commonalities in their individual ways of experiencing innovation(see Table 1). These categories formed a hierarchical progression from less comprehensive tomore comprehensive ways of experiencing innovation along two dimensions: Focus ofInnovation Activities and Extent of Innovation Process (see Figure 1). It should be noted that thefinal four categories (5–8) were each at the highest level of comprehensiveness in the outcomespace. They differed primarily on the Focus of Innovation Activities dimension.The Focus of Innovation Activities dimension addressed the area(s) that individuals prioritizedduring innovation activities (e.g., technical, human, or enterprise). In less comprehensivecategories (1–4), this dimension represented participants
traveling and resulted in short reportsafter travel.Site visit reports: Participants completed reports for each site visited. These forms consisted offive question prompts and resulted in formative, reflective reports that captured their experiencesat each visit and also acted as informal journals that they could use in the future to identifytrends, concepts and/or innovations that they found notable. The reports also served as a recordfor their continued investigation into their individual inquiry question(s).Sector Reports: Upon return, participants were paired up on teams based on their specific areaof renewable energy expertise to complete sector reports which compared and contrasted theGerman and U.S. energy industry, educational pathways
) and a Doctorate in Education from Northeastern University (2022) where she recently completed her dissertation in elementary STEAM education. She also worked as a professional engineer in the athletic footwear and medical device industries for 10 years before joining the faculty at Northeastern University in 2006.Mrs. Claire Duggan, Northeastern University Claire Duggan serves as Executive Director for The Center for STEM Education at Northeastern Univer- sity. She is a Co-Pricipal Investigator for the NSF Bernice Johnson Includes Alliance, Engineering PLUS, the S-STEM grant, S-POWER, and an NSF REU site, REU Pathways.Mr. Jeffrey Xavier, SageFox Consulting GroupAmi N. SlaterKenneth Rath
. Medin, C. D. Lee, and M. Bang, “Point of View Affects How Science Is Done,” Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/point-of-view-affects-how-science-is-done/ (accessed Feb. 13, 2023).[4] S. C. Hill, “When I Learned the Value of Diversity for Innovation,” Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-i-learned-the-value-of-diversity-for-innova tion/ (accessed Feb. 13, 2023).[5] C. Cole et al., “What Factors Impact Psychological Safety in Engineering Student Teams? A Mixed-Method Longitudinal Investigation,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 144, no. 12, p. 122302, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1115/1.4055434.[6] A. Edmondson, “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams,” Adm. Sci. Q
tellus why they took these photos/videos and what they mean to them [BLINDED]. Each interview was approximately 60 minutes in length and led by a team member at thatinstitution; often a second team member was present in a supporting role to ask follow-upquestions. All interviews were conducted over Zoom so they could be recorded and allowed forflexibility with the student schedules, particularly as we started this research during the Covid-19pandemic. Interviews were then transcribed and coded by the faculty researcher/s at the sameinstitution as the participant. Participant anonymity is ensured as much as possible withpseudonyms and at times, slight changes to the contextual information or timeline to reduce thespecificity that could
critical pieces of evidence to uncover:1) researchers and practitioners work together and that 2) partners feel as if they are a valuedmember of the team. The indicators (as defined by the Five Dimensions framework), codes thatwe established based on the indicators, and corresponding questions are outlined in Table 2. Table 2: Dimension 1: Codes for Building trust and cultivating partnerships. Indicator Code Corresponding Questions Researchers and practitioners Inclusive Collaboration (IC): Re- How often do you collab- routinely work together searchers and practitioners rou- orate with the other part- tinely work together and all feel as ner(s
expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Resources[1] “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019 | NSF - National Science Foundation.” https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/ (accessed Apr. 12, 2019).[2] M. Estrada et al., “Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 3, p. es5, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038.[3] M. Ong, N. Jaumot‐Pascual, and L. T. Ko, “Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 581–615, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20345.[4] M
-2119930. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The authors thank Dr. Anni Reinking who contributed to the framing of thedata collection and analysis and assisted on the data interpretation. Drs. Amy Slaton and KaylaMaxey also contributed to framing the study.References[1] Awards/degrees conferred by program (CIP), award level, race/ethnicity and gender, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), 2011–2021. [Online]. Available: https:// nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data[2] National Science
, for her assistance incoordinating the experiment itself, and for her indispensable mentorship and encouragementevery step of the way.References[1] D. A. Harrison, K. H. Price, J. H. Gavin, and A. T. Florey, “Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1029–1045, 2002, https://doi.org/10.2307/3069328[2] D. van Knippenberg, C. K. W. De Dreu, and A. C. Homan, “Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1008–1022, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008[3] S. W. DeGrassi, W. B. Morgan, S. S. Walker, Y. Wang
learning environments [18].References[1] M. Castells and C. Blackwell, “The information age: economy, society and culture. Volume 1. The rise of the network society,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 25, pp. 631–636, 1998.[2] H. V. Haraldsson, Introduction to system thinking and causal loop diagrams. Department of chemical engineering, Lund University Lund, Sweden, 2004.[3] M. A. Dolansky, S. M. Moore, P. A. Palmieri, and M. K. Singh, “Development and validation of the systems thinking scale,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 35, pp. 2314–2320, 2020.[4] K. E. Dugan, E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, and L. R. Lattuca, “Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review,” Systems
://www.carteeh.org Last accessed, December 2022.[3] EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency. EJScreen: Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool. URL: https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen. Last accessed August 2022.[4] Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 2020. CAMS 151 Monthly Summary Report. https://www.tceq.texas.gov/cgi-bin/compliance/monops/monthly_summary.pl. (TCEQ. 2020). Last Accessed, February 2023.[5] O. Egbue. S. Long. “Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Analysis of Consumer Attitudes and Perceptions.” Energy Policy 48 (2012) 717-729. Elsevier, 2012[6] R. M. Krause., et. all. “Perception and reality: Public knowledge of plug-in electric vehicles in 21 U.S
statistician who can present statistical results in lay language. She is also a storyteller through data visualization. She earned her PhD in Educational Research and Evaluation from Ohio University. During her PhD, she served as a Graduate Associate in the Statistics and Research Lab, which allowed her to practice consulting with students on their doctoral dissertations in the field of Education, especially in research design and statistical analyses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Examining Timely Positive Interventions Utilized by First-Year Students to Improve their Course Grades in Science and Engineering Kim, S., Forney, A., Cappelli, C., Doezema, L. A., Morales, V. C., and
developed in technology-enhanced learning environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Examining Student Experiences Related to Transfer from Two-Year Technical Colleges to Engineering and Computer Science Degree Programs at a Four-Year InstitutionAbstractIn this paper, we explore issues related to student transfer from two-year technical colleges tofour-year institutions in the context of SPECTRA, an NSF Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM)project (Award#1834081) led by Clemson University in Upstate South Carolina. The program'spurpose is to provide financial support to low-income transfer students who intend to transferfrom South Carolina's two-year technical
engineering management from FIU and is particularly interested in computer science for all. Her research interests include teaching and learning computer science in the Metaverse.Stephanie A Damas, Clemson University Stephanie Ashley Damas is currently a graduate student at Clemson University studying to get her Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her area of interest is Diversity and Inclusion in Engineering. She holds a bachelorˆaTM s degree in electrical engi American c Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exploration of Servingness across Virginia's Top Ranking HSI, HBCU, and PWIIntroductionSocio-political History of
diverse and inclusive field ofengineering capable of attending to the plural interests of diverse communities and the complexchallenges they face.References[1] W. J. Baumol, "Education for Innovation: Entrepreneurial Breakthroughs Versus CorporateIncremental Improvements," vol. 5, (1), pp. 33-56, 2005.[2] K. Kazerounian and S. Foley, "Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study ofInstructors and Students Perceptions," vol. 129, (7), pp. 761-768, 2007.[3] A. E. Zaghi et al, "Unique potential and challenges of students with ADHD in engineeringprograms," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016, pp. 1-15.[4] L. D. Goegan and G. L. Harrison, "THE EFFECTS OF EXTENDED TIME ON WRITINGPERFORMANCE," Learning Disabilities (Weston
coordinator for an NSF S-STEM program to prepare students for gateway courses across differ- ent disciplines of engineering to support and retain students in these disciplines. His research focuses on techniques to collect and analyze the electrical impedance of biological tissues using wearable sensors and their health applications.Dr. Memorie Gosa Memorie M. Gosa is a pediatric speech-language pathologist and board certified specialist in swallowing and swallowing disorders. She is an assistant professor at The University of Alabama and maintains a clinical caseload at The University of Alabama SpDr. Debra Moehle McCallum, The University of Alabama Debra McCallum is a Senior Research Social Scientist and Director of the
physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Prof. Dominic J. Dal Bello, Allan Hancock College Dom Dal Bello is Professor of Engineering at Allan Hancock College (AHC), a California community col- lege between UC Santa Barbara and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. At AHC, he is Department Chair of Math- ematical Sciences, Faculty Advisor of MESA (the Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement Pro- gram), and Principal/Co-Principal Investigator of several National Science Foundation projects (S-STEM, LSAMP, IUSE). In ASEE, he is chair of the Two-Year College Division, and Vice-Chair/Community Col- leges of the Pacific Southwest Section. He received the Outstanding Teaching
?,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 22, no. 1, April 2000.[6] J. S. Coker et al., “Impacts of experiential learning depth and breadth on student outcomes,”Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5-23, 2017.[7] D. Galbraith and S. Mundal, “The potential power of internships and the impact on careerpreparation,” Research in Higher Education Journal, vol. 38, June 2020.[8] K. Gray, “Intern hiring projection jumps 22.6%, co-op hiring makes small gain,” NationalAssociation of Colleges and Employers (NACE), May 2022. [Online] Available:https://www.naceweb.org/job-market/internships/intern-hiring-projection-jumps-22-point-6-percent-co-op-hiring-makes-small-gain/?utm_source=college&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nace-insights
Students of Color pursuing STEM majors. Race Ethnicity and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2021.1997971[2] Kendricks, K., & Arment, A. (2011). Adopting a K-12 family model with undergraduate research to enhance STEM persistence and achievement in underrepresented minority students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(2), 22-27.[3] Rodriguez, S., Pilcher, A., & Garcia-Tellez, N. (2021). The influence of familismo on Latina student STEM identity development. Journal of Latinos and Education, 20(2), 177- 189.[4] Sweeder, R. D., Kursav, M. N., Valles, S. A. (2021). A cohort scholarship program, that reduces inequities in STEM retention. Journal of STEM Education, 22(1), 5-13.[5] Rincón, B. E
. Mueller-Alexander and H. J. Seaton, “Researching Native Americans: Tips on vocabulary, search strategies and internet resources.” Database, 17(2), 45, Apr. 1994.[2] A. Soto, A. B. H. Sanchez, J. M. Mueller-Alexander, and J. Martin. “Researching Native Americans: Reflections on Vocabulary, Search Strategies, and Technology.” Online Searcher, 45(5), 10–19, Sep./Oct. 2021.[3] D. Thomas, “Reflections on Inclusive Language and Indexing.” Key Words, 28(4), 14–18, Win. 2020.[4] D. Thomas, “Another Look in the Mirror: Correction to Reflections on Inclusive Language and Indexing.” Key Words, 29(2), 26, Sum. 2021.[5] S. Ullstrom, “Decolonizing the index.” Indexer, 34(3), 110–112, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.3828/indexer
their children in STEM activities and nuclear science programs. These activities haveresulted in deeper, sustained student engagement and understanding of mitigating factors that ourstudents face and need to be addressed to enhance a nuclear workforce pipeline at an HBCU.IntroductionIn the USA, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) continue to award a largeshare of bachelor's degrees to African American students in Science, Technology, Engineering,Arts and Mathematics (STEAM). HBCUs are also the baccalaureate origins of one-quarter toone-third of black science and engineering (S&E) doctorate recipients [1]. However, as shownby the National Science Foundation data [2] for college aged population (18-24 years), blackstudents
-level courses offered atregional campuses.References[1] Bonwell, C.C., and J. A. Eison, “Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom,”ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No.1, George Washington University, Washington, DC,1991.[2] Bormann, J. (2014). Affordances of flipped learning and its effects on student engagement andachievement, Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Iowa.[3] Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction onundergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.[4] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and
mean by it and how arewe preparing our students for it?,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings,Jun. 2017.[4] B. J. Ranger and A. Mantzavinou, “Design thinking in development engineering education: Acase study on creating prosthetic and assistive technologies for the developing world,”Development Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 166–174, 2018.[5] D. Nieusma, “Alternative design scholarship: Working Toward Appropriate Design,” DesignIssues, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 13–24, 2004.[6] B.K. Jesiek, N.T. Buswell, and Q. Zhu, “Global Engineering Competency: Assessment Toolsand Training Strategies,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Paper ID 21663, 2018.[7] D. Stone and S. Heen, Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving