More Axes persistence in sketching. Workbook pages with 9) Reflection and Symmetry sketching exercises are also available as pdf files 10) Cross-Sections of Solids for students who do not have an iPad.IV. Implementing Curriculum at Participating InstitutionsThe study examined the extent to which the online course format accommodated complexstudent schedules and decreased the level of institutional resources needed to implement thecourse. Along with an analysis of course implementation, the study also monitored outcomesand assessed whether an exclusive on-line format would yielded the results observed with face-to-face or hybrid course delivery.From the fall 2014 semester to the fall 2017 semester, four community
Green InfrastructureThe lesson outcomes for the Green Infrastructure lesson are: 1. Explain the motivation for green infrastructure 2. Suggest candidate green infrastructure to integrate into a new or existing site 3. Design a green infrastructure plan using EPA National Stormwater Calculator 4. Reflect on how green infrastructure can affect quality of lifePre-class activities require students to watch a screencast developed by the lesson authors, towatch a background video on the benefits of green infrastructure, and to familiarize themselveswith the National Stormwater Calculator. This software program, developed by the US EPA, hasthe following purpose [3]: The National Stormwater Calculator is a simple
this data is preliminary, it gives context to the reader on the success of the program. I look forward to hearing more about this program in the conference setting. ● A reviewer commented on the rewrite -done ● Framed as a work in progress, the limited evidence is acceptable. The future development of the academy will be of interest, though division members would be interested in survey response data, examples of participant work, and reflective commentary on the success and challenges of the camp. ● A reviewer commented on the rewrite -done ● Please check the Author’s guide for correct formatting. Recommend survey data be presented in a table in the Outcomes Section
chemical engineers is polymers. I think it would be interesting to design and work with different polymers in product design.”The student above demonstrates the trends in the responses that reflect a shift from a general ideaof what engineers could do to a specific idea. The responses have a trend of growing moreconcrete over the course of the surveys. A possible reason for this increase could be similar towhy the number of students mentioning options decreases. If students pay more attention to thedetails of their careers and begin to narrow down what they want to do, it is possible that theywould then have a better understanding and increased ability to discuss the specifics of their job.As students narrow down their interest in their
has previously used this instrument to assess andcompare motivation and curiosity among students in a set of elective courses [6].The study was deemed “exempt” by the IRB, and student participation was voluntary. Thefaculty member directing the study invited students to participate; names of participatingstudents were not disclosed to instructors. Aggregate student response to surveys was notdisclosed until after the end of the course and grades had been finalized. Three times throughoutthe semester – within approximately two weeks of the start, end, and middle – students were sentan email with a link to the SIMS/Curiosity survey and asked to complete it while reflecting onthe most recent instance of their course. At the end of the semester
assumptions tosimplify problems, choose equations and solution methods, break complex problems down intocomponent parts, link component parts together to form solutions for complex engineeringsystems, and reflect on the results of the analysis and associated design they learn engineering.Throughout this learning process, formative assessment and feedback effectively guides studentstoward mastery of learning objectives [1], [2]. The engineering instructor learns to identifyproblems that will provide students with the necessary skills to be successful in their course.For years, chapter-end problems and solution manuals have provided instructors a helpful tool forassigning and assessing students work as part of this learning process. Over time, students
• computer searches of databases such as PubMedJournal management platform ScholarOne includes their “Reviewer Locator” [7] to offer upnames, but the underlying process for how those names are identified is unknown. This system isused by ASEE’s Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Lisa Benson [8], current editor ofJEE, offers the following guidance for Associate Editors (AEs): In general, reviewers should be chosen to reflect the broad, growing, global field of engineering education, including content domain experts and experts in education and the learning sciences. Also, well-qualified graduate students may be invited to review manuscripts. Consider choosing reviewers for their expertise in the methodology used by
thepassion these students found in their project, even though it was not hands-on, led them to amuch deeper and expanded understanding of their potential responsibilities as engineers in thefuture. Most students shied away from describe their work as contributing to social justice as itwas too politically charged and ambiguous. Some had taken an Engineering and Social Justicecourse, so the term came up, but was not actively used with a broad audience in their finalpresentations.Progress to dateEach PBL intervention has preliminary indications, anecdotal and through reflections, thatstudents were able to consider social responsibility and social justice issues in context withengineering problems in both technical and non-technical offerings.In the
response that reflected the student’s good-faith effort to becorrect [25].The final course grade was assigned based on how many assignments earned a passing score andhow many “E” scores were earned on quizzes. Table 2 describes the requirements to earn aparticular base letter grade (A, B, C, etc.). All requirements for a grade had to be met in order toearn that grade. A course grade of “F” was earned if the requirements for a “D” were not met. Agrade checklist was also provided to students to help them track their progress.Table 2: Course Grade Requirements To earn Accomplish the following: this grade: A Earn passing scores on 15 quizzes, including at least 11 "E" scores, AND earn passing scores on project report
other words, thresholdconcepts support the goals of interdisciplinarity and portability by giving instructors and studentsa common language for identifying and building communication skills.In the sections that follow, we first describe the process we used to map TC across thecurriculum, including soliciting feedback from faculty about how well the flowchart reflects thepractices and goals of the department. Then, using memos as a test case, we suggest thresholdconcepts that could be used to scaffold memo writing across the curriculum. This test casedemonstrates the potential applications of the flowchart and threshold concepts to theinterdisciplinary teaching of TC. Finally, we outline the next steps for implementation with thegoal of
Lead the Way? o If yes, would you please list the name of the training?• In what areas do you currently hold a teaching endorsement? (Select all that apply) o Physics; Chemistry; Physical Science; Technology and Engineering; Earth Sciences; Environmental Science; Geography; Middle Level Science; Biological Science; Other.• Would you be willing to attend sponsored and funded professional development training at Utah State University to learn and develop engineering curriculum to enhance your existing science curriculum and to address the new engineering standards?• What is your current gender identity?• What permanent population estimate best reflects the area of the school you teach in
engineering andengineering technology programs. This was a sophomore level course, students are usually notquite familiar with airplane components and reflect difficulty in understanding and applying thetheoretical knowledge of statics. In order to strength instruction, tours of adjacent aircrafthangars were conducted to expose students to real aircraft components. Integrating hangar tourswith theoretical instruction and computer-aided analysis is expected to assist students to betterunderstanding theoretical static knowledge and applications in real aerospace environment.Therefore, students would have better understanding of relevant theoretical knowledge and thefuture application environment of theory, as well as the coursework
]ducation must be conceived as a continuing reconstruction of experience… the process andgoal of education are one and the same thing” [10] . Kolb states that learning is best supportedwhen students are engaged in a process that draws their beliefs and ideas about a topic so thatthey can be examined, tested, and integrated with new and more refined ideas [11]. Kolbdescribes learning as a four-stage process: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstractconceptualization and active experimentation. He contents that immediate experience is the basisfor observation and reflection, which is assimilated to abstract concepts, where new ideas andactions can be generated [12].The Skope applications leverage affordances of AR and VR technologies to
Model (PSRDM) created by Canneyand Bielefeldt [4]. The model seeks to gauge “the development of personal andprofessional responsibility in [students]” and merges these two dimensions togetherfor the professional connectedness realm [4]. The personal social awareness piecerelates to the development of one’s feeling “a moral or social obligation to help1This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1635554. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. 1others” while
accountability, each student is thenasked to formulate a discussion question and be prepared to lead a 10-15 minute in-class groupdiscussion. This approach was successfully used in a senior-level course on digitalcommunications [11]. The accountability requires student reflection to provide a productivelearning experience when the students meet in a group setting. The professor can then randomlyselect or solicit a student volunteer to lead the discussion.The F2F learning is a more expensive mode of communication when compared to onlinecommunication. F2F learning requires both instructor and students to be physically together. Ina F2F environment, learners must work together at the same time and place, to reach a commonunderstanding of what is to be
Web-basedMultimediaPre-labs Figure1.Atheoreticalframeworkforthedevelopmentofweb-basedmultimediapre-labs.Content: explanation of related theoriesStudents require adequate time for interaction and reflection in order to enable meaningfullearning [21]. However, when executing an experiment, students have to carry out many taskswithin a set limited time, leaving no time for reflection [23], [31]. One method to overcome thislimitation is to prepare students conceptually through pre-labs before they attend the laboratory.Thus, pre-labs should focus on theory in addition to procedure by explaining the related theory,connecting theory to procedural steps, providing a rational for each step, and explaining what
, we found that the patterns by gender reflect themesidentified in the literature for major preferences by gender. Zafar, for example, found that collegeaged women favored degree programs emphasized social responsibility, a concern for people andthe environment [15].Table 2: Analysis of students’ academic standing in the year following their departure fromengineeringColumn1 Women Men Count % Count %Not enrolled 205 16% 1733 20%Good Standing ProbationRemoved or Reinstated 28 14% 286 17%Switched Non Stem 92 7
journal article and five conference publications connected to this project.Data CollectionThe primary source of data were interviews conducted in dyads with collaborating engineeringand education faculty members. Semi-structured interviews lasting approximately 60 to 90minutes were designed and implemented to elicit understandings about futures, values, systems,and strategic thinking and how these ways of thinking were used by the engineer-educator teams.Dyads were first asked to describe their collaborative projects followed by a moment to reflectindividually. The individual reflection involved writing about their thinking related to theirengineering-education collaboration. This activity was used to prepare participants forverbalization of
line configurations including bundled conductors and usage of standard conductor data tables for calculation of transmission line parameters are introduced. Transmission line equivalent circuit parameters, voltage, current, active and reactive power variations along the transmission line, π model and its approximations for short, medium and long lines are presented and discussed. 6. Power Flow in Power Systems: One-line diagrams, bus types, Ybus matrix calculations, power balance equations, iterative solutions such as Gauss and Newton Raphson methods along with examples are introduced. 7. Power Transformers: Ideal transformer current voltage relationships, turns ratio, reflected
example,between the years 2000 and 2015, the percentage of engineering bachelor’s degrees earned byHispanics has increased from 5.8% to 10.7%, while the percentage for African Americans hasdeclined from 5.6% to 4.0% (Gibbons, 2009; Yoder, 2016). If the goal is to achieve parity inrepresentation that reflects national demographics, this lack of progress is problematic. For thisreason, African Americans are the minority group that is of most interest in this study.In pursuit of progress, many national and university-based efforts have focused on increasingthe number of African American men and women in STEM, in general, and engineering andcomputer science, specifically. For example, universities with Minority Engineering Programshave an explicit
, therelationship of the stakeholder with infrastructure, and if they thought the stakeholder would bein favor, against, or unsure of adopting EVs. Instructors followed the student activity with adiscussion of the results. After class, the students had to reflect on the activity through an onlinequestionnaire (Table 2). Instructors led Day 2 with a short introduction to autonomous vehicles (AVs) and thestatus of the technology. Students were asked to answer four questions individually so that theycould start the thought process. Students were then placed in groups of 3-5 where they discussedtheir individual answers with each other. After this short discussion, students were instructed toread two articles that described several social issues related
specifications into material andgeometric forms. Table 1 shows the complete module list.Table 1: CAD+Design Modules Module1 ThinkOutsidetheBox 1.5hours Module2 FailFast–CommandHunt 1hour Module3 Early-StageDivergence 2-3hours Module4 PivotingandPlussing 1hour Module5 User-CenteredDesign 2hours Module6 Research-DrivenIdeation 3hoursModules 2 through 6 all center around a unique “design problem” that requires students to learnand experiment with command and strategic-level CAD affordances. These affordances are then“epistemically contextualized” through written reflections, group discussion, and collaborative,real-time design iteration. For example, Module 3, “Early Stage Divergence,” featurescomputationally aided
3.69 (.947) 3.92 (.862) complex issues Perceive relations and patterns 3.85 (.899) 3.92 (.862) Recognize conflicting points of view and 3.77 (1.013) 3.77 (.832) move beyond to an independent point of view Synthesize from different ways of knowing, 3.85 (.689) 4.00 (.226) bodies of knowledge, and tools for learning Tolerate ambiguity and paradox 3.15 (.899) 3.31 (.947) Reflect constructively on your experiences 4.08 (.760) 4.00 (.707) and knowledge Employ a range of intellectual tools 3.85 (.987) 3.92 (.862) Solve problems and work through situations 3.92 (.862) 4.15 (.222) Connect in and out of classroom work 4.00 (.913) 4.23 (.599
included as part of each course unit (i.e.,Appendix 1, below).As shown in Table 1, in the Spring 2016 offering only 2 students were enrolled via distance,while approximately 1/3 of the class was enrolled via distance in Spring 2017 and 2018. Thischange in enrollment for, “Public Health for Environmental Engineers,” corresponds to anoverall trend in enrollment observed at the institution, which reflects an increase in the numberof total students enrolled via distance.As shown in Table 1, the majority of students from each offering held Senior status (i.e,. 19, 20,and 26 individuals in Spring 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively), and were enrolled in, “PublicHealth for Environmental Engineers,” in their final semester of baccalaureate studies
in online socialcollaborative learning. The instructor set up a learning environment via the Facebook platform toenable students to discuss their Engineering Science topic at anytime, anywhere within theperiod of the lesson plan. Subsequently, the distribution of roles, learning tasks andmetacognitive learning activities to promote and enhance the students’ flexibility and constructknowledge through reflection and metacognition occurred through online learning. Salmon [3]revealed that the instructor has to develop relevant activities that can promote interaction andreflective thinking in the classroom in order to enhance the growth of students’ subjectknowledge via online learning.2.0 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDYThis paper describes the methods
that the metaphors we speak reflect the “metaphors we live by” (i.e. howwe formulate thoughts and perform actions) has become the dominant thinking among cognitivescientists, linguists, psychologists, philosophers, literary critics, and composition and rhetoricscholars [3], [23]–[26]. Indeed the understanding of metaphor as more than an aesthetic tool canbe traced back to Aristotle, who remarked in Rhetoric, “Midway between the unintelligible andthe commonplace, it is metaphor which most produces knowledge” [27] ctd. in [26].In the seminal book, Metaphors We Live By, cognitive linguist George Lakoff and philosopherMark Johnson describe “conceptual metaphors” that are so embedded in our culture andconsciousness that they are “reflected in our
quantify the degree of active learning and other interactive practices.The assessment plan consists of a host of methods, including 1) pre, midterm, and post-coursesurveys, 2) an end-of-term focus group, 3) a project presentation with a panel of judges, and 4)midterm and end-of-term student written reflections on their application of the design thinkingprocess. The post-course survey included questions from the StRIP (Student Response toInstructional Practices) survey, a new rigorously-developed survey for measuring students’perspectives on and responses to active learning. Rubrics and measurement matrices from theliterature were adapted to guide assessment of the students’ presentations and design solutions,including the Oral Communications VALUE
also tellingly—May 16, 2010 saw the space shuttleEndeavor take off on its last mission, which was also the second to last shuttle launch before theend of the space shuttle program. We hypothesize that these phenomena reflect a change in thecreative and aspirational energies of the United States. To some extent, at least in the U.S.context, entrepreneurship seemed to be becoming the frontier that had previously been occupiedby the space program.These hypotheses are supported by further evidence that 2009-2010 saw the emergence of whatmight be called the “cult of the entrepreneur,” a phenomenon in which entrepreneurship andentrepreneurs are viewed not only as the leading figures in business innovation, but also as Deleted
, negatively impact the instructors [10]. Assessments can foster the development ofway people perceive members of disadvantaged groups. autonomy and maturity, as well as improve social andUnfortunately, biases often extend into the classroom professional skills [11]. The process also encourages self-environment [1], [2]. In one academic year, 38% of professors reflection and deeper understanding of the material, whichsurveyed perceived an act of bias in their classes [2]. In small may lead to improved retention and confidence [12]. Givengroup learning classrooms, these biases have been shown to the increasing prevalence of small group learning and amanifest in many ways
Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Con- struction and in the Department of Civil & Environmental