aerodynamic phenomena.To do justice to the subject invariably requires some significant attention to experimentation, notonly to discover and demonstrate the associated aerodynamic principles, but to validate how wellaerodynamic theory represents real physical characteristics. In an engineering program thatincludes a full aerospace program, this subject and the related topic areas would invariably bedeveloped in a multiple course sequence. Doing justice to the subject of aerodynamics isparticularly challenging when all the relevant topics must be focused into a single course, ratherthan part of a full aerospace program course sequence. The challenge is then to find the properbalance between the development of aerodynamic theory and laboratory
interests are laboratory/project-driven learning and integration of research into undergraduate education. Dr. Yao is a member of the American Society of Engineering Education.Loren Limberis, East Carolina University Loren Limberis is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at East Carolina University. Prior to joining ECU, he was a faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at The College of New Jersey. He received both his BS degree in Electrical Engineering and PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. His research interests include the study of motor protein motility mechanisms and the incorporation of motor proteins and their associated tracks into bio
Break 1:00-5:30 Individual Research (B) Group (C) Group (E) Industry Design Collaboration and Lab project/ Session Visits, competition (D) Weekly Outreach, or preparation Seminar Social InteractionIndividualized Research ProjectsEach REU fellow will directly participate in regular research activities together with faculty andother research personnel in one or more of our research laboratories
those devices even better? Electricalengineers and technologists spend most of their time learning how these technologieswork and developing new ways to improve them.This course emphasizes practical, hands-on laboratory work that is closely coordinatedwith theoretical classroom discussion. The course focuses on both standard and wirelesscommunication systems.Course Learning Outcomes • Understand basic concepts of Electronics and circuit design; • Understand how electronic communication systems work and their application to daily life; • Understand concepts of radio frequency (RF) propagation, including AM/FM modulation; • Understand the different types of transmitting media; • Understand the architecture of a wireless
them and participate in active learning basedmodules. This paper elaborates innovative projects that are suitable for laboratory work incomputer information technology curriculum. It explores both hardware and softwarecomponents that are now being used for practical exercises in wireless networks courses. Thispaper discusses the hands-on labs for wireless networks such as site survey, MAC (MediumAccess Control) layer settings, upgrading the firmware of wireless devices, etc. In addition, thispaper also illustrates the wireless security labs which discuss how to set up WPA/WPA2 (Wi-FiProtected Access) on Cisco and Linksys wireless access points (AP).IntroductionThe field of wireless networks is dynamically changing due to the advances in the
advance in the program without first completing the traditional freshman calculus sequence.3) A more just-in-time structuring of the required math sequence.The WSU model begins with the development of EGR 101, a novel freshman engineeringmathematics course. Taught by engineering faculty, the EGR 101 course includes lecture,laboratory and recitation components. Using an application-oriented, hands-on approach, EGR101 addresses only the salient math topics actually used in the core sophomore-level engineeringcourses. These include the traditional physics, engineering mechanics, electric circuits andcomputer programming sequences. More importantly, the EGR 101 course replaces traditional
nanoscale will be available at the project home page,http://fc1.tamu.edu/resources/nano.The modules were used in the ENGR 213 when it was taught in the fall semester of the 2003-04academic year. Approximately 85 students worked with the two modules.Required Mechanical Engineering Course on Materials and DesignMEEN 360 Materials and Manufacturing Selection in Design is a required course for mechanicalengineering majors. It is taught both semesters, offered to about 200 students each year, andincludes a laboratory component. Like ENGR 213 the project introduced two one-hour moduleson nanoscale manufacturing: one on micro and nanoscale lithography and another onnanoparticle processes for bulk materials. In addition, the project introduced one
Paper ID #9705Evidence for the Effectiveness of a Grand Challenge-based Framework forContextual LearningDr. Lisa Huettel, Duke University Dr. Lisa G. Huettel is an associate professor of the practice in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University where she also serves as associate chair and director of Undergraduate Studies for the department. She received a B.S. in Engineering Science from Harvard University and earned her M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Duke University. Her research interests are focused on engineering education, curriculum and laboratory development, and
1985. From January 1985 to September 1986, he was employed as a Research Scientist at Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, and an Assistant Professor at Purdue University Calumet until September 1986. Then, he joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at IUPUI where he is now Professor and Associate Chair of the Department. His research interests include solid State devices, VLSI signal processing, and electromagnetics. He is a senior member of IEEE and a PE registered in the State of Indiana.Dr. Sudhir Shrestha, IUPUI Dr. Shrestha received his B.E. in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Kathmandu University in 2003 and his Ph.D. in Engineering with an emphasis on Micro/Nanosystems
graduate education at the University of New Mexico. Throughout his undergraduate degree, Francisco was the President of the NMT Society of Automotive Engineers Student Chapter. During his time as president, the chapter grew to become one of the largest chapters in the world. He also volunteered at the NM State Science and Engineering Fair and NM State Science Olympiad. Francisco was awarded the NMT Student Appreciation Award (2013), the DOE Summer Visiting Faculty-Student Fellowship at Sandia National Laboratories (2013) and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Outstanding Scholarship Award (2012).Ms. Miquela Trujillo, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Miquela Trujillo is an engineering student
2005-1601 Multi-section Freshman Classes with Laboratories: Lecture as Intro vs. Lecture as Wrap-up Jon Sticklen, Mark Urban-Lurain, Timothy Hinds Taner Eskil, Marilyn Amey Michigan State UniversityIntroduction A common instructional model for freshman engineering is the lecture/laboratory model.In this model, students usually spend two to four hours per week in a large lecture sectiontypically of one hundred or more students, and three to six hours per week in smalllaboratory (or recitation) sections typically of twenty or fewer students. Although not universal
theestablishment of state-of-the-art laboratory facilities as well as partial scholarship support forstudents in the program. The program had its first class of students enter in fall 1995 andcurrently consists of approximately 100 students majoring in mechanical engineering. TheABET evaluation visit under EC2000 occurred in September 1999 and resulted in accreditationof the program. Designing a new engineering curriculum—in concert with industrial partners—within the broad context of a private, moderately sized, comprehensive college posed manychallenges. This presentation will review these challenges, the process used for establishing anew program in mechanical engineering, and the role industry has played in developing andsupporting the program.I
studying fatigue andmachine components. However, the remainder of the course is dedicated to Mechanics ofMaterials. In addition, the laboratory associated with the course is entirely Mechanics ofMaterials based. Syllabi for the Summer 2001 offering of both lecture and laboratory portions ofthe course are included in Appendix A and Appendix B.This project was first implemented three years ago (three offerings of the course) as a basic straingage use experiment. Since, it has been expanded to include experimental design and correlationwith both theoretical and FEA results.The project incorporated both a high degree of engineering analysis and experimental design andverification. The actual project assignment is presented in Appendix C. It is
energy storage, including advanced battery systems for hybrid electric vehicles. Yeh is also experienced in developing formal degree programs and professional development programs for incumbent engineers, community college instructors, and high school science and technology teachers. He is the PI and co-PI of several federal and state funded projects for course, curriculum, and laboratory development in advanced automotive technology.Dr. Gene Yeau-Jian Liao, Wayne State University Y. Gene Liao is currently Director of the Electric Transportation Technology program and Associate Pro- fessor of engineering technology at Wayne State University. He received a B.S. in mechanical engineering from National Central University
generally contribute to awide variety of activities, it is often difficult to adequately determine faculty workloads. Facultyactivities generally include teaching traditional classes, advising students, conducting sponsoredand non-sponsored research, committee assignments, laboratory supervision, development,outreach, maintaining industrial partnerships, student club advising, shared responsibilities withpeers, and other assignments. Also, at a time when the cost of education is rising faster than mostother sectors of the economy, the cost of each of these activities is important for department headsto monitor. Increasingly, governing boards and upper administrators, as well as legislators (atpublic institutions) and other constituents are
Session 1526 A Project-Based Approach to Teaching Membrane Technology C. Stewart Slater (1), Kauser Jahan (2), Stephanie Farrell (1), Robert P. Hesketh (1), and Kevin D. Dahm (1) (1) Department of Chemical Engineering (2) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Rowan University Glassboro, NJ 08028 Abstract This paper describes a NSF-funded Instrumentation and Laboratory Improvement (ILI) project onmembrane process experiments funded through DUE-9850535. We have
format for each oftwo courses per semester. In addition to TV classes, the program depends on Web-basedassignments, email communications with the instructor, and library and computer materials ateach site. Laboratory courses will be taught as concentrated four-Saturdays-on-campus sessionsof three experiments per day for each of four courses. We have appointed a half-time sitecoordinator for each site to take care of logistics such as registration, books, handouts, proctoringtests, and, in two of the three cases, operating the cameras. We have attempted to set up adistance-learning Mentoring Program with on-site mentors for these students in a model similarto the quite-successful one initiated in the last two years on the UNC Charlotte campus
determine what I wanted to communicate to the students; that is, Ineeded to establish learning outcomes. I selected the following objectives:By the end of the semester, students will be able to: 1. Use multiple perspectives to answer important questions about a complicated problem 2. Explain the chemical differences between dyeing with indigo and dyeing with other natural dyes 3. Create a process flow diagram, identify major process equipment and explain briefly how they work 4. Write a technically competent laboratory report on the processes studied 5. Show an understanding of what a professional is and the ethical responsibilities of a professionalEach week, the students spent two hours in class and two hours
Bachelors degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Bangalore University in 2004 and was awarded a Masters of Science degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Southern Illinois University Carbondale in 2010. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Southern Illinois University Carbondale and is a Re- search Assistant at Embedded Control Systems Laboratory. His main areas of research includes power electronics and control systems.Aishwarya Vasu, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Aishwarya Vasu received her Bachelor’s degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Anna University, Chennai, India in 2006. She received her Master of Science
AC 2011-1618: AUDIO-VISUAL LAB TUTORIALS TO DEVELOP INDE-PENDENT LEARNERSDeborah Walter, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Deborah Walter is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches courses in circuits, electromagnetics, and medical imaging. Before joining academia in 2006, she was at the Computed Tomography Laboratory at GE’s Global Research Center for 8 years. She worked on several technology development projects in the area of X-ray CT for medical and industrial imaging. She is a named inventor on 9 patents. She has been active in the recruitment and retention of women and minorities in engineering and currently PI for an NSF-STEM
“Scienceand Technology of Everyday Life (GEMS-151)” during the Fall 1998 semester. This course isintended for non-science and non-engineering majors. It was developed and first taught in theSpring 1995 semester. The course describes how things work, and examines the scientificprinciples underlying their operation9, 10. Science concepts are presented in the context offamiliar technological devices. Topics studied include: the automobile, the telephone, thephotocopier, television, radio, compact disk players, and medical imaging technologies. Theorganizational structure of the course is based on technological devices rather than naturalphenomena. Weekly hands-on laboratories are included. These involve such activities as takingapart a car engine
laboratory classes, to the student’s senior, but usually not last, year.Because of low student enrollment and dissatisfaction with the JEP by both the local employers,who did not benefit, and the two partner universities, the JEP ended in spring semester 2004. At the close of the JEP, a partnership of local engineering employers, city, state, and federalgovernment agencies motivated a single university to offer programs to provide mechanical andelectrical engineering baccalaureate degrees to students locally through a combination ofinteractive broadcast lectures and locally taught engineering laboratory courses.Industry/Government support for the program included temporary funding for an electricalengineering professor’s salary and an
processes.Students are asked questions concerning classical engineering failures, dangers of materialsubstitutions, environmental and social impact on product design and also on o materials usedin the school’s laboratories by research students and staff. Instructional knowledge forms aplatform for further inquiry.The teaching, in this subject, is presented in grand narrative form. Students are required toundertake further reading of recommended and referenced texts. The course material is alsosupported by the course material l written and compiled by this author.Experimentation and ObservationIn a traditional schema this is normally referred to as to laboratory practical session. However,as important as traditional laboratory sessions are in developing
undergraduate laboratory experience. In 2010 we addedthree completely new experiments to the course; these activities (a student-directedexperiment with thermoelectricity, a pump performance module, and a fluid flowexperiment of unparalleled flexibility) were designed to encourage exploration, to appealto students with different learning styles, and to promote physical contact between thestudent and the underlying phenomena. This paper describes our initial experiences with,student reaction to, and our assessment of, these changes to the laboratory course.Introduction The childhood environment for the previous generation of engineers was verydifferent. Grose1 recently reviewed the formative influences upon six accomplishedengineering educators
the entire curriculum that (1)reinforces student understanding and retention through reinforcement at short intervals, and (2)minimizes fading of conceptual knowledge due to extended disuse – as is often problematic inthe traditional ME curriculum.IntroductionHistorically, engineering education has followed a linear model in which engineering topics aretaught in separate, disconnected classes that “serially encapsulate” the course material in thestudents’ minds. In contrast, our newly developed first-year course sequence, funded by a CourseCurriculum and Laboratory Improvement Phase 1 Grant from the National Science Foundationtitled “Design-Based SPIRAL Learning Curriculum” (DUE-0837759), strives to integrate avariety of engineering topics in
made at each successive stage ofdissemination. State of the art evaluation techniques are being developed to facilitate theseassessments. Experts in their respective fields, from industry and national laboratories, willactively participate in offering the courses. The courses being offered cover the design, analysis,and testing of mixed-signal/telecommunications (MST) circuits and systems. Each course offersparticular challenges to distance delivery. These challenges and their respective solutions will bedescribed. New course design when the target is ultimately distance delivery via Internet2 isaddressed as well. Lastly, the design of modular courses for rapid introduction of recent researchdevelopments is described.I. Introduction The
requires anunderstanding of many factors including the physical and chemical properties of thebiosolid, risks posed to potential receptors and applicable regulatory requirements. Theseoptions continue to evolve due to new technologies and changes in regulatoryrequirements. Many “new” options for biosolid reuse and recycling have met regulatoryacceptance due to pressures from limited landfill space and advances in risk assessment.This paper is a presentation of how current research in biosolid characterization andbiosolid management are being integrated into selected courses in Wentworth’sundergraduate environmental engineering program.With participation from the Biosolids industry, lecture material, laboratory studies and aCapstone Design project
members than there are graduates in a year. Naturally therefore,the distance method fails to yield dividends in the most neglected areas of conventionaleducation. That is, it is fails as an alternative in engineering and the physical sciences wherewomen are under-represented and therefore is vitiated as a solution to their problems.One of the reasons for the non-fruition of the promises offered by distance education, is that inthe area of laboratory work, distance education is typically neither asynchronous nor distant.Laboratory work is not done at home. Presently all students need to come to the central campusfor an intense period of laboratory work, sometimes for as long as a month in an academic year.As a result, housewives and working
institutions ranging from community colleges to doctorategranting universities. Parallel to these initiatives, a host of textbooks and professional referencebooks are now widely available in the market with new ones being introduced steadily. Thesebooks tend to cover various selections from a wide spectrum of topics to different levels of depthand breadth as well as from different aspects such as technical, economic and environmental. AtGrand Valley State University a four credit hour upper division undergraduate technical electivecourse was developed and taught since fall 20091-2. The course was initially offered on anexperimental basis as a four credit four contact hour course for a couple of times before a finalformat of 3-lecture and 3-laboratory
improvement of the Engineering Technology (ET) curriculum, including integrated laboratories, project- based learning, and practicum-based assessment. Dr. Ertekin serves as the faculty advisor for the student chapter of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (S058) and is a member of the College’s Undergradu- ate Curriculum Committee. Involved in research, Ertekin has received funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF), private foundations, and industry. His research has focused on the improvement of manufacturing laboratories and curricula and the adoption of process simulation into machining and addi- tive manufacturing practices. His areas of expertise are in CAD/CAM, manufacturing processes, machine and process