physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Prof. Dominic J. Dal Bello, Allan Hancock College Dom Dal Bello is Professor of Engineering at Allan Hancock College (AHC), a California community col- lege between UC Santa Barbara and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. At AHC, he is Department Chair of Math- ematical Sciences, Faculty Advisor of MESA (the Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement Pro- gram), and Principal/Co-Principal Investigator of several National Science Foundation projects (S-STEM, LSAMP, IUSE). In ASEE, he is chair of the Two-Year College Division, and Vice-Chair/Community Col- leges of the Pacific Southwest Section. He received the Outstanding Teaching
?,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 22, no. 1, April 2000.[6] J. S. Coker et al., “Impacts of experiential learning depth and breadth on student outcomes,”Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5-23, 2017.[7] D. Galbraith and S. Mundal, “The potential power of internships and the impact on careerpreparation,” Research in Higher Education Journal, vol. 38, June 2020.[8] K. Gray, “Intern hiring projection jumps 22.6%, co-op hiring makes small gain,” NationalAssociation of Colleges and Employers (NACE), May 2022. [Online] Available:https://www.naceweb.org/job-market/internships/intern-hiring-projection-jumps-22-point-6-percent-co-op-hiring-makes-small-gain/?utm_source=college&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nace-insights
Students of Color pursuing STEM majors. Race Ethnicity and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2021.1997971[2] Kendricks, K., & Arment, A. (2011). Adopting a K-12 family model with undergraduate research to enhance STEM persistence and achievement in underrepresented minority students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(2), 22-27.[3] Rodriguez, S., Pilcher, A., & Garcia-Tellez, N. (2021). The influence of familismo on Latina student STEM identity development. Journal of Latinos and Education, 20(2), 177- 189.[4] Sweeder, R. D., Kursav, M. N., Valles, S. A. (2021). A cohort scholarship program, that reduces inequities in STEM retention. Journal of STEM Education, 22(1), 5-13.[5] Rincón, B. E
. Mueller-Alexander and H. J. Seaton, “Researching Native Americans: Tips on vocabulary, search strategies and internet resources.” Database, 17(2), 45, Apr. 1994.[2] A. Soto, A. B. H. Sanchez, J. M. Mueller-Alexander, and J. Martin. “Researching Native Americans: Reflections on Vocabulary, Search Strategies, and Technology.” Online Searcher, 45(5), 10–19, Sep./Oct. 2021.[3] D. Thomas, “Reflections on Inclusive Language and Indexing.” Key Words, 28(4), 14–18, Win. 2020.[4] D. Thomas, “Another Look in the Mirror: Correction to Reflections on Inclusive Language and Indexing.” Key Words, 29(2), 26, Sum. 2021.[5] S. Ullstrom, “Decolonizing the index.” Indexer, 34(3), 110–112, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.3828/indexer
their children in STEM activities and nuclear science programs. These activities haveresulted in deeper, sustained student engagement and understanding of mitigating factors that ourstudents face and need to be addressed to enhance a nuclear workforce pipeline at an HBCU.IntroductionIn the USA, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) continue to award a largeshare of bachelor's degrees to African American students in Science, Technology, Engineering,Arts and Mathematics (STEAM). HBCUs are also the baccalaureate origins of one-quarter toone-third of black science and engineering (S&E) doctorate recipients [1]. However, as shownby the National Science Foundation data [2] for college aged population (18-24 years), blackstudents
-level courses offered atregional campuses.References[1] Bonwell, C.C., and J. A. Eison, “Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom,”ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No.1, George Washington University, Washington, DC,1991.[2] Bormann, J. (2014). Affordances of flipped learning and its effects on student engagement andachievement, Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Iowa.[3] Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction onundergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.[4] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and
mean by it and how arewe preparing our students for it?,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings,Jun. 2017.[4] B. J. Ranger and A. Mantzavinou, “Design thinking in development engineering education: Acase study on creating prosthetic and assistive technologies for the developing world,”Development Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 166–174, 2018.[5] D. Nieusma, “Alternative design scholarship: Working Toward Appropriate Design,” DesignIssues, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 13–24, 2004.[6] B.K. Jesiek, N.T. Buswell, and Q. Zhu, “Global Engineering Competency: Assessment Toolsand Training Strategies,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Paper ID 21663, 2018.[7] D. Stone and S. Heen, Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving
Passive a, k, s a, k Type of instruction Interactive d, g, i, l, n, u i, l Type of instruction Constructive b, c, h, j, r, t b, j, rFor the actual course, Figure 2 shows the percentage in which, from the students’perspective, the instructor performed or asked them to do certain actions in class, such asdiscussing concepts with classmates and solving problems in groups, among others. For theideal course, students indicate the percentage in which they would like the actions to occuras part of the type of instruction. This is particularly important, since a semester has (onaverage) 30
Delgado, Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, (2010). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_working_papers/47. Accessed 19 Apr. 2021.[04] Winner, Langdon. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus, vol. 109, no. 1, 1980, pp. 121–136. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/20024652. Accessed 19 Apr. 2021.[05] Lord, S. M., & Olson, R., & Roberts, C. A., & Baillie, C., & Dalrymple, O. O., & Perry, L. A. (2020, June), Developing Changemaking Engineers – Year Five Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2—34427.[06] Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities. Editor Juan Lucena. Springer 2013. DOI 10.1007/978
cultural knowledge. • A necessary key to success is selecting a proper class variety to maximize students’ eligibility to apply. Classes offered abroad should be as many as possible to maximize the supply, but of course, each class has a cost and is bound by the availability of the instructor(s). An ideal compromise is 4-5 classes, to allow willing and fully eligible students to complete a full Spring semester of face-to-face learning abroad. At the same time, some of the interested students might not be attracted to all classes, so it is imperative to broaden the supply with available online courses. This would greatly increase the eligibility, interest, and applications to the program from multiple
time to explore on their own can be a key aspect of developing thesecompetencies. Beyond the travel component, we consider the academic aspect of these types ofprograms (i.e., courses associated with it) and also intentionally design learning activities thatallow students to obtain complementary learning gains to what they are experiencing by the factof being abroad. Including self-reflection as part of the assignments have proven to help withawareness.References[1] B. K. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. E. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global Engineering Competency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” p. 16, 2014.[2] L. A. Braskamp, D. C. Braskamp, K. C. Merrill, and M. Engberg, The Global Perspective Inventory (GPI): Its Purpose
Approaches for Neuroscience, Ethics, and Society, vol. 1, May 2014. [Online]. Available https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/node/3543.html.[2] P. R. Wolpe, “Neuroethics,” in Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd ed., vol. 4, S. G. Post, Ed. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2003, pp. 1894–1898.[3] A. Roskies, “Neuroethics,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2016 ed., E. N. Zalta, Ed. [Online]. Available https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/neuroethics/.[4] O. Müller and S. Rotter, “Neurotechnology: Current developments and ethical issues,” Front Syst Neurosci., vol 11, no. 93, December 13 2017. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00093.[5] R. Yuste et al., “Four ethical priorities for
-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.American Journal of Physics - AMER J PHYS. 66.[6] Springer, Leonard & Stanne, Mary & Donovan, Sam. (1999). Effects Of Small-GroupLearning On Undergraduates In Science, Mathematics, Engineering, And Technology: AMeta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. 69. 21-51.[7] Carlson, K.A., & Winquist, J.R. (2011). Evaluating an Active Learning Approach to TeachingIntroductory Statistics: A Classroom Workbook Approach. Journal of Statistics Education, 19.[8] Kvam, Paul. (2000). The Effect of Active Learning Methods on Student Retention inEngineering Statistics. American Statistician 54. 136-140.[9] F. S. Tsai et al., "From Boxes to bees: Active learning in
inenvironmental engineering, transportation engineering and physics department. The entire STEMtrainees reported that the analog devices used during the training session engaged and made themcurious fully in exploring and performing the experiments. The ECP team members became moreconfident in guiding their students to conduct home-based hands-on lab experiment safely andeffectively.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1915614. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References1. Despain, M. (2020). What does effective virtual training look like? Find
desde la perspectiva del estudiante. (Assessment of online courses from a student's perspective)," Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23-38, Jan. 2016. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412016000100002[2] S. Sundararajan and T. Heindel and B. Ganapathysubramanian and S. Subramaniam, “Women in Mechanical Engineering: A Departmental Effort to Improve Recruitment, Retention, and Engagement of Women Students,” 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--22240, 2012, pp. 25.1483.1 - 25.1483.15. https://www.jee.org/22240[3] E. P. Deess and K. Joshi and V. Briller and R. Calluori, Predicting Engineering
.[6] Hunt, J.M., Goodner, R.E., & Jay, A. (2019, October), Comparing Male and Female Student Responses on MIT Maker Survey: Understanding the Implications and Strategies for More Inclusive Spaces Paper presented at 2019 International Symposium on Academic Makerspace, New Haven, Connecticut.[7] Kilgore, D., & Sheppard, S., & Atman, C. J., & Chachra, D. (2011, June), Motivation Makes a Difference, but is there a Difference in Motivation? What Inspires Women and Men to Study Engineering? Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2–18816[8] Lewis, J. (2015). Barriers to Women’s Involvement in Hackspaces and Makerspaces. The Uni- versity of Sheffield.[9] Robinson, J., &
onnational rates of educational achievement and retention in STEM, especially for populationsunderrepresented in STEM. The National Science Board (NSB) reports that “About 18% ofrecent (2009–13) U.S. citizen and permanent resident S&E [Science and Engineering] doctorateholders reported earning some college credit from a community or 2-year college,” and thatincludes 32% of American Indian or Alaska Natives, 21.8% of Hispanics or Latinos, 18.1% ofBlacks or African Americans, and 21.5% of mixed race people. [16] Looking at those whoreceived science and engineering bachelor’s degrees between 2007 and 2011, the NSB reportedthat about 18% had associates degrees--which does not account for the students who transferredtheir community college credits
/hcp/non-us-settings/overview/index.html [Accessed March 6, 2021].[2] WHO, “Coronovirus,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/health- topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1 [Accessed March 1, 2021].[3] S., Parr, B. Wolshon, P. Murray-Tuite, and T. Lomax, "Multistate Assessment of Roadway Travel, Social Separation, and COVID-19 Cases," Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 147(5), 04021012. 2021.[4] J. Glanz, B. Carey, J. Holder, D. Watkins, J. Valentino-DeVries, R. Rojas, and L. Leatherby, "Where America didn't stay home even as the virus spread," The New York Times, April 2, 2020. Online. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/02/us/coronavirus-social
existing models; creativity is evident in the design User friendly: 0-10 The design takes into account that users may be young or old, tech-proficient or not so tech-proficient? Can design be used by the average person? Mission: 0-10 Relates to the mission of the non-profit organization/ stakeholders? Feasibility: 0-10 Is it realistic to implement (consider design, skills, timeline)? Additional feature(s) useful to the stakeholder: 0-20 Does the
of Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference. Montreal, Canada, 2020.[8] G. Hofstede, G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition. McGraw Hill Professional, 2010.[9] P. Sharma, “Measuring personal cultural orientations: scale development and validation,” J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 787–806, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11747-009- 0184-7.[10] K. S. Cortina, S. Arel, and J. P. Smith-Darden, “School Belonging in Different Cultures: The Effects of Individualism and Power Distance,” Front. Educ., vol. 2, 2017, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00056.[11] A. Alshahrani, “Power Distance and Individualism-Collectivism in EFL Learning Environment,” AWEJ, vol. 8
Outcomes Related to Lifelong Learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 28(3): p. 606-620.17. Borrego, M., J.E. Froyd, and T.S. Hall, Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(3): p. 185-207.18. Kirkpatrick, A., S. Danielson, and R.O. Warrington, Reduction to Practice. Mechanical Engineering, 2012. 134(11): p. 38-39.19. National Academies. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation. 2011; National Academies: Washington, D.C., 270 p. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/read/12984/chapter/1.20. Seymour, E. and N.M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving : why undergraduates
, 2011.[3] E. M. Duffy and M. M. Cooper, “Assessing TA buy-in to expectations and alignment of actual teaching practices in a transformed general chemistry laboratory course,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 189–208, 2020.[4] R. Tormey, C. Hardebolle, and S. Isaac, “The Teaching Toolkit: design of a one-day pedagogical workshop for engineering graduate teaching assistants,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 378–392, 2020.[5] T. Bourelle, “Preparing Graduate Students to Teach Online: Theoretical and Pedagogical Practices,” Writ. Progr. Adm., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 90–113, 2016.[6] F. Marbouti, K. J. Rodgers, H. Jung, A. Moon, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Factors that help and hinder teaching assistants
field? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 39–52.Journal of Engineering Education. (2006). Special Report - The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4). (October), 259–261.Hernandez, K. A. C., Chang, H., & Ngunjiri, F. W. (2017). Collaborative autoethnography as multivocal, relational, and democratic research: Opportunities, challenges, and aspirations. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 32(2), 251-254.Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2007). The practice of feminist in-depth interviewing. Feminist research practice: A primer, 111148, 111-138.Hughes, S. & Pennington, J. (2017). Autoethnography: introduction and overview. In Autoethnography (pp. 4-33
. Linger, “Plumbing the STEM Pipeline: Exploring Areas of Influence for Promoting STEM Education,” Hofstra University, United States -- New York, 2016.[3] K. Hamrick, “ Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering,” 08-Mar-2019. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/digest/field-of-degree-women#computer-sciences. [Accessed: 1/27/20].[4] M. Linger, “Plumbing the STEM Pipeline: Exploring Areas of Influence for Promoting STEM Education,” Hofstra University, United States -- New York, 2016.[5] M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer, and J. Coleman, “Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K–12 Students to Engineering Fields,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 144– 151,2010.[6
Section 2, the first step above (Establishing the Criteria) is also implemented in the control group, i.e. Section 1. II. List the Criteria in an Online Survey Following the class activity on Day 1, and using the list generated under task interdependence, the instructor creates a survey asking each student to self- identify their potential contribution to the project group, as well as their gender, race, and other aspects of their personality (e.g. collectivism vs. individualism, source(s) of motivation, view on engineering and social justice, etc.). In keeping with the spirit of Potosky and Duck [8], this survey should give
Challenges - 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering,” National Academy of Engineering. [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx. Accessed on: Jan. 28, 2020.[2] “NAE Grand Challenges Scholars Program,” National Academy of Engineering. [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx. Accessed on: Jan. 28, 2020.[3] A. Wood, S. Arslan, J. Barrett, S. Brownell, A.M. Herbert, M. Marshall, K. Oates, D. Spanagel, J. Winebrake, and Y. Zastavker. “Work in Progress: Transformation through Liberal Arts-Focused Grand Challenges Scholars Programs.” Proceedings from American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Tampa, FL, 2019. Available: http
specific nor necessarily • Curriculum that reflects and affirms problematic marginalised student histories and subjectivities • Connectionist transition pedagogy (Hockings et al. 2010) Source: Gale, T & Parker, S, Studies in Higher Education, 2014Although the voyage of Caroline was narrated fully in this paper, it is worth noting that the
prepared that the millennials before them,growing up bombarded with messaging that the world is a dangerous place and that they must takeprecautions as they navigate it [4]. For those working in higher education, assuming they know howto handle this new cohort because they have always worked with 18-to-22 year-olds is an outdatedarrogance that many institutions will not be able to afford as they compete for a dwindling number ofprospective students to fill incoming class quotas. Schools in the Northeast and Midwest in particularare bracing for an up to 15% decline in the typical college-going population by the mid 2020’s due todeclining birth rates following the 2008 recession, as well as shifting college-choice behavior [2] [12][13]. Today’s 18
. Horlin, J. Hutchison, J.A. Murray, L. Robson, M.K. Seery, J. MacKay, "Ten simple rules for supporting a temporary online pivot in higher education”, PLOS Computational Biology, October 1, 2020, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008242.[2] D. Schaffhauser, “Educators Feeling Stressed, Anxious, Overwhelmed and Capable”, The Journal: Transforming Education, June 6, 2020, Retrieved from https://thejournal.com/articles/2020/06/02/survey-teachers-feeling-stressed-anxious- overwhelmed-and-capable.aspx.[3] C. Cahill, S. Jackson, N. Summerall, K. Harruna, “Helping Career and Technical Education Programs Meet this Moment”, JFF, September 1, 2020, Retrieved from: https://www.jff.org/what-we-do/impact
help inform initiativesgeared towards broadening the participation of underrepresented minorities in STEM and makethe culture of engineering more inclusive for all students. By shifting the frame of engineeringwork towards one more aligned with the NEP, underrepresented minority students can feel moreconnected to the field of engineering and all students can be better prepared for the broader,global work of engineering work.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work collected and supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1635534 and 1635204. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science