, the results of the program will be discussed in detail,as the program has created tangible, measurable, and sustained results over a period of five yearsfor both students and faculty.Retention…and a bit of recruitment tooAccording to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) there are almost 4,000 degreegranting institutions in the US [7], with just over 18.5 million students enrolled in degree-granting postsecondary institutions as of 2021 [8]. Projections illustrate enrollment is notexpected to get back to the highs of 2010 and 2011 over the next ten years, and while projectionsfor the number of degree granting institutions are not provided by NCES, this number has beensteadily declining over the last ten years [7] [8]. These
context of their empirical experiences. Elaborate Tailored to extend learning, this phase involves more intricate or extensive project work. Students are encouraged to refine their solutions, incorporate advanced technologies, and consider the broader societal and environmental implications of their work. 3 Evaluate The evaluation phase transcends traditional assessment methods by incorporating peer reviews and reflective practices on the design process and final outcomes. This comprehensive assessment strategy focuses on both technical skills and the overall problem-solving methodology, highlighting the
Nadia Sahila is a dedicated doctoral student at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, specializing in research and evaluation in education. She holds a Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction and a Bachelor of Arts in Marketing and Management. Currently, Nadia is a graduate research assistant with the River Hawks Scholarship Academy and a teaching assistant for the Fulbright Teaching Excellence and Achievement program, as well as the Research, Academics, and Mentoring Pathways program. Her research interests focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly in educational settings. Recent projects have explored culturally responsive education and gender equity. Nadia has presented her research at
proposed that actualengineering examples and reporting of case-studies should be used. Similarly Gao [10] discussedthe Task-Based-Instruction and the Project-Based-Instruction pedagogies as learner-centeredapproaches to teach technical writing, the former being based on assigned writing tasks for eachlesson, typically to a student team, while the latter utilizes a team-project for most of thesemester. He emphasized that the core or focus for either approach is not the learning of anystructure and grammar points, but instead communicating the tasks involved in technical writing,although language proficiency still helps students, as it improves student completion of the tasks.Several innovative approaches have been proposed to teach technical
witha tendency toward an emic account from the institutional perspective given his many years inadministrative positions. However, he has strong personal sensitivities to individuals and familiesfighting for rights. Dr. Mejía is a Latina engineering educator and an immigrant in the UnitedStates. Prior to teaching in academia, she worked in for-profit and non-profit sectors to optimizetechnologies, processes, and policies in organizations. She provides unique emic and eticperspectives to the research problem. Dr. Crippen is a white male science educator whochampions change in educational systems to meet the needs of every student. He has worked onmultiple projects with engineering faculty but views himself as an outsider in engineering
PhD student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UBC. Her research focuses on equity issues in engineering education, particularly looking at the impacts of engineering outreach programs on historically marginalized groups in STEM.Shouka Farrokh, University of British Columbia Shouka Farrokh is an undergraduate student pursuing Psychology at The University of British Columbia. She contributes as a research assistant in Engineering Education projects focusing on STEM Outreach initiatives.Dr. Katherine Lyon, University of British Columbia Katherine Lyon is Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Sociology at the University of British Columbia. Katherine’s research merges sociology of education
demonstrate the ways that these fourthreads are interwoven and interdependent.Research Approach: Systematic, Qualitative AnalysisThe biggest challenge of the research design for this project was the size and diversity of theLEES program in 2018: 13 technical sessions, 46 papers, 5 workshops and panels, and 2distinguished lectures. The complete program appears in Appendix A. The technical sessionsserved as the primary unit of analysis, which made the work more manageable but also requiredreading all of the papers associated with each session to discern each session’s unifying themes. 1 To capture at least some of what transpired in the
Paper ID #35816Online Nuclear Power Summer Institute and Day of Science: A two-prongedapproach to increasing girls and under-represented minorities towardsSTEM careersProf. MERLYN XAVIER PULIKKATHARA, Physics Department, Prairie View A&M University Dr. Pulikkathara’s research involves nanomaterials for aerospace and biomedical applications.Mr. Kelvin K. Kirby, Prairie View A&M University Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Prairie View A&M University, Texas A&M Uni- versity System. Twenty-nine years of academic experience with twenty-two years of military service. Research projects sponsored by
Values, Modules Lab 10, 10b 11 (11/5-11/9) Writing Functions, Scope Lab 11, 11b 12 (11/12-11/16) Functions and use in top-down/bottom-up design Lab 12, 12b 13 (11/19-11/20 ) Systematic Debugging Lab 13, Team Project assigned 14 (11/26-11/30) Topic TBD 15 (12/3-12/5) Last exam Finals Week NO FINAL Team Project due MethodsThe new engineering course's curriculum redesign was already complete. The purpose of this workwas to establish a pilot program to
graduatingfrom high school are prepared to take university level courses in math and science. In 2022, theACT composite results fell to the lowest values since 1991. This generation of students is moredistressed, disengaged, digitally distracted, and discouraged when compared with previouscohorts.The purpose of this project is to identify the challenges faced by students transitioning from highschool to college after the COVID-19 pandemic. For this study, we are focused on the transitionof first-generation students as they experience their first semester in college. We believe that theCOVID-19 pandemic has caused significant shifts in the struggles and needs of incomingstudents. For the analysis, first semester students enrolled in an engineering
academicresources and maximizing opportunities in their college environment have a relationship withstudents’ academic achievement and the progress they make with their learning [1]–[3].Satisfaction with college outcomes has also been found to have a relationship with studentengagement in academic activities [4]. Active classroom learning strategies have facilitatedstudents’ involvement in course learning. Such pedagogical strategies that have improvedstudents’ engagement with course learning and academic achievement in engineering classroomsinclude project-based learning, problem-based learning, flipped classroom, cooperative learning,questions, and discussions [5], [6].Furthermore, it has been found that motivation has the strongest relationship with
Alignment Model,In this paper, the authors attempted to investigate current engineering entrepreneurship educationthrough the lens of Constructive Alignment. We want to understand if this framework can capturethe nuts and bolts of the abovementioned diverse entrepreneurship education program designs. Theauthors proposed a modified model for the existing constructive alignment model to reflect thefeedback we received from the field.2. Methodology2.1 Data SourceTo obtain a comprehensive view of Canadian entrepreneurship education, we accessed the list ofdesignated educational institutions from the Canadian Federal government’s web tool provided byEmployment and Social Development Canada. We limited the scope of the project to educationalinstitutions
Paper ID #38515How much does readiness matter? An examination of student persistenceintention and engineering identityMr. Syahrul Amin, Texas A&M University Syahrul Amin is a PhD candidate in Curriculum and Instruction at Texas A&M University. He is Experi- enced in conducting numerous STEM education research projects and skilled in working in collaborative environments to collect and evaluate research data for a variety of STEM education projects. He is also experienced in K-16 teaching for over 8 years. His research interests focus on science education, engi- neering education, GT education, and international
produced include a concept map. Students leave the course with a clear listof which topics they mastered and which they are still working on. This model still permits roomfor traditional laboratory and project components.IntroductionIn standard teaching, course topics are covered on a set schedule and exams occur at set schedules.If students have not learned the material for an earlier portion of the class, the course moves alonganyway and focuses on new more difficult material that builds on the previous material thatstudent still does not understand. This promotes a fixed mindset promoting the idea that if youdidn’t get a concept, you never will. At the end of the course, students may only have a partialunderstanding of the material and may be
interaction with the students. These industry sessions, therefore,provided a general, real-world contrast while students were also doing a deep dive into one specificarea to complete a laboratory research project in six weeks.A third reason, as we discussed in a previous paper [1], is consistent with some general designelements known to inspire and increase inclusion. For example, an Industry Energy Program willhelp deepen the REM student’s understanding between theory, research, and application; of howwhat they learn in class relates to what companies may be doing. For students with morecommunity-minded orientations (i.e., altruistic cultural values), this bigger picture of what ishappening in the different energy sectors, and learning about real
sustainability offers the only viable path to human safety, equity, health, andprogress” [21, p. 6]. There are strong synergies between ideas of generational equity andsustainable development, for example [22], [23]. Within civil engineering, the infrastructuresustainability rating system Envision [24] is commonly used. Envision has been integrated intoengineering education as a method to educate students about sustainability [25], [26], [27]. DEIissues are included within the Envision credits including the following examples: • QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety [24, p. 32] • “Measures taken to increase safety and provide health benefits on the project site, surrounding sites, and the broader community in a just and equitable
Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). After graduating she worked for two years in a construction management company in Dhaka, Bangladesh. She was involved in various residential and infrastructure projects. Rubaya now is a Ph.D. student at Department of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering and Teaching/Research Assistant at Moss School of Construction, Sustainability and Infrastructure, Florida International University. Her research interest includes Sustainable and resilient infrastructure, Engineering Education, and Sustainable transportation system.Mr. Mohamed Elzomor P.E., Florida International University Dr. Mohamed ElZomor is an Assistant Professor at Florida International
None N/A On-the-job Training None None N/A Number of Jobs 63,000 113,300 80% Job Outlook Over Ten Years 31% 36% 3% Employment Change Over Ten Years 20,000 40,500 202% Table 1. Quick Facts on Data Science Jobs in the United States [4,5]The Bureau of Labor Statistics [4] projected the employment change for Data Scientists to bemuch faster than the average and notes that “[e]mployment of data scientists is projected to grow36 percent from 2021 to 2031, much faster than the average for all occupations
learn” [3]“project-based learning” [4], [5] and “design-based learning” [6], [7] frameworks and uses threeintegrated modules to promote theoretical and technical competency. Importantly, the integrationof pedagogical theory and practice is not novel in of itself [8], [9], though the integration tosupport technical skillsets that reinforce design and data analysis is a novel component to theTDA framework. • Theory: Traditional lectures that take place in the classroom and the laboratory. During this module students are engaged around a critical topic in tissue characterization. Mechanistic background related to the underlying cellular processes is provided to aid students in understanding how such processes can affect
different topics.The most recent score is weighted more heavily than the older scores. This promotes the growthmindset and the idea of continuous improvement and helps motivate the students to continuetheir work on the content rather than giving up after one or more low marks.Chemistry Challenge OutcomesThe Chemistry Challenge (CC) is a team project that the students work on throughout thesemester. Students select a topic they want to dive more deeply into and develop a procedure,perform experiments, collect and analyze data, and present their results in a poster session. Theseoutcomes are specific to this project and include aspects of teamwork. CC outcomes includeexperimental design, data analysis, and teamwork. For example: Analyze numerical
are engineering projects that specifically attempt to address animalwelfare, such as painting blades to increase their visibility at the Smøla wind-power plantin Norway, where the annual bird fatality rate was reduced at the turbines with a paintedblade by over 70% [30]. Temple Grandin’s design of a more humane cattle handlingsystem [31] is another example.STS literature has a growing body of synergistic writings pertaining to ethics and animals. Alsopertinent are the fields of Animal Geographies and Multispecies Ethnography. As Hovorkaexplains: “Animal geographies are at their core grounded in ethical commitments and emancipatory practices to improve the lives of animals. Since the late 20th century, animal geographers have
Giraffe Award (for sticking her neck out); 2014 College of Engineering In- struction Award; 2014 The University of Texas System Regents’ Outstanding Teaching Award; the 2012 NCEES Award for students’ design of a Fire Station. In her work, Dr. Santiago helps to find innova- tive engineering solutions through an understanding of the balance between sustainability, social equity, entrepreneurship, community engagement, innovation, and leadership to improve the well-being of peo- ple. A few examples include: interdisciplinary projects that provide safe drinking water to underserved communities in El Paso, Ciudad Ju´arez, Puerto Rico, and Haiti; a bridge that connected communities in Puerto Rico; a solar charging station
below pre-calculus. Yet, despite being academicallyunderprepared (AUP) by traditional program standards, youth are responding to invitations topursue these career fields. Significant research and financial resources focus on increasingretention in engineering and computing, including the problem of practice study informing thiswork-in-progress paper [11], [12]. To truly understand the AUP student experience, a complextheoretical framework was developed for this project and is the focus of this work in progresspaper. II. Complex Problems Need Complex Frameworks Systems influencing human development are described by Albert Bandura [13] and UrieBronfenbrenner [14]–[16] as external and internal to the individual. Yoder’s [12] ASEE
leads articulation and the curriculum alignment effort of 53 gateway courses between UCF and DirectConnect partner institutions. Prior to joining UCF, Har- rison worked for three years at West Virginia University (WVU) as a project specialist in Undergraduate Academic Affairs and an adjunct professor in WVU’s College of Education and Human Services where he taught undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Harrison holds a B.A. in Education (Kenyatta Uni- versity, Kenya), a M.A. in Special Education (WVU), and Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction (WVU). His research focuses on the role of curriculum on student access, success, and persistent.Dr. Shawn A Putnam, University of Central Florida Dr. Shawn A. Putnam joined
ADAPT project team conducted a contemporary review of the literatureconcerning AE in order to assess the current state of the art. This work is described in [13] and indicatesthat while, as discussed, several definitions of Adaptive Expertise exist in the literature, few validatedtools for the measurement of AE have been developed. A paucity of data concerning levels of AEdisplayed by various populations was also observed. Fortunately, a survey instrument [14], originallydeveloped in 2001, was found to still be in use as a tool for measuring AE, and various studies hadindicated its reliability [9], [15]. Based on this review of the literature, the definition of AdaptiveExpertise and the survey for its measurement put forward by Fisher and
studies, forearthquake preparedness [16]–[18], disaster impact mitigation [19], [20], flooding policies [21],territorial risk management [22], and construction projects [23].Learning Goal and TopicsThe goal of the proposed game is to familiarize players with the community resilience-basedmulti-criteria decision-making process and its fundamental concepts including equity. The gameis designed as a cooperative board game to emphasize the feature of multi-criteria decision-making by facilitating discussion among players who would have different weights on theconsidered criteria. The multi-criteria nature can demonstrate all the different facets a structuralengineer will need to consider as they design infrastructure for communities and work to
identityWith the evolution and expansion of the chemical industry, the gap between academia andindustry is broadened. The skills that the workforce expected from practicing engineers are nottaught in the typical chemical engineering undergraduate core curriculum. Students become lessengaged and less motivated by not seeing the applications of course content in their courses.Therefore, they struggle to identify with the field and develop skills necessary for the workplace.This NSF PFE: RIEF project aims to bridge the gap by implementing industry-relevantcontemporary problems into a sophomore chemical engineering course.The project’s main goal is to understand how the implementation impacts students’ engineeringidentity and self-efficacy development. We
dQ1:How much experience doyou have engaging in real- 1.515 1.289 11.699 98 .000 1.18world, hands-on engineeringresearch?Q3:How much experience doyou have understanding the 1.131 1.131 9.955 98 .000 1.00theory and concepts guiding aresearch project?Q4:How much experience doyou have understanding the .899 1.298 6.894 98 .000 .69relevance of research to yourcoursework?Q5: How much experience doyou have understanding what 1.606 1.300 12.292 98 .000 1.24everyday research work is like?Q7: How much experience doyou have understanding 1.051 1.128 9.264 98
participants with cohort building activities, professional networkingopportunities, and knowledge that builds their navigational capital, such as tips for applying tostudy abroad and graduate school. Furthermore, engineering program advisors invitedparticipants to join Engage ME, a college of engineering program designed to successfullyrecruit, retain and graduate multicultural students with degrees in engineering by connectingthem with diverse mentors and social networking opportunities. Throughout the year,participants were invited to engage as a cohort with professional engineers, visit internship sites,and observe field studies of active engineering projects in the community. The year concludedwith a highly attended networking dinner, featuring
are repeatedly referred to as “attentive”, as having provided a “meaningful (and well-planned) research experience”, as “focused on student learning goals”, as having developedstrong connections with their research students, and having developed a supportive researchstructure through their labs and research groups. Further, in their comments, the REUparticipants highlight “a very strong coordinator and program staff”, valuable preparationworkshops for graduate studies and applying to graduate school, fun social activities whichhelped build connections among participants and with project staff, and a helpful orientationprogram and final symposium. All these features allow the program to build strong positiveexperiences (despite the unavoidable