that many students’ passions (humanitarian work, justice, andenvironmental topics) directly relate to engineering and that their institutions can improve bymaking those connections. Our project differs slightly in that our effort is not to integrate theirpassions into their engineering coursework but to find ways of igniting their curiosity and passionin their liberal arts general education.Education is an endeavor in instrumentalism at the individual level (career attainment) and liberationat the societal level (ideological exploration). Liberty, freedom, and intellectual agility are commongoods requiring sound judgment; sound judgment requires breadth of understanding and curiosity.This work attempts to understand curiosity among first-year
the aspectsthat make broadening participation initiatives effective as well as to identify persistent barriers totheir successes. This requires exploration of complex systems tools and methods andconsideration of the theories explaining the systems where these problems are located.This full research paper describes the ongoing data collection stage of a larger project evaluatingthe effectiveness of the NSF-ADVANCE program as an exemplary broadening participationinitiative. As the ADVANCE program has now supported more than one-hundred US institutionwith the goal of expanding women representation in STEM careers, it offers a uniqueopportunity to explore the intricacies of enacting positive change for gender equity withinexisting complex
of the difficult series of math courses required for an engineering degree and thenegative impact it has on underserved populations of students, this work-in-progress researchbegins to explore the effects of math courses on students who do not enter collegiate engineeringprograms with the traditionally expected math readiness. This case study narrative inquiryhighlights trends for this type of student during year one – when retention is the lowest - as partof a larger study that will follow students through their entire collegiate career. While“traditional” engineering students come into most engineering programs ready to start mathcoursework at the calculus level, some students who elect to pursue an engineering degree do nothave the test
recognitioncommensurate with such achievements and contributions [1], [2]. However, this belief is oftenoverly idealized and may not always reflect the complexities of reality, as it fails to fully accountfor the barriers, biases, and inequalities that impact who succeeds and how recognition isdistributed. [3], [4], [5]. For many, in particular women and underrepresented and minoritized(URM) students, the STEM space—the early stages of pursuing an engineering degree or later intheir professional careers—frequently experience overt sexism, gender bias, racism,discrimination, stereotyping, and isolation [4], [6], [7].National concern and acknowledgment of barriers faced by women in STEM is longstanding andwell-documented [1], [3], [8], [9]. According to the
to the case study capstone course represent an apprenticeship-style learningexperience historically associated with construction trades. Thus, the relevance of this study tothe civil engineering community applies to both academics and professionals as the measuredoutcomes due to changes made in the case study capstone course represent “real-world” early-career impacts on students and their employers. Senior capstone is an excellent forum to measurethe effects of course changes since most students in this program enter the workforce almostimmediately after the completion of the capstone, thus providing some control to the experiment.Provisional conclusions from the measured outcomes include improved student experience inCIF surveys, improved
paper examines the incremental impacts of a pre-college STEM outreach program usingthree longitudinal surveys – opening, mid-program, and end-of-program surveys. Findingsdemonstrate how students’ self-evaluations and perspectives on STEM college education changeover time while attending a summer program, which will help educators and outreach projectdirectors better design and implement such programs. National Summer Transportation Institute (NSTI) is one of the Federal HighwayAdministration’s (FHWA) educational initiatives. It is to “promote the Science, Technology,Engineering and Math (STEM) disciplines in transportation-education and career opportunitiesamong middle and high school students, including at-risk youth.” [7] The NSTI
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025How Engineering Faculty Define and Value the Impact of University ServiceAbstractThis research paper presents the results from a survey meant to help define and understand whatservice at the university level is and how it is valued among engineering faculty across multipleinstitutions. Service at the university level is often poorly defined and undervalued, contributingto inequities in workload distribution and limiting faculty career progression and satisfaction.Additionally, this study seeks to identify suggestions for reward systems that offset servicecommitments such as extending the tenure clock, salary enhancements, and awards formeaningful service.A Qualtrics survey conducted in the summer of
benefits of producingstudents who are better-informed at decision making as they launch their careers or embark onadvanced study, to the more subtle benefits such as enhanced STEM graduation rates for someunder-represented minorities [3], and improved motivation, confidence, academic performance,and self-management skills [4]. Graduate students often serve as mentors to undergraduatesengaged in research, which can enhance access to mentorship while providing undergraduateswith a more peer-like mentoring experience [5]. For a faculty member directing research,engaging their graduate students in research with undergraduates offers the graduate studentsexperience and training that can better inform and equip them as they make decisions aboutwhether
Villanova University. Justin is passionate about teaching the fundamentals of chemical engineering in an engaging manner while also developing new courses that introduce students to the evolving biotechnology industry. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work-In-Progress: Developing a project-focused synthetic biology elective course to prepare chemical engineering students for careers in biotechAbstractChemical engineering graduates are increasingly entering biotechnology fields due to thepromise of biotechnology to offer cutting edge and sustainable solutions to world problems aswell as its inherent connection to chemical engineering principles. Novel
committed to helping individuals advance their careers, business, academic pursuits, and personal growth through project management principles, tools, and techniques. She believes project management is a lifestyle. Her research explores the intersection of project management with business, engineering and STEM, social sciences, and family and consumer sciences. Beyond academia, she actively contributes to the project management community through event planning and mentoring aspiring project practitioners, volunteering to support STEM initiatives for the youth, and passionate about helping those in need.Oguzhan Oruc, The Citadel Dr. Oguzhan Oruc received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from Istanbul
development, K-12 outreach workshops, onlinetrainings, and in-person training sessions (i.e., bootcamps). The K-12 outreach workshops aretargeted at inspiring young students to pursue further learning and potential careers in METAL.The Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 curriculum is targeted to a broad audience from young adultsthrough “gray” adults with increasing level number corresponding to more job/ industry specifictrainings and the study of more advanced technologies and research topics. The overall targetedaudience for the METAL program is said to be “K to Gray.” Table 1. Primary contributions to the METAL program by partner organizations. Organization Contribution IACMI program
medium groups andorganizations), and macro (encompassing broader systemic and institutional environments). Eachecosystem level provides different types of resources and assistance, with support across alllevels often necessary for women to flourish in engineering environments. As a result, someresearch effort, though still limited, has begun to focus on the contextual support systems forwomen engineering interns [13], [15].The most frequently discussed form of support for women is interpersonal interactions, usuallycoming from teammates and supervisors, with mentorship receiving the most attention inresearch. For example, mentors in cooperative education programs provided both social supportand career-related support to engineering interns, and
sought to share effective strategies for introducing bioengineering concepts tostudents with minimal exposure to engineering and life sciences while growing the studentsʼconfidence and interest in STEM. By providing enriching workshops aligned with the core8th-grade curriculum, this series aimed to increase student understanding and confidence inscientific experimentation, potentially influencing future educational and career interests inSTEM. In summary, our objectives included: 1. To assess changes in confidence and interest in STEM topics among students before and after participation in the workshop series, 2. To measure student comprehension and retention of bioengineering and biology principles taught through workshops
Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Brian Mercer is a Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley, in 2016 and subsequently worked as a research engineer at the Illinois Applied Research Institute before turning to a career in teaching and education in 2018. His technical expertise lies in computational and theoretical solid mechanics, and he teaches a range of courses in these topics, including introductory solid mechanics, machine component design, computational mechanics, and finite element analysis. Brian’s pedagogical research efforts focus on developing and implementing effective
the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine(NASEM) mentorship in STEMM focuses on research development (career support) andpsychosocial support (psychological and social development) [4]. Despite this description ofwhat STEMM mentoring relationships should entail, some mentors do not consider thepsychosocial support of graduate students their responsibility [16]. This lack of engagement inpsychosocial support can influence the self-awareness of the mentor and the mentee, which tendsto show up in the form of (mis)communication between the mentor and mentee. Studies havefound that faculty tend to react negatively to students who attempt to address their mental health,and faculty are less likely to initiate conversations about
and the workforce: the context of climate, cultures, policies,and procedures of organizations and person-based attributes like interest, abilities, and self-confidence.The recognition of this disparity and the pursuit of effective strategies for recruiting, retaining,and promoting women in engineering – both in academic and professional contexts – are notrecent endeavors. Groups formed to devote resources and energy towards tackling the issue.These include the Society of Women Engineers founded in 1950 [9], whose mission is broadly toempower women to achieve their full potential in careers as engineers and leaders, and the non-profit WEPAN, originally the Women in Engineering Program Advocates and now the Womenin Engineering Proactive Network
framework developed for this program; this is the fourth paperin the sequence. With this paper, the authors hope to share the implementation of the assessmentprocess and assessment results from the first four years of the program as the first cohort graduatedrecently. The authors also hope to share the best practices as the team prepares for the readinessreview.IntroductionABET Accreditation offers guidance for collegiate programs to meet essential standards necessaryto prepare graduates for successful careers in STEM fields. Employers recognize the importanceof the robust assessment process for the ABET-accredited programs and trust that the graduatesare prepared for the industry standards and are capable of meeting expectations. Since
isseen as overly burdensome or if there are other political or personal objections to completing thegovernment forms, potential scholarship applicants are being missed due to low FAFSAcompletion. This issue will require further inquiry and research to determine a strategy toincrease student applications.Multi-Layered MentoringResearchers have found that a multi-layered mentoring approach provides students access todiverse avenues of support, where tier of mentoring plays a vital role in helping mentees navigatetheir undergraduate education and future career spaces [4]. Discipline experts (including facultyand industry mentors) provide field-specific details, student peers (such as upper divisionstudents in the program) help to provide a
STEM fields. Theseprograms used hands-on activities, cultural storytelling, and exposure to STEM professionals to inspireinterest in engineering careers. Degen et al. (2022) highlighted the importance of first-generation studentprograms like SD-FIRST, which provided targeted support for students facing financial and culturalbarriers in higher education. Huang et al. (2015) highlighted the importance of addressing accessibilitybarriers in instructional materials to ensure that all students can participate fully in STEM programs.Benning et al. (2014) and Kellogg (2014) described similar approaches to creating inclusive classroomsby fostering intercultural competency and cognitive diversity. Targeted outreach programs focusing on STEAM
comparing their design team based capstone to previous design experiences, studentswere asked to rate a set of statements on a five-point Likert scale, with 5 meaning the student wascompletely true and 1 being completely false. Results from these questions are given in Table2.Table 2: Student Comparison of Capstone based on Design Team to Previous Design Experiences Statement Average Rating The capstone was more difficult than previous design experiences. 3.45 The capstone was more interesting than previous design experiences. 4.36 The capstone provided more realistic design experiences. 4.09 The capstone provided better career preparation
plausible [1]. While the nuclear industryhas long sought to increase its workforce, the United States’ recent commitment to triple itsnuclear capacity by 2050 has intensified this need [2]. National Labs and the private sector alikeseek employees with nuclear and nuclear-related expertise, even as student and public interestremains somewhat lower than other engineering disciplines and careers [2]. At the same time, thenuclear community continues to seek a diverse workforce, knowing that diversity improves workquality and innovation across project teams and organizations. Nuclear engineering as adiscipline has also committed to, in recent years, rectifying injustices of the past, whereminoritized communities were taken advantage of
the importance of hands-on learning experiences,undergraduate engagement with STEM research is becoming more common [1], [2].Undergraduate researchers are often able to contribute to journal publications and conferencepresentations, benefitting both the undergraduate student, their research group, and their mentors.These experiences allow undergraduates to explore their interests to determine which researchfield is most interesting to them, and they provide an effective learning experience to applypractical skills for future careers [1]. Additionally, students who spend more time doing researchduring their undergraduate careers are more likely to be accepted into graduate programs andcontinue onto careers in science [3].However, the pressures
problem-solving.A key innovation is the use of AI-driven modeling tools alongside open educational resources(OER), eliminating financial barriers from costly textbooks and software. Students publish theirsimulations on the Mathematica Demonstrations platform, gaining professional feedback andexperience with scholarly publication. The course structure promotes engagement, teamwork,and equity, ensuring all students—particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds—actively participate and build confidence in both experimental and computational research.Preliminary results suggest improvements in student performance, engagement, andpreparedness for careers involving AI and data-driven engineering. In particular the cohortshowed a statistically
Paper ID #47572Exploring the Discipline-Based Identities of LGBTQ Students in STEMDr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ undergraduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration from Seattle University, and a B.S. in general
the percentage of students who graduate within four years of starting high school. • Extended Graduation Rates: Includes five-year and six-year graduation rates to account for students who take longer to complete their education.3. English Language Proficiency • Progress of English Learners: Evaluates the improvement in English language proficiency for students identified as English learners.4. College, Career, and Military Readiness (CCMR) • College Readiness: Measures the percentage of students meeting college readiness benchmarks on standardized tests like SAT, ACT, or Texas Success Initiative (TSI) assessments. • Career Readiness: Assesses the percentage of students earning industry-recognized
Miranda et al. (2021), who cohort of engineering students, aiming to uncover note that while AI tools can enhance personalized shortcomings in current educational methods and to learning experiences and adapt educational content to the suggest improvements. The findings are expected to contribute to the ongoing discussion on enhancing changing needs of the industry, they also require new engineering education, ensuring students are well-prepared pedagogical strategies to ensure they are used with essential AI skills and ethical insight for their appropriately. professional careers
growing phenomenon ofreflects the challenge in preparing students for a career in industry. scientists and humanities in academia working separately and In 2023, the Technology Management faculty at the struggling to collaborate, which he called the “two cultures.”University of Bridgeport created an Industry Advisory Board [5] In his argument, he says this phenomenon will lead to lessconsisting of regional executives from large corporations. This innovation in society as well as hindering the problem-solvinggroup reiterated the concept of communication breakdowns, in capabilities of any organization. Snow concluded his lecture bythis case between engineers and business professionals
Events (Paint n Sip, Therapy Dogs, BINGO night, and Table Talk Slime Night) - Career Fair Prep Workshop - Affinity Networking Reception for Career Fair Spring 2024, WIT events became more popular and better-attended with direct student-led programming. The E-Board coordinated and executed the following social events paired with General Meetings: Professional Development Workshop with Society of Professional Hispanic Engineers (SHPE) Unconventional Game Night Social Event with Queer in STEM (qSTEM) Trivia Night Social Event with Computing Organization for Multicultural Students (COMS) 4 Additional Social Events (Paint n Sip, Therapy Dogs, BINGO night, and Table Talk Slime Night) Career Fair Prep Workshop Affinity Networking Reception for
College of Education and the University of Michigan’s Marsal Family School of Education. His research focuses on college education issues associated with racially minoritized students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Fostering Tomorrow's STEM Entrepreneurs: Insights from an Innovative STEM Program Promoting Equity-Centered EntrepreneurshipABSTRACT:The representation of Black students in STEM entrepreneurship remains disproportionately low,with only 2% of Black recipients of science and engineering PhDs in 2017 pursuingentrepreneurial careers. This disparity is compounded by systemic barriers faced by entrepreneursof color, including limited access to entrepreneurship
. Post-Survey Open Ended Questions 1. How would you define social marketing? 2. Please explain how you see the principles of social marketing discussed in this class applying to your future studies/careers. 3. What did you enjoy the most about this course? 4. What would you remove from this course?Results & DiscussionThis study examined student learning outcomes in a research methods course based in socialmarketing during the Fall 2024 semester. During this semester a total of 12 students at a junior,senior, or graduate level participated in the course. A pre- and post-survey format allowed thestudents to self-assess their understanding of the eight course learning objectives using a five-point Likert scale. Pre