engineering.Teaching in the programs are mainly carried out as lectures, lessons, and laboratory sessions. In atypical engineering course, 30−40% of the education is carried out as lectures, 30−40% aslessons and 20−40% as laboratory experiments. In addition, case studies and project works areused in about half of the courses. Some projects are small (down to 15% of the course workload)and some may make up the whole course.In the present study, two courses are of interest. One is a course in Engineering thermodynamicswhich both the ME, DPD and IEM students take; the ME students as the very first course of theprogram, and the PDP and IEM students at the middle of the second year. The other is a bachelor(capstone) project course that the IEM students take as
“Parallel Triples.” As a professor who gives lectures and creates laboratory assignments inelectronics fundamentals, I will now be able to use this research to create “unmessy” parallelresistor examples with standard values that, unlike the formula 6Ω || 3Ω = 2Ω , will not cause mystudents to assume that the parallel resistance formula can simply be replaced with division.References1 Evelyn B. Christensen, “Pythagorean Triples Served for Supper,” Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Sept. 1997, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60-62.2 Tony Atherton, “A History of Ohm’s Law,” Electronics and Power, June 1986, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 467-471.3 Aziz S. Inan, “What did Gustav Robert Kirchhoff
Denial of Service Attacks, Intrusion Detection, Information Visualization. He published more than 140 conference and journal papers, many of them at IEEE level, authored 2 books and coauthored 3 books in the area of digital communications systems. During the AY 2014-2015 he spent his sabbatical at the Center for High Assurance Computer Systems Code 5540, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, 20375. Since 2009 he has been selected every summer as ONR Senior Research Fellows for the ASEE Summer Faculty Research Program at NRL. His research is sponsored by NSF, ONR, AFOSR and USAF. He received in last five years more than $1M for his research from DOD as a sole PI for the following grants: –Army Research
, private cloud, public cloud, online learning.IntroductionLearning by doing is important for engineering and technology education. Cloud computingleverages efficient sharing of on-demand, self-managed, virtual infrastructures, allowing swiftdeployment and adaptation of curriculum and laboratory experiences in step with the advances inthe field. Adoption of cloud computing technologies is a clear trend in online learning.1,2 Someeducators have used cloud technologies for years. Others are still exploring ways of incorporatingcloud computing in teaching and learning. There are many different approaches of implementingcloud computing.2,3 For educators with little experience in cloud computing deployment, selectinga suitable cloud platform to use can
. His research is in DigitalCommunication, Information theory, Statistics and Applied Mathematics and Cybersecurity:Anomaly detection, Detection of Low Rate Denial of Service Attacks, Intrusion Detection,Information Visualization. He published more than 140 conference and journal papers, many ofthem at IEEE level, authored 2 books and coauthored 3 books in the area of digital communicationssystems. During the AY 2014-2015 he spent his sabbatical at the Center for High AssuranceComputer Systems Code 5540, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, 20375. Since 2009he has been selected every summer as ONR Senior Research Fellows for the ASEE SummerFaculty Research Program at NRL. His research is sponsored by NSF, ONR, AFOSR and USAF.He received in
continuous learning and provide a clear that the biggest issue amongst all of the schools is themore detailed look at the various disciplines in lack of funding. It is difficult for every elementary, middleengineering. The repeated visits also allow the EOW and high school to have the correct equipment to teach theteam members to develop a rapport with the students five main engineering disciplines. Other concerns includethat they are working with to enable them to provide the lack of interest the students may have, the knowledge thementorship and guidance in advising the children on a teachers have for the subject and the lesson/laboratory spacepath to a successful career within the STEM
with the culmination of their knowledge how to solve a complexengineering problem. The senior capstone course is divided into two quarters the first one beingthe design phase and the second one being the build. The students are divided into groups of 5 to6 with each group having a different project. What made this group noteworthy is that the scopeof their project went beyond just design and fabrication: They had to prepare a laboratory-styleexperiment to obtain useful data. The students were then required to assess the data in thecontext of ground source heat pump technology. The testing and analysis made this a unique,research-based project which set it apart from many other capstone projects. Students obtainedexposure in both academic and
. 3.81 3.42 0.39I have the ability to integrate theory and practice. 4.00 3.76 0.24I understand how scientists work on real problems. 4.13 3.70 0.43I understand that scientific assertions require supportingevidence. 4.53 4.33 0.20I have the ability to analyze data and other information. 4.25 4.09 0.16I understand science. 4.28 4.12 0.16I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 3.84 3.97 -0.13I have learned laboratory techniques. 3.78 3.76
, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 MAKER: Face Detection Library to Teach Algorithm Basics in PythonAbstractThis paper describes an approach to teach face detection algorithms to beginner levelprogramming learners using a face detection tool built in Python. Learners are expected tounderstand and practice their Python coding skills
seals for the next generation of manned spacecraft. The unique problem necessitated a grasp of both fluid dynamics and material science, as well as experimental and computational analysis. As a DAGSI/Air Force Research Laboratory Ohio Student-Faculty Fellow, Dr. Garafolo gained experimental knowledge in structural dynamics of turbomachinery. In particular, his research on engine order excitation yielded insight into generating high cycle fatigue of turbomachinery using acoustic excitation.Mr. Benjamin G. Kruggel, University of Akron Ben is a graduate student at the University of Akron pursuing a MEd in high school science education. He received his B.S. in aeronautical engineering from Ohio State in 1994 and was
learning.Dr. Ravi P. Ramachandran, Rowan University Ravi P. Ramachandran received the B. Eng degree (with great distinction) from Concordia University in 1984, the M. Eng degree from McGill University in 1986 and the Ph.D. degree from McGill University in 1990. From October 1990 to December 1992, he worked at the Speech Research Department at AT&T Bell Laboratories. From January 1993 to August 1997, he was a Research Assistant Professor at Rutgers University. He was also a Senior Speech Scientist at T-Netix from July 1996 to August 1997. Since September 1997, he is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rowan University where he has been a Professor since September 2006. He has served as a
struggling students. These efforts help build the CEE Department as a place wherepositive change is happening and coupled with the research group’s efforts to disseminateknowledge, will lead the transformation of the College of Engineering.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underIUSE/PFE:RED Grant No. 1632053. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. C.S. Slater, T.R. Chandrupatla, R.A. Dusseau, J. L. Schmalzel, (1996). “Development of multifunctional laboratories in a new engineering school,” ASEE Annual Conference and
the under-representation of women and minorities in STEMby involving undergraduate students from across the U.S. in automotive-related research projectsfor 10 weeks during the summer [1-3]. Ultimately, the goal is to engage participants in rewardingautomotive research experiences that motivate them to pursue graduate studies and embark oncareers in in industry, government or academia.REU programs are designed around the needs of the undergraduate participants. The researchprojects, seminars, laboratory/industry tours, meetings with mentors, networking events andother activities are all set up to maximize the positive impact of a research experience on thestudents. Numerous studies have shown that active participation in hands-on
Paper ID #23098Investigation of Factors Promoting Competitive Candidates for Entry-levelBioengineering PositionsDr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Programs in Bio- engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In her career, Marcia has been active in improving undergraduate education through developing problem-based laboratories to enhance ex- perimental design skills; developing a preliminary design course focused on problem identification and market space (based on an industry partner’s protocol); and
theireducation, complete their degrees, and prepare for a career and/or graduate studies; 3) toincrease the retention rate and monitor each supported student’s progress to ensure theircompletion of degree requirements within a reasonable time frame; 4) to encouragestudents to graduate and continue their education in graduate school, or obtainemployment in local industry, such as a nearby national laboratory; and 5) to engagescholarship recipients in college activities and encourage college service career options,such as teaching and research.The indicators measuring the effectiveness of the project are: 1) increasing the degreeprogress rate; this means that scholarship recipients will successfully complete aminimum of 12 credit hours towards the degree
’ professionalism and autonomy.The expected outcomes of this REU program are:1. Students will be able to demonstrate core knowledge in SST related areas (i.e. structural control, structural health monitoring, signal processing, etc.);2. Students will be able to understand and identify the differences between engineering science and engineering practice;3. Students have publications co-authored with academic/industrial mentors.Program ActivitiesThe program will feature: formal training, workshops, and supplemental activities in the conductof research in academia and industry; innovative research experience through engagement inprojects with scientific and practical merits in both academic and industrial environments;experience in conducting laboratory
study was set up as a traditional lecture classroom.Based on student comments, students attended class expecting to listen to a lecture with noexpectations of participating in group exercises. In the future, the course will be offered in aclassroom that is more conducive to group exercises. A classroom configured for groupexercises (such as a laboratory setting) [2] should inform student expectations regarding classactivities.Conclusions and Future WorkThe data from this preliminary study do not yield a firm conclusion about the effectiveness of theguided-inquiry active learning system. The results do indicate a modest gain in learning;however, it is not clear whether students would have demonstrated a higher gain in knowledgewithin a
currently being pilot tested under the Active Learning Modules toSupport Problem-Based Learning: Effects on Engineering Retention and Academic Outcomes ofAt-Risk Students project funded through the National Science Foundation IUSE Program(Award # 1725874) to refine through evidence-based process outcomes.IntroductionAn engineering graphics course is important for the development of visualization abilities,communication in engineering settings, and provides foundational skill needed in subsequentengineering coursework [1], [2]. Like many introductory courses at the collegiate level,engineering graphics may be taught via a lecture-based format of instruction with studentsworking on assigned work outside of the classroom or in a large laboratory
University. Her interests include innovative laboratory experiments for undergraduate instruction, engineering design for first-year students, and encouraging women to study engineering. For the three years prior to teaching at Michigan State University, she taught freshman and sophomore engineering courses at Rowan University. While at Rowan University she was Co-Director of RILED (Rowan Instructional Leadership and Educational De- velopment), the advisor for the student chapter of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), and given the ASEE Campus Representative Outstanding Achievement Award. Her teaching experience also includes work as a graduate student facilitator and engineering teaching consultant at the University of
Technology. His research focuses on integrating Makerspaces and Design Thinking with higher education to enhance learning through hands on interdisciplinary practices.Dr. Megan K Halpern, Michigan State UniversityDr. Isaac Record, Michigan State University Isaac Record is an Assistant Professor of Practice at Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, where he directs the Collaborative Experiential Learning Laboratory and teaches courses in philosophy of science, science and technology studies, and critical making. His research seeks to situate our epistemic and ethical circumstances within a network of values, capabilities, and material and social technologies. Isaac holds a PhD and MA from the Institute for the
and Cybersecurity:Anomaly detection, Detection of Low Rate Denial of Service Attacks, Intrusion Detection,Information Visualization. He published more than 140 conference and journal papers, many ofthem at IEEE level, authored 2 books and coauthored 3 books in the area of digitalcommunications systems. During the AY 2014-2015 he spent his sabbatical at the Center forHigh Assurance Computer Systems Code 5540, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC,20375. Since 2009 he has been selected every summer as ONR Senior Research Fellows for theASEE Summer Faculty Research Program at NRL. His research is sponsored by NSF, ONR,AFOSR and USAF. He received in last five years more than $1M for his research from DOD asa sole PI for the following grants
and natural sciences. Theprogram’s faculty must assure that the curriculumdevotes adequate attention and time to eachcomponent, consistent with the objectives of theprogram and institution, while preparing studentsfor life-long learning 50Criterion 5 cont’dThe curriculum must include:• a. combination of college-level mathematics and sciences (some with laboratory and/or experimental experience) appropriate to the discipline• b. advanced technical and/or science topics appropriate to the program• c. a general education component that complements the technical and scientific content of the curriculum and is consistent with the program and institution objectives
Undergraduate Studies in Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and Associate Director in the Honors College at the Univer- sity of Missouri in Columbia. Triplett has won awards for his research, teaching, and service. He directs the Precision Imaging Research Laboratory (PIRL), which focuses on the development and integration of nanomaterials and their applications in biomedical, energy, and physical science. He currently focuses on the capture of signal transduction mechanisms in real time, specifically interactions between amino acid functional groups of proteins with donor molecules and protein kinase using photonic technology integration. He graduated from Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Florida State
.. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engaging Students’ Creativity through Designing a Low-Cost Educational Robotic ArmAbstractRobotic arms have been around for many years and are widely used within industries. In 2010,the availability of low-cost robotic arms increased substantially. These types of robots are idealsolutions with applications in automation, laboratory, and education because of their adaptabilityto various industries and tasks. The objective of this project is to design a low- cost/affordableindustrial robot manipulator including base, arm, wrist, and end effector with similar functions toa human arm and fingers with educational applications. The mechanism of the manipulator
features without size.3. Specify limit dimensions.4. Calculate virtual condition for features.5. Determine the advantage of using different material condition modifiers.6. Apply appropriate datum reference frames to designs.7. Apply appropriate form, orientation, profile, runout, and location tolerances to designs.8. Execute proper inspection set-ups and procedures for checking geometric tolerances.Outline of the CourseTEC333 was designed to provide students an overview of the basic terminology used in GD&T,opportunities to apply GD&T in a design setting for modestly complex parts, activities wherestudents apply GD&T within a CAD environment, and laboratories where students inspect partsusing calipers and coordinate measuring machines
education and/orresearch-based careers. These experiences can take a variety of forms, from a structured REUprogram with a specific cohort to an individually designed experience. Typically the researchexperience occurs in a school’s research lab, however students may also participate in researchinternships in industry or national laboratories as well.In a survey of 651 alumni from the College of Engineering at the University of Delaware, [12]showed that engineering alumni who participated in undergraduate research were much morelikely to pursue a graduate degree. Of the students who participated in the university’s structuredundergraduate research program, over 80% of the respondents had completed or were currentlyenrolled in graduate school
the students’own experiences.Research activityThe greatest change proposed and eventually implemented relates to the teaching process andhow the teacher-facilitator presents the physics concept. In the pre-existing paradigm, teachersintroduce the theory of a new concept prior to running an experiment or discussing contextualapplications of the theory. The physics laboratory objective is solely to verify or support thepresented theory. Teachers then encourage students to extrapolate implementation contextsthrough discussions that follow the lab experiment. The focus of the student lab report is ontheory, procedures, data collection and applying that data to the theoretical equations. Reportconclusions recount how well the experiment matched
an introduction to microcontroller architecture, instruction sets, C languagecompilers, microcontroller interfacing, microcontroller peripherals, and embedded system design.Case studies examined microcontroller-controlled systems as well as simulation and emulation ofspecific families of microcontrollers.Hardware and Software Development Environment: For this project, laboratories were builton an Altium Designerand NanoBoard 3000 [4] aplatform equipped withXilinx Spartan-3AN chip,with Xilinx ISE, andAltium Designer 10software development.Figure 1 shows both aNanoBoard 3000 and an Figure 1 Hardware and Software PlatformAltium Designer. TheNanoBoard 3000XN is an FPGA prototyping board with an integrated color TFT LCD
proposals to address aspecific engineering/design need, work in labs for hand-on practice, and complete a project todevelop a design and/or working prototype to address the need. The class was assessed incompliance with the design control process, documentation, laboratory reports, final design, andanalysis.For the specific group who chose orthopedic implant, the students were asked to design thedevices without consideration of the surgical procedure. After students had a design completed,the surgical procedure was introduced to the groups, and the student groups investigated if therewere needs to revise the design based on the consideration of surgical procedure. At the end ofthe semester, a special assessment was conducted for these groups only
. While these courses differ bydiscipline, all are similar in that they are lecture sections of the course (i.e., no laboratory ordiscussion sections), they are one of the first courses taken in the disciplinary sequence (i.e., asophomore-level gateway course), they typically enroll only students of sophomore status (afterstudents have declared their major), and they enroll a large number of students. Each section hadenrollments of between 73 and 148 students, with an average enrollment of 108 students. Thetotal population sampled was 539 students. No students were enrolled in more than one courseduring the survey administration. I employed a series of two student surveys, which were based on the Student Response toInstructional Practices