develop improved student writing skills. The “Writing Assignments for TechnicalCourses” workshop sponsored by the Liberal Education Division at the 2000 ASEE Conferencediscussed how student peer review can be used with well-designed writing assignments intechnical courses. Based on this workshop, writing assignments in a junior level civil engineeringtechnology course have been used to help students improve their writing skills. Writingassignments varied from transmittal memos, technical memos, laboratory reports and a five toseven page research paper on topics that time constraints prevent from being covered in class. Tocompare the effectiveness of peer reviewed writing assignments with non-peer reviewedassignments; the peer review process was
admonish proponents with, "Youcan’t do labs, so it can’t be done". The authors, both practicing engineers in addition to servingas educators, would prefer to take a more open-minded view. Applying DE to a laboratory-based curriculum is challenging, but this is certainly not the first obstacle EET educators haveever faced. The authors envision a "hybrid" delivery method, where the lecture material iscompleted online, and the lab work is still done in the laboratory. (The intent here is to addressthe needs of the time-bound student rather than the place-bound student.)In this paper, we will explore the EET curriculum with respect to the national skill standards1developed by the Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)2. Each skill standard will be given
process project.2 Background Several efforts have been made over the years to improve the experimental experience thatstudents obtain at the undergraduate level. With respect to teaching students about mathematical design ofexperiment concepts and statistical analysis Gleixner, et al.2 and Munson-McGee4 both introduced theseelements into a laboratory course in chemical engineering. Equally, Lyons, et al.3 has introduced theteaching of instrumentation and experimental practices into a mechanical engineering laboratory, whileCyr, et al.1 has exposed students to open ended experimental process projects to promote creativity andinnovation. However, there is no documented case of where all of the material and practices necessary toaddress a
grading and recitations as a TA. Ask to be involved in developinghomework assignments or exam questions. Ask if you can deliver a lecture or help make materialfor a class session.Bibliography[1] J. M. Mutambuki and R. Schwartz, “We don’t get any training: the impact of a professional development model on teaching practices of chemistry and biology graduate teaching 14 assistants,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 106–121, 2018, doi: 10.1039/C7RP00133A.[2] J. A. Luft, J. P. Kurdziel, G. H. Roehrig, and J. Turner, “Growing a garden without water: Graduate teaching assistants in introductory science laboratories at a doctoral
Division of the American Society for Engineering Education; chair of a new IEEE program on Early Career Faculty Development; editorial board of IEEE/HKN The Bridge magazine; and ABET EAC program evaluator.Dr. Robert W. Hasker, Milwaukee School of Engineering Rob is a professor in the software engineering program at Milwaukee School of Engineering, where he teaches courses at all levels. He was recently at University of Wisconsin - Platteville, where he taught for 17 years and helped develop an undergraduate program in software engineering and an international master’s program in computer science. In addition to academic experience, Rob has worked on a number of projects in industry ranging from avionics to cellular
scholarship of teachingand learning.Graduate student instructors (GSIs) are an important component of the CoE teaching staff.There are 318 faculty, including assistant, associate and full professors, as well as 62 non-tenuretrack instructors. An average of 215 GSIs supplement the instructional faculty each term, along Page 9.596.1with an untold number of graders. The duties of a GSI are varied and range from leading Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationdiscussion and laboratory sections to holding
changes in our environment and to better prepare ourstudents to be future academic leaders.IntroductionPreparing Future Faculty (PFF) programs typically meet three standard requirements: 1. they focus on the full spectrum of faculty roles and responsibilities with regard to teaching, research, and service, and how these responsibilities may be interpreted in different institutions; 2. they provide participants with multiple mentors and feedback not only on their research but also on teaching and service; 3. to accomplish these goals, they involve a cluster of institutions, with one doctoral degree-granting institution partnering with a variety of other institutions.The 12-year-old Preparing
retention.Studies have shown that students are more likely to stay in college if they have clear goals, areactive learners, and are active participants in classroom activities. In other words, students learnmore when they are intensely involved in their education and have opportunities to apply whatthey are learning. Students also benefit when they are engaged in the teaching and learning oftheir peers, such as group work, peer review, study groups, and peer teaching in and out of class.Flipping the classroom is a relatively new active learning technique that faculty at manyinstitutions have incorporated in their teaching. In a flipped classroom, laboratory and in-classactivities replace typical class-lectures. Lectures are normally delivered over some
Engineering and Construction Management. In an attempt to better integratethe Engineering students and Management degree students as well as to seek newefficiency in teaching, the Construction Management students were required to take a 4credit course that was previously required only of the Engineering students. The courseon “Civil Engineering Materials” includes a significant laboratory component and was tobecome the only laboratory course taken by the Construction Management students intheir 4-year curriculum. Starting Fall 2006, the prerequisites and course content werechanged to accommodate the new clientele. The integration proved to be challengingpartly due to the diverse academic background of the two cohorts of students(management and
thenecessary skill acquisition. This paper discusses the structure and support of this course, and our experiencewith teaching it.1. BackgroundFalling enrollments and problems with retention of sophomores prompted us to examine our curriculum in1992. We interviewed students, looked at initiatives at other schools, consulted with industryrepresentatives, and debated strategy and tactics internally. Our conclusion was that we needed to improvethe students’ laboratory experience and integrate it more closely with lecture material. In that way, we feltthat we could provide stronger motivation for the lecture material and also reinforce it through immediateapplication.There has been a trend at the University of Colorado towards a separation of lectures
Session 2233 Fuel Cells and Discovery-Oriented Teaching Camille George Programs in Engineering & Technology Management University of St. Thomas, St. Paul MinnesotaAbstractFuel cells and the hydrogen economy are mentioned in every media outlet. However, the averagegraduating mechanical engineer does not know any more about fuel cells than an interestedlayman. Are our future engineers equipped with the inquiry-based skills needed to adapt torapidly changing technologies? A fuel cell engineering class has been introduced at theUniversity of St
Evaluation of Inexpensive Hardware for Control Theory Application Nahid Uzzaman, Dale Schinstock Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Kansas State University Email: nuzzaman@ksu.edu, dales@ksu.eduAbstractWith the increasing class size, it is necessary to increase the laboratory size associated with thatclass. However, that creates problems like cost and space issues. If smaller and cheaperlaboratory hardware is used these problems might be minimized by having hardware thatstudents can purchase and use at home. However, inexpensive hardware may lead to poormatches between theoretical models and experimental data
for SustainabilityThe estimated volume of concrete produced in 2011 in the U.S. was 500 million cubic yards. In terms of rawmaterials, this volume represents the consumption of 900 million lbs. of stone, 600 million lbs. of sand, 300 millionlbs. of cement and 18 million gallons of water. The Portland Cement Association, (PCA), estimates that the cementindustry is responsible for 1% of mankind’s carbon footprint, while others claim it is as high as 5%. As a teachinginstitution that has numerous degree programs preparing graduates in construction and related built environmentcareers, it is necessary to both teach and practice principles of sustainability in regard to construction materials.While an academic laboratory consumes very small
physically observe thetypes of failures in reinforced concrete that were being studied in the course. The testing was toprovide hands-on experience with the failures to supplement the reading and lecture material.This provided an opportunity for alternative patterns of teaching and learning. The physicaltesting is especially valuable in providing opportunities for visual vs. verbal, inductive vs.deductive, and active vs. reflective learning – patterns that may be less emphasized in atraditional lecture format9, 10.Specific goals include: • Students are able to classify service and failure load behavior in reinforced concrete beams based on observed and recorded data • Students are able to collect and analyze of laboratory data
related systems. That combination ofyears of consulting and teaching helped create the foundation for the course.The course is specifically required for mechanical engineering majors who have elected thevehicle systems concentration within mechanical engineering. Other students who meet thebasic course requirements of Electrical Circuits, and Physics are welcome to take the course as atechnical elective.Course Format and General Content:The Vehicle Energy Systems course involves a typical lecture and laboratory format with twolecture hours and a three-hour laboratory each week. The initial lecture content briefly reviewsfundamental electrical and mechanical basics, and applies basic DC, single phase and three phaseAC content as well as power and
affordability ofcomputing and networking technologies have made Internet-based teaching and learning of boththeory and lab-based courses and programs very practical1,5,9,13. Advances in Internet accesstechnologies like dial-up, broadband, satellite, and personal wireless communication serviceshave propelled online teaching and learning to unprecedented levels. Additionally, thetremendous processing power and reduced cost of today’s personal computers and networkingequipment have made Internet-based programs much more appealing and practical than othertraditional DE based counterparts. As a result of these and other technological developments,there is a flurry of activity as academic institutions attempt to capitalize on this new wave ofenrollment
instructors to proactively incorporate inclusive principles in various aspects oftheir course design, such as syllabi, content, assessment, pedagogy, and laboratories. Bydoing so, they can help students feel included and promote their sense of belonging. Whilethe comprehensiveness and breadth of the checklist may seem overwhelming, courseinstructors and faculty members are encouraged to read through the checklist and considerincorporating practices and strategies as they see fit for their courses and context.Alternatively, an instructor might choose just one of the categories listed in the frameworkand see what course changes might be possible with a more focused approach. The checklistincludes elements of inclusive teaching practices that can be
ideas. Participants could attend workshopsof their choice fitting their professional and teaching interests. The workshop described in thiswork was attended by 30 participants and the workshop slides and references were disseminatedto all 150 Summer School attendees.Particulate systems can be found in more than 90% of chemical and pharmaceutical processes.5Integration of laboratory experiments and demonstrations that include particulate systems is anexcellent way to integrate particle technology into the traditional engineering curriculum andfamiliarize students with this important technology and the pharmaceutical industry. Thepharmaceutical industry employs one in eight chemical engineers, second only to the chemicalprocess industry. The
hours of instructional activity. Electronic Delivery SystemA MATEC module consists of background information, learning plans, and support resources toenable successful delivery of the learning activities by the instructor and mastery of the targetedcompetency by the learner. Because these modules contain the technical core of a rapidlyevolving industry, it is critical that MATEC develop an equally nimble system for deliveringthem to the faculty. Traditional paper-based or conventional electronic delivery systems wouldprohibit rapid response to industry change. Therefore, MATEC is delivering the modules andtheir associated teaching materials to the faculty electronically, using a hybrid Internet/CD
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition CopyrightÓ 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationWill you ever pursue a tenure-track position? “At the end of the most intense laboratory course Iteach, one student asked me, ‘How will you ever get tenure when you spend so much time withus?’ I explained that I did not do research and thus could devote most of my time to teaching. Ialso explained that I will never get tenure unless the criteria for tenure at Rice Universitychanges. Some days I think I should get tenure for my contributions in bioengineeringeducation, and maybe at another university it could happen. Together with two colleagues, Ihave a contract with Prentice Hall to develop the content of the
, Strategies for Success”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.4. Radian Belu, “Virtual Laboratory For Study of the Electric Machines Parameters and Characteristics”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, 20105. Radian G Belu, Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, “Using a Virtual Platform for Teaching Electrical Machines and Power Systems”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 20136. S. Ayasun and G. Karbeyaz, DC motor speed control methods using MATLAB/Simulink and their integration into undergraduate electric machinery courses, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 15, 2007, pp. 347 - 354.7. J.R
quarter in the redesigned course. It shouldalso be noted that in the redesigned course, students were required to attend the once a week one-hour laboratory section in order to work with their design group. The students honored thisrequirement and only rare absences due to illness or conference participation were noted. A BFigure 1. Evaluation of Student Engagement and Perceptions on the Relevance of theCourse Material. (A) Students responded to the prompt “Please indicate the overall educationalvalue of the course” on an end-of-term student evaluation of teaching using a Likert-type scale(1 = Poor to 5 = Excellent). The percentage of responses for each category is presented for the‘15 (black, n = 68/122), ‘16 (dark grey, n = 57/145), ‘17
theinstructor responses, the available texts have a low cost/benefit ratio for students, do not containhelpful homework problems, software examples, or laboratory exercises, and do not adequatelycover the topics that the instructor would like to teach. The highest mean score for textbook wasin “Appropriate writing level for the class you teach”, which averaged a 3.71/7.0 (stdev 1.64).The lowest mean score for textbook was in “Helpful laboratory exercises”, which averaged a Page 26.1446.51.56/7.0 (stdev 1.59).Figure 3: Responses to textbook satisfaction where 7 represents “extremely satisfied” and 1represents “extremely dissatisfied.” A rating of 4.0
power area.The mission of the Center is: • to support the missions of the University and the College of serving its major constituents and striving to create a teaching and learning environment that promotes academic excellence and fosters intellectual growth and scholarship. • to promote and develop fluid power technology. • to develop a productive partnership between the University and the fluid power industry through cutting edge research and innovative educational programs3. Structure of the CenterThe Center consists of four functional units that include two laboratories and two programs. Thelaboratories are a hydraulics laboratory and a computational laboratory. The two programs are atechnical assistance
numericalproblems and generate charts and graphs using MATLAB. This course is designed to givestudents opportunities for hands-on practice through the lab work and project studies. The authoralso instructed senior students to use MATLAB for experimental data analysis in course MEEN4131 (Mechanical Engineering Laboratory). In this paper, these successful teaching experiencesare summarized and some additional suggestion is also addressed.IntroductionMATLAB has been largely used in many engineering schools, because it provides a friendlyinteractive system that incorporates numeric computation, symbolic computation, and scientificvisualization [1-2, 4-10]. Authors taught a sophomore course to help the students apply theMALAB tool for engineering problem
, the paper relates author’s preliminary findingson teaching-learning practices in selected engineering colleges, sheds light on the pros and consof the lecture format, and identifies meanings and substance of different active learningprotocols focusing on cooperative engagement strategies. Next, it identifies common barriers toreformation in general, and to the use of modern pedagogical skills in particular. It is also arguedthat any meaningful change in classroom practices today (dominated by traditional lecture-basedmethods) must be mandated and supported by the university administration. What is necessary tocreate a change, is for the department or college, to have a comprehensive and integrated set ofcomponents: clearly articulated
education, is vitiated, particularly for women and thepoor and more particularly in the physical sciences where women do especially badly, by thenecessary laboratory, quiz and examination components that cannot be offered in distance mode.The solution we have come up with is as follows: 1. Use web-based teaching 6 so that students, communicating over the Internet, do not have to come to meet their teachers. Further, the attendant peer-interaction over the network will diminish the prospects of failure. 2. Redesign traditional experiments so that they can be done at home through home-kits7 and thereby obviate the need to come to a central campus for laboratory sessions. 3. Use the opportunity of using the web to make women
classroom demonstrations and illustrative laboratory and field experiences. He has served as an ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop mentor for five years as well as the founding coordinator for the Oregon Tech Excellence in Teaching Workshop.Dr. Dave Kim, Washington State University Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy of engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his
real time simulation of the powersystem. The GPS units are available for time stamping data received from PMUs and relays. Thelab has been featured in a prominent industrial trade publication 9 and is set to double in size witha $1 million equipment donation from Doble Engineering.The Setting and Testing Digital Relays laboratory course is taught by faculty and experiencedengineers from industry, with TVA routinely supplying adjuncts to teach actual industry practiceto a diverse group including traditional graduate students as well as practicing engineers.To expose students to a wide variety of equipment present in the smart grid, a new laboratorycourse was developed with specific assignments including: • Phasor Measurement Unit setup
, sequentially:1) Newton’s and Faraday’s laws as applied to Cartesian particle dynamics, plus an introductionto elasticity, 2) the same concepts extended to rotational systems, 3) fluid dynamics, and 4)conservation of energy and heat transfer. Teaching of the fundamental technical and physicsemphases will be done through lectures, and their application will occur in the team-based designprojects. Laboratories will be used to teach about, test and characterize the mechanical andelectrical devices associated with the physics emphasis, and to teach the associated softwarepackages and manufacturing techniques to be used in modeling and constructing the student