of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2011.tb00015.xCardella, M. E., & Knight, D. B., & Lee, W. C., & Reid, K. W., & Hynes, M. M., & Young Collins, G. D., & Beauchamp, C., & Dandridge, T., & Colquitt, D. (2019, June), Board 24: Promoting the Participation of Elementary School African Americans, Hispanics, and Girls in STEM by Expanding Summer Engineering Experiences Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32305Carr, R. L., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Horstman, B. J. (2012, October). Work in progress: Analysis of change in engineering construct knowledge. In 2012
struggle to attract foreign grad- uate students discouraged by the tone of U.S. policies and rethoric,” ASEE Prism, pp. 24–29, Mar. 2019. [4] Q. Guo, “Top U.S. Colleges With Branches Overseas,” Forbes, Aug. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/quanzhiguo/2018/08/21/ top-u-s-colleges-with-branches-overseas/ [5] “Enrollment in Distance Education,” Aug. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.chronicle. com/article/Enrollment-in-Distance/244085/ [6] D. Lederman, “Are we seeing early signs of saturation in online academic programs?” Inside Higher Ed, Jan. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/ article/2019/01/09/are-we-seeing-early-signs-saturation-online
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[2] D. M. L. Salazar, “Faculty as Change Agents”, 2015.[3] G. Lozano, M. Franco, and V. Subbian, “Transforming STEM Education in Hispanic ServingInstitutions in the United States: A Consensus Report,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018, doi:10.2139/ssrn.3238702.[4] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, vol. 111, no. 23, p. 8410, Jun. 2014, doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[5] A. Ali and I. Cuervo, “Applying Design Thinking in Evaluation,” AEA 365, 28-Sep-2018.[Online]. Available:https://aea365.org/blog/applying-design-thinking-in-evaluation-by-asma-m-ali-and-isabel-p-cuervo/.[6] Pellet Productions, “ATE
-Purdue University Indianapolis Karen Alfrey is a Clinical Associate Professor in Biomedical Engineering and Associate Dean for Undergraduate Academic Affairs and Programs in the School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. She has been a member of ASEE since 2003.Dr. Mengyuan (Alice) Zhao, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42482 Mengyuan (Alice) Zhao is the Associate Director of Research and Development at IUPUI CyberLab. Her team works on designing, developing, and implementing innovative educational technology tools
“significanteducational benefits” of HIPS have been shown to extend to “those from demographic groupshistorically underserved by higher education” [18], and these are the groups institutions will behoping to recruit and retain as we hit the enrollment cliff.Information and research, like that shown in the previous paragraphs, are a small sampling of thedata that inspired CSU to start the SURE program in the spring of 2019. Since that time, theSURE program has yielded stellar results, demonstrating increased retentions rates of over 7% inthe WSCOE and increased retention rates of almost 5% at CSU when compared to a WSCOEreference group. In addition, students participating in the SURE program are better able to seethemselves as an engineer, more likely to reach
-racial-and-ethnic-diversity/[5] J. Bhuyan, F. Wu, C. Thomas, K. Koong, J. W. Hur, and C.-H. Wang, "Aerial drone: Aneffective tool to teach information technology and cybersecurity through project-based learningto minority high school students in the US," TechTrends, vol. 64, pp. 899-910, April 2020.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00502-7.[6] C. Brathwaite and J. Vernon, "GlobalCUNY: The NYC Louis Stokes alliance model forinternational research experiences for minority students," in 2019 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo.,Tampa, FL., June 2019, DOI: 10.18260/1-2-32876.[7] C. Demetry and S. Sontgerath, "A middle school engineering outreach program for girlsyields STEM undergraduates," in 2017 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Columbus, OH, June 2017,DOI
the ASEE Energy Conversion and Conservation Division. She received a Dipl.Ing. degree in mechanical engineering from Belgrade University in 1992, an M.S.M.E. from the University of Washington in 1994 and a Ph.D. from the University of Washington in 2000.Dr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is a Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the Univer- sity of Washington. She is interested in all aspects of engineering education, including how to support c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #26707engineering students in
activities that can be used throughout various engineering andcomputer science courses from first year to upper division [5].As part of this project, the University of Denver (DU) has developed and implemented severalactivities, including a group-based hairdryer design task for second year thermodynamicsstudents. The pilot of the activity took place in spring of 2019 and this initial experience waspresented at ASEE in 2020 [6]. Since then, the activity has been run four times and iterated tohelp strengthen the goals of the activity and assess its effectiveness. Changes since the initialpilot have included options for remote courses, added reflection time, and a focus on overalldesign process instead of detailed mathematical questions. The current
] Institute of International Education, Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange, 2019. http://www.iie.org/opendoors[11] B. Jesiek, Y. Haller, and J. Thompson, “Developing Globally Competent Engineering Researchers: Outcomes-Based Instructional and Assessment Strategies from the IREE 2010 China Research Abroad Program.,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 2014.[12] S. Levonisova et al., “Identifying Factors That Enhance Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Global Preparedness,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, Washington, 2015, pp. 26.874.1-26.874.18, doi: 10.18260/p.24211.[13] G. Ragusa, “Engineering Global Preparedness: Parallel Pedagogies
from theimmediately relatable and incrementally to the future self an instructor can increase the studentawareness of different perspectives, widen the inter-relations of stakeholders being consideredand incrementally provide situations that are further removed from the student’s personalexperience. Students were then asked to interview non-engineers to get feedback on theperception of engineering decisions accounting for end user perspectives. This was followed upwith a final assignment in which students reflected on watching portions of an ASEE sessionpanel of activists giving their experiences around specific engineering crisis (CommunityEngagement Panel, 2019). The voices of stakeholders in these last two assignments are intendedto move
, “Utilizing Parametric 3D Solid Modeling to Illustrate Statics and Strengthof Materials Concepts.” in Proceedings of the 2018 ATMAE Annual Conference, KansasCity, Missouri, November 7-9. 2018, ATMAE, 2019. pp. 146-152.[6] R. Shih, “The applied finite element analysis course at Oregon Institute ofTechnology.” In Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual conference and Exposition,Honolulu, Hawaii, June 24-27, 2004, American Society for Engineering Education, 2007.[7] R. L. Roberts, “Teaching Finite Element Analysis for mechanical undergraduatestudents,” Doctoral dissertation, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, 2019.[8] J. L. Irwin, “Three-way Comparison Used to Reinforce FEA Solutions.” InProceedings of the 2008 ASEE North Midwest Section
Capacity, Access, Participation, and/orExperience, as based on the CAPE Framework [3]. Overall, models focused on partnership 1Zarch, McGill ASEE 2023collaborations, including RPPs, are designed to enable a more balanced power structure betweenresearchers and practitioners to create an asset-based approach to research [4].Recently, three organizations, all of which focus on CS education implementation, formed anRPP to identify problems of practice and develop an intervention to address them. Since this workfocuses on the collaborative partnership model of an RPP, a clear definition is needed. RPPs aredefined as “...long-term
typically cover several disciplines across a fewweeks or only devote one single day to cover each engineering branch [8, 9, 10]. Furthermore,BME specific programs typically encompass the entire multidisciplinary field, which requiresimplementation of a wide variety of projects [11, 12].To provide a low-cost and scalable approach to introduce BME applications to high schoolstudents, the authors developed a BME high school summer program that was piloted in thesummer of 2019. Aimed at introducing students to the BME field, the program focused onintroducing neuroscience and neuroengineering principles using low-cost and open sourcematerials.Objective:To determine the efficacy of this approach, the following research questions were posed:1) Is it
conduct research on Smart Energy Management Systems in High-Rise Buildings. During her industry career, she designed and procured the electrical, mechanical and HVAC systems for large commercial, residential and industrial buildings. She established the BS EE, BS CpE and MS EE Concentrations in Power Engineering at GMU. She supports energy-related projects and initiatives at GMU, and collaborates with a multidisciplinary team on research projects in the areas of smart grid, power system protection and cybersecurity, Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) and grid modernization.Mr. Matthew Gardner, ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section
Publications, 2016, p. 248. SAGE Publications.[14] C. O. Flores, T. Poisot, S. Valverde, and J. S. Weitz, "BiMat: a MATLAB(R) package to facilitate the analysis of bipartite networks," Methods Ecol Evol, vol. 7, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12458.[15] C. Brehm, J. Linsey, and A. Layton, "Designing MakerSpaces in a Nested Structure to Maximize Student Impact," presented at the ASEE 2020 Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Canada, abstract accepted.[16] C. Brehm and A. Layton, "Designing eco-industrial parks in a nested structure to mimic mutualistic ecological networks," Procedia CIRP, vol. 80, pp. 590-595, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.011.[17] M. Almeida-Neto, P. Guimarães, Paulo R
including several papers on engineering education and the unique undergraduate curriculum at Rowan University, especially the Engineering Clinics. She has been involved in various outreach activities to recruit more women and minorities into engineering and is Program Chair Elect of the Women in Engineering Division of ASEE. She is the recipient of the 2011 New Jersey Section of ASCE Educator of the Year award as well as the 2013 Distinguished Engineering Award from the New Jersey Alliance for Action.Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA). Prior to 2016 she was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at
, “Engineering Ph.D. students’ research experiences: A think-aloud study,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., 2019, pp. 1–4.[21] N. H. Choe and M. Borrego, “Master’s and doctoral engineering students’ interest in industry, academia, and government careers,” J. of Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 325–346, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20317.[22] G. Sallai, J. Vicente, C. Berdanier, and K. Shanachilubwa, “Coping landscapes: How graduate engineering students’ coping mechanisms correspond with dominant stressors in graduate school,” in 2022 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., 2022.[23] E. Hocker, E. Zerbe, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Characterizing doctoral engineering student socialization: Narratives of mental health, decisions to
Eibenschutz, S. M. A. Awadh, L. and El Said,“Being female and an engineering student in Qatar: Successes, challenges, andrecommendations, ASEE 2017 Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25-28,2017. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/being-female-and-an-engineering-student-in-qatar-successes-challenges-and-recommendations (Accessed March 5, 2021].[11] M.S. Alsheeb and A. Hodges, “The impact of socio-cultural factors in Qatar on females inengineering, ASEE 2019 Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 15-19, 2017.[Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-impact-of-socio-cultural-factors-in-qatar-on-females-in-engineering (Accessed March 5, 2021].[12] C. Seron, S. S. Silbey, E. Cech, and B. Rubineau, “Persistence
faculty arelooking forward to collecting further data in future years when this course sequence is againoffered. At this juncture, we can infer that we have a highly plausible solution for filling theeducational gap in the robotics and automation curriculum.References[1] G. Lyman, J. Wilcox and R. Sanford, "Robotics Retrofit: Renovating Outdated Robotics Platforms to Meet Current Curriculum Requirements Driven by Industry Demand," in ASEE PEER, New Orleans, LA, 2019.[2] M. Mikhail, "Enhancing College of Technology and Engineering Technology Programs with Industrial Robotics Concentration," in ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[3] A. Yousuf, M. A. Mustafa, A. G. De La Cruz, A. Villanueva and M. M. Hayder
climate," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, pp. 45-51, 1996.[5] C. Faber, C. Smith-Orr, C. Bodnar, A. Coso Strong, W. Lee, and E. McCave, "Best practices for developing a virtual peer mentoring community," in ASEE Annual Conference proceedings, 2017.[6] R. Pimmel, A. F. McKenna, N. L. Fortenberry, B. Yoder, and R. C. Chavela Guerra, "Faculty development using virtual communities of practice," In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Atlanta, GA., vol. 23, p. 1, 2013.[7] L. Bosman and P. Voglewede, "How can a faculty community of practice change classroom practices?," College Teaching, 2019.[8] A. L. Pawley, A. R. Carberry, M. E. Cardella, M.-I. Carnasciali, S. R. Daly, J. L. Gorlewicz
; Exposition.Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, revised Nov. 2018 “2018 Accreditation Criteria andProcedures”, retrieved from https://engineerscanada.ca, February, 2020.Estrada, H. (2006). “A survey of the American architectural engineering curriculum”, 2006ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Mitchell, J. (2009). “Defining architectural engineering design”, 2009 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition.Mui, R.H., Woo, S.J., Arbuckle, S., Al-Hammoud, R., and Walbridge S., (2019) “ArchitecturalEngineering Start with Design from Day 1”, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Phillips, J.J. (2018). “Current trends in architectural engineering education”, 2018 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition.
online delivery of en- gineering content with emphasis on how the material can be modified to provide a personalized learning experience. LaMeres is also researching strategies to improve student engagement and how they can be used to improve diversity within engineering. LaMeres received his Ph.D. from the University of Col- orado, Boulder. He has published over 90 manuscripts and 5 textbooks in the area of digital systems and engineering education. LaMeres has also been granted 13 US patents in the area of digital signal propa- gation. LaMeres is a member of ASEE, a Senior Member of IEEE, and a registered Professional Engineer in the States of Montana and Colorado. Prior to joining the MSU faculty, LaMeres worked as
. Godwin, A. Thielmeyer, J. A. Rohde, D. Verdín, B. S. Benedict, R. A. Baker, and J. Doyle. “Using topological data analysis in social science research: Unpacking decisions and opportunities for a new method,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[11] J. D. Cribbs, Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert and P. M. Sadler, "Establishing an explanatory model for mathematics identity," Child Development, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1048-1062, 2015.[12] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler and M. C. Shanahan, "Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study," Journal of research in science teaching, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 978-1003, 2010.[13] A
AssessingEngineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 105–115, 2004,[17] “Intercultural Knowledge and Competence VALUE rubric.” Association of AmericanColleges and Universities, 2009https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics/value-rubrics-intercultural-knowledge-and-competence[18] “Integrative and Applied Learning VALUE rubric.” Association of American Colleges andUniversities, 2009https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics/value-rubrics-integrative-and-applied-learning[19] Hylton, J. B., and Hays, B. A., “Modifying the VALUE Rubrics to Assess theEntrepreneurial Mind-set” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Tampa, Florida. June 2019.[20] Li, C. Q., & Harichandran, R. S
Proceedings, June 2020. [5] E. Briody, R. Rodriguez-Mejia, C. W. Rothstein, and E. Berger, “Busy times, production students: Cutoff points marking time in university engineering culture,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.purdue.edu/meercat/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/REES-Final- Version-of-Paper-May-2019.pdf [6] E. Dringenberg and A. Kramer, “Smartness in engineering culture: An interdisciplinary dialogue paper,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–33272, Tampa, Florida, USA, 2019. [7] D. S. Rose M. Karra, Kelly A. Rodgers and B. Bogue, “Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101(1), pp. 6–27, 2010. [Online]. Available: https
remotely during COVID. In 2021 and2022 a hard copy of the pre-survey was handed out on the first day of class. The post survey wasavailable online and also handed out on the last day of class. Response rates were much higheron the pre-survey (71-88%) than the post-survey (25-63%). Results in this paper represent onlythe paired responses where students completed both the pre and post surveys.DEI Course Integration DetailsEthicsThe ethics homework assignment for the course in 2019 to 2022 are shown in Figure 1. In 2019portions of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Community Panel [42]were shown in-class. During the panel Lena Young-Green discusses how her community inTampa, Florida, was impacted when the interstate highway was
thinking integrated into the course. In theone exception (Fall 2019, First Year course at University B), the research team member/co-author gave two guest lectures on sociotechnical thinking in the course. The courses span threeyears of a typical engineering curriculum and represent both introductory/project-based coursesand a core engineering science course to facilitate understanding across a breadth of studentexperiences.To protect students, the semi-structured focus groups were conducted by two of this paper’s co-authors not teaching the specific classes from which participants were recruited. A secondmember of the research team, either a student researcher or faculty member, observed each focusgroup. Focus groups were recorded and later
must find ways to recruit and retain these students and support educators indoing the same in the classroom.References[1] S. Secules, “Putting Diversity in Perspective: A Critical Cultural Historical Context for Representation in Engineering,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017, Accessed: Jun. 28, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/putting-diversity-in-perspective-a-critical-cultural-historical-context-for -representation-in-engineering.[2] N. A. of E. and N. R. Council, Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. 2009.[3] G. Lawrie et al., “Moving Towards Inclusive Learning and Teaching: A Synthesis of Recent Literature,” Teach
traditional college classrooms and learningmanagement systems are teacher-centered pedagogy in which the instructor provides the content6. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 2Direct learning is teacher centered, interaction between students is lacking, and there are nocooperative groups. Lack of activity makes students face difficulties in understanding the learningmaterial. Therefore, it should take a learning model that stimulates students' responses andactiveness7. Linsenmeyer suggested that
—is of paramountimportance.The importance of communication within the engineering industry has prompted an ideologicalshift in higher education—especially regarding the skills engineering students should possess.Learning outcomes of engineering students are moving from emphasis on students’ technicalabilities towards what are termed ‘soft skills’ that complement technical expertise—one suchskill being successful communication. In fact, the main accrediting board for the Engineeringfield—the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)—listed the students’“ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences” (ABET, 2017) as one of its maincriteria for institutions seeking accreditation. Troy and Liang (2019) echo this