Paper ID #19225The Development and Evaluation of Expert Witness Role Play Instruction forTeaching Engineering EthicsMs. Alison J. Kerr, University of Tulsa Alison Kerr is a graduate student at The University of Tulsa. She is pursuing a doctoral degree in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Her research interests include training development and evaluation as explored across a variety of academic disciplines and organizational settings. She is currently assist- ing on a number of training projects aimed at developing engineering students on relevant non-technical professional skills including ethical practice and
a study looking at the perceptions of and experienceswith academic integrity that students bring with them post K-12, at the start of theirundergraduate engineering careers. It also provides a foundation to help track the evolution ofstudents’ perceptions of academic dishonesty as they progress through their studies.IntroductionEngineering work is performed within the context of a code of ethics. Codes of ethics are sharedby the different engineering professional societies, such as the American Society of CivilEngineers1, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers2, and the National Society ofProfessional Engineers3, among others. It is therefore important to ensure that engineeringstudents are being prepared to act within the
Services Practice. Prof. James left Huron in 2016 to become one of the Principals of the Maine Regulatory, Training, and Ethics Center (MeRTEC) and Coordinator of Student, Industry, & International Partnerships at the University of Southern Maine where he now also teaches Business & Legal Ethics and has been developing new courses which will form the basis of their graduate certificate in regulatory compliance and ethics.Mr. Alexander Curry Smith, University of Southern Maine Graduate Assistant at the University of Southern Maine pursuing an MBA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Strategically Integrating Environmental and Human Components Into
Paper ID #19477Ethically Informed Intellectuals or Responsible Professionals? A Compara-tive Study of Engineering Ethics Education in China and the United StatesDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Xiaofeng Tang is a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Prof. Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University 2015-Present Professor, Institute of China’s Science,Technology and Education Strategy, Zhejiang Uni- versity Associate director of Research Center on Science and Education Development Strategy
Accrediting Engineering Programs (CAEP), for example, guides programs onprogram educational objectives, student outcomes, assessment of these outcomes, and thenprocess improvement/evaluation determining how well the program addresses these criteria.2 TheStudent Outcomes a-k have almost universally been adopted by engineering departments tocharacterize their programs without modification, usually to simplify the accreditation process.Outcome f, an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, is typically satisfied by acourse on ethics, often taught outside the department and from a non-engineering perspective.Outcome h, the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental and
novel treatment methods for emerging contaminants, and the development of systems and methods to sustainably treat water and wastewater.Kristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kristin Boudreau is Paris Fletcher Distinguished Professor of Humanities at Worcester Polytechnic In- stitute, where she also serves as Head of the Department of Humanities and Arts. Her training is in nineteenth-century literature, but for the past 8 years she has taught engineering ethics, first-year en- gineering courses, and humanities for engineers. She has also worked with students and colleagues to develop role-playing games teaching engineering within its complex humanistic context. NOTE: this paper has co-authors.Glenn
was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Debra S. Fuentes, Brigham Young University Debra S. Fuentes is a doctoral student at Brigham Young University in Educational Inquiry, Measurement, and Evaluation specializing in Mathematics Education. She received a Master’s degree in Curriculum and Instruction emphasizing English as a Second Language, and a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, minoring in
Paper ID #19709Investigating the Contextual and Shifting Nature of Ethics within Engineer-ing Design Teams across TimeDavid Torres, Purdue University David is a third year doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University pursuing a PhD in Organizational Communication with a minor in data analysis and research methodol- ogy. His research interests reside at the intersection of organizational communication, identity, design, and organizational ethics.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering
ethics, technology and societywhere an entanglement of complex moral issues required a fresh insight into how toaddress the concerns of competing parties in a way that is mutually satisfactory to all.Students were given scenarios in which they were assigned different roles and were toldthat tough decisions had to be made. Those that did not have the spirit of accommodationwere uncomfortable but, faced with the prospect of getting entrapped in an even biggermoral dilemma, they ended up seeking a reasonable outcome. Students rated the coursevery highly and commended its attempt to find realistic and coherent ways towardresolving moral problems.Tags: Moral dilemma, dispute resolution, creative middle way, rational thinking.1. IntroductionFaced with
Paper ID #26367Short Story Writing Requirement for Enhanced Biomedical Engineering Ed-ucation and for Engineering Ethics Competitions — Ethical Twists and CostAssessment RequiredDr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University Director, Center for Rehabilitation Engineering, Science and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Pro- fessor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Short Story Writing Requirement for
Paper ID #26859Statistical Analysis and Report on Scale Validation Results for the Engineer-ing Ethical Reasoning Instrument (EERI)Peter Wesley Odom, Purdue University - Department of Engineering Education Wesley is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His primary research interests surround assessment technologies, the psychology of student learning of STEM subjects, ethics, and international community development.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of
practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Mr. David ZhaoAlexandra Danielle Kulich, Tufts UniversityMs. Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder Madeline Polmear is a PhD candidate in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural En- gineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research interests include ethics education and the societal impacts of engineering and technology.Dr. Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc. Dr. Canney conducts research focused on engineering education, specifically the development
Paper ID #25655The Moral Foundations of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary In-vestigationDr. Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute Rockwell F. Clancy is an Associate Teaching Professor in engineering ethics and philosophy at the Uni- versity of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute, Research Fellow in the Institute of Social Cognitive and Behavioral Science at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and has acted as a long-term educational consultant, setting up a course and writing a corresponding textbook with Heinz Luegen- biehl, entitled Global
Paper ID #31173A Simulation for Exploring Ethical Situations that Arise fromConflicting Product GoalsProf. Allen R. White, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Allen White is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Chemistry at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and an Adjunct Professor of Chemistry at Indiana University, Bloomington. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Simulation System for Exploring Ethical Situations that Arise from Conflicting Engineering Team Goals Allen R. White
Paper ID #30620Assessment of the Impact of Civil Engineering Design Problems forPromoting Ethical DecisionsDr. Jagadish Torlapati, Rowan University Dr. Jagadish Torlapati is currently a Lecturer at the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Rowan University in Glassboro. His primary areas of interest are environmental and water resources engineering. Prior to his role at Rowan University, he was a post-doctoral researcher at New Jersey Institute of Technology where he worked on Exxon Valdez and BP oil spills.Dr. Sarah K. Bauer, Rowan University Dr. Sarah Bauer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil
Institute, studying the intersections of engineering cultures, peace and ethics, educational power structures, and the experiences of disabled, queer, and trans engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Ethics Education as Enculturation: Student learning of personal, social, and professional responsibilityIntroductionThis paper explores how engineering students understand the meaning and role of ethics withintheir own life experiences, the context of their education, and their projections of professionalpractice. While the majority of work in engineering ethics educational research seeks toimplement and assess new educational activities, approaches, or paradigms, this
Paper ID #22991Exploring the Relationship Between Ethical Awareness and Personality Traitsof Undergraduate Engineering StudentsMr. Samuel Aaron Snyder, Virginia Tech Sam Snyder is a first year Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received his Bachelors of Science in Materials Science and Engineering in 2017 from Virginia Tech. His current research interests are in engineering ethics education and exploring the relationship between empathy and ethical decision-making. ´ Virginia TechIndhira Mar´ıa Hasbun, Indhira Maria Hasbun is a Ph.D. student and Graduate
Paper ID #21419Faculty Perceptions of Challenges to Educating Engineering and ComputingStudents About Ethics and Societal ImpactsMs. Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder Madeline Polmear is a PhD student in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural En- gineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research interests include ethics education and societal impacts of engineering and technology.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural
Paper ID #22853A Longitudinal Study of Social and Ethical Responsibility Among Under-graduate Engineering Students: Comparing Baseline and Midpoint SurveyResultsMs. Shiloh M. James Howland, Brigham Young University Shiloh M. James Howland is a doctoral student at Brigham Young University in Educational Inquiry, Measurement, and Evaluation. She received a master’s degree in instructional psychology and technol- ogy as well as a bachelor’s degree and master’s degree in geology. Her current research interests are in educational assessment and evaluation.Dr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is
Paper ID #23042A Midwestern Ghost Town: Times Beach, MissouriDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud retired as a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Tech- nology, where she has taught for nearly four decades. She has been a member of ASEE for 32 years and is active in the Engineering Ethics Division, as past chair, and the Engineering Technology Division, as the current program chair. She is an ASEE fellow (2008), winner of the McGraw Award (2010), winner of the Berger Award (2013), and serves as the communications editor of the Journal of Engineering Tech
Paper ID #21794An Introduction to the Integrated Community-Engaged Learning and Ethi-cal Reflection Framework (I-CELER)Mr. Grant A. Fore, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Grant Fore is a Research Associate in the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute (SEIRI) at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. As a SEIRI staff member, Grant is involved in research development, qualitative and mixed methods research, and programmatic assessment and evalu- ation. His research interests include ethics and equity in STEM education, the intersubjective experience of the instructor/student
significant research projects investigating musculoskeletal injuries in the workplace, assistive technologies for persons with disabilities, adaptive technology development, robotics and human-system interactions c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integrating Product-Safety Curriculum to Enhance Design and Reinforce Engineering EthicsAbstractThe National Society of Professional Engineers’ (NSPE) Code of Ethics for Engineers has, as itsfirst Fundamental Canon, the admonition: Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of thepublic. Despite recognizing and accepting this, the majority of today’s engineering students aregiven little guidance on safety. Product
Paper ID #23163Learner Types: A Means to Expand the Definition of Diversity and to Re-design Ethics ModulesDr. Rider W Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster for the Center for
mixed messages about the importance of professional licensure.In the Civil Engineering department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, professionallicensure and/or significant engineering design experience for faculty is traditionally highlyvalued. ABET requires that design courses be taught by faculty who are professional engineers, orwho have qualification by degree and experience. This paper discusses the ethics of teachingtechnical content without licensure from the perspective of senior practicing civil engineers, andthrough personal reflection. This paper also shows initial survey data of the percent of faculty withprofessional licensure.To discern the ethics of licensure among faculty and whether or not faculty licensure plays a
Paper ID #22995Tools to Assist with Collection and Analysis of Ethical Reflections of Engi-neering StudentsDr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University Roman Taraban is Professor in the Department of Psychological Sciences at Texas Tech University. He received his Ph.D. in cognitive psychology from Carnegie Mellon University. His interests are in how undergraduate students learn, and especially, in critical thinking and how students draw meaningful con- nections in traditional college content materials.Dr. William M. Marcy PE, Texas Tech University Professor and Director of the Murdough Center for Engineering Professionalism and
Paper ID #22409Creating Faculty Buy-in for Ethics-across-the-curriculum: Year One of De-veloping an Ethics Curriculum in an Undergraduate Biological EngineeringProgramDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Jeffrey M. Catchmark, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Jeffrey Catchmark is currently Professor of Agricultural and
Paper ID #19507Building a Community of Ethics Educators in Graduate Engineering Pro-grams: Developing an Ethics Workshop Following a User-Oriented ApproachDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Xiaofeng Tang is a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Eduardo Mendieta, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Eduardo Mendieta is professor of philosophy and acting director of the Rock Ethics Institute at Penn State UniversityDr. Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State
Paper ID #17874Challenges and Opportunities: Faculty Views on the State of MacroethicalEducation in EngineeringDr. Nathan E. Canney, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an emphasis on structural
engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective peda- gogies for ethical reasoning and engineering design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 WIP: Crossing the line - When does testing with human subjects in engineering capstone design projects require IRB oversight?IntroductionEngineering design projects in undergraduate capstone courses are increasing in sophisticationand real-world relevance every year. More complex projects with real customer needs requiresignificantly more advanced testing for design verification and validation that often will involvehuman subjects, especially for medically related devices. Currently there is limited policyinformation
representations of the ease-to-act responses comparing theUS self and peer ratings on one plot and the German self and peer ratings on the second plot. Themedian ease-to-act value is noted by the square. The box represents interquartile range. The 95%confidence notch interval is indicated on both data sets with an x marker.The difference between the self and peer ratings are not nearly as striking in the Germancomparison (Figure 7) as in the US comparison (Figure 8). Fourteen of the 19 are statisticallydifferent for the German respondents. The typical German respondent places their own ethicalcompass much nearer to their peers than the US respondents, who report that their peers are farless ethical than they are. The overall higher ratings for the German