. 2, pp. 226–239, 2021, doi: 10.1080/09687599.2020.1730159.[6] Alison Hillman and Gerard Quinn, “Justice for all Q&A: A Different Approach toDisability,” Open Society Foundations Voices, 2021. Accessed: Aug. 9, 2021. [Online].Available: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/q-and-a-a-different-approach-to-disability?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_080621&utm_content[7] D. Marks, “Models of disability,” Disabil. Rehabil., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 85–91, 1997, doi:10.3109/09638289709166831.[8] Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L., No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328, 1990.[9] D. Goodley, Dis/Ability Studies: Theorizing disablism and ableism, 1st ed. New York,NY: Routledge, 2014.[10] M
each breakout group, students would work in small groups (<15 students each) to hold deeper conversations about different elements of environmental injustice. ● Friday’s class period (10/30/2020) would consist of a guest presentation by two members of UCCO, followed by a 15-minute Q&A portion, where students could appreciate the perspective of a group leading in environmental activism. Topics would include environmental racism in Connecticut and Puerto Rico as well as the climate movement taking place on the university’s campus.Figure 1. Comparison of EJ week to the rest of the course Monday Wednesday Friday Average Week in the
’ explanations of suffering,” in Morality and Health, A. Brandt and P. Rozin, Eds. London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 119– 169.[28] H. C. Luegenbiehl and R. F. Clancy, Global engineering ethics. New York: Elsevier, 2017.[29] R. F. Clancy, “The development of a case-based course on global engineering ethics in China,” Int. J. Ethics Educ., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40889-020-00103-1.[30] P.-H. Wong, “Global Engineering Ethics,” in Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering, D. Michelfelder and N. Doorn, Eds. 2021.[31] Q. Zhu and B. Jesiek, “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 28252.[32] H. E. Canary, J. R
Mining Society, 2018.[22] A. Fortino, Q. Zhong, W. C. Huang, and R. Lowrance, “Application of text data mining to stem curriculum selection and development,” in 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). IEEE, 2019, p. 354––361.[23] S. Lunn, J. Zhu, and M. Ross, “Utilizing web scraping and natural language processing to better inform pedagogical practice,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2020, p. 1––9.[24] B. Rybarczyk, L. Lerea, P. K. Lund, D. Whittington, and L. Dykstra, “Postdoctoral training aligned with the academic professoriate,” Bioscience, vol. 61, no. 9, p. 699–705, 2011.[25] X. Su, “Postdoctoral training, departmental prestige and scientists’ research productivity,” J
look into the student writing samples. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S A Centrality of Military & Corporate 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 B Commitment to Problem Solving 0 6 3 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 5 1 2 20 0 6 0 2 C Narrow Technical Focus 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 D Persistence 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 E
students at their institutions,” Teach. Learn. Inq., vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.7.[8] J. H. Waldeck, V. O. Orrego, T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney, “Graduate student/faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end,” Commun. Q., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 93–109, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1080/01463379709370054.[9] W. Wright-Harp and P. A. Cole, “A Mentoring Model for Enhancing Success in Graduate Education,” Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord., vol. 35, no. Spring, pp. 4–16, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1044/cicsd_35_S_4.[10] N. A. of S. Medicine Engineering, and, P. and G. Affairs, B. on H. E. and Workforce, and C. on E. M. in STEMM, The Science of Effective Mentorship in
, pp. 1–7, 2013.[2] S. Provasnik, A. KewalRamani, M. McLaughlin Coleman, L. Gilbertson, W. Herring, and Q. Xie, “Status of Education in Rural America,” Washington, DC, 2007.[3] J. J. Versypt and A. N. Ford Versypt, “Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical En- gineering Undergraduate Enrollment in the States of Illinois and Kansas Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Enrollment in t,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[4] L. Zahedi, M. Ross, and J. Batten, “Pathways and Outcomes of Rural Students in Engineering," no. June 2019.[5] K. M. Ganss, “The college transition for
forward with their failures.” Another student alsocommented that it was important to realize that many have faced challenges. “Just learning ofothers' experiences really helps let me know that I am not alone in the hardships I face and haveto overcome.”Students were asked to suggest changes to improve the Epic Fail event. One student suggestedlengthening the event time. A number of others suggested providing more time for interactionthrough a Q and A session and time for a discussion or for sharing.DiscussionThe intent of this evaluation was to determine if the EPIC program is meeting its goals throughthe implementation of its three
-College and Pre-Professional Supports:CWIT’s Bookend Approach to Inclusive Excellence in Undergraduate Tech Education Presented by: Danyelle Tauryce Ireland, Ph.D. Cindy Greenwood, M.Ed. Erica D’Eramo, M.A. Kate O’Keefe, M.S.Ed. 2 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Pre-College Programs a. Impact b. Lessons Learned 3. Pre-Professional Programs a. Impact b. Lessons Learned 4. Future Directions 5. Adapting the Model 6. Where to Start 7. Q&AThe Center for Women in Technology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore Countyhas a 21 year record of working to enable success
accomplished through partnerships with community colleges, high schools, and the internal and external University community. Listed are a few initiatives that were implemented this year to increase female enrollment: Counselors recommended 50 females students that were unsure of career plans from High Point Andrews and T. Wingate High School for a tour of the School of Technology, followed by an overview of our programs. We then had leading female students in their respective majors host a Q/A session. Our exit survey showed that the tour and overview stimulated interest in 51 percent of the females who had not been interested in Technology
in the book, and some requested moreguided journaling assignments. Overall, the lesson learned is programs that build upon texts orother “homework” must be carefully designed to provide utility for students who may not beable to complete the “assigned” tasks.Balance Information and CommunityOften, co-curricular programs are either highly structured (i.e., lectures with Q&A, guestspeakers) or very informal (i.e., coffee hours). While both approaches can be successful, theycan also stifle enthusiastic students or frighten away shy ones. In the “Lean In” discussions, themost successful sessions struck an even balance between formal professional developmentactivities—videos, structured discussion, information sharing—and open discussion
46.8 40 30 20 15.4 11.2 10 7.1 7.8 7.1 7.1 6.0 4.5 6.5 2.6 3.0 1.9 3.0 2.6 0.9 0.9 1.9 1.9 2.2 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.0 0 Critical Q Expert Conseq popular Position Cause Correlat Bias Analogy commit induct Deduct exam
development the design project for the capstone course) to meet with the instructor and officers from the office of alumni engagement, with a dynamic of fast Q&A sessions as described in Figure 4. These meetings are scheduled in the last week of classes (before the week of finals) in one class session, where one group attends the meeting (15-20 minutes) while the other groups keep working on the final report of technical project.The first three editions of the project were included as a regular (mandatory) component of thecourse. However, more recently, the Department has been reviewing the curricular load forstudents, in response to some criticism of potential excessive demand for students’ independentwork