constantly engaged in the planning, execution, and closing phasesby helping design the project and labs with topics similar to those they would give to aCoopthe different engineering disciplines the connection between the academy andprofessional life. Hence, they can feel more motivated to pursue an engineering degree. Inother words, our participants have a small disclosure of what an engineer does in the realworld. Throughout the development of the program, our sponsor is constantly engaged inthe planning, execution, and closing phases by helping design the project and labs withtopics similar to those they would give to a Coop student. 3
using ROS Lecture 7 Path Planning, PID and MPC Control Chapter 2 - Perception Subsystem - CV vs. ML Additional Sensors, Full Perception Lab 7 AV Simulation Using CARLA Part I Subsystem in ROS Lane Detection / CARLA Lecture 8 Student Half-way Project Reports and Simulator Overview Presentations Half-Way Project Presentations Lane line detection using Lab 8 GitHub Evaluation and Open Discussion OpenCV
engineering-focused teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre-College Engineering Education Division, a division she has chaired. Her current research includes investigating how children plan, fail, and productively persist; how mixed-reality simulated classroom environments can be used to help pre-service and in-service teachers practice facilitating challenging discussions in science and engineering; and how undergraduate engineering design teaching assistants address (and may be able to practice addressing) team conflict within similar simulated environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
,resource constraints, and differing student goals contribute to nuanced responses, demonstratingthe complex considerations faculty members must navigate in shaping doctoral trainingexperiences.4.5. Unstructured commentsThe last question in the survey asked participants to provide additional information that theybelieved could enhance doctoral training. Two themes emerged from their responses. The firsttheme pertains to the refinement of academic course plans. For instance, one faculty memberhighlighted the need for a revision in academic coursework to incorporate more relevantproblem-solving, data analytics, and writing skills. This sentiment aligns with another suggestionemphasizing that academic courses often focus excessively on “technical
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Lessons Learned: “I Can’t Build It, Because They Won’t Come:” Faculty Survey Response Rates in Engineering Education ResearchObtaining faculty perspectives to enhance higher education teaching practices is an essential stepin assessing and planning professional development and training. However, procuring this crucialfeedback can often feel like an insurmountable challenge. In a recent research study aimed atgathering faculty feedback through an anonymous online survey, a notable revelation emerged –faculty members exhibit reluctance to participate in surveys. The question that arises is, how canwe gain an understanding of the collective faculty
. This section is still in development. This section aims to provide anassessment method that looks at the project's impact, developed through the PDC, on the students'understanding of the pre-defined course outcomes. Some measures being considered forassessment are course-specific student learning objectives and/or ABET student learningoutcomes.Future WorkThe PDC will continue to be developed and assessed for its effectiveness. Specifically, assessingthe impact of the PDC in reducing perceived barriers to implementing projects in courses byfaculty. Additionally, plans for evaluating the PDC’s effectiveness in helping to develop projectsare planned. To disseminate the PDC process to the larger STEM education community,workshops will be developed
topics course within our university’s engineering department, indicating a weekly averageof 2 hours of in-class time and 4 hours of homework. Through the course activities, students willdevelop a concrete plan for their (new or ongoing) advocacy work, and begin to enact this planwith support from both peers and instructors.Learning ObjectivesWe have developed the following Learning Objectives for the initial offering of the course.By participating, students will: • Identify their individual interests and strengths to integrate advocacy into their practice. • Articulate their scientific and/or engineering identity and how it relates to critical consciousness and their unique potential to shape the world. • Develop critical
ECR: BCSER program is to build a researcher’s capacity and expertise in STEMeducation research [10]. The author’s proposal titled “An Individual InvestigatorDevelopment Plan for Building Capacity to Study Undergraduate Latinas Interest inGraduate School” was selected for funding.Project ApproachThis NSF project incorporates capacity building through the “4 steps to Growth in EngineeringEducation Research” depicted in Figure 1. These steps were designed to strengthen the author’scapacity to carry out fundamental engineering education research (EER). The proposed strategystarts with Step 1: Knowledge Building. The knowledge building step outlined opportunities togain knowledge through both formal and informal learning opportunities. As an
disciplinary engagement [13, 14].The goals of this NSF Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (PFE: RIEF) project are to: 1. Build on preliminary work to develop the Virtual Jar Test Laboratory for Water Treatment and develop a corresponding Physical Jar Test Laboratory for Water Treatment. 2. Compare student engagement and demonstration of epistemic practices in the virtual laboratory and physical laboratory modes to develop transferable knowledge about the development of epistemic practices in the laboratory. 3. Develop capacity in PI Nason as an engineering education researcher through a deliberate mentoring plan and research activities.To accomplish these objectives, we are conducting a microgenetic analysis of
point where we can attempt an answer to the last research question of ourproject which is a question measuring the long-term impacts of computational thinking skilldevelopment. Such a question requires a longitudinal approach that our IRB offices haveapproved.Finally, during our project, we came to the realization that our recruiting mechanism – self-selection – limited our participants by demographic categories, and thus our results seemedincomplete. We have initiated steps towards expanding our research to the DFW audience. Whilewe seek IRB approval to include this audience in this final stage of the project, we have analyzedthe cohort from which we did gain access to their grades (n=296). We plan to interviewindividuals who have struggled
customers and coworkers, providing thoughtful, courteous, and knowledgeable service. 10. Teamwork: Assumes shared responsibility for collaborative work and respects the thoughts, opinions, and contributions of other team members. Professional competencies 11. “Big picture” Thinking: Understands one's role in fulfilling the mission of the workplace and considers the social, economic, and environmental impacts of one's actions. 12. Career and Life Management: Plans, implements, and manages
other engineering departments in CECS. For the second time around,faculty members from each engineering department were trained on the bootcamp activities, andhow to conduct the weekly program.Proposed ApproachThe FYIE participants will be taking two courses simultaneously: Introduction to Engineering(Course A) and Learning Frameworks (Course B). These selected courses are focused on assortedtopics and include project elements of technical innovation (MECE 1101) and career path planning(UNIV 1301). As such, the Challenge Based Instruction (CBI) approach was selected as thepedagogical method for these courses (Figure 1) [2], [5], [9]. In this regard, CBI is focused onstudent engagement when properly implemented. Figure 1
developed throughexposure to, practice of, and socialization in disciplinary expectations and norms, the research questions tobe answered through the course of the evaluation plan include: What are factors governing optimal time tointroduce research to undergraduate students to encourage them to pursue graduate school? Whatcharacteristics of REU experiences are most critical in encouraging students to pursue graduate study?How do these vary given other factors (e.g, gender, race, institutional type, impact of prior researchexperiences?) Educational data were collected through qualitative and quantitative methods. Three surveyswere distributed to participants over the course of the summer and into the fall semester comprising severalestablished and
the program were diverse in their year of undergraduatestudy, discipline of study in STEM, and location in the USA. Participants came into the programwith some awareness of sustainability and climate-change basics and challenges. Still, pre- andpost-program surveys and end-of-program interviews showed a short-term gain in knowledge ofsustainability and climate change among the SRTS-REU participants. These results can be usedto inform similar future programs that aim to engage undergraduate students in sustainabilitytopics. We plan to build upon this study with future cohorts of program participants.References[1] “THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development.” Accessed: Jan. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/goals[2] “Grand
think this class is goingto be boring”, ”I think this class is going to be enjoyable”, ”I think that I am going to bepretty good at this class”, ”This is a class that I cannot do very well in”.Value was measured in Survey 1. It is a measure based on participants’ intrinsic motivationdesigned based on self-determination theory [1]. It focuses on the aspect of motivation thatcomes from the importance and effort that they attribute to this class. Students respond ona 5 point Likert scale of “Strongly agree” to “Strongly Disagree” to the following questionsand the measure corresponds to the average of the answers. ”I plan to put a lot of effortinto this class”, ”It is important to me to do well in this class”, ”I believe this class couldbe of some
. Through narrative inquiry and a novel,boundary-spanning framework, we explore the career stories of women who have leftengineering after having worked in industry. We make sense of the participants’ career decisionsby considering their career journeys through the lens of the unfolding model of turnover, a theoryfrequently used by organizational psychologists yet not fully applied to the study of women’sengineering career decisions. In this paper, we describe the engineering career journey of Louise,one of three participants from our larger study [1]. We invite you to come alongside us as weexplore Louise’s engineering career story through the shocks (jarring events), scripts (plans ofaction), and image violations (violations of goals and values
-ready engineers, any instance where an assessment can serve as a dual-purpose learningtool provides an opportunity for efficient planning. In this action research, an enhancedassessment as learning was utilized to teach engineering students basic tenants of contract reviewwhile emphasizing the learning objective and student outcomes necessary for success in anengineering course. The assessment in this study included questions prefaced with basicdefinitions. Students acquired minimal knowledge from reading the question and then respondingappropriately by utilizing the information contained in the course syllabus. With this efficientmethod, students were able to change their perspective on syllabi acknowledging this document asa contract
, howtomechatronics.com/how-it-works/electronics/555-timer-ic-working-principle-block- diagram-circuit-schematics/.[3] Damirchi, Written by Mohammad. “Interfacing 2.42 Inch OLED SPI/I2C Display Module with Arduino.” Electropeak, 9 Jan. 2022, electropeak.com/learn/interfacing-2- 42-inch-oled-spi-i2c-display-module-with-arduino/[4] Fahad, Engr. “Types of Multi-Vibrator: Astable, Monostable and Bistable Vibrator.” Electronic Clinic, 3 Jan. 2024, www.electroniclinic.com/types-of-multi-vibrator-astable- monostable-and-bistable-vibrator/Justin FaustoJustin Fausto is currently pursuing a Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering with a minor inComputer Engineering, at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, and plans
components. Educators at other institutionsmay find that lecture-based courses in the engineering curriculum could benefit equally frominformation literacy instruction. However, the degradation of some students’ recall ofinformation sources following the 4901 post-test (where specific information tools were notaddressed) may highlight the importance of continued refresher training on these topics.Future Work: The objective questions in these tests do not measure how well students can usetechnical literature; rather, they test recognition of resource types, tools, and article structure. Atthe 2024 Annual Meeting, we plan to share preliminary data from a sentiment analysis of arandom sample of open response questions from students who completed all
obtaining R1 status a top priority for theirorganization, with many embedding the goal in their critical strategic plans or key initiativeswithin their leadership teams’ organizational priorities. Despite such efforts, an integralingredient to achieving R1 status – leadership – is under-researched in the field. Thus, our studyaims to acknowledge the vital role of transformational and distributed leadership within HBCUsand their broader stakeholder community in achieving their goal of reaching R1 status.The goal of this research study is to (1) conduct an analysis of data available within the CarnegieClassification®, (2) provide a thorough review of the literature surrounding this phenomenon,(3) explain the role of engineering-related expenditures
improvements. 5. Implementation of the Pilot plan – Project MicroGrid V 1.0Using the resources developed to facilitate the Implementation of the educational model for remoteblended learning, the organization of the logistics arrangements that led to the successfulImplementation of the course began in August 2023. The following table details the implementationsteps.Table 2. Description of the timetable for the Implementation of the pilot project Dates Description August – September Administrative meetings to arrange the logistics needs of the project – Pilot (2023) Plan Project MicroGrid V 1.0 September- Implementation in the local institutions of the course MicroGrid
-design courses with instructor-centered approaches. This suggests a disconnectbetween planned, enacted, and experienced elements of curriculum and lifelong learningoutcomes [7]. More research is needed to understand how or why current and recent students’perceptions of the effectiveness of their programs and courses sometimes contradict purportedbest practices, and the implications for lifelong learning motivations and strategies.Marra et al. [30] also explored how the nature of an undergraduate engineering programimpacted alumni lifelong learning, focusing on the program’s emphasis on metacognition andreflection often facilitated through team projects. The researchers interviewed 15 recentgraduates (3-4 years post-graduation) in the United
anticipated as manyfaculty members continued to expand and refine the resource well beyond the original timeline.In addition to the more reflective studies, there are multiple guides for aspiring OER authors andthose wishing to set up OER adoption and authorship programs at the institutional level. TheOER guide on authoring OER, Authoring Open Content [11], offers many solid advice toprospective OER authors. The resource covers far more than we can summarize here, but the listof ten tips for OER authors does reiterate some of the same lessons learned in the previouspapers. 10. Good authoring begins with planning 9. It’s going to take longer than you think 8. Share the load 7. Do the prep work (understand the licenses) 6
CE450: Construction Management. The purpose of the InfrastructureEngineering core engineering sequence is to focus “on the design, analysis, and construction ofthe built environment, (i.e., man-made structures and facilities used to accommodate societies’activities). Cadets learn about the importance of the infrastructure sectors, such as water, power,and transportation, and their interrelationships” [11]. The integrative experience for theInfrastructure Engineering core engineering sequence is the designing, planning, and presentingof a construction management plan for a contingency base camp within a combat theater ofoperations.Table 1: Sequence of courses and course objectives in the Infrastructure Core EngineeringSequenceCE350
construction projects' design and planning phases. The goalis to eliminate or minimize safety and health risks of field workers, which is particularlyimportant in the construction industry. However, the implementation of PtD in the constructionindustry faces several challenges that hinder its widespread adoption. This paper aims to betterunderstand the key factors negatively influencing civil engineers' ability to utilize PtD. Theresearch team, therefore, conducted a survey aimed at gathering insights from engineeringpractitioners regarding the factors that might impede its utilization and the role of engineers inits implementation. The findings indicate that various factors contribute to the challenge, suchas the absence of PtD educational materials
started allnine STEPS scholars were enrolled in the same Introduction to Engineering and First-Year Seminarcourse. This Intro course was taught by the faculty member who would also be their faculty mentorthroughout the STEPS program and the Seminar course was taught by the STEPS researcher who wouldalso serve as their academic advisor. The Intro course had many other students in it, but the seminar coursewas limited to the nine STEPS scholars. By intentionally scheduling the students in this manner, acohesive cohort was organically formed, enhancing the scholars’ sense of belonging and providing themwith easy access to student support services.Peer Mentoring and Social Events: Before the Fall semester, the plan was for peer mentors to scheduleone
capability to have privacy filters when needed.These suggestions would make the design more inclusive.Figure 3: Engineering products that can be improved to be made more inclusive. (a) Cochlear Implant. (b) SchoolChair. (c) Current version of a Body Scanner and (d) Improved more inclusive version of a Body Scanner.Future WorkAs we develop this activity more, here is our current plan for assessing its success. A bias detectionexercise and lively discussion will be the first week's evaluation. This evaluation will use studentreflection journals and qualitative feedback. We will also use Likert scale pre-activity surveys toassess students' understanding and attitudes on DEIBJ and Inclusive Design. Students will beassessed in the second week on their
ETD 445 Fostering Faculty Scholarship and Grantsmanship through Engagement Activities Mohammad A. Zahraee and Niaz Latif Purdue University NorthwestIntroductionPurdue University Northwest (PNW) is committed to applied research and communityengagement within its metropolitan region. PNW’s strategic plan focuses on significant goals oncommunity and regional partnerships. PNW is uniquely equipped to strengthen and enrich itssurrounding communities in ways that are mutually beneficial for internal and externalstakeholders alike [1]. These mutually beneficial
shared similar on-campus experiences to non-program participants. Moststudents also reported plans to pursue a career in STEM immediately following graduation,regardless of program participation.Additional analysis of open-ended response questions revealed more insight into student STEMinterest and experiences. Responses for S-STEM and non-S-STEM students were similar. Surveyrespondents shared that earning potential and job security were among the reasons they chose aSTEM major. When asked about individuals or experiences that encouraged their interest ordevelopment in STEM, multiple survey respondents indicated that their interest in STEM wasdue to their academic preparation or in some way inherent and indicative of their innate abilitiesand
Work and ConclusionWhile they are central and essential to our redesign process, faculty are not our onlystakeholders. In our future work, the new curricular objectives and proficiency rubrics, alongwith curriculum mapping data, will be shared with a focus group of current undergraduatestudents, as well as external stakeholders (including alumni, employers, and the program’sexternal advisory board), for observations and input. Once input has been received and any finaladjustments to the objectives and rubrics have been made, the UPC will develop proposals forcurriculum changes. These changes may include changes in sequencing, course offerings, orindividual course changes. The UPC plans to use the objective rubrics to track student learningover