and an implementation plan. The students, throughout this process,work with the community in designing the project to ensure that the solution is appropriate forthe community and accepted by all. Before the implementation trip, students are trained in thenecessary construction and implementation skills. Once the team is ready, a team of seven to tenstudents returns to the country to work with the community to construct and complete theproject. Even after the project has been completed, Rice-EWB regularly returns to thecommunity to maintain ties and to work on improvements and other projects in the area. In addition to project team activities, Rice-EWB holds periodic training sessions for allmembers to teach skills that will be needed to
classroom foruse by sophomore level students. This involved the following steps. First, students were askedto focus on just one of the five business units and in particular analyze only one product to findout whether it was a good candidate for growing the company’s gross profits. The Personal Carebusiness unit was chosen since it was felt that the products were easily understandable to non-engineering students. The possibility of selecting the Super 120 Noage Lotion for funding wasconsidered. Next, the case was shortened for use in the class and the following scenario wascreated. Ms. Baldwin met with each of her assistants to layout plans for the data analysis andresulting report that she would then present to the CEO in the next retreat
their college experience. Throughclassroom activities and individual performance coaching, students and their instructorswill explore academic and social success strategies that can help each student get themost of their RIT experience. This course is designed to enhance the student's knowledgeof themselves, how they interact with others, and how they affect and are affected by thecampus community/environment.The mission of the First Year Enrichment (FYE) Program is to empower first-yearstudents to realize their academic, professional, and personal potential. FYE will providea curricular plan through coaching and instruction that guides students in becomingindependent members of the college community in order to facilitate their academic
for five years as a MechanicalEngineering Program Chair. This past year the first author became a Department Chair at a newuniversity. As department chair he has responsibility to mentor new faculty, and as a newprofessor, he was also on the receiving end of an established mentoring program. The secondauthor moved to an endowed teaching chair after eight years of service as Program Chair andAcademic Director of multiple engineering programs at another university. The third author hasserved as a Department Head for a very large program. These new experiences of the first twoauthors will be integrated into the already developed activities to form an overall suggested plan
• Understanding of convergence, stability and response of systems • PID controllers and their tuning • Statistical process controlThe design task for the new course was to cover the above material adequately, within a15-week term, and to do so in a manner that that had flow and continuity. In addition,each section should relate in a logical way.To accommodate this material, we developed the course plan listed in Table 1. Incomparison to the more traditional course plan that we followed previously, this courserepresents a significant deviation, both in terms of content and emphasis. Page 11.1026.2 New Course Old
moderate to high complexity. (ii) Demonstrate an ability to work effectively in a multidisciplinary team. (iii) Demonstrate acquisition of new technology skills through use or development of appropriate computer hardware, software, and/or instrumentation. (iv) Demonstrate business and entrepreneurial skills which may include developing a business plan, market plan, venture plan, or other approved instrument. (v) Demonstrate effective use of project and personnel management techniques. (vi) Identify and meet customer needs. (vii) Integrate engineering professionalism, ethics, and the environmental in their work and as it relates to the context of engineering in society. (viii) Demonstrate
accreditation review and academic program assessment and design and manage outcomes assessment projects and studies on effects of college and university policies and administrative decisions.Eugene Deess, New Jersey Institute of Technology Perry Deess is the Director of Institutional research and Planning at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research interests include higher education program assessment, evaluating university performance, and the role of institutions in civic engagement. He is currently collaborating with researchers at the University of Washington and the University of Colorado on an NSF funded, nationwide study of civic engagement.Kamal Joshi, New Jersey Institute of
Technicians). TEST, Incorporated provides consultation, technical assistance, and applied research to business, industry, schools and universities, human service agencies, and foundations in the areas of program and performance evaluation, strategic and organizational planning, community relations, organizational and leadership development, diversity training, and human resource management, training, and assessment. She has provided services to over fifty client organizations and institutions over the past 20 years including the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, St. Joseph Mercy of Macomb Hospital, Leadership Macomb, The Troy Community Coalition, The Greater Battle Creek Substance Abuse Council, and
and integratedpresentation skills into course work for the engineering students. Northern EssexCommunity College worked with a number of the motor designs to explorealternative power generation connected with the wind blade design. The highschool teachers also worked on a variety of projects through out the year.The leadership team re convened in the spring to plan regional seminar series tobe hosted by each of the community colleges. The goal of these seminar serieswas to expand the number of teachers using contextual learning activitiescentered on the power and energy theme, to address theoretical topics. Each ofthe regions presented a slightly different training, though all offered the windblade design and ‘reverse engineering’ challenge
Construction Management, Master of Science in Project Management,and Master of Science in Human Development and Consumer Science. 1. The Master of Technology in Network CommunicationsThis program builds upon TAC-ABET-accredited baccalaureate degree programs in the fields ofcomputer, electronic or electrical engineering technology, and related fields. The programprovides an advanced knowledge of communication between and within computer networks,including data processing in the network environment, network operations software and operatingsystems, and communication systems. 2. The Master of Technology in Construction ManagementThe program provides an advanced knowledge of construction project planning and management,cost analysis and estimating
into doctoralprograms, the Bridge program provided a set of monetary supports for the student and his/herresearch as well as key psycho-social supports. The monetary support is utterly essential for theprogram. Most of NMSU’s students are considered “non-traditional” based on one—and oftenmore than one—of the defining features of “non-traditional” students (i.e., married, presence ofown children in the home, older than 22, and noncontinuous degree completion interspersed withwork in the paid labor force, etc.). As such, NMSU’s undergraduate students face significantchallenges in completing their undergraduate degrees in a timely manner. According to NMSU’sOffice of Institutional Research and Planning, only 43% of the 2,078 members of the
curriculum, including coverage ofconstruction science, planning, regulation, estimating, safety, project management, and business Page 11.456.5management. Special emphasis was placed on contrasting demolition and reconstructionactivities with new construction. The limitations of a single three-credit semester course preventan in-depth treatment of any major topic. Consequently this course concentrates on processes andactivities that are required by demolition or reconstruction that might not be encountered in newconstruction. Since these activities require coordination with existing project conditions ratherthan execution of construction plans and
Professional Education. Dr. Fry is a member of the Association of Teacher Educators (ATE), and serves on the organization's National Conference Planning Committee, and in 1996 received the ATE Distinguished Research in Teacher Education award. In addition, she co-edited Action in Teacher Education, a premiere journal in teacher education, from 2000-2003.Adrienne Redmond, Oklahoma State University ADRIENNE REDMOND earned her B.S. in Elementary Education from Oklahoma State University in 2000 and her M.A. in Curriculum and Instruction from the University of Phoenix in 2003. She is currently working on her Ph.D. in Professional Educational Studies at Oklahoma State University. Adrienne Redmond
kinds. My primary effort is in teaching, butequally important is support of infrastructure. If I wish to have an activity count as RAT, it isimportant that the University sanction the performance of work. For example, if I am electedfaculty representative to the University Board of Trustees, then the institution will expect me toattend all meetings of the board and my assigned committees. In planning I should count the timeas RAT. But there is a legitimate standing rule that teaching comes first. This means that if inperforming Board duties I strike a conflict with my teaching responsibilities, I must find a way tofulfill both. Also, the University acting through the Dean or the Provost should assist me inresolving the conflict. For workload
significant projects in civil,electrical/computer, and mechanical engineering. The remaining lectures covered many of theprevious general topics such as problem solving, ethics, and careers.The revised course dealt with one of the weaknesses of the original course, but still included thelarge lectures. Faculty did not like to give these lectures since it was very hard to connect withthe students in a large lecture hall. Students did not like to attend the classes, and it was veryeasy to go to sleep in them. Furthermore, the perception of the students was that the course waseasy and that engineering was not going to challenge them as much as their math or physicscourses. Based upon these concerns, a major course evaluation was planned for the 2004
, process testing, facility layout and location, material handling system design. Management and Simulation Systems - 309/311 Cherry Hall Manufacturing Processes and Resource planning, scheduling and control systems, supply chain management, teach Systems - 206 Cherry Hall using simulation exercises, case studies and
consolidated their thoughts andapplication ideas into a personal career development action plan report that was submitted as afinal individual project. In addition to the written report, students were asked to submit, indigital form, a presentation communicating why a workplace decision maker should considerthem as a candidate for a leadership position. This presentation was to become a part of apersonal web-site.Assessment Results and DiscussionIn Fall 2004, an extensive assessment of the first iteration of the course was conducted in orderto make improvements to the syllabus before the course was offered in Spring 2005. Theexperimental group consisted of 24 students. The following data was collected: • pre-course and post-course attitude survey
. The video created from this storyboard can beviewed on the Mindworks web site: www.webs1.uidaho.edu/ele/mindworks.The entire process took about one week as an extra-curricular homework assignment. Studentsworked in teams of two, spending 1½ - 2 hours per day on video design and developmentactivities. This involved extensive interaction with graduate student mentors and professionalstaff members. Needs analysis and topic selection was conducted by graduate student mentors,faculty, and professional staff in planning the course. Student teams selected topics of personalinterest. Design specifications were approved 1-2 days after author teams received theirassignments. Background research, skill development, creation of quick references, and
Mining 1.277 - - - - 227 359and EnergyMinistry of Agrarian - 352 358 36 - - -DevelopmentMin. of Development,Industry and Foreign - - - - - - 161TradeMinistry of Sports and - - - - - - 584TourismMinistry of Planning,Budget and - 3.358 15.543 - - - -ManagementMinistry of Labor and - - 69
2006-2285: INTEGRATING ETHICS INTO A CIVIL ENGINEERING COURSEChristy Jeon, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAdjo Amekudzi, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 11.784.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Integrating Ethics into a Civil Engineering CourseAbstractEthics is a critical component of Civil Engineering education and practice. This paper discussesa case study to integrate ethics into a required undergraduate Civil Engineering course -- CivilEngineering Systems -- at Georgia Institute of Technology. The course introduces systems andsustainability concepts in Civil Engineering planning, design, operations, and renewal, and thuspresents an
. sent a purchasingcommission to U.S. shipyards. A deal was quickly reached, but then all progress came to a stop.To the commissioners’ dismay, their ship plans proved meaningless to American engineers,workers, and managers. The entire set of drawings had to be redrafted and hundreds of additionaldrawings were needed before work could begin on building the ships that would help save thewar for Britain. Explain. Second, in ABET criteria 3a-3k, the ability to apply math and science while understandingprofessional responsibility is first of the eleven criteria, while understanding of ethics is sixth andunderstanding of global, societal, environmental and economic issues is eighth. In contrast, inthe eight criteria established by JABEE, the
Templates Fig. 18. Plan layout of the plaster pour Fig.19. Folded paper mock up for the prior to being folded to make the mold. formwork and the final structure. Page 11.1303.8Fig. 20. Failed plaster pour Fig. 21. Failed plaster pour Page 11.1303.9 Figs. 22 -23 Plaster pours using Styrofoam moldsIn the second exercise, “Part Two – Aggregated Castings – Pre-cast Concrete”, students wereasked to research the relationship between pre-cast concrete construction units, methods of theirassembly, and a range of volumes which such
11.1037.7 o Licensing Committee of CAP^3• The committee regularly updated its draft Accreditation Master Plan to incorporate those changes needed in response to a changing environment. The Accreditation Master Plan lays out in detail how the committee will work to publish approved criteria in the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC)/ABET document titled Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs (effective for evaluations conducted during the 2008-2009 accreditation cycle) that fulfill the formal educational requirements for entry into the professional practice of civil engineering (i.e., licensure) as specified in the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century.• The committee conducted a
designing a streamlined, manageable, and assessable curriculum that allows instructors Page 11.1316.3to honor their content expertise while serving a diverse student population. By separatingknowledge of a professional into four main curriculums or parallels, the PCM helps frame theinstructional strategies so instructors can select the most appropriate ones for the objectives. Byaligning the knowledge, skills, and dispositions of the engineering professional across four maincurriculums or parallels, PCM helps the instructor to identify and select essential curricularcomponents to design and plan a comprehensive curriculum.Section 2 grounds the
deposition bydiffusion, interception and impaction. The sections on interaction of particles with turbulence and turbulent depositionthat are normally taught in the second course. Computational modeling of turbulentflows was discussed, and classical models of turbulent deposition were described. Inaddition the process of aerosol charging and transport under the action of electrical forcesand turbulence were discussed. We have added a number of computational modules to make the coursepresentations of the materials more interactive. The plan is to have sufficient number ofcalculation modules for the student to experiment with. As a result the student willdevelop a physical understanding of some of the more complex concepts.Module II
they do generate healthy profits for the company.Your team has been asked to prepare a 3-5 page white paper presenting the relevant backgroundand issues from the perspective of your functional group. In addition, your team shouldsummarize relevant strategy and planning issues related to the given scenario. Each team willmake a 10 minute presentation to the CEO and to the other Vice-Presidents on March 17th, 2005.You can (and should) communicate with the other functional teams to ensure consistency and toshare information.In a subsequent offering of CHE 395, the students were allowed to select their own technicaltopic and prepare a 15-page paper and 15-minute oral presentation on their topic.Connecting in the Senior Year: CHE 450 CHE 450
Libraries for LightWater Reactor Calculations (PANTEX) Page 11.1318.5MCNP Critical Benchmarks for Mixed Oxide Lattices of the Saxton Plutonium Program(PANTEX)ConclusionThrough careful planning, recruitment and pursuing funding opportunities we have beenable to attract well qualified students who have worked at interns at the national labsand/or have secured employment, while employees at the national labs have been able topursue advanced degrees through our distance learning program.Biographic InformationDr. Steven Biegalski is an Assistant Professor in the Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Program. Hespecializes in the fields of nuclear instrumentation, neutron
factor analysis and confirmatory factor on a large survey sample to reduce theinstrument and identify the factor structure are in press elsewhere.1 Our earlier published workdescribed the importance of assessing teamwork in the engineering classroom and the challengesit represents and laid out the ambitious assessment plan that would help develop an instrumentthat is easy to use and yet meaningful for both faculty and students, 2 described and demonstratedthe benefit of a behaviorally anchored rating system,3 detailed the process of creating a newbehaviorally anchored rating scale to simplify administration, data analysis, and reporting, andmake feedback more understandable.4 This paper shows how the behaviorally anchored ratingscales are
, including designing and starting up aresearch program and getting it funded, attracting and managing graduate students, finding andworking with appropriate faculty or industrial collaborators, planning courses and deliveringthem effectively, writing assignments and tests that are both rigorous and fair, dealing withclassroom management problems and cheating and students with a bewildering assortment ofacademic and personal problems, doing what it takes to learn about and integrate into the campusculture, and finding the time to do all that and still have a life. Figuring out how to do all these things is not trivial. Robert Boice studied the careerdevelopment of new faculty members and found that most of them take between four and fiveyears