, and a 2017-2018 Project NExT fellow. He served as a graduate assistant to the Penn Emerging Scholars Program, and co-founded the Northwestern Emerging Scholars Program to improve female retention in pipeline courses for the mathematics major. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Impact of an Emerging Scholars/Peer Led Team Learning program on
surveys and individual interviews in Year 1(2017-2018), Year 2 (2018-2019), and part of Year 3 (Fall 2019) of the project. No data werecollected in the Spring of 2020 due to COVID-19. Over the course of the three-year project, weattempted to examine girls’ perceptions of outreach educators as role models in a variety ofways. We collected data at the end of each academic semester, reviewing participants’ responses,and modifying the interview protocols and survey instruments when preliminary analyses ofstudent responses suggested additional or different questions would elicit more nuanced ordetailed participant responses. Figure 1 depicts the progression in how we shifted ourquestioning across the project. The progression reflects our efforts to
, Aerospace, Junior, White)Figure 8: Female students rate the degree to which they feel isolated in their engineering classes. Figure 9: Female students participants rate the frequency of being treated as if they were not competent while working with peers.The literature shows that women pursuing engineering often receive negative messages regardingtheir abilities [1]. Our female interview participants acknowledged this and indicated that acommon outcome is that women are often pushed towards non-technical roles in group projects.Our results show that 44% of our female participants are sometimes or often denied the opportunityto participate fully in group projects, as shown in Figure 10. A survey participant also