collectiondevelopment goals will be to grow our electronic collections.The New Science and Engineering Building Our university is a new campus, relative to many universities in the state. However, it isgrowing rapidly, especially in the sciences. In the last five years, our university opened twomulti-disciplinary science and engineering buildings. The newest building, the AppliedEngineering and Technology Building, opened for occupancy in Fall 2009 and officially inSpring 2010; our library opened few months later, in May. In the original plans for the building, a laboratory space was built where our library isnow. The architects and builders outfitted the room with various lab specifications, including aneye-wash station, a multitude of power
methodology. The coretopics are assessed through theoretical questions including true/false questions, shortanswers, and algorithm simulations. Table 2 shows the comparison of student scores oncore topics in Fall 2008 and Fall 2010 course offerings, respectively. From the table, theimprovement on student scores is tremendous. The D&F rate has dropped from 50% to21%. Even though with the limited number of samples we cannot simply conclude thatthe practice-oriented approach is the mere contributor to this improvement, without anydoubt, the hands-on experiments do help students digest the core theoretical data miningconcepts. In future, we plan to develop a detailed assessment rubric to evaluate theeffectiveness of course delivery systematically
servicedevelopment, testing and alternative energy product certifications with an emphasis on theelectrical and electronic systems. The SES program helps prepare you to take the Alternative-Energy Integrator Certification examinations offered by the Electronics Technicians Association,International.” The SES degree program sequence plan is provided in Table 1. The certification componentof the program description is explained in the next section.Table 1. SES program sequence plan.2. Designing a curriculum for assessment The faculty agreed unanimously the new program should not be designed for installers, butrather designers who possess a great breadth of knowledge that embellishes their expertise inelectronics. It was also decided that external
Electrical orComputer Engineering) or a Biomedical Sciences minor (through Mechanical Engineering) 1;both options offer students an opportunity to take coursework and some laboratory work in thebiomedical area well into their plan of study. Implementing a full scale biomedical engineeringprogram is not feasible without significant additional recourses or an affiliated medical school.There is little opportunity to work in a laboratory setting on projects related to biomedicalengineering in the first year of study, as is the case for most if not all engineering programs.Engineering faculty met with faculty from the Department of Nursing while pursuingopportunities for undergraduate student research projects and, together, an undergraduateresearch and
plan that would help determine the extent to which thistechnology was changing the nature of teaching and learning. The plan was designed incollaboration with representatives from the School of Education at Virginia Tech.Conceptual FrameworkThe assessment approach tied to this initiative is informed by best practices and includesthe fundamental qualities of a comprehensive assessment program, including the idea thatthe evaluation, reporting, and use of results are an ongoing, cyclical process. This processis intended to be a transparent, public process involving many different stakeholders andit is designed to understand and improve student learning. The methodology uses asystematic process to collect and analyze data. Results are then used to
skills and how to assess them. Shuman et al suggest thatstudents be able to • Demonstrate Reading, Writing, Listening, and Speaking Skills • Demonstrate an Awareness of What Needs to be Learned • Follow a Learning Plan • Identify, Retrieve, and Organize Information • Demonstrate Critical Thinking Skills • Reflect on One’s Own Understanding iiiShuman’s outcomes correlate well iv with the ACRL Information Literacy standards for Science andTechnology, which briefly are • Determine the extent of information needed • Access the needed information effectively and efficiently • Evaluate information and its sources critically • Incorporate selected information into one’s knowledge base
Intelligence and Design Informatics (CInDI) Laboratory and the Product Development and System Engineering Consortium (PDSEC). Dr. Kim’s research focuses on assembly design; collaborative product development; computational intelli- gence and informatics for product design and development; sustainable and renewable energy product design; and design and manufacturing of soft products. Dr. Kim has received over $5.9M by external funding from several U.S. federal agencies including NSF, NIDRR, and Department of Energy, the Ko- rean Ministry of Knowledge Economy, and industries including Ford and GM. Currently, Dr. Kim is a planning site director for the NSF Industry and University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) for e
learning gains promisingly. We are continuing the developmentand plan to apply the system to other local institutions for biomedical or other engineeringstudents.IntroductionBiomedical engineering (BME) education, a part of STEM, has developed as an interdisciplinaryengineering training area in the last 30 years. Based on the current ASEE College Profiles12,BME undergraduate enrollment has become one of the most rapidly growing engineering majors(Figure 1 left panel).Figure 1 Left panel: BME undergraduate enrollment has been monotonically increasing from1999 to 2009 and has exceeded 20,000. Right panel: The difference between the number of BMEprograms and the number of online medical imaging teaching materials indicates a potentialdevelopment area
. In response, we have developed a yet broader first year experience encompassinga pair of two unit courses, one each in fall and spring. In the first, professionaldevelopment topics are followed by creation of an independent, ten page researchproposal. The second, spring semester effort requires the student, in consultation withher new advisor, to develop a NSF length proposal for the prospective PhD effort, andpresent it to her nascent PhD committee and course instructor. Additionally, earlierengagement with the PhD committee is now achieved through a January, second yearoral report to the PhD committee. The customary university Preliminary Exam occurs atthe beginning of year three, and includes both a document (progress and plans) and
categories of devices: 1. Mobile Phones – Students can respond to questions posed by the instructors using text messages, also known as the short messaging service or SMS. To respond, students simply text their answer to a 5-digit short code (i.e. a shortened telephone number) with their desired response. It should be noted that most students have text messaging plans and do not incur extra charges. Actual data regarding the number of students with text messaging plans was collected in an introductory course and detailed further in §5. 2. iPhone/iPod/iPad and Android Smartphones – Many student possess high-powered mobile devices ranging from smartphones to iPods. The MPS provides an installable application
the semester so that in class activities, homework and exams can be provided to students at the right time. This provided the students a tentative schedule so that they can plan their other activities accordingly. 3. Clear and Concise grading guidelines were prepared to grade homework and exams. Thought was put into coming up with the grading guidelines such that students get more points for showing higher level of understanding. 4. Detailed grading rubric was created for the project. 5. Students were encouraged to post on discussion boards. 6. An outline for the exams was created after a thorough analysis of the topics that need to be
of Xeragen, Inc., a San Luis Obispo-based biotechnology startup company. He has also served as an Assistant Professor at Milwaukee School of Engineering and was employed by McDonnell Douglas Space Systems Company, where he was a lead engineer and Principal Investigator on projects to develop technology evolution plans for the Space Station.Daniel W. Walsh, California Polytechnic State University Daniel Walsh is currently a Professor of Biomedical and General Engineering, and a Professor of Materials Engineering at the College of Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his B.S. (Biomedical Engineering) , M.S. (Biomedical Engineering) and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering
Joint Regional Fall Conference Planning Committee Member CIC/McNair SROP 2008 National Conference Planning Committee National Consortium for Graduate Degrees for Minorities in Engineering and Science, Inc. (GEM) University Representative, 2007-Present Advancing Minorities Interest in Engineering (AMIE) Membership Committee, 2007-Present Institu- tional Service Staff Adviser, National Society of Black Engineers, Michigan State University Chapter, 2006-Present Staff Adviser, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Michigan State University Chap- ter, 2008-2009 MSU Pre-College Committee, 2006-2009 MSU IDEA Coordinators, 2007-PresentKyle P. Foster, Diversity Programs Office, College of Engineering, Michigan State
. In response, we have developed a yet broader first year experience encompassinga pair of two unit courses, one each in fall and spring. In the first, professionaldevelopment topics are followed by creation of an independent, ten page researchproposal. The second, spring semester effort requires the student, in consultation withher new advisor, to develop a NSF length proposal for the prospective PhD effort, andpresent it to her nascent PhD committee and course instructor. Additionally, earlierengagement with the PhD committee is now achieved through a January, second yearoral report to the PhD committee. The customary university Preliminary Exam occurs atthe beginning of year three, and includes both a document (progress and plans) and
Mobile GIS and GPS software. Additionally, thiscourse provides students with the opportunity to plan and implement field surveys in a teamenvironment, as well as perform laboratory-based geospatial data analysis on informationcollected in the field. The course emphasizes the integration of geospatial technologies for fieldsurveys. Topics include: • Principles of Global Positioning Systems (40%) • Data accuracy requirements (10%) • Mobile GIS software (10%) • Field mapping planning and implementation (20%) • Location-based services and asset tracking (20%)Educational and career outcomes • Students will be able to describe the principles of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) location measurement • Students will be
extent ofknowledge, readiness, and comfort level of science teachers in teaching engineering andtechnology innovation.An extensive literature search was also conducted on pre-existing science experiment orlaboratory kits produced by other universities and published as peer-reviewed research, as wellas websites that sell products for science teachers in high school.ResultsThe response rate was 40% out of the total questionnaires distributed, with 90% of the responsesreceived online. In addition, 90% of the respondents were from schools outside of St. John’s, thecapital city of NL. Sixty-two (62%) percent of the respondents were male; 38% were female.Of all respondents, 71% indicated that they were aware of at least one student who had plans
for significant innovation at the interfaces between disciplines.By understanding expert mental models of innovation, engineering students can be prepared withboth specific skills for early career contributions to innovation, as well as insights into key leversfor the overall innovation system. By teaching these insights, educators may influence ongoing,self-directed education throughout an engineer’s career, enhancing the value creation frominnovation education.We are continuing the analysis to build a composite mental model that fully represents the tenexpert interviews, and are also planning more interviews. Moving forward, we plan tocomplement the insights from innovation experts with those from educators as well as students.References
Prior to this effort either thesources for senior sources for student department or students paid for thedesign projects over past 3 parts required in the projects. years Over the past 3 years our efforts have led to funding from both the Air Force and the Navy for senior design projects.VIII. Conclusions and Plans for Future WorkBased on the results presented here, the authors conclude that the use of SDR in senior designprovides many benefits. It provides a platform that
and set up a competitive lab. There are manyapproaches and innovative ideas to accomplish such a task [5, 6]. While some lab developmentcan be supported by substantial grants [7-9], things can easily become very disappointing whenstartup funds are unavailable to support the faculty’s research plans. The task of setting up a labmay often be vital, as research results in the lab and publications can provide additional grantproposal ideas for external funding, which can promote new research at higher levels.Nevertheless, solutions can sometimes be found [1, 6, 10]. This article discusses the plan and the Page 22.489.2decisions made in designing
. In 2007, electricity purchasedfrom the local utility company accounted for 74% of the campus energy usage. Since theuniversity does not have direct control over which fuel is being used to provide this neededelectricity and since Congress is currently debating “Cap and Trade” legislation, it behooves theuniversity to take a serious look at its energy conservation practices. Recommendations to the university administration include the following: (1) line-itemthe energy cost to students as a part of their bills, (2) increase the rate of replacing olderequipment with high-efficiency units, (3) develop a plan for becoming carbon-neutral by aspecified date in the future, and (4) sponsor a project which integrates environmental, business
. Page 22.599.2ABET, Inc., has been the recognized accreditor for college and university programs in appliedscience, computing, engineering, and technology for more than 75 years. Among the purposes ofABET, Inc. (ABET) are two that relate to accreditation. ABET intends to 1) organize and carryout a comprehensive process of accreditation of pertinent programs leading to degrees, and assistacademic institutions in planning their educational programs, and 2) promote the intellectualdevelopment of those interested in applied science, computing, engineering, and technologyprofessions (ABET Policy, 2008). The Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) evaluatesand accredits individual degree programs with the word “engineering” in their title
specific topics such as chemistry and physics. Other includes ideas that did not follow acommon theme, some examples are know how to read floor plans, welding, and understandingmaterials. Page 22.601.7 Question 4 25 Percentage of Responses 20 15 10 5 0 Test
adultlearning theories of Knowles and Lawler, the experiential learning theory of Kolb, therecommendations of the Veterans’ Education for Engineering and Science workshop report, andthe recommendations developed from a case study completed by the University of KentuckyMilitary Veterans of America. The three focus areas of our approach are: 1) Recruitment andSupport Constructs, 2) Transition, and 3) Integration of Technical Experience. Recruitment andRetention strategies include development of “dummy proof” advertising and structuredcurriculum plans which incorporate BCTCblue+, a transfer/dual enrollment program betweenBCTC and UK that includes advising, guaranteed admission, UK courses at BCTC tuition rates,and more. This program offers pathways for
needed for America to compete in the diverse globaleconomy. This outreach effort has been designed and implemented with the aim of instillingan interest in computer science, engineering and entrepreneurship among the futureinnovators of America.LEAD-SEI’s three-week core curriculum consists of a team-based research project andcomputer science. These components allow groups to develop innovative solutions,products/prototypes, business plans and technology driven presentations to address real worldproblems; including the global challenges of the 21st century. In addition to theaforementioned, participants learn the scope of the different engineering fields fromUniversity professors and graduate students. Beyond discovering computer science
Engineering (CSE). Offered throughout the fall andspring semesters, EOE FIGs assist students with building a support network that includes peers,upper division students, faculty, and professional engineers. Each FIG consists of 20 to 25 firstyear engineering students, one FIG Academic Tutor, two FIG Engineering Peer Leaders, and oneFIG Facilitator. The participants in each FIG cohort share a class schedule that includes at leasttwo to four courses in common which are also applicable to their engineering degree plan. Oneof these courses is a small, one-hour weekly FIG seminar designed to help students get to knoweach other, improve study skills, and develop strategies for academic success. The weeklyseminar is hosted by EOE staff members and upper
current trends in local industries; (2)providing students with the course examples and experiential learning that help ensure studentreadiness to meet the needs of the industries in which they plan to become employed becausetheir instructors are engaged with the industries in which they plan to become employed; (3)helping the College equip labs with the latest materials and equipment needed to provide currentand relevant training with commitment and assistance from these same local industries; (4)receiving awards and discounts from manufacturers selling equipment to our local industries andour labs because we are training students in the same technologies our industries are using; (5)helping local industries save money by reducing their training
education including teaching with technology, assessing teaching and learningand teaching and learning through diversity. In addition, participants work on their teachingportfolios and develop a teaching-as-research project plan for later implementation. In line withthe CIRTL pillars, this program develops a short-term, but intensive, learning communityatmosphere while exposing participants to the teaching-as-research and learning-through-diversity concepts. Evaluation of the program indicates that it is very well-received byparticipants with 94% agreeing that they would recommend the institute to a friend. In addition,nearly 60% of participants agreed that they both understood how to develop a teaching portfolioand had outlined an effective
description languages, and only 40% of the four-year are planning tointroduce hardware description languages in the near future [3].Clearly, electrical engineering technology programs are far behind in teaching the skills thatrepresent current and future industry needs. As a result, the School of Technology is stepping upto this challenge by developing and introducing curriculum in hardware description languagesand programmable logic design. The major objectives of this curriculum shift are to give the Page 22.333.3students in the Electrical Engineering Technology program the opportunity to learn andexperience logic design using FPGA that is in line
objective analysis of the design process in a global context in order to enhance usability, influence perception, and increase appeal relative to cultural standards. At the conclusion of the RSAP travel abroad experience, students will be able to: identify and annunciate properly five basic phrases in the native language of the country visited demonstrate an ability to plan, execute, and lead three critical aspects of a study abroad visit evaluate their experiences in the study abroad program for improvement in key areas of leadership, communication and cultural awareness.The focus of this paper is on the steps
appropriate modifications in order to prepare the students for ethical issues they will face in their engineering practice. (2) The authors have been developing ethics modules that could be integrated into two undergraduate engineering courses: (1) transportation engineering and (2) intelligent transportation systems. (3) The authors plan to submit an NSF TUES grant for this effort.Bibliograpy Page 22.385.51.Gilbert, L. D. 1973. The changing work ethic and rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation, 39 (4).2.Miller, P. F. & Coady, W. T. (1989). Teaching the ethics of work. Vocational Education Journal, 64