technology. Lipread’s interoperability with remote learningsystems and interactive educational software establishes it as an innovative tool in the digital education field, withthe ability to revolutionize the way educational content is accessed and engaged with. III. M ETHODOLOGYA. Data PreprocessingDuring the preliminary stage of our research, our primary focus was on establishing a strong basis for data handlingand preprocessing. This aspect is of utmost importance for ensuring the effectiveness of our lip-reading model. Figure2 Outlines the entire methodology, The initial stage of this project was setting up the Python environment, whichincluded installing important libraries such as OpenCV for video
- sity. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their development of problem-solving skills, self-regulated learning practices, and epistemic thinking. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and re- searchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is the past editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research As- sociation
engineering student participants who were currently orformerly enrolled at a predominantly White university? And relatedly, in what ways did thesenuances lead to components of deeper stories?We introduce a new term, a Sounding Line, for the marker-based methodology we developedfor this analysis. A Sounding Line marker reflects a research participant’s communication, in themoment, taking measure of the interviewer, determining if they are to be trusted with thepersonal, culturally-sensitive, and perhaps highly revealing stories from their lived experiences.This paper is about the methodology we developed and applied, in 2023, to the initial datasetfrom 2019-2021.Listening to these stories evoked an awareness among the research project interviewers
Conference 1 Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Educationwith ideas, test implementations, and customize the hands-on experience I find necessary to learnnew material. Not only that, but I was enjoying myself! After taking Computer Architecture,I approached my professor about exploring incorporating the game into the coursework at myuniversity as a means to assist struggling students through alternative learning methods. This paperis a formalized version of the proposal that I made to my professor.In addition to developing unique projects for students, this paper suggests an innovative approachto easing the transition between digital logic and computer architecture. We propose taskingstudents with
Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, received the College of Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including
its own unique way, adapting it to fitthe specific context and demands of the field. In their final year, all students complete a capstonecourse, which allows students to apply their accumulated knowledge in a practical, project-basedcontext. Students are required to not only focus on the technical aspects of design, but also theethical and societal implications of their decisions, as per ABET requirements.The Engineering Ethics Reasoning Instrument (EERI) was assigned as a homework assignmentfor data collection purposes. This instrument measures two key metrics: the P score and the N2score. The EERI was administered as a mandatory component of required courses in both thefirst and fourth years of the undergraduate engineering curriculum. The
Paper ID #42347Gender Equity in Higher-Education Institutions: An Analysis of StudentPerceptions in an Engineering School in ChileProf. Camila Zapata-Casabon, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Master in Marketing and Market Research from the University of Barcelona, Spain. Industrial Civil Engineer from the Universidad del B´ıo-B´ıo. She has three diplomas in the areas of coaching, digital marketing and equality and empowerment of women. Her professional experience is linked to higher education as a project engineer and university management in the public and private area. Teacher at different universities in matters of
component for innovation in theindustry [33]. Traditional engineering programs do not adequately prepare students to be designengineers. Despite advances in engineering education, there is a substantial disconnect betweenengineering education and the practice of engineering, that includes teamwork, collaboration,business and marketing skills in addition to traditional engineering skills [31], [33]. In the ABETCriteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, to prepare engineering students for industry,creativity was highlighted in the engineering curriculum, as a necessary element foraccreditation, where ABET defined engineering design as an iterative process leading to aproduct or solution of the highest possible quality [34].Project-based learning
) Fluid Dynamics Technical Committee provided the list of CFD-relatedconcepts and different approaches to introduce CFD into a undergraduate engineeringcurriculum [1]. Integrating CFD topics into a fluid mechanics course is a suitable approach tobenefit engineering students in general, while a separate CFD course is more appropriate toengineering students who are interested in CFD research or careers. [2] and [3] designed separateundergraduate CFD courses and provided the detailed information on course contents andassigned projects. There are a number of studies that integrated CFD topics into theirundergraduate fluid mechanics courses to increase students understanding of flow behaviors( [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]). In the present study, the
, particularly for international students. He aims to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency by interventions, counseling, pedagogy, and tool selection to promote DEI. In addition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at the CATME research group. He served as the ASEE Purdue Student Chapter President from 2022-2023, the Program Chair of ASEE Student Division, and Purdue ENE Graduate Committee Junior Chair.Dr. Moses Olayemi, University of Oklahoma Moses Olayemi is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Pathways at the
strategic dissemination via various media platforms,including China's influential graduate student recruitment system, it was anticipated that UGA'sreputation would be bolstered among millions of prospective Chinese students and parents.BUCT, as a national key university under the Ministry of Education, boasts exceptionalprograms in bioengineering and materials science and engineering, attracting top-tier talent fromChina and East Asian countries. Collaborative programs with UGA were poised to attract evenmore high-caliber candidates, enriching both institutions. Moreover, in addition to teaching,faculty members from both universities could work together on joint research projects,supervising graduate students, publishing research papers, and
the value of the oral exams for professionalism and oralcommunication skills. For example (emphasis added): “(The oral exam) tested in a more realistic way” “My intern project meetings were similar to the oral exam.” “Better practical use than written exams ... which are useless the day after the exam” 60% 50% 45.6% 40% 32.7% 30% 17.7% 20% 10% 2.4% 1.5% 0% Wr Def Wr Some Same Oral Some Oral Def Figure 1: Survey Results for the
at University of Wisconsin – Platteville. He received his Ph.D. in Systems and Engineering Management from Texas Tech University. Gana’s research interests are in engineering education, learning analytics, and novel use of data analytics in decision making.Ingrid Scheel, Oregon State University Ingrid Scheel is a Project Instructor at Oregon State University. She emphasizes diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging in her courses. Scheel volunteers for organizations including but not limited to: ChickTech, Tech Trek, Willamette Innovator’s Network, InnovationX, Redefining Women in Tech, and the Society of Women Engineers. She is the past president of Optica, Columbia Section, and contributes to the
paying specialattention to the mentoring, training, and recruitment of the underrepresented population inSTEM, especially women and minorities. This paper presents program details and recentevaluation results.IntroductionThe number of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) jobs in the UnitedStates is growing faster than ever. According to the Bureau of Labor statistics, while totalemployment is projected to increase by 2.8% from 2022 to 2032, STEM jobs are expected togrow 10.8% during the same period [1]. This translates into more than one million new STEMjobs in the American labor market over the next 10 years. This demand for STEM graduates isof interest to many colleges and universities, where the focus has been on
Track 1, I-Corps, and I-Corps for Learning) as principal investigator. She transitioned to tenure track in Fall 2022 to pursue her research interests in convergence in engineering education, global engineering education, and social issues in STEM research and practice. Recently, she has taken on new NSF projects to broaden participation in quantum engineering (IUSE Level 3), research abroad (IRES Track 1), and use-inspired research (Convergence Accelerator Track I). Having grown up in Australia, Canada, Korea, and Germany, she speaks three languages. Leveraging her international connections, she has served in leadership positions in the Korean-American Scientists and Engineers Association (KSEA, Vice President
first-hand the ways in whichgrades are centralized in our students’ educational experiences (positive and negative emotions,focus on points/scores over learning and growth, etc.). Recently we have observed how thecentralization of grades to students’ experiences has negatively impacted their engagement andwork in project-based courses. Students have seemed to procrastinate PBL course work toprioritize other courses, disengage with lessons in class to complete homework for other courses,or even not attend class sessions to study for an upcoming quiz or test in a different subject.When addressing these concerns with students, they often offer explanations that relate to theirneed for a good grade in another course (such as calculus, physics, or
the particular context of each case and the generalization and mobilizationbetween them. On the other hand, this paradigm does not presuppose contradictions aboutontological or epistemological assumptions since it is more important to respond to the situationfrom an empirical perspective [12].The methodological design of any research proposal must be intimately related to the paradigmand approaches, perspectives or appropriate positions by the researcher. In this way, the use of amixed investigation entails a design that integrates quantitative and qualitative methods in someor all of the parts of the process. Specifically, for the research project, we make a sequentialexplanatory design of quantitative predominance and importance, which
onnon-traditional students in foundational engineering courses that have potential to leave theengineering pathway without additional social and academic support early in their academicplan. The project offers peer support through small group activities in online foundationalengineering courses that incorporate structured active learning sessions to enhance theengineering content [1] [2] [3]. These types of active learning scenarios have potential tostrengthen STEM competencies to increase students’ academic persistence [4] [5]. Persistence inengineering pathways is contributed to students’ acclimation and mindset to accomplish theireducational goals [6] and enter the engineering workforce [7]. This paper specifically examinesthe qualitative
TexasDebbie Huffman, North Central Texas CollegeMary J Combs, Quality Measures Mary J. Combs has over 20 years of experience in higher education and healthcare working with faculty as an instructional designer to create student-focused curricula using assessment data and program evaluation. She also has experience working with community-based organizations advancing health equity through data-driven strategies and providing performance feedback to improve clinical education. Combs excels in qualitative and quantitative analysis, project management, and delivering impactful training programs. She holds a master’s degree in occupational and technical studies (business and industry training). As a Senior Evaluator at Quality
AbstractThis paper demonstrates the design and implementation of an innovative gamified softwareapplication for learning human-spoken languages. The game serves as an interactive and enjoyablesupplement to aid the learning process of different languages for elementary-aged children. At its core,the application uses a translation Application Programming Interface (API) to process text and outputtranslations in the target language chosen by the learner. Additionally, it is AI-enabled, allowing theutilization of APIs such as OpenAIs’s ChatGPT to enhance the translation capabilities. Provided is abasic proof of concept that was developed as part of the Final Pi Project in the Intermediate ComputerProgramming (COSC 1352) course. The gamified program was
the clicker study where questions from the end-of-course evaluations did notreveal any apparent differences between the clicker and control classes2. The NSSE annualsurvey of freshmen and seniors asks students how often they have, for example, participated inprojects that required integrating ideas or information from various sources, used e-mail tocommunicate with an instructor, asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions,received prompt feedback from faculty on their academic performance, participated incommunity- based projects, or tutored or taught other students. The findings are used todetermine how successful a university is at engaging students4.Sometimes student feedback contradicts the results associated with
Paper ID #37206Strategies for Continuous Improvement in ETAC of ABET Programs: ANovelApproachProf. Ravi C. Manimaran, Department Chair, Engineering Technology, Austin Peay State University Ravi C. Manimaran is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Technology, Austin Peay State University. His education includes two Master of Science degrees in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering and Electronics and Control Engineering. He has been dynamically involved in higher education leadership as a Dean, Department Chair, Project Director, and a faculty member since 1997. He has served as the PI / Co-PI of multiple
that orbital debris is an issue, butconflict starts when deciding who should do what to solve the problem [16]. The lesson wasdesigned to introduce students to the exploration of macroethics without pushing them to a‘panic zone’ in which they would disengage and shut down [17]. Future lessons will build ontheir confidence by presenting more disputed topics.A table outlining the agenda of the 80-minute macroethics lesson is provided in Appendix A.While students walked into the classroom (a large lecture hall with stadium-like seating anddesks), we presented what we called the “hook.” We projected a paragraph-long issue brief on1 The authors note that they learned post-lesson and wish to help educate others that “stakeholders” is not
STEM [4]. So, although this research project applies to all UD faculty, engineering and relatedfaculty are disproportionately involved and impacted.UD has also been investing in improving departmental climates and diversity, equity, andinclusion on campus. As part of this work, in spring 2020, UD faculty participated in theCOACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey. This survey, developed at the Harvard GraduateSchool of Education, measures faculty perceptions of various aspects of worklife. Despiteconducting the survey in spring 2020, a semester significantly disrupted by the COVID-19pandemic, UD’s survey response rate was 40%. COACHE determined that most responses werecollected before the disruption and performed a special analysis to determine
. Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno Derrick Satterfield is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on engineering graduate students’ experiences and motivation centered on career planning and preparation.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of studenDr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University
. Having an understanding of what contributes to barriers to belongingness has helpedinform the scope and data analysis of this project. In summary, the three barriers to belongingdiscussed were faculty interaction with women students, negative interactions with men-identifying peers, and stereotype threat.Research Statement While the literature abounds with studies evaluating the impact of varying REU programson student participants, less attention has been placed on evaluating specifically the experiencesof women REU participants. It is important to ensure that these experiences are inclusive andcontribute to positive experiences for all students, including women students. The researchquestions for this study seek to investigate: (1) How
engagement projects, evaluation tools and tech- nology, and gender issues in STEM education. https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-0383-0179Prof. Marcela Silva, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile Marcela Silva is the Academic Director at the Engineering Faculty of the Andres Bello University in Campus Santiago. She works as a teacher in the Construction Engineering career and supports innovation and entrepreneurship courses. She obtained a BacheloDr. Carolina Alvarado, California State University, Chico Dr. Alvarado is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Science Education at California State University, Chico. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Engineering Physics and a doctorate in Physics Education from
Psychology, vol. 52, no. 2,p. 196, 2005.[48] J. S. Bruner, The Process of Education. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1960.[49] D. DiBiasio, L. Comparini, A. G. Dixon, and W. M. Clark, “A project-based spiralcurriculum for introductory courses in ChE: III. Evaluation,” Chemical Engineering Education,vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 140–146, 2001.[50] Lohani, Vinod K, M. L. Wolfe, T. Wildman, K. Mallikarjunan, and J. Connor,“Reformulating general engineering and biological systems engineering programs at VirginiaTech,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 4, p. n4, 2011.[51] S. Vemuru, S. Khorbotly, and F. Hassan, “A spiral learning approach to hardwaredescription languages,” in 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems(ISCAS
engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Ben D. Lutz is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Design at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He is the leader of the Critical Research in Engineering and Technology Education (CREATE) group at Cal Poly. His research interests include critical pedagogies; efforts for diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering, engineering design theory and practice; conceptual change and understanding; and school- to-work transitions for new engineers
belonging inmathematics classrooms? The PLC was part of a larger NSF-funded project entitled Student Engagement inMathematics through an Institutional Network for Active Learning (SEMINAL). The project is a5-year initiative examining departmental change efforts to infuse active learning teachingstrategies into precalculus and calculus courses. During the outset of this project, it becameapparent that although departments were concerned with issues of equity and inclusion, mostdepartment members communicated that they needed additional support engaging with thesetopics. As such, we developed a professional learning community (PLC) and invited instructorsfrom nine universities to participate in a year-long series exploring issues of equity