lab activities in this course, students were tasked with a visual depiction to showdifferent types of bias. The details of this activity and resultant student visual depictions will bediscussed in this section. The lab for this week consisted of a 75 minute course block with areading and question prompts assigned for after the lab period. In the lab, the first activity forstudents was to discuss and define the word bias with their peers. At this point in the semester,students have not encountered a formal statistical definition of bias in data. In the next step,students were tasked to read a comic inspired by Dr. Joy Buolamwini’s work on gender shades(Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018). This comic was drawn by Vreni Stollberger and published in
ourinstrument was guided by the research question: What influence does the instrumental andpsychosocial support that engineering graduate students perceive from their advisor haveon their thesis self-efficacy? Using SCCT as our theoretical foundation, this work focuseson the development and validation of the Advisor Support and Self-efficacy for Thesiscompletion (ASSET) instrument with graduate students pursuing master’s and doctoraldegrees in engineering disciplines.Our resultant construct of Thesis Self-efficacy measures the confidence that a student has in theirabilities to complete specific tasks that are key to the writing of their dissertation, thesis, orapplied project report, while our Advisor Support construct measures a student’s perception
are reported on threefocus groups held with ten women, all students, former students, and teaching professionals froma Construction Engineering degree program at a private Chilean university. This methodologypresents results regarding participant perception of their sense of belonging, their positive andnegative experiences in an environment related to construction, whether in the campus or workcontext, and their proposed solutions for enhancing this sense of belonging within the sector.Despite differences in participants' life stages, they all believe that self-confidence, recognitionfrom peers and leaders, social interactions, and knowledge and skills are critical factors thatimprove their sense of belonging.Keywords: focus groups; sense of
become a primary focus at the University of economic backgrounds, and prior knowledge among studentsTexas at Arlington (UTA). UTA conducted a study that at UTA, ENGR 1300 utilizes the Student-Centered Activefound students were ill-equipped in the areas of problem Learning Environment with Upside-down Pedagogiessolving, professional writing, and computer (SCALE-UP) method. This method, developed at NC Stateprogramming. Therefore, UTA has recently created a University [1] and now utilized in many universities [2],new first year engineering course focused on improving focuses on creating a highly active and collaborativethese specific skill areas using the Student-Centered
; Measurement, respectively from Purdue University. Her work centers on P-16 engineering education research, as a psychometrician, program evaluator, and institutional data analyst. She has authored/co-authored more than 40 peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings and served as a reviewer of journals in engineering education, STEM education, and educational psychology, as well as an external evaluator and an advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects.Dr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 & a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, taught at Northwestern for Fall 1995, worked at Argonne
component. A group specializing inengineering teamwork psychology also provided material for the students to appropriate handleteam conflict resolution. Teaching assistants were also engaged in ensuring that students werecontributing during lab time. Students reported that while it was difficult for four people to workon the code, peer-programming techniques allowed multiple team members to write code,alongside the work needed to complete the testing, documentation, and presentation deliverables.Students were also graded by their peers. Each team rotated around the room and attempted eachgame in their lab section, giving each other team an anonymously reported grade. The gameprototypes were graded on three main aspects: does the game satisfy the
, and tools required for classes are provided. The following are key software and servicesprovided.Software § eBooks in one Platform – Vital Source § Microsoft Office 365 § Educational Apps § Productivity AppsServices § Video Production § Closed Captioning § Mobile Device Management § Help DeskAsynchronous LearningThe entire system is set up to be asynchronous learning. This means students can log-in anytime,plan class deadlines around business travel and office projects. Student peer learning experienceis enhanced through discussion boards and group projects, all of which can be accessedasynchronously. Students can also access the MID's course contents and dedicated student servicesusing the mobile platform. These includes
passion for increasing Hispanic representation in STEM. She currently lives with her husband Andr´es, their two sons David and Sebasti´an, and their minia- ture schnauzer Lucca in Winter Garden, Florida.Esther Gonzalez Esther Gonz´alez, MPA, MBA, ABD is a PhD Candidate at University of Southern California’s Price School of Public Policy with subject matter expertise in organization behavior and diversity management. Her research is multidisciplinary and applies methods and fields in public policy and management. She is a published author in several peer reviewed journals with media mentions in Forbes. Previously, she served as Director on the Research and Innovation team at the Society of Hispanic Professional
nanoscale surface corrugation for enhanced light trapping for pho- tovoltaic devices; and (4) microsphere-based manufacturable coatings for radiative cooling. He has close to 70 publications in peer-reviewed journals and over 200 invited/contributed papers at academic insti- tutions, national laboratories, and conferences. He received a UNM Junior Faculty Research Excellence Award in 2005 and an NSF Career Award in 2001. He is a recipient of STC.UNM Innovation Award consecutively from 2009 to 2018, and he was elected as the 2018 STC.UNM Innovation Fellow. Dr. Han holds 17 UNM-affiliated U.S. patents and 6 pending U.S. and PCT patent applications. He currently serves as the Chief Technical Officer of Osazda Energy LLC, a
to solve small, specific problems. For example, one student wrote “I would ask it howto write specific syntax (make arrays that are all zeros, for loops syntax, math modifiers).”While the tool code captured the way students used ChatGPT for specific tasks during the codingprocess, 25% of student responses to the survey also described ChatGPT as a learning aidbeyond syntax or debugging code (code: tutor). These responses also often included elements ofpersonalized help or access to help outside of the available hours for other support tools(professor office hours, peer tutors, etc.). “...Having a tool to be able to help me when othersaren't available to help was amazing.” As detailed above, these responses included descriptionsof how students
at Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity, Pittsburgh (2001 – 2003) and BHP Institute for Steel Processing and Products, Australia (1998 – 2001). Dr. Manohar held the position of Chief Materials Scientist at Modern Industries, Pittsburgh (2003 – 2004) and Assistant Manager (Metallurgy Group), Engineering Research Center, Telco, India (1985 – 1993). He has published over 55 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences including a 2007 Best Paper Award by the Manufacturing Division of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), three review papers and three book chapters. He has participated in numerous national and inter- national conferences. He is a member of ASM International, TMS, ACerS, AIST, ASEE, and a
Teaching AssistantsAbstractThis complete experience-based practice paper describes the ongoing development of diversity,equity, and inclusion (DEI) training for undergraduate engineering teaching assistants in a first-year, team project-based design course. At a large private university, undergraduate teachingassistants play a key role in first-year student success and the mentorship of their cornerstonedesign project. As the first points of reference for students, they assist with content delivery,guide students through hands-on labs and projects, and deliver regular feedback on assignments.Effective teaching assistants are leaders, thus their training as educators is essential to our first-year students’ success. To support this endeavor, peer
education, wireless and sensor networks, and signal and information processing.Dr. Randal T Abler, Georgia Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Diversity and Student Persistence in the Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) Course SequenceAbstractWhile historically underserved students derive differentially greater benefits from participationin research with faculty, they engage in the activity at lower rates than their peers. In contrast tothe national trend, the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program at the Georgia Institute ofTechnology enrolls representative proportions of Black/African American students andHispanic/Latino students with
/coding, computer aided design, laser cutting, and 3D printing. Through ASPIRE,students are able to engage with their peers, form networks, and gain a sense of community. Inthe past two summers, 41 students have participated in the program. This paper provides detailson the design and evaluation of the ASPIRE program.IntroductionThe STEM “pipeline” that is imagined to guide Science Technology Engineering and Math(STEM) students from middle school into successful STEM careers has sprung leaks atessentially every junction. In its most common configuration, it implies a single path that oftenrequires students to develop an interest in STEM by middle school, choose particular math andscience courses in middle- and high-school, and gain experience and
Construction Management, and offers a B.S.in Engineering with specializations in Mechanical, Civil, Electrical, and Computer Engineering.Students may also define a custom specialization. In 2012, when the STILAS grant was awarded,women constituted 12% of the graduating engineering class, while underrepresented minoritystudents constituted 4%. As of this writing, approximately 18% of engineering students arewomen, and 8% are underrepresented minorities.Description of the STILAS ProgramThe original intent of the STILAS program was to build on the university’s existing InterculturalLeadership Ambassadors (ILA) program to support more STEM students. Started in 2007, the ILAprogram works to recruit and retain underrepresented and first-generation students
debt and finding a job. As a cohort, the studentsparticipated in periodic vertically-integrated discussion groups with faculty mentors and theirpeers at multiple levels of seniority, and were introduced to university resources designed toaddress specific student needs. Results of a follow-on survey suggested that peer-to-peerdiscussions can be useful in alleviating anxiety on particular topics. It was also observed that theinteractions facilitated by these group discussions are helpful in developing a sense ofcommunity and shared enthusiasm among the cohort.Keywords: Engineering student anxiety, Remediation1. IntroductionSources of anxiety among engineering and engineering technology students may stem from bothacademic and non-academic demands
there is no consensus at this stage, it is agreed that innovation isthe key and engineering is essential to this task….”Of the identified soft skills, engineering students are often most challenged to develop and honetheir skills in creativity and innovation. For engineers, creativity may be defined as developingnovel and original ideas with emphasis on their applicability to solving problems2, 3. This Page 26.748.2definition of creativity is more specific for engineering students than for students in other majors(i.e. art, music, creative writing, theater, etc.). For engineers to exercise creativity within theirdiscipline, they must emphasize
technical presentations. The educational activities and technical presentation weredeveloped to cover several topics such as financial literacy, standardized testing, resume writing,and time management. Pre-college students also participated in individual mentoring sessions toallow for a one-on-one learning environment. Online surveys were formulated and distributed tothe participants at different stages of the STEM Education Workshop during the summer of 2020.The information collected was preliminarily analyzed to generate conclusions about the STEMEducation Workshop and draw recommendations to improve the material content, presentationmethods and communication technology for use in upcoming STEM Education Workshops.IntroductionSchools and
sustainable systems with over 60 peer-reviewed publications. Dr. Landis is dedicated to sustainability engineering education and outreach; she works with local high schools, after school pro- grams, local nonprofit organizations, and museums to integrate sustainability and engineering into K-12 and undergraduate curricula. Page 26.915.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Improving engineering student persistence and diversity through conative understandingAbstractEngineering teaching strategies that engage students are desperately needed to recruit
those in their third semester orabove. Departments in the College of Engineering (except for Civil Engineering) allowedstudents to count 3 credit hours of a technical elective toward their degree by completing 3 VIPcourses (excluding the first-year honors course, which counts towards the honors program).Course sections were cross listed so that all VIP students can access the same material onCANVAS. These materials included a course syllabus with a letter-grading scheme, introductoryunits on best practices on how to engage in team-based research, mid and final peer-studentevaluations, weekly journal assignments for students to reflect on their research experience, andpre- and post-surveys about the program. Each semester, course and scheduling
and with what levels of effectiveness. For that research, we will seekadditional funding to study how teachers use and apply these materials. References1. S. E. Lopez, W. H. Goodridge, M. Tajvidi, K. H. Becker, Assessing the Need for Professional Development in Engineering Among Ru-ral High School Science Teachers (Fundamental) (2017).2. T. Porter, M. E. West, R. L. Kajfez, K. L. Malone, K. E. Irving, The effect of teacher professional development on implementing engineering in elementary schools. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 9, 5 (2019).3. K. Eby, The Essential Guide to Writing S.M.A.R.T. Goals 2019 (2019).4. T. J. Moore, A. W. Glancy, K. M. Tank, J. A
reduces STEM self-concepts and lowerspersistence for Women, African American, and Hispanic/Latinx students [4], [12 – 16]. Inaddition, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Genderqueer, Asexual, Non-BinaryGender, as well as other traditionally oppressed gender and sexuality minority identities, faceadditional bias and discrimination in engineering spaces with complex intersections of genderand race/ethnicity mistreatment in both undergraduate and graduate education [17], [18].STEM broadly, and engineering specifically, lacks quantitative discrimination and bias measuresthat capture the unique spaces (e.g., labs, classes, offices) and experiences (e.g., research,conferences, advisor, peer relationships) of graduate students. Qualitative
proposal, while working in a research group with a faculty, and oftengraduate student, mentor; 2) Mentoring, which consists of a multi-tiered approach designed tosupport the students with trained peer mentors often former LEARN® participants assigned toeach student in the program, paired laboratory/faculty mentors, and a LEARN® programcoordinator; and 3) Community Building, which consists of living/learning opportunities, socialprogramming, and other non-research related extracurricular activities. It is hypothesized that theLEARN® program participants will:1. Demonstrate higher fall-to-fall retention, credits earned, GPA, and graduation rates compared to matched intra-institutional comparison groups;2. Demonstrate developmental gains in
since 2012, wejust recruited our fourth cohort.One crux of our current grant is to examine what happens when we take anintervention and adapt it to a different group. When we adapted WEBS to BRAINS, wedidn’t explicitly study the process of adaptation.Our program is also influenced by the peer mentoring summits for womenengineering faculty of color previously run by one member of our leadership team,Dr. Christine Grant. 4Scientific and professional skills are necessary but not sufficient to increase thepersistence of women in engineering and computer science. The theory underlyingour program developed as the model evolved, first through WEBS and now
. 5Each student is asked to write briefly in their journals on a weekly basis to document their learning and their challenges. These are read by staff who include comments and questions for students. Staff intervene if they think it is needed to improve the situation for the student. In most cases the students are advised to advocate for themselves—ask questions, for example.At the end of the semester of research, the student develops a presentation that shows what she has done during her research, what she has learned, how the research will be impactful if successful, and if this research opportunity has influenced her future plans.They get to make their presentation to an audience of their peers, theirs and others’ mentors and faculty
, faculty mentoring, extra-curricular activities, peer group support interactions, and research/work experiences.A pilot group of 92 students from ten different engineering programs and four different entrylevels, joined the project. At the end of the first year indicators shows encouraging preliminaryresults. 97.9% students in the study group performed above the college-wide average. Freshmensuccess indicators in terms of academic performance, retention, and sense of belonging were upand career goal planning and actions began to show.BackgroundSuccess in higher education institutions by itself is a subjective concept that depends on themetrics defining it. Factors such as retention, quality, completion, and attainment are typicallyaddressed by
Hanyang University, ERICA. He is a Member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and a member of the Project Management Institute (PMI). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Preparations in Writing an Engineering Education Grant Kim, S.; Perez, F.; Lomiento, G.; Salem, Y.; Woo, J.AbstractAt California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona, CPP), two gatekeepercourses for the undergraduate students in the Civil Engineering program have been identified asStatics and Mechanics of Materials. Our university’s Civil Engineering Department is the largestundergraduate CE Department in the nation with approximately 1,600 students, graduating
technology and how specific affordances can change the ways we collaborate, learn, read, and write. Teaching engineering communication allows her to apply this work as she coaches students through collaboration, design thinking, and design communication. She is part of a team of faculty innovators who originated Tandem (tandem.ai.umich.edu), a tool designed to help facilitate equitable and inclusive teamwork environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Context of All in Which You Live: How Women Engineering Students Perceive Gender BasedPatterns in Teams 1
Rutgers University and a B.S. in Applied Mathematics from The Ohio State University. Her current research interests include parameter estimation via optimization, infectious disease modeling, applications of graph theory in criminal network analysis and developing and applying bio-math related undergraduate modules in various SENCER related projects. She has several publications in peer-reviewed journals and is the recipient of several MAA NREUP grants, a SENCER leadership fellowship, Department of Homeland Security grants, and several NSF S-STEM and PSC-CUNY grants/awards. She also has an extensive experience of mentoring undergraduate students in various research projects. She has mentored more than 45 students
Education initiative and others demonstrates that NTT faculty arepaid 25% less than their TT peers while lacking the protections of tenure [3]. Recommendationsdictate that benefit packages offered to full-time NTT faculty should correspond to thoseavailable to TT faculty [3], [4], but a quick glance through most university websites shows this isoften not the case. Although many features of NTT faculty employment are problematic [5], ourfocus is on disparities around caregiving support - specifically parental leave and workload reliefpolicies.Despite their critical roles in teaching, mentoring, and research, NTT faculty are often excludedfrom benefits offered to TT faculty, including parental leave and workload relief policies. Thelack of equitable