and has presented over 30 scientific and technical papers at various professional conferences worldwide.Dr. Aaron Weir Kelstone EDUCATION Ed.D in Education, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, 2013 M.A. in English Literature Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, 2001 B.A. in English Literature Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1994 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Senior Lecturer, 2010 & Program Director of Performing Arts, NTID ,2011 RECENT PUBLICATIONS American Deaf Prose: 1980-2010: Gallaudet Deaf Literature Series, Vol. 1, ”Homecoming,” Gallaudet UP, April, 2012 Wordgathering: A Journal of Disability Poetry, ”Ruminations of a Cyborg,” (WWW.wordgathering.com) March, 2010 Vi- gnettes
. The Fall 2011 full-time enrollment (FTE) for both STEM and Non-STEM students was 20,466. Due to the non-traditional status of many of the students, an equation is employed to calculate full-time equivalents when defining FTE. Table 1 shows enrollment and graduation rates for STEM and non-STEM students. STEM students are defined as those that have enrolled in or taken Pre-Calculus and/or Principles of Chemistry. Table 1. Institutional enrollment, graduation, and transfer rates for STEM and non-STEM students entering 2011-2012. STEM Students Non-STEM Students TotalEnrollment (FTE) 4402 18702 20466Graduates 2013-2014 154 (3
. A singleCLO is a definitive statement that can be readily mapped to specific topics of the course materialand thus to problems derived from those concepts.Here is the catalog description, CLOs and SOs for this ME for EEs course: ENGR3334 Mechanical Systems - This course considers the fundamentals of mechanics including statics, dynamics, materials, thermodynamics and fluid mechanics and their application to systems of beams, pulleys, gear trains, levers exhibiting vibration, heat conduction, convection and expansion and fluid flow. Course Learning Objectives 1. Understand and apply the principles of statics in mechanics (SO A, E, K) 2. Understand and apply the principles of dynamics in
. The aim of these models is to highlight the differencebetween Computer Science and Programming, to show the relevance of Computer Science inrecent advances in various fields, and to inspire students to appreciate Computer Science andthe role of algorithms in our daily lives. The modules will cover various topics about the role ofCS in cyber warfare, understanding biology, electronic voting, etc. In subsequent work, thesemodules will be launched as part of a mixed methods study to determine their effectiveness ascompared to a control group not learning through these models and the impact of those moduleson the retention rates of Computer Science majors.1. IntroductionThe President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology’s (PCAST
rationing of water in certain locations due to a reliance upon the national reservoir system. Among those reservoirs which are actively used, the problem of excessive sediment deposits is becoming an increasingly critical focus forengineers [1], since these sediments reduce reservoir capacity, negatively impactreservoir functions, and may even pose safety hazards [2]. Globally, it is estimated that net reservoir storage has dramatically reduce due thefact that the rate of sedimentation (which has be estimated at 0.53% per year) exceedsthe pace of new storage construction [3], [4]. In Taiwan, about 90% of the annual rainfalloccurs during wet season, from May through October, with only 10% of rainfalloccurring during the rest of the year. This
question with a small but vocal minority indicating a desire for less businesscontent.1- IntroductionThe pedagogical goals, academic motivation and models of freshman engineering designexperiences are many. A survey paper1 lists eight models: reverse engineering; creatingsomething useful from a preset number of objects; full scale project; small scale projects; casestudies; competitions; non-profit project; and, redesign of a local project. The reader is invited toread Reference 1 for details.The last decade has witnessed a newfound emphasis on entrepreneurial engineering education,exemplified by efforts to develop engineering graduates with an entrepreneurial mindset2. Twoof the preeminent organizations advocating for changing the education
environment developed using the Open edX codebase. Virtualreality systems are becoming more frequently used in educational settings primarily because oftheir ability to provide visualization and interaction within an environment that closely resemblesa real-world setting. Both text-based and VR-based case studies were integrated into an onlinecourse on workplace safety. The online courses consisted of multiple short video-based lectureswith assessments after each. Using a between-subjects experimental design, 109 communitycollege students were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (1) an online course withintegrated case studies presented as text and images; (2) an online course with integrated casestudies presented as virtual reality content
understanding of fundamental scientific principles and lack of any formalinstruction in the science of quantum systems is what was intended for the “ScientificFoundations of Engineering” course in the Gordon Engineering Leadership Program atNortheastern University to address. But before going to Quantum Physics, we start with a quickreview of classical mechanics.Based on his more than 25 years of experience with K-12 science teacher professionaldevelopment and his knowledge of how to teach through preconceptions, the author decided togive the 1992 version of the FCI1 to the 34 students in his class of graduate engineering studentsin order to accomplish three goals: 1. Assess student prior knowledge by probing the level of understanding of these
tutorapplications were used as a supplement to conventional teaching material to allow a self-paced review.The concept tutors were tested in an experimental/control group setting. The quantitative andqualitative results obtained from surveys show that students find such materials useful in thelearning process. This work presents the development methodology of such tutors,implementation in class and the evaluation results.Keywords: Pedagogy (Didactics) of Higher Education, Knowledge Gain, EngineeringEducation Research, Course Construction, Computer Aided Learning1. Introduction: The advance in technology inspires the rise new teaching-learning methodologies inform of videoconferences, chats and blogs, podcasting [1], webcasting and webinars [1],video
conferences. Dr. Gong received 2014 NDSU Development Board of Trustee Endowment award and 2014 NDSU Centennial Endowment award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 WIECE: Women Undergraduates in Electrical and Computer Engineering Summer Research ProgramThe Women Undergraduates in Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECE) SummerResearch Program was an intensive eight-week research program for women undergraduates inElectrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). Our goal was to build distinctive experiences thatcan propel female undergraduate students to enter graduate school.1. Motivation.ECE is one of the largest engineering disciplines and it is also one of the oldest
. Thiswork categorizes 3D printed objects as students move through different evolutionary stages whilethey become more experienced and engaged with 3D printing technologies. The stages areaddressed in the following section.Five stages of 3D printing evolution In this work, the development of 3D printing knowledge and expertise is categorized infive evolutionary stages as shown in Table 1. Table 1. The five stages of 3D printing expertise evolution Stage Name Characteristic Stage 1 Familiarization Manufacturer supplied and web-based objects printed Stage 2 Design Student-designed (CAD) objects printed Stage 3 Extension Pre
2017. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Immerse Students in AI-Infused Cybersecurity Through Software Process1. IntroductionCyberspace and the Internet have become an integral part of every nation, such as cities andcoastlines. They serve as the backbone for today's economy because we perform all of our dailyactivities, including shopping and banking, on the Internet. [1]. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic,all organizations were compelled to transition online and must now adjust to the "always-on"environment to maintain connectivity with their consumers [2].The expansion of the Internet, the rapid growth of cyberspace, and the always-on world have allplayed a significant role in the remarkable
STEM/STEM adjacent major.IntroductionCourse-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) focus on creating an inclusiveresearch community for students and are excellent first-time research opportunities. Althoughclear definitions of CUREs vary, the elements they provide remain consistent. Women in STEMwho benefit from CUREs that are specifically designed for them participate in a first timetangible and quality research experience, engage in a collaborative learning environment,exercise scientific practices, and receive mentorship and support that address gender disparitiesin their various disciplines [1-3]. Strategies to increase gender diversity in STEM have beenemployed nationally over the years, with a focus on various collaborative
customized teaching approach, developing a unique curriculumsystem, organizational structure, and management framework. The program isdedicated to cultivating high-caliber interdisciplinary talents equipped withprofessional expertise, innovative capacity, leadership potential, and globalperspectives. By integrating practical training, it enhances students’ engineeringdesign capabilities, preparing them to contribute to major engineering andtechnological advancements.2.1 Program Features 1:Personalized Curriculum SystemThe Advanced Engineering Education Program emphasizes students' knowledge,design skills, and creativity, following the principles of Problem-Based Learning(PBL). It offers a personalized curriculum system combining required and
there were similar effortswithin academia, by using ASEE’s Peer paper depository system, employing multiple phrases.The phrase “rapid tooling” yielded 4636 entries, “rapid tool making” yielded 4139 entries,“direct rapid tooling” yielded 2910 entries, and finally “indirect rapid tooling” yielded 251entries. Most of these entries involved one of the keywords within the phrase, yet there were a lotof papers found focusing on rapid prototyping or use of 3D printing in product or system designand development, while some others employed 3D printing as a teaching tool. A very smallnumber of papers actually was centered on rapid tooling like the one by Hoekstra [1], but was notrelevant to workforce development. After these initial attempts, a new
identities inSTEM fields. LGBTQ students in STEM often face significant barriers, including unsupportiveand hostile environments, harmful biases, heteronormative STEM spaces, and marginalization,as well as a lack of understanding of their experiences both inside and outside the classroom [1-4]. These challenges make LGBTQ students less likely to be open about their identities withSTEM peers, which can negatively impact their sense of authenticity, belonging, and persistencein these fields [5]. Such barriers can hinder professional formation, as LGBTQ students maystruggle to reconcile their sexual or gender identities with the dominant norms and cultures ofSTEM disciplines, creating tensions and identity threats for these students navigating
, thermodynamics presents a practical challenge: it demands constantlookups of property values from massive data tables. Students and engineers must flip through © American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 2025 ASEE Annual ConferenceFigure 1 – A typical tabulated properties of a common substance in thermodynamics. The table is extractedfrom (Michael J Moran, 2010).these tables, find the right values, and then use them in detailed calculations. Even simple problemscan turn into lengthy processes as each new step requires another round of table lookups andnumber crunching.While there exist some commercial software such as EES (F-Chart Software, 2024), REFPROP(NIST, 2024), CoolProp (Ian H
,participants will be supported in designing course projects that make use of the smartmanufacturing facility. Ultimately, the series of seminar focuses on incorporating smartmanufacturing technologies and applications into undergraduate education. Finally, thispaper will present feedback and assess the effectiveness of the seminars from theparticipants' perspective.IntroductionThe rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to challenge andtransform the traditional manufacturing industry [1]. However, current engineeringtechnology curricula often struggle to keep pace with the needs of modern AItechnologies [2, 3]. In order to bridge this gap and prepare students for the future ofindustrial innovation, the School of Engineering
students to build broad professional abilities while considering a varietyof restrictions and designing applications that go beyond technical content understanding [1].Including framing engineering in a larger social perspective will also aid to retain students whoidentify as female or from other underrepresented minority groups, who have been proven to bemore sensitive to the link between engineering and enhancing people's life [2,3]. According toChristensen and Ernø-Kjølhede [4], the engineering education community globally values socio-technical thinking and capabilities. According to research on the benefits of incorporating socio-technical abilities into engineering courses, engineers must be deliberate and careful whiledeveloping solutions
performance [1]. High-achieving studentsdemonstrate self-regulated learning by consistently engaging with academic resources [2]. Inresponse, universities have expanded the variety of academic resources available to students andhave designed a variety of interventions to improve student resource engagement. For example,some interventions work to improve student understanding of the available resources by providingall students with regular advising sessions in first-year seminars [3] Others acknowledge the needfor support structures that connect to students’ identities [4].But personal [5], social [6], and institutional [7] barriers can influence student help-seekingbehaviors and hinder the effective use of academic resources. Past studies have
technological demands, thus ensuring thatstudents are better prepared for professional challenges upon graduation. UIC models includeguest lectures, field visits, internships, and industry-sponsored capstone projects, and researchsponsorships [1]. These partnerships are mutually beneficial, providing students with real-worldapplications of theoretical concepts and helping industries recruit and retain skilled engineers infields such as power and renewable energy.This paper builds on this premise by showcasing a successful example of UIC-drivenexperiential learning. At the heart of the 2024 Exploring Renewable Energy EngineeringSummer Camp held at George Mason University was a dynamic partnership between academiaand leading energy companies. Through
education to help overcome the common misconception that onlinelearning is a solitary, self-paced, non-instructor led activity [1], and it retains the social andparticipation aspects that are a key factor in the success of online learning [2]. The 2010 meta-analysis performed by the U.S. Department of Education [3] found that, on average, students inonline learning conditions performed modestly better than those receiving face-to-faceinstruction. Moreover, using the live interaction instruction possible with Zoom and BlackboardCollaborate could help address the Sloan-C quality elements including learning and costeffectiveness and institutional commitment, access, faculty and student satisfaction [4].IntroductionAlthough the successes and student
innovation to better prepare a diversepopulation of engineers capable of addressing the sociotechnical opportunities and challenges ofthe future [1]. Much of this conversation has traditionally centered on preparing engineeringstudents with both the technical and professional skills needed to tackle these sociotechnicalchallenges, particularly engineering leadership. However, this goal depends not only on how andwhat we teach students but also on the perceptions engineering faculty have of leadership andleadership development. In their roles, faculty shape curricular change, model professionalbehaviors, and influence department and institutional cultures. Yet, many faculty do not receiveformal leadership training and frequently learn through
developed SMET concentration under an EngineeringTechnology (ET) program.1. BackgroundSince the end of the last century, the manufacturing industry has been significantly evolving dueto the quick emergence of novel technologies and the increasing need for more flexible,sustainable, and efficient manufacturing methods [1]. The idea that traditional manufacturing hasgiven way to what is now called SM embodies this change. As can be seen in Figure 1, thenotion of smart industry is fundamentally about incorporating advanced technologies into theproduction process, including several automation, control, and robotic components [2][3]. All ofthese advanced manufacturing components help producers better meet the market's ever-changing demands while also
earlier stages asneeded to refine the review process (Borrego et al., 2014). To facilitate transparency and replicability, weinclude a summary table outlining the objectives and expected outcomes for each stage of the review. Thisframework serves as both a roadmap for our study and a resource for others conducting similar review. Table 1: Stages of ScLR Framework for Exploring Engineering Students’ STW Transition Stage Process Task per the Research Plan Define a clear focus on school-to-work transition experiences of 1 Identifying the research question undergraduate engineering students. Identifying relevant studies
experience and practical skills inthis critical area.IntroductionThe history of electric vehicles (EVs) dates to the early 19th century when inventors in Europeand the United States began experimenting with battery-powered transportation [1]. In the late1800s and early 1900s, EVs gained popularity, particularly in urban areas, due to their quietoperation and ease of use compared to gasoline-powered cars [2]. In that time, electric taxiswere used in cities like New York and London. However, the mass production of affordablegasoline vehicles, such as the Ford Model T, along with the expansion of fuel infrastructure, ledto the decline of EVs by the 1920s [3]. Interest in electric mobility resurged during the 1970s oilcrisis and again in the 1990s with
, inclusive culture” [1]. Although critical in any field of engineering, it is of utmostimportance that pavement engineers and decision makers come from diverse groups, consideringthe implications of their decisions. For example, a recent study of Massachusetts found thatEnvironmental Justice (EJ) communities, defined in Massachusetts as communities with lowincome, high minority population levels, and/or lower levels of English speaking, were found tobe more than twice as likely (21% compared to 10%) to live near roads rated to be in poorcondition, compared to non-EJ communities [2]. Considering these factors, it is crucial to ensurethat students from underrepresented groups have knowledge of the field of pavement engineeringand are encouraged to
the design of the experiment, its implementation, andpreliminary results from student feedback. Our findings suggest that this multifaceted, real-worldapplication of engineering principles significantly enhances student engagement andunderstanding of engineering concepts.1. IntroductionEngineering education confronts ongoing issues in attracting and maintaining students,particularly at the high school level, where many people acquire long-term impressions aboutpotential career pathways [1, 2]. This problem is especially acute in subjects such as Electricaland Computer Engineering (ECE) and Computer Science (CS), which are crucial for promotingtechnological innovation and addressing society's growing reliance on digital solutions [3
Development (EUFD) workshops to engineeringfaculty to support the development of entrepreneurial mindset in the faculty participants and theirstudents. EUFD workshops consist of 3 days of in-person engagement followed by a year ofcoaching and are focused on developing connections between participants andfacilitators/coaches and among participants themselves. In this project, we use a survey of EUFDparticipants to understand the role of connection in their workshop experience. Our researchquestions are: 1) How many others did participants have meaningful interactions with during theworkshops? And 2) What differences in number of meaningful interactions were there betweendifferent workshops?In our survey, participants selected who among their
power plant design.1 IntroductionNuclear power plant design requires cohorts of engineers trained in various aspects of reactortheory, thermal-hydraulic analysis, and power system stability. Several fields of study mustsynergize to effectively harness the power of the atom; yet most undergraduates are unfamiliarwith the fundamentals of atomic physics, radiation interaction, and basic reactor theory. Thus, alayered, hands-on simulation approach can provide confidence and foster proficiency in keyeducational topics across multiple disciplines.To this end, one can find several institutions whose organizational goals include the advancementof nuclear education and safety with simulation tools. The Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA)maintains a catalogue