National Science Foundation (NSF) award Abstract #1348410. Indigenous Program for Stem Research and a Regional Native Network of Graduate Education: A National Research and Educational Model. http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1348410 ii National Indian Education Association (NIEA). Statistics on Native Students. http://www.niea.org/research/statistics.aspx. iii Mendoza, W. (2014) Indian Students in Public Schools- Cultivating the Next Generation: Hearing on Indian Education Before the S. Comm. on Indian Affairs, 113th Cong. (Testimony of William Mendoza, Exec. Dir., White House Initiative on Am. Indian and Alaska Native Education.) iv Stetser, M. & Stillwell, R. (2014). U.S
instructor can encouragestudents to respect the ideas and opinions offered by fellow classmates. S/he can stress theimportance of active listening (using both the mental and physical components of listening).After different viewpoints are exchanged, students can be encourage to decide on a course ofaction for dealing with the issues identified. Table 15 provides an example of the potentialComponents of Civility that can be satisfied using the preceding example.Table 15: Potential Components of Civility satisfied by the preceding example.Civility Assignment Features/Author’s (Civility) BehaviorComponentGive Praise The instructors can express appreciation to students for ideas contributed.Be considerate The instructor
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Applied to Engineering Student Project Teams: A Research Review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 472-512. 2. Chapman, K. J., Meuter, M. L. Toy, D., & Wright, L. K. (2010). Are Student Groups Dysfunctional? Perspectives From Both Sides of the Classroom. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(1), 39-49. 3. Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into practice, 32(3), 179-186. 4. Facione, P. A., Sánchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 1-25. 5. Froyd, J. E., Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Henderson, C., & Prince, M. J. (2013). Estimates
in a singleclassroom or over multiple classes across universities, with input from additional instructors.AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (EEC1227110). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Some of the data analysis and representation was performed using Igor Pro (WaveMetrics, Inc.,Oregon, USA) https://www.wavemetrics.comReferences[1] Chi, M.T.H. and R. Wylie, The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 2014. 49(4): p. 219-243.[2] Krause, S. and C. Waters
from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=23306664. Ryan SJ Baker, Albert T. Corbett, and Vincent Aleven. 2008. More accurate student modeling through contextual estimation of slip and guess probabilities in bayesian knowledge tracing. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 406–415. Retrieved February 12, 2017 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540- 69132-7_445. Benjamin S. Bloom. 1984. The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational researcher 13, 6: 4–16.6. William G. Bowen, Matthew M. Chingos, Kelly A. Lack, and Thomas I. Nygren. 2014. Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Six-Campus
; Society, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 426–438, 1999.[12] Bradley, T. Waliczek and J. Zajicek, "Relationship Between Environmental Knowledgeand Environmental Attitude of High School Students", The Journal of Environmental Education,vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 17-21, 1999.[13] P. Tikka, M. Kuitunen and S. Tynys, "Effects of Educational Background on Students'Attitudes, Activity Levels, and Knowledge Concerning the Environment", The Journal ofEnvironmental Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 12-19, 2000.[14] D. Levine and M. Strube, "Environmental Attitudes, Knowledge, Intentions andBehaviors Among College Students", The Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 308-326, 2012.[15] S. Liu and H. Lin, "Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Mental Models of
teamwork across disciplines aremultidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity. The two concepts have a great deal common, but mayentail slightly different outcomes for participants and for their projects.Briefly, in multidisciplinary work, collaborators work together on a problem. Each bringsexpertise, but, as Borrego and Newswander explain in their overview of cross-disciplinaryengineering collaboration, “collaborators leave the project without having learned much aboutthe other discipline(s). Each researcher continues on his or her own independent trajectory,unchanged by the experience [8].” This means that, while multidisciplinary work brings togetherpeople with different ways of conceptualizing and operating on problems, each takes on
selection will be addressed along with project identification,scheduling, and the presentation of outcomes.During the admissions process, students are divided into sections that range from 16-24 studentseach. Every section has a different theme in the STEM fields, centered in the area of expertise ofthe faculty lead instructor, which can range widely in subject. Students rank their top twosection topics in the application and nearly 80% of students are offered their first-choice section.Since 2014, a section entitled, ‘Racecar Design through Engineering Experimentation,’ orRacecar, has been offered with section enrollment around 25 students, which representsclassroom and laboratory capacity. Unlike most other sections, Racecar i s taught
from Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India (2001). Dr. Nandy had served as a Co-Principal Investigator of an NSF S-STEM Project, and is currently serving as the Principal-Investigator of an NSF IUSE project. Dr. Nandy is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), and American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Steve Cox, Northern New Mexico College Schooled at Marquette University in Electrical Engineering and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and New York University in Mathematics. Joined the Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics at Rice University in 1988 and the Department of Neuroscience at Baylor College of Medicine in 2004. Held visiting positions in Madrid, Cologne and
for thisstage will come from snowball sampling methods, because non-completers are an invisible andsensitive population. Either quantitative or qualitative differences (or similarities) between the twogroups (current students vs non-completers) will be fascinating with respect to the graduateengineering socialization process in which writing is an invisible competency.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant1733594. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] Council of Graduate
project staff including the AUHSDteachers & administrators, CSUF college student mentors, and the project evaluator: ArroyoResearch Services for their contributions to this research.References 1. Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, May 2013, 3-9. 2. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self‐efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485-499. 3. Huang, J., A. Bernal, J. Jackson, Y. Lu, & A. Cox-Petersen (2016): Integrating STEM Education with Entrepreneurship Practices at Middle Schools: Feasibility Study and Preliminary Results, Proceedings of Hawaii University International Conference on
-workshop survey; eleven handouts during the workshop that were either completed individually, in dyads,or in small groups; and a follow-up survey in the fall semester of 2018.Data AnalysisA thematic analysis [17] was conducted by categorizing each quote based on emergent themes within thehigher-level categories of student assets and challenges, corresponding to the two prompts on the handout.Thematic analysis is an iterative analysis process that includes reading and rereading participantresponses, developing categories to capture the key component(s) of the responses, and then combining,collapsing, and/or renaming categories based on examinations of the other responses [17]. In addition,each response was coded for workshop location (Texas or
).EverydayCognition:ItsDevelopmentinSocial Context,Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress. Secules,S.,A.Gupta,A.Elby,E.Tanu,SupportingtheNarrativeAgencyofa MarginalizedEngineeringStudent,JournalofEngineeringEducation107(2),1-33, 2018 Turner,D.W.,III(2010).Qualitativeinterviewdesign:Apracticalguidefornovice investigators.TheQualitativeReport,15(3),754-760 U.S.CentersforDiseaseControl(2016).YouthRisksBehaviorSurvey. Woods,D.R.(1994).Problem-BasedLearning:HowtoGaintheMostinPBL, Waterdown,Ontario:D.R.WoodsPublishing. 17
initiatives, teacher and faculty professional development programs, and S-STEM programs.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on several engineering education research projects, including one on
Engineering Strategic Goal of Becoming a National Model of Inclusivity and Collaboration. In The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity annual conference. Washington, DC.Bothwell, M., Furman, K., Driskill, Q.-L., Warner, R., Shaw, S., & Ozkan-Haller, T. (2018b). Empowering faculty and administrators to re-imagine a socially just institution through use of critical pedagogies. In Annual Conference of the Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity. Washington, DC.Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and… tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339–346.Bucciarelli, L. L
a faculty devel- opment and leadership program to train and recruit diverse PhD students who wish to pursue academic positions in engineering or applied science after graduation. Dr. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder in 1992 and 1994, respectively. She went on to earn a Specialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies in 2011 and a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Student Affairs Leadership in December 2017, both from the University of Northern Colorado. She is a Founding Leader of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Engineering and a facilitator of
Conference, Indianapolis, IN. https://peer. asee. org/20142, 2014.[6] W. C. Lee and K. J. Cross, "Help me help you: Building a support network for minority engineering students," age, vol. 23, p. 1, 2013.[7] J. P. Bean and B. S. Metzner, "A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition," Review of educational Research, vol. 55, pp. 485-540, 1985.[8] V. Tinto, "Constructing Educational Communities: Increasing Retention in Challenging Circumstances," Community College Journal, vol. 64, pp. 26-29, 1994.[9] W. C. Lee Jr, "Providing co-curricular support: A multi-case study of engineering student support centers," Virginia Tech, 2015.[10] W.C. Lee, L. Moyer, A. Godwin, and D. Knight,”Instrument Development: Measuring
of classes (see the below section regarding s tudent and faculty reflections). These new courses will be offered s tarting in 2019, and will serve CIA minors and discipline specific majors as well: ART 376 The Art of Mixed Reality: Conceptual creation, storytelling, interface design in 3D virtual and augmented realms, visual styles and use of metaphors. A theorybased view of mixed reality (MR) worlds, including coding and software, the making of 3D assets, technical challenges and constraints. The students will develop, research, write and propose their own idea for a MR project. ART 470 Conceptual Art and Storyboarding for
the data and outcomes from this summer activity will help determine if the winterbreak is a more effective intervention period than the summer, since it happens earlier in thestudents’ academic career.AcknowledgmentThis paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1430398. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] US Census Bureau, Census Data for Kern County and Bakersfield, California, 2010 census and 2019 estimates.[2] California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress, Kern High School District and California Mathematics
had never heard of these goals but were alleager to incorporate the sustainable development applications into their proposed design projects.Each student was asked to conduct research on the UN Goals and then write a brief essay onwhich goal(s) they wanted to incorporate into their proposed design project. Each group thendiscussed the goals selected by the individual team members and decided upon the goals thatwere most applicable to their design project. These results can be found on Table 2. Of the 17UN Goals the engineering students selected eight as illustrated in Figure 2. • Goal 5: Gender Equality • Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation • Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy • Goal 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
Attrition Process,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 199–227, 2000.[8] S. K. Gardner, “Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low- completing doctoral programs in the United States,” High. Educ., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 97–112, Nov. 2009.[9] A. E. Austin, “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 94–122, 2002.[10] A. E. Austin, H. Campa, C. Pfund, D. L. Gillan-Daniel, R. Mathieu, and J. Stoddart, “Preparing STEM doctoral students for future faculty careers,” New Dir. …, vol. 2009, no. 117, pp. 83–95, 2009.[11] C. L. Colbeck, “Professional identity development theory and doctoral education
, the data contained funding information for all doctoral students, including fundingmechanism(s) and total dollar amount of funding by month for each funding mechanism. Weconsolidated the funding categories to Teaching Assistantship (TA), Research Assistantship(RA), Fellowship, and No University Funding. Assistant instructor (AI) positions were classifiedunder TA, and any scholarships the students received were included under Fellowship. Anyfunding received externally from the institution was not included in the dataset. However,government agency funding, such as that through the National Science Foundation (NSF) or theNational Institutes of Health (NIH), are distributed to students through the institution and wouldbe included in the dataset
Journal of Higher Education 2016, 87 (5), 605-634.5. Reith, F.; Seyfried, M., Balancing the Moods: Quality Managers’ Perceptions and Actions Against Resistance. Higher Education Policy 2018, 32 (1), 71-91.6. Kolb, D. M.; Williams, J.; Frohlinger, C., Her Place at the Table: A Woman's Guide to Negotiating Five Key Challenges to Leadership Success. Wiley: 2010.7. Kolb, D. M.; Coolidge, G. G., HER PLACE AT THE TABLE. Journal of State Government 1991, 64 (2), 68-71.8. Kolb, D. M., Her Place at the Table: Gender and Negotiation after Trump. Negotiation Journal 2019, 35 (1), 185-189.9. Slank, S., Rethinking the Imposter Phenomenon. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2019, 22 (1), 205-218.10. Silbiger, N. J.; Stubler, A. D., Unprofessional
learning objectives, instructional strategies, and assessments forsustainable infrastructure topics. Subsequent problem-based learning activities are being revisedand improved.AcknowledgmentsThis work was funded by the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning grant from the University ofNorth Carolina at Charlotte.References[1] A. Steinemann, "Implementing Sustainable Development through Problem-Based Learning:Pedagogy and Practice," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice,vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 216-224, 2003, doi: 10.1061[2] S. A. Gallagher, B. T. Sher, W. J. Stepien, and D. Workman, "Implementing Problem-BasedLearning in Science Classrooms," School Science and Mathematics, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 136-146,1995, doi: 10.1111/j
University.References[1] C. Seemiller and M. Grace, “Educating and engaging the next generation of students,” About Campus, vol. 22, pp. 21-26, 2017.[2] J. Cruz and N. Kellam, “Beginning an Engineer’s Journey: A Narrative Examination of How, When, and Why Students Choose the Engineering Major,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 44, pp. 556-582, 2018.[3] P. C. Rickes, “Generations in flux- How Gen Z will continue to transform higher education Space,” Planning for Higher Education Journal, vol. 44, no. 4, 2016.[4] L. S. Nadelson et al., “Knowledge in the making: What engineering students are learning in makerspaces,” in Proceedings, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2019, Tampa, FL.[5] R. M. Carbonell, M. E
40 35 10 30 Skin 5 25 0 20 3 103 203 303 403 503 3 103 203 [s] 時間 303 403 503
, a series of meetings werearranged, including a detailed presentation of our course objectives during the preparatory visit.Subsequent virtual meetings were held to discuss logistics and the future vision for ourcollaboration, which includes the establishment of an annual "Abu Dhabi Global EngineeringSummit." To secure financial support, the author submitted an application for funding through the"Advantage Abu Dhabi Application Form," [5] which was evaluated and approved by the AbuDhabi Convention and Exhibition Bureau, a part of the Abu Dhabi Department of Culture andTourism.This preparatory trip also facilitated encounters with industry leaders, including the CEO & HeadDubai Campus & Director of S P Jain School of Global Management
Professor Quirrell cannot. You should create a random document foryour own and demonstrate this scenario.This lab task assumes that a confidential document is encrypted by Hermione Granger, whosecontent is only viewable by Harry Potter and Ron Weasley. In other words, only Harry and Roncan decrypt and read the document, while Professor Quirrell cannot. Students should demonstratethis scenario with two deliverables: 1. Let’s say you are Hermione Granger. Please provide command lines that encrypt the doc- ument. Also, please include the screenshot(s) to demonstrate that the document has been encrypted successfully. 2. Please provide command lines that show Harry Potter and Ron Weasley can decrypt the ciphertext. Also, provide the
analyze how they differ from one another, pending more survey respondents.References[1] Personal Communication between K. Mallouk and S. Chin. January 24, 2024.[2] A. M. Ogilvie and D. B. Knight, “Post-transfer Transition Experiences for Engineering Transfer Students,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, p. 152102511882050, Jan. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025118820501.[3] N. L. Smith, J. R. Grohs, & E. M. Van Aken, (2021). "Comparison of transfer shock and graduation rates across engineering transfer student populations," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111. 10.1002/jee.20434.[4] M. J. Gray, S. A. Gunarathne, N. N. Nguyen, and E. E. Shortlidge, “Thriving