Agree Disagree Agree Agree Disagree1. I benefited from MEMS and NEMS introduction 6 13 10 4 1 3.6presented on Tuesday.2. I am currently involved in one or more MEMS / 0 0 8 12 14 1.8NEMS related project(s).3. I am interested in pursuing a MEMES / NEMS 2 10 13 5 4 3related project in the future
., 1984.2. Harb, J. N., Durrant, S. O., and Terry, R. E., ”Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering in Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, April 1993, pp. 70-77.3. Harb, J. N., Terry, R. E., Hurt, P. K., and Williamson, K. J., Teaching Through the Cycle: Application of Learning Style Theory to Engineering Education at Brigham Young University, 2nd Edition, Brigham Young University Press, 1995.4. Ortiz, L. E. and Bachofen, E. M., “An Experience in Teaching Structures in Aeronautical, Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Applying the Experimental Methodology,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 2526.5
Laboratory(s) 1 Single Acting Cylinder 1 1 2 Double Acting Cylinder 1 1,2 3 Rotating Three Position Cylinder 1 4 4 Non-Rotating Three Position Cylinder 1 4 5 Double Rod Double Acting Cylinder 1 3 6 Bidirectional Motor 2 3 7 Push button valve 3 1,2,3,4 8 5/2 way externally piloted directional valve 1 1,2 9 5/2 way externally piloted
would be hands-on, but also have some Labswhere a simulation is used, to expand activities beyond equipment in our Electronics Lab.References[1] Tobe, Frank, “30+2 research reports forecast significant growth for robot industry”, Nov21,2017, The Robot Report retrieved from https://www.therobotreport.com/302-research-reports-forecast-significant-growth-robot-industry/#[2] Kevin M. Lynch and Frank C. Park, "Modern Robotics: Mechanics, Planning, and Control",Cambridge University Press, 2017, ISBN 9781107156302.[3] Richard M. Murray. California Institute of Technology. Zexiang Li. Hong Kong Universityof Science and Technology. S. Shankar Sastry. University of California, Berkeley, “AMathematical Introduction to. Robotic Manipulation”, cс1994, CRC
Approach to Teaching Design Fundamentals to Large Numbers of Students and Its Effect on Engineering Design Self-efficacy,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[9] E. P. Torrance, The search for satori & creativity. Creative Education Foundation, 1979.[10] R. M. Berger, J. P. Guilford, and P. R. Christensen, “A factor-analytic study of planning abilities,” Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1–31, 1957.[11] K. H. Kim, “Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT),” Creat. Res. J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2006.[12] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring Engineering Design Self-Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no
. West, "Toy Adaptation Program Workshop: Enriching First-Year Engineers by Teaching the Electronic Toy Adaptation Process," in American Society for Engineering Education, New Orleans, 2016.[8] M. West, R. L. Kajfez and E. Riter, "One Program’s Approach to Creating a Strong Network Paper," in American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[9] M. Y. Mollica, H. A. Feldner, S. Israel, A. Caspi, K. M. Steele and D. G. Hendricks, "Toy Adaptation as Engineering Outreach to Diverse High School Students," in American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[10] Toy Adaptation Program, "Ohio State University Toy Adaptation Program (TAP)," [Online]. Available: https
for Faculty Development,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 121– 134, Apr. 2010.[5] M. S. Garet, A. C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon, “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 915–945, Dec. 2001.[6] C. J. Berger and V. Berger, “Academic Discipline: A Guide to Fair Process for the University Student,” Columbia Law Rev., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 289–364, 1999.
importance. This will help put all of theresults into the context of the larger picture of the MDC program.References1. Miller, R.L. and Olds, B.M., “A Model Curriculum for a Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary Engineering Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, 83(4), 1994, pp. 311-316.2. Todd, R.H., Sorensen, C.D., and Magleby, S.P., “Designing a Senior Capstone Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers,” Journal of Engineering Education, 82(2), 1993, pp. 92-100.3. Howe, S. and Wilbarger, J., “2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2006.4. Todd, R.H., Magleby, S.P., Sorensen, C.D., Swan, B.R., and Anthony, D.K., “A
: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. (The National Academies Press, 2004).7. Grover, S. & Pea, R. Computational Thinking in K–12 A Review of the State of the Field. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER 42, 38–43 (2013).8. Partovih, H. Transforming US education with computer science. in 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2014, March 5, 2014 - March 8, 2014 5 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2014). doi:10.1145/2538862.25547939. Nikou, S. A. & Economides, A. A. Measuring student motivation during ‘The Hour of Code’ activities. in 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2014, July 7, 2014 - July 9, 2014 744–745 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
R. J. Puerzer, “The Smaller Engineering School and its Industrial Advisory Board; An Effective Partnership?,” in ASEE /IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, 2002.[3] R. Greenlaw, “Setting Up and Maintaining A Strong Industrial Advisory,” Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 23-34, 2009.[4] S. R. Genheimer, “The Effectiveness of Industry Advisory Boards in Engineering Education,” University of Oklahoma Graduate College (PhD Thesis), Oklahoma, 2007.[5] D. J. Bremner, “Analysing the IoT Ecosystem: the Barriers to Commercial Traction,” in Embedded World 2016, Nurenberg, 2016.[6] M. E. Porter, “The Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 86
, by states. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press. 2. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC.: The National Academy Press. 3. National Research Council. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students' motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 4. Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H. H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is Adding the E Enough? Investigating the Impact of K‐12 Engineering Standards on the Implementation of STEM Integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44. 5. http://www.eie.org/eie-curriculum/curriculum-units/water-water-everywhere-designing-water
develop hybrid educational modules linked to engineering grandchallenges to improve science and math concepts in k-12 curriculum.References 1. Ward, J. S., & Fontecchio, A. (2012, October). Work in progress: The NAE Grand Challenges, high school curricula and Graduate student research. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2012 (pp. 1-2). IEEE. 2. Davis, V., Raju, P. K., Lakin, J., Davis, E. (2016). Nanotechnology Solutions to Engineering Grand Challenges. American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. 3. Mote Jr, C. D., Dowling, D. A., & Zhou, J. (2016). The Power of an Idea: The International Impacts of the Grand Challenges for Engineering. Engineering, 2(1), 4-7 4. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A
engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and multivariable control. Dr. Rodriguez has given over 70 invited presentations - 13 plenary - at international and national forums, conferences and corporations. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research academic success and professional development (ASAP) program that has served over 500 students. These efforts have been supported by NSF STEP, S-STEM, and CSEM grants as well as industry. Dr. Rodriguez’ research inter- ests include: control of nonlinear distributed parameter, and sampled-data systems; modeling, simulation, animation, and real-time control (MoSART) of Flexible Autonomous Machines operating in an uncertain Environment
refine the systemspecifications. Table 1 shows the finalized PVEPS system requirements. Table 1 PV emergency power system requirements ID Requirements 1 Power generated by solar panel(s) shall be stored in lead-acid AGM batteries 2 The batteries shall be able to power the following devices for two consecutive days: 1. Two White LED lights (continuous) 2. The suction machine (used 3 hrs. each day) 3. Two “car-charging sockets” for charging 12VDC appliances (used 3 hrs. each day) 4. One 5V DC USB charger for charging cell phones and tablets 3 The system shall contain on/off switches to individually control each appliance
ProgramReview- Enrollment, http://osra.georgiasouthern.edu/sra/CPRenrl/index1.cfm, Last Accessed January,2016.[2] May, Gary S.; Chubin, Daryl E.; A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success forUnderrepresented Minority Students, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 92, Issue 1, pp 27-39,January 2003.[3] Lent, Robert W.; Lopez, Frederick G.; Sheu, Hung-Bin; Lopez Jr., Antonio M.; Social cognitivepredictors of the interests and choices of computing majors: Applicability to underrepresented students,Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 78, Issue 2, pp 184-192, April 2011[4] Hernandez, Paul R.; Schultz, P. Wesley; Estrada, Mica; Woodcock, Anna; Chance, Randie C.,Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden
. 28, Issue 4 (Summer 2008), pp. 43-50.[5] Laursen, S., et al. Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010[6] Lopatto, D. Science in Solution: The Impact of Undergraduate Research on Student Learning. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation for Science Advancement, 2009.[7] Taraban, R., and Blanton, R.L., Eds. Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science: The Transformation from Student to Scientist. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008.[8] Russell, S.H., Hancock, M.P. and McCullough, J. "Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences" Science, Vol. 316, No. 5824 (27 April 2007), pp. 548-549.[9] Zydney, A.L., Bennett, J.S., Shahid, A. and Bauer, K.W
engineers and non-engineers. Engineering faculty needto push for inclusion in the liberal arts core of their universities. Exposing those from otherfields of study to engineering broadens their knowledge base. The grand challenges facingengineering are going to require collaboration with those from other fields to solve. Engineeringas a liberal arts exposes others to the principles of engineering and well enable the types ofcollaborations needed to solve these problems.Bibliography[1] Abelson, Paul. The seven liberal arts: a study in mediæval culture. Vol. 11. Teachers' College, ColumbiaUniversity, 1906.[2]Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. “Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves.” Strategic Management Journal
, I’ll be like,alright, I’m never doing this again. Like I try it, I mess up, and you know what, forget it, I quit.But like I just learned to just stick with something all the way through, try a little harder. Itshows result[s].”Cyrus’s claim here is that the experience helped to develop persistence, broadly. He elaboratedon this by giving an example from school, where he persisted on a difficult presentationassignment that normally would have prompted to quit:“I was doing it, I kept getting stuck, you know. So I just took a break really fast because mybrain was fried from irritation and stress. And you know, I finished it, and I’m glad I did, and atfirst I was like, ‘Look, dude [to his partner], you’re going to have to do it.’ But you know
problems, and but also achieve personalized,real-time, economic production utilizing additive manufacturing technology, in particular, 3Dprinting technology, and ultimately to produce the real products which can actually be soldand used. The lab is a typical cyber-physical-social system (CPSS) that enables students tohand on and experience the entire social manufacturing process.Acknowledgements This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.61533019 and 71232006).References[1] E. F. Crawley. Creating the CDIO syllabus, a universal template for engineering education, Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002, 2:8-12.[2] E. F. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D. R. Brodeur. Rethinking
Altera Cyclone FPGA, 64 MS/s dual ADC, 128 MS/s dualDAC, and USB 2.0 connectivity. The USRP1 platform can support two complete RFdaughter boards and can operate from DC to 6 GHz. The daughter board we used on eachmotherboard is RFX400, which has 2 quadrature frontends for transmitting and receiving,and the bandwidth is 40MHz for both frontends (see Figure 1). Figure 1: A USRP1 Motherboard with RFX400 Daughter Board2.2. Software SetupIn order to improve undergraduate students' understanding and learning, the followingstep-by-step laboratory modules were developed:I) Ubuntu/Windows duel operating system installation. Many SDR development tools,including GNU Radio, only officially support Linux operating system. However
external rewards, and others,briefly reviewed below.During the 60’s and 70’s, a deviance hypothesis found some support in studies of work values.Career oriented women “stressed intrinsic features of the work including the kind of people in agiven occupation, the high prestige of the occupation, the opportunity to use special abilities, andwhether the work left enough time to spend with family.”7 By comparison, non-career orientedwomen preferred “more feminine values including working with people rather than things, livingup to their parents' ideas of success, a stable secure future, and helping others.”8Other research at the time, however, showed limited support for a ‘deviance hypothesis’. In afour year longitudinal study of 110 college women (a
.99CH37011 2, 12D4/26–12D4/31 (Stripes Publishing L.L.C, 1999).[13] Erwin, B., Cyr, M. & Rogers, C. LEGO Engineer and RoboLab: Teaching Engineering withLabVIEW from Kindergarten to Graduate School. at[14] Williams, A. B. The qualitative impact of using LEGO MINDSTORMS robots to teach computerengineering. IEEE Trans. Educ. 46, 206–206, 2003.[15] Grahame, K. S., Freeman, S., Goldthwaite, D., Love, J., Pfluger, C., Maheswaran, B., Hertz, J., Variawa, C.,"Shall I Try This? An interactive workshop on assessing hands-on teaching", American Society for EngineeringEducation (ASEE) Northeast Section Conference, Boston, MA, April 30, 2015.[16] Hitt, J. Problem-Based Learning in Engineering. United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, 2010.[17] Bédard
student demands as well asleader roles in STEM graduate programs will be fundamental to understanding the specificfactors that foster the academic and professional development of underrepresented graduateSTEM students.Bibliography1. Folt z, L. G., Gannon, S., & Kirschmann, S. L. (2014). Factors That Contribute to the Persistence of MinorityStudents in STEM Fields. Planning For Higher Education, 42(4), 46-58.2. Ghosh-Dastidar, U. u., & Liou-Mark, J. j. (2014). Bridging Pathways through research and leadership forunderrepresented students in STEM. Mathematics & Co mputer Education, 48(3), 214-2263. Graham, E. (2013). The Experiences of Minority Doctoral Students at Elite Research Institutions. New DirectionsFor Higher Education, 2013
challenges requires iteration and planning, skills that are germaneto the engineering design process but difficult to teach. These rapidly deployable prototypingactivities embrace active learning while also providing valuable hands-on experience with theengineering design process.Bibliography[1] ABET, "ABET Accredition Requirements," [Online]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016- 2017/. [Accessed 26 1 2016].[2] J. S. e. a. Lamancusa, "2006 Bernard M. Gordon Prize Lecture*: The Learning Factory: Industry‐Partnered Active Learning.," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 5-11, 2008.[3] D. Knight, L. Carlson and J. Sullivan, "Staying in
, Washington, 2013.[5] K. D. Purcell, "5 Ways to Get Girls into STEM," Edutopia-George Lucas Educational Foundation, 2015.[6] Girl Scout Research Institute, "Generation STEM: What Girls Say about Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math," Girl Scouts of the USA, New York, NY, 2012.[7] G. M. Faitar and S. L. Faitar, "Teachers’ Influence on Students' Science Career Choices," American International Journal of Social Science, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 10-16, July 2013.[8] S. Flynn, "Brain Blasts," 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.fit2bsmart.com/brain-blasts.php. [Accessed 30 January 2016].[9] R. Pica, Early Elementary Children Moving and Learning: A Physical Education Curriculum, St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press, 2014, p. 8.[10] Phoenix Contact
. Page 26.826.4The class will act as a consulting group representing various interests: the community, the city ofGoodyear and the state of Phoenix. The City of Goodyear has strategic action plan found in thislink: http://www.goodyearaz.gov/government/city-manager-s-office/strategic-plan-goals whichcan be used a starting point.The class will be divided into three groups to advocate for three sectors: community citizens, cityadministrators and state officials. The groups will represent the transportation needs, plans andbudgets of their representative sector. Using a brainstorming visualization map (suggestion:Power Point Smart Art Graphics) brainstorm the elements of your group’s vision statement forthe City of Goodyear, Arizona. This vision
Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross‐Institutional Study. Journal of Engineering Education 2004;93(4):313-320.11. Ahuja S. Math Remediation in A First Semester Engineering Technology Course. 2006.12. Bamforth SE, Robinson CL, Croft T, Crawford A. Retention and progression of engineering students with diverse mathematical backgrounds. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications 2007;26(4):156-166.13. Beanland DG. Challenges and Opportunities Facing the Education of Engineers-Address to Victoria Division of Engineers Australia Seg Meeting. Melbourne; 2010.14. Craig TS. Conceptions of mathematics and student identity: implications for engineering education. International Journal of Mathematical
University, 1992. 5) Baird R.J., Contemporary Industrial Teaching, Goodheart-Willcox publisher, 1972.Clicker 6) Bugeja M., "Classroom Clickers and the Cost of Technology," The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(15) 1D5, 2008. 7) Kay R.H. and LeSage Ann, "Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature," Computers & Education, 53(3), 2009, pp. 819-827. 8) Keller C., Finkestein N., Perkins K., Pollock S., Turpen C., and Dubson M., "Research-based practices for effective clicker use," Proceedings, Physics Education Research Conference, 2007, pp. 128-131. 9) Yourstone S.A, Kraye H.S., and Albaum G., "Classroom Questioning with Immediate Electronic Response
separated are coded A (Achievers), S (SupportSeekers), P (Purpose Seekers) and P&S (Purpose & Support Seekers). The overall JMP analysisis shown in Figure 6. It is important to note that previous iterations of the regression utilized afull factorial method and generated biased results and very weak correlations for all but the two- Page 26.1142.8dimensional and single variables shown below. The results below were achieved after reducingthe regressed variables by eliminating the three-dimensional analysis and the cross of timing andlevel. Neither of these two analyses provided explanatory value. Summary of Fit RSquare
Engineering Concepts to Harness Future Innovators and Technologists) project. Professor Harriger’s current interests include application development, outreach to K-12 to interest more students to pursue computing careers, applying IT skills to innovating fitness tools, and wearable computing.Dr. Gloria Childress Townsend, DePauw University Gloria Townsend, Professor of Computer Science, has taught at DePauw University for thirty-four years. She was the PI for both NSF-BPC project, the Grace Hopper Regional Consortium, and NSF-S-STEM project, Julian Scholars. Gloria is a member of ACM-W’s Women’s Council, where she founded the concept of small celebrations for women in computing and where she now serves as project leader