). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony(Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199-241). New York: Cambridge University Press.15. Medin, D.L., & Ross, B.H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization problem solving, and induction. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.16. Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (2003). Analogical learning in negotiation teams: Comparing cases promotes learning and transfer. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2 (2), 119-127.17. Catrambone, R.., Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on
curricular innovation but also rises tothe challenge of providing globally relevant engineering education.Project ContextThe Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), founded in 1903 is an educational institutionbased on an applications-oriented curriculum. From the beginning, leaders of business andindustry cooperated in the institution's development, and a close relationship was established thathas continued throughout the school’s history.The Biomedical Engineering Program at MSOE was started as a Biomedical EngineeringTechnology program in 1969. In the mid 1980’s the program moved from a technology focus toan engineering focus, and was ABET accredited as one of the first four Biomedical Engineeringprograms in the country in 1990. MSOE’s
consistent information resource for the student teams. At the end ofthe course, students prepare a white paper and present a PowerPoint to the senior managerswithin the participating agency(s).This Practicum course accomplishes several objectives. It provides students with real worldexperience in the analysis of transportation issues. It gives them experience communicating theresults of their work to industry managers. And, critical to this discussion, it provides thestudents with experience working with teams of people from other disciplines, who havedifferent talents, vocabularies, and approaches to problem solving.The spring of 2007 marked the fifth spring in which this course was offered. The transportationtopic areas that students have been
developed to meet this expanding need for IET and IT principles in non-manufacturing industries under the guise of ‘Lean Six Sigma.’ Emerging opportunitiessuch as these at various academic institutions will be discussed.IntroductionThe profession of Industrial Engineering has been evolving since its conception in the1880’s when Frederick Taylor and Frank and Lillian Gilbreth first began to develop therules and techniques of methods improvement1. Since then the term Industrial Engineerhas been associated with a variety of organizational functions and methodologies thatstem from this one central concept of helping enterprises to drive down costs andimprove organizational efficiency. Topics associated with this over the years haveincluded quality
also like to acknowledge contributions from colleagues in theEngineering Learning and Practice Group and Dr. Lesley Jolly of the University of Queenslandfor invaluable help with survey design and methodology.References1. J. P. Trevelyan and S. Tilli, Published Research on Engineering Work. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2007. Vol. 133, No. 4, pp. 300-307.2. J. P. Trevelyan, Technical Coordination in Engineering Practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. Vol. 96, No. 3, pp. 191-204.3. J. P. Trevelyan. A Framework for Understanding Engineering Practice. in American Association for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. 2008. Pittsburgh.(submitted for review).4. R
previous step, students were able touch and feel themechanisms, see them working, and watch the visual aids. The very next step wasabout them getting into the mechanisms for a learning experience that was based onclose contact and practical. Animated toys were selected as the target products sincethe course was based on Animatronics. An example activity is given below in Figure 3.After experimenting with and dissecting the toys, students were asked to generatereports that included: • Function(s) of the toy or the mechanism including motions generated Page 13.76.4 • Structure of the toy and its subassemblies (mechanisms present within
engineering choices.As an art form, film has inherent value in: the richness of the human experience captured in itthat is shared by its audience; the pleasure and insight the experience of viewing film brings tothe audience; the creative integration of narrative, composition, perspective, and techniquecommanded by a team of producer(s), director(s), writers, actors, cameramen, film editors, setdesigners, etc.; the cultural moment it expresses and reveals as it is created and produced; and, itsstaying power as it is viewed, experienced and interpreted over time. Film enables this artisticand technical collective to transform moving image, creating symbols and exploring themes andmyth which mirror other art forms, all of which depend upon technologies
easily. It can provoke interest to related field by experimenting directlywith understanding of simplified system. Also, it provides students an opportunity to apply theknowledge they learned in class.2. The vehicle that replace FCC by GCS loads only GPS does not require expensive inertiasensor or air data sensor, can make by cheap price. Also, It is possible to achieve small size andlight weight because required loading space is decrescent. And It is enable direct application toMAV.Bibliography1. S. Morries and M. Holden, “Design of Micro Air Vehicle and Flight Test Validation”, Conference on Fixed,Flapping and Rotary Wing Vehicles at Very Low Reynolds Numbers, University of Notre Dame, June 20002. K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 4th
produce the same output voltage from a mass flowcontroller. The GCF is a function of specific heat, density, and the molecular structure of thegases. In our case pure hydrogen is used as the baseline gas but flow controllers are usuallycalibrated with nitrogen. To calculate the Gas Correction Factor (GCF) for pure gases, followingformula is used: (0.3106)( S ) GCFx = (d x )(cp x )where GCFx is the gas correction factor for gas x (In our case hydrogen gas used),0.3106 is the factor of (Standard Density of nitrogen) and (Specific Heat of nitrogen),S is the molecular structure correction factor where S is 1.03 for
Page 13.689.7 standard deviation).• One or more statistical measures (e.g. maximum, range, standard deviation) of height (surface elevation) are used to quantify the roughness of the image. The measure(s) selected are aligned with a clearly stated definition of roughness.• Frequency, 2-d size, and/or distances between significant features in the images is addressed. Procedures that address these issues must also use a measure related to height to quantify roughness. This is necessary as measures of frequency, 2-d size, and distance between features alone cannot define roughness. Either the procedure accounts for these issues or a rationale is provided for not considering these issues within the procedure.• The fact
/weblinks/MKEZ-6G6QZY?OpenDocument2. Mariasingam, M.A., Smith. T.W., Courter, S. S., & Moses, G. A. (2007). Globalization and Engineering Education for 2020. Paper presented at the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education [ASEE] Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 24-27, 2007.3. ASEE Conference (2005). Globalization of Engineering Education. Retrieved on August 25, 2006 from http://www.gcee2005.com/default.asp?pageid=10.4. Grindel, T. (Ed) (2006). In search of global engineering excellence: Educating the next generation of engineers for the global workplace. Atlanta/USA. Continental AG, Hanover/Germany. www.conti-online.com5. Kenney, M. and Dossani, R (2005). Offshoring and the Future of U.S. Engineering: An
). Cost analysis of inadequate interoperability in the US capital facilities industry. http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/oae/publications/gcrs/04867.pdf6 Johnson, S. (1998). What’s in a representation, why do we care, and what does it mean? Examining the Evidence from Psychology. In Automation in Construction. 8 (1): 15-24.7 Birx, G. BIM Evokes Revolutionary Changes to Architecture Practice at Ayers/Saint/Gross. In AIA Architect. (2005). http://www.aia.org/aiarchitect/thisweek05/tw1209/tw1209changeisnow.cfm8 Khamlani, L. (2004). The IFC Building Model: A Look Under the Hood. AECbytes Feature (March 30, 2004). http://www.aecbytes.com/feature/2004/IFCmodel.html9 Hagan, S, Graves, T, Matta, C., and Kam, C. (2005). Building
, Collaborate, Teach, Collaborate, Teach, Retrieve, Assemble, Learn, Understand, Learn, Understand, Find, Discover, View, Edit, Annotate Create, Discover Create, Discover Extract, Organize Interact with Shared Content Interact with Shared Content Interaction and Collaboration Workspaces (“Documents”) brevitatem, 2 3 Description and Organization absolutionem, paucitatem s f 2
., Michael Lovell, and Larry S. Shuman. “Product Realization for Global Opportunities: Learning Collaborative Design in an International Setting.” International Journal of Engineering Education, forthcoming Spring 2008.2. T.L. Friedman, “China’s Little Green Book,” New York Times, Nov. 2, 2005, Section A, p. 29.3. Eric Beckman, Mary Besterfield-Sacre, Gena Kovalcik, Matthew Mehalik, Kim LaScola Needy, Robert Ries, Laura Schaefer, Larry Shuman, and Doris Kowaltowski, “Creating the Holistic Engineer: A Focus on Sustainability in an International Setting.” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, Rio Conference, 2006.4. C.K. Prahalad, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School
into the cone (see Fig. 2). The nut structure was then changed to a retainer ring structure (Zhong, 2001). However, five years later, on March 16, 2006, the retainer ring structure also broke at the same location (see Fig. 2). A comprehensive investigation was then performed including dynamic analysis of position rods to identify the design problem. References Zhong, S. (2001). Failure analysis and design strength study of piston rod for the Shuikou hydroelectric power unit 6. Large Electr Mach Hydraulic Turbine, 7, 7–11.Second Passage The turbine was put into production in November, 1995. On February 10, 2000, the turbine was found to be
, An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, 1998, Addison-Wesly Educational Publishers Inc.3. Brauer, Roger L., Safety and Health for Engineers, Second Edition, 2006, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.4. Meredith, Jack R., and Samuel J. Mantel, Jr., Project Management, Managerial Approach, Sixth Edition, 2006, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.5. Ostwald, Phillip F. and Timothy S. McLaren, Cost Analysis and Estimating for Engineering and Management, 2004, Pearson Prentice Hall6. Peterson, William R., Rafael E. Landaeta, and Bryan Magary, “Is It Time For A New Paradigm?”, 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings (June 12 – 15, 2005, Portland, Oregon), American Society for Engineering Education, Session 2639 (CD-ROM
. Page 13.32.137. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., and McGourty, J. (2005, January). The ABET “Professional Skills”- Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, p. 41-55.8. Brumm, T. J., Hanneman, L. F. & Mickelson, S. K. (2006). Assessing and Developing Program Outcomes through workplace competencies. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22, 1, p. 123-129.9. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., and McGourty, J. (2005, January). The ABET “Professional Skills”- Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, p. 41-55.10. Rogers, G. (2006, August). “Direct and Indirect Assessments: What Are They Good For?” Community Matters: A Monthly
classifications identified in other studies ofcommunities of practice – i.e., elaboration, interpretation, explanation and argumentation in thework of Palincsar[10] and contextualization, explanation, instruction, critique, and elicitationamong the speech events identified by Donath et al.[3].Scaling tendency refers to the context in which the discourse occurs and where it fits in thelandscape of activities that comprise the experience of doing research. We have identified threescales of discourse. The most finely grained is tactics (T) , which focuses on details of thespecific research. The mid-level is strategy (S), which focuses on both the experimental designand interpretation of results, which may address issues like assumptions, simplifications
. “Development of a Concept Inventory for Strength of Materials”, 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2003.28. Richardson, Jim. “Concept Inventories: Tools for Uncovering STEM Students’ Misconceptions”, AAAS, 2005.29. Rosati, Peter. “Mechanics Texts are for Students”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 1996.30. Sjøberg, S. Lie. Technical Report 81-11, University of Oslo, 1981.31. Steif, Paul. “An Articulation of the Concepts and Skills Which Underlie Engineering Statics”, Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2004.32. Steif, Paul S. and John A. Dantzler. “A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis”, Journal of Engineering Education, October
implementation is easier to implement because there is noadditional cabling required beyond power to the access points, but the distribution system mustbe configured manually by the administrator.In order to replicate similar course modules, the instructor(s) must obtain the proper hardwareand make it available for student use. Access points must support some kind of similar meshprotocol, as well as wireless distribution system protocols that can work in conjunction with802.11 standards. Ideally, wireless access points utilized for this course module should supporttwo separate radios. One radio should support 802.11a while the other supports 802.11b/gstandards. In this manner, the distribution system can be separated from the client-accessdomain. A
Priviledges and Watchlist Statistic Black List s and (IP or Block Loggin Username ) User Group (Different Projects ) PACE Global Vehicle
Solving: The Path-Mapping Approach,” Cognitive Science, Vol. 25, 2001, pp. 67-110.[14] Mayer, R. E., “Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Motivational Aspects of Problem Solving,” Instructional Science, Vol. 26, 1998, pp. 49-63.[15] Cho, K.L., and D. H. Jonassen, “The Effects of Argumentation Scaffolds on Argumentation and Problem Solving,” Educational Technology: Research & Development, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2002, pp. 5-22.[16] Dunkle, M.E., G. Schraw, and L. D. Bendixen, “Cognitive Processes in Well-Defined and Ill-Defined Problem Solving,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, USA, 1995.[17] Hong, N.S., D. H. Jonassen, S. McGee, “Predictors of Well
.Hoyles, C. and Sutherland, R. Logo Mathematics in the Classroom. Routledge, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, 1989.Papert, S. Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books Inc., New York, NY, 1980.Papert, S. Children’s Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. Basic Books Inc., New York, NY, - 1993.Watt, D. Learning with Logo. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, 1983.Watt, M. & Watt, D. Teaching with Logo: Building Blocks for Learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Menlo Park, CA, 1986.Weir, S. Cultivating Minds: A Logo Casebook. Harper & Row Publishers, New York, NY, 1987.Appendix B: Example of a
cross walking techniques continue to help us make progress while providing us withthe flexibility to adapt to rapid changes in the volatile environment.Bibliography1. M. Bakia, “The Cost of Computers in Classrooms: Data from Developing Countries.” Mimeograph, Page 13.39.14Washington: The World Bank. 2000.2. E. Brewer, M. Demmer, B. Du, M. Ho, M. Kam, S. Nedevschi, J. Pal, R. Patra, S. Surana, K. Fall, “The Case forTechnology in Developing Regions,” IEEE Computer Society, June 2005.3. A. Cawthera, “Computers in Secondary Schools in Developing Countries: Costs and Other Issues” (2001)http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Pubs/files/computersinsecschoolsedpaper43
greatest force on which particle(s)?Table 1 shows that there is no significant difference in the average performance on the pre-testand post-test on question (5). The most common incorrect choice for question (5) was option (b)because students used the redundant information about angle provided and had difficultyvisualizing the problem in three dimensions. The correct answer is option (e) because thevelocity of all of the three charged particles is perpendicular to the magnetic field. Writtenexplanations and interviews suggest that some students incorrectly used the superfluousinformation provided about the angles that the charged particles (1) and (3) make with thehorizontal. During interviews, only when the students choosing option (b) were
scholarship.”([2], p. 17). Achieving such recognition and rewards would beof value to new faculty. Therefore, it is in the long-term interests of new faculty that thisprecursor discussion targeting administrators be held.Our particular focus is scholarly teaching by engineering faculty. The NRC has recognized thatthere are distinct differences in the ways the various disciplines approach teaching andlearning([2], p. 5). Three linked events have prompted changes in the instructional environment forengineering faculty and created an opportunity for increased attention to evaluation of teaching: ‚ In the late 1990’s the system of accreditation for undergraduate engineering degrees shifted from a focus on process to a focus on student learning
insulation to provide a level surface tosecure the water pipes (Figure 5b). Cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) tubing was selectedfor ease of installation and its ability to withstand the expected 30 psi circulationpressure. A second three-inch pour covers the tubing to a depth of two inches (Figure5c).The orientation, diameter and length of the PEX tubing required was determined using aConduction Shape Factor, S, for rows of equally spaced parallel, isothermal cylindersburied in a semi-infinite medium12. The distance from the top surface of the pad to thepiping is 2”, the distance from the piping to the insulation below is 3”. The use of asemi-infinite shape factor, when the geometry is clearly not semi-infinite is supported bythe addition of
for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin 128: 612-637; 2002.Bransford JD, Schwartz DL. Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal with Multiple Implications. In: Iran-Nejad A, Pearson PD, editors. Review of research in education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999: p 61-100.Brewer WF, Chinn CA, Samarapungavan A. Explanation in Scientists and Children. Minds and Machines 8: 119-136; 1998.Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher 18: 32-42; 1989.Carey S. On the origin of causal understanding. Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate: 268-308; 1995.Cobb P, Bowers J. Cognitive and Situated Learning Perspectives in
AC 2008-207: ACTIVE AND COLLABORATIVE LEARNING EXERCISES FOR AFIRST COURSE IN FLUID MECHANICSStephen Turns, Pennsylvania State University Stephen R. Turns, professor of mechanical engineering, joined the faculty of The Pennsylvania State University in 1979. His research interests include combustion-generated air pollution, other combustion-related topics, and engineering education pedagogy. He has served as an ABET mechanical engineering program evaluator since 1994. He has received several teaching awards at Penn State, including the Milton S. Eisenhower Award for Distinguished Teaching. He is also the author of three student-centered textbooks: An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and