has a Bachelors, Masters and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering. Page 25.1303.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Helping Hands Dense Network – A Collaboration Across Multiple UniversitiesInspired by the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network’s (KEEN) mission of educating a newtype of entrepreneurially minded engineer who will ―catalyze a transformation in the workforceand build economic and technical commerce in their communities,‖1 four member universities ofthe KEEN joined together to form the Helping Hands Dense Network (HHDN) with a three-yearplan of work that: Leverages
Paper ID #6192Entering the Performance Zone: a Practical Pre-Lecture Guide for New Fac-ultyDr. Tomas Enrique Estrada, Elizabethtown College Page 23.542.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Entering the Performance Zone: a Practical Pre-Lecture Guide for New FacultyIntroductionWhile, in recent decades, undergraduate engineering curricula have been strengthened throughan increased emphasis on projects and hands-on learning, the need to provide students witheffective lectures remains a key
process, undergraduates from mechanical engineering, entrepreneurial studies, interiordesign, and early childhood education completed pre- & post- surveys measuring the soft skillsmentioned above. In addition, students completed weekly mind-maps measuring their currentstate of mind regarding the design process. Finally, there were self-reflections at four milestonesduring the eight-week process focus on the space-in between qualities of movement,experimentation, lines of flight and sense of stuck-ness.IntroductionHigher education’s organizational nature often limits multidisciplinary interaction throughdisciplinary silo-ing. Conversely, multidisciplinary interactions support cross-pollination of ideasand raising multiple awareness of
, and leadershipNow we turn to the larger social context in which we see environmental engineering studentsstarting to form decisions about their career and then begin their career. By social context, wemean, for this study, the gendered and racialized contexts in environmental work. In fact, wewould expect these contexts to come into play even in the selection of their major—climateeffects, public environmental discourse, and environmental policy all have gendered and racialsocial components that frame students’ matriculation into the major as much as their journeysthrough and beyond it. Keeping in mind the gender, race, and ethnic characteristics ofenvironmental engineering degree-earners in Section 2.1.1, we will return to this
peers for 10 points per case study. The 10 points were distributed as 1) content (5pts), 2) originality (3 pts), and 3) presentation quality (2 pts). The grades for individual students werethen averaged based on the points they were assigned by their peers. The project grade was decided bythe instructor based on the final presentation and the feedback from open-house attendees.a. Weekly presentations on social innovation case studies 40%b. Project 40 %c. Reflections, mind maps 10%d. Class participation 10 %Figure 3: Highlights of a project report3. Lessons learned: Engineering, globalization, leadership3.1 Learning from the in-class discussion:3.1.1 Attributes of social innovations and frugal engineering -Through the continued interactive
evidence of entrepreneurial mindsetgrowth within freshmen and upper level students’ ePortfolios.IntroductionIn order to foster entrepreneurial mindset development throughout the undergraduate experience,Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech has created avertically integrated portfolio process centered around entrepreneurial mindset, reflection, andstories. The goal of this work is to empower students to tell the story of their growth intoentrepreneurially minded engineers. Through connecting, reflecting upon, and constructing theirunique stories, students begin to see themselves as engineers who have developed and willcontinue to develop an entrepreneurial mindset to create value for others. The purpose of
and InnovationKeywords: Innovation, Cognitive Science, Engineering Education, Technology Education,Research1. IntroductionThis paper addresses an observed shortcoming of university efforts towards innovation –particularly at land grant STEM-focused institutions. Specifically the observation is thatconsiderably more effort has been expended on actions towards the realization andcommercialization of ideas than has been invested in research on the actual ideation process,how it occurs in the minds of the ideators, as well as which conditions promote it. Thishypothesis is borne out by comparing university investments in ideation research to fundsappropriated for realization and commercialization.The synthesis presented in this paper focuses on
, fromthe fourth principle. Students picked up on specifics from Chief Albert’s presentation, includingquoting some parts of his discussion. Examples are provided below. words for engineers: “Your work is more than plans and specifications. Your work is more than creating a design for a client. Your work impacts people, communities, and the landscape. You have a responsibility to be aware of the negative impacts of the work you engage in.” A reminder to keep community in mind in every step of the process…. One element from Chief Albert’s presentation that I personally found most impactful was the list of his Tribe’s values. When I read the RAE report about sustainability, I only thought about the impact that civil engineers
. Sarah’s research interests include: motivation, student and faculty metacognition, and engineering faculty self- regulated learning.Dr. Liesl Baum, Virginia Tech Dr. Liesl Baum is the Associate Director for Strategic Initiatives at the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. She is a former middle school teacher and spent seven years teaching in Virginia public schools. Her research interests and goals are to develop a frame of mind that allows for creativity to develop among students and faculty of all levels. She works with university faculty to identify and build c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
develops an entrepreneurial mindset as described by the KEEN framework.The overall strategy for incorporating entrepreneurial minded learning (EML) into the coreengineering curriculum may be seen in Figure 2. Part of this effort has been the modification ofthe first year engineering course sequence as described by Gerhart et al2. The logical next stepwas then to make curricular modifications that enhance the development of the entrepreneurialmindset in the sophomore year. Using KEEN funding, Lawrence Tech is taking this next stepthrough the development and institutionalization of a multidisciplinary, design studio course tobe taken during the second year of the engineering curriculum. This course builds on thefoundations of the first year and
posits that contemplation in an elementary andmiddle school setting can improve children’s social and emotional skills [2]. At the undergraduatelevel, Bernadez et al. have found software engineering students to be slightly more efficient indeveloping conceptual models after four weeks of mindfulness training [3]. Rieken et al. havefound positive correlations between mindfulness and innovation self-efficacy in undergraduateengineering students [4]. In the business world, Goleman shows that mindfulness results in“stronger focus, staying calmer under stress, better memory, and good corporate citizenship [5].”And in the military, mindfulness has attracted attention as a way to “to heal trauma-stressedveterans, make command decisions and help
Paper ID #28477The Effect of a Deliberately Merged Program for Women and Minorities inEngineeringDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, Teaching Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Elementary Education, is also the Director of Women in Engineering and The Engineering Place at NC State University. She has been working in the field of engineering education for over 30 years. She is dedicated to conveying the joint messages that engineering is a set of fields that can use all types of minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEE
AC 2010-398: IDEATION TO INNOVATION (I2I) WORKSHOPDaniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic UniversityDavid Barbe, University of Maryland Page 15.662.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Ideation to Innovation (I2I) Workshop Daniel Raviv Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL ravivd@fau.edu and David F. Barbe University of Maryland, College Park, MD dbarbe@umd.eduAbstract This paper describes an on-going
their habits of minds and frames of references. This paperexplored the extent of transformative learning experiences in a first-year engineering program ata midwestern (USA) institution. The study employed two instruments to assess transformativelearning: the Learning Activity Survey (LAS) and the Transformative Outcomes and ProcessesScale (TROPOS). The LAS assessed whether and to what extent the first-year engineeringexperience has led to a perspective transformation in the students. TROPOS evaluated students'overall transformative learning outcome, focusing on four subscales: social support, attitudetowards uncertainty, criticality, and transformative outcomes. Analysis of the LAS datafacilitated the categorization of students into four
Paper ID #20567Setting the Foundations for International and Cross-disciplinary Innovation:The U.S.-Denmark Summer School ”Renewable Energy: In Practice”Dr. Tela Favaloro, University of California, Santa Cruz Tela Favaloro received a B.S. degree in Physics and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Univer- sity of California, Santa Cruz. She is currently working to further the development and dissemination of alternative energy technology; as project manager of a green building design initiative and researcher with the Center for Sustainable Engineering and Power Systems. Her background is in the development of
Tech.Dr. Rochelle L Williams, Northeastern University Rochelle L. Williams, Ph.D. is the Chief Programs Officer at the National Society of Black Engineers. She is a former Chair of the MIND Division and ASEE Projects Board.Dr. Alaine M Allen, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Alaine M. Allen is an educator who intentionally works to uplift the voices of and create opportunities for individuals from groups historically marginalized in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) environments. She currently serve ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #40800Dr. Linda Vanasupa
Jing Guo, D.Eng., Keysight Technologies Kathy Kasley, Ph.D, Emeritus Professor, Pamela Phillips, Professor, Ce Yao, MSEE College of Engineering, Colorado Technical UniversityIntroductionThe key contribution for this paper is that two frameworks were used to apply systemengineering and further promote entrepreneurial-minded concepts for a capstone course at themaster’s level in electrical engineering. In addition, entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML)activities were implemented in several courses in electrical engineering and computerengineering based on the recent results in the undergraduate program. For this project,background and explanation of the frameworks are described in a capstone course for the
theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.5. Gredler, M. (2009). Learning and instruction; Theory into practice (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.6. Hartman, N. W., & Branoff, T. J. (2005). Learning theories: Applications for instruction in constraint-based solid modeling and other engineering graphics topics. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 69 (2), 6-15.7. Schmittau, J. (2003). Cultural-historical theory and mathematics education. In: Kozulin A, Gindis B, Ageyev V, Miller S (ed), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.8. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes
. Page 12.405.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Divergent/Convergent Creativity Working With Different Modes of Creative Thought in Interdisciplinary Settings.IntroductionCurrently, the Bachelor of Fine Arts degree in Industrial Design at _____________University ishoused and awarded by the College of Engineering and Technology. This came about in the Fallof 1999 when the Industrial Design program left the College of Fine Arts and Communications(where it had been for the 30 previous years) and moved to the newly formed School ofTechnology in the College of Engineering and Technology.Even before the move from the College of Fine Arts to the College of Engineering
Paper ID #40691S-STEM Partnerships Supporting Low-Income Engineering Students: ADescriptive Case StudyDr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Walter Lee is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the director for research at the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College
University, where she is pursuing a degree in Sec- ondary Mathematics Education. Outside of class, she is an undergraduate researcher for the Department of Engineering Education and a math tutor for the Ohio State University’s Mathematics Department.Zachary Dix, The Ohio State UniversityMr. Nicholas Rees Sattele, The Ohio State University Nicholas is an Undergraduate Research Associate with The Ohio State Department of Engineering Ed- ucation. He is in the process of completing a B.S. in Computer Science and Engineering at Ohio State. His interests include incorporating Entrepreneurial Minded Learning into engineering coursework and interdisciplinary innovation.Dr. Krista M Kecskemety, The Ohio State University Krista
., Kruschwitz, N., Laur, J., & Schley, S. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York: Doubleday14. Ramsey, J. (n.d.). An integrated science and technology undergraduate curriculum. Unpublished manuscript. College of Integrated Science and Technology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA.15. Fluellen, Jr., J. (2011, November 18-20). Preparing 21st Century minds: Using brain research to enhance cognitive skills for the future. Creating a nation of innovators: A brief report of the Learning & Brain Conference, Boston.16. Daly, S., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J., Seifert, C. & Gonzalez. (2012). Design heuristics in engineering concept
designer/engineer with something that can be evaluated, revised,redeveloped or dismissed. As an approximation the single sketch is not final or finished but inprogress. The simple transfer of an idea from the mind to paper allows it to develop.The Sketch as Process - An Integral Part of CreativityEach new sketch represents a progression in thought. As Goldschmidt says, design sketching “isnot merely an act of representation of a pre-formulated image; in the context we deal with, it is,more often than not, a search for such an image.”5 The very process of creating a sketch plays anactive role in shaping thoughts and ideas. The activity of sketching involves a process ofconstructive critical questioning. The placement of each mark and line involves
dynamics that occur at both curricular stages, however, can oftenbe challenging. Student population, course structure, project scope, timeline, and courseworkload are just a few factors that may influence how effective students are as team membersand what strategies instructors may use to promote healthy team dynamics.Previously, the implementation of an equity minded strategy for promoting healthy teamdynamics was explored in an introductory biomedical engineering (BME) course [1]. The use ofasset-based activities throughout the course provided introductory students with a mechanism toshare about their individual assets with their teammates and complete their team-based designproject through the lens of team member assets and interests. Student
and we must listen to other suggestions and understand them. Only then can we ultimately choose which the best idea is.Being open-minded was therefore a very important attitude to have during the design process formany of the students and was closely associated with generating creative ideas, acceptingfeedback, and listening intently.3. Working Effectively as a Team The ability to work effectively as a team was another core theme that emerged from thefreshmen engineering students’ reflections. Many reflections described the importance ofactively participating, being a team player, cooperating, distributing work, managing timeappropriately, supporting group members, and trusting group members. In a typical groupproject
schools to engineering and associatedopportunities and careers via one-day sessions. Participants have the ability to interact withengineering faculty members and undergraduate students while participating in hands-onengineering activities. The program reaches on average over 100 middle-school-aged girlsannually, bringing them to Rowan’s campus to explore engineering through hands-on projectsand demonstrations. This applied approach to learning, a hallmark of Rowan Engineering,introduces AWE participants to various engineering disciplines and careers and provides anopportunity to connect with like-minded peers and current engineering undergraduates asmentors and advisors. AWE was established in 1998 and has hosted over 2,000 middle schoolgirls
traditional engineering curriculum: innovation and entrepreneurship. The prospective studentinnocently stated, “Why would I go to Colorado School of Mines? I want to be an entrepreneur”and the non-traditional student inquired about “courses that will make me be a better innovator”.It took one ambitious faculty member to hear these statements and to gather a team comprisingthree other like-minded faculty members who shared the belief that Colorado School of Mineshad an opportunity to positively change the innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem at Theirinstitution. The quest for support began.Epicenter, started through Stanford University as a product of a NSF grant, launched a programcalled the Pathways to Innovation Program3 (“Pathways”) in 2014
. IntroductionIn the five years leading up to the beginning of our current strategic planning cycle, the Collegeof Engineering at Purdue had undergone a period of significant growth both in faculty andfacilities. The key questions facing the college centered around how to identify and realize theopportunities that this growth was creating. With this in mind, when the work on the nextgeneration strategic plan began in late 2006, inclusiveness and widespread engagement ofstakeholders were defining goals for the planning process. Reflecting this goal of including alllevels of faculty and staff as well as students, outside academic and industrial experts andalumni,approximately hundreds of people across 25 continentshave been engaged in the preparation ofthe
offer a new technical elective, the providedhigh-level overview of a course is likely not helpful. As an example, one faculty membercommented on a card, “This project is well thought out and comprehensive. If I were designing acourse from scratch I would strongly consider using this as the thread through the course as theauthors did,” [17], and plenty of other supportive but not-ready-as-is comments exist on the cardpages. Ultimately, engineering faculty already feel the pressure of having to teach too manytopics within each course, and many faculty members have trouble finding the time toincorporate entrepreneurially-minded learning into their courses [16]. Shared resources that arefull courses or even month-long projects are unlikely to be
from using concepts in kinetics and kinematics in an application that also trainsthem on business planning, cost analysis of new biotechnology and market analysis. There is a need tointroduce engineers to the entrepreneurial mindset which can help to engage students in the course materialand become more curious about the world around them. This paper aims to demonstrate how a semester-long human body motion analysis project can teach innovation and business skills in the engineeringclassroom through the use of an entrepreneurially minded learning (EML) module.IntroductionIt is valuable to implement entrepreneurial mindset in the undergraduate engineering classroom. Often,entrepreneurship courses are taught by business programs and do not focus