, professionalism, individual technical contributions, presentation skills, etc.)that are difficult to teach/evaluate without in-person team meetings.In addition, these reviews expose team members to “real world” business practices that they willexperience in their engineering/management career. These program reviews have helped theauthors successfully and efficiently manage and grade on average 10 to 20 projects per semesterin Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Senior Design program at Authors’ institute.Team Program Review High-level rubric:The high-level TPR rubric is designed to assess three major aspects of any senior design project:(1) Presentation skills, (2) Project planning, management skills, and (3) Technical contributions.TPR format
power systems, in particular, electric machinery and electromagnetics. Robert has worked as a mathematical modeler for Emerson Process Management, working on electric power applications for Emerson’s Ovation Embedded Simulator. Robert also served in the United States Navy as an interior communications electrician from 1998-2002 on active duty and from 2002-2006 in the US Naval Reserves.Mr. Dekwuan Stokes, University of Pittsburgh Dekwuan is a senior electrical engineering major at University of Pittsburgh. He plans to enroll in the PhD program with a focus in power, as well as, achieve his MBA throughout the process. His career choice and long term goal is to become a professor and to start his own businesses
extracurricular activities that promise to cultivate anentrepreneurial mind-set and develop skills needed in this start-up world. Risk taking, in a way,has become the new critical thinking. It’s what colleges believe they need to teach for graduatesto meet the needs of today’s work force. For students, entrepreneurship offers the creativity andindependence that traditional careers seem to lack” 3,4.Integrating entrepreneurial skills and activities into the Engineering program may be one way torespond to the serious challenge of Engineering student retention, especially in the transitionbetween freshman and sophomore years5,6,7. It has been reported that students may decide toleave engineering if motivation for the required hard work is not provided via
Paper ID #15814An Analysis of First-Year Engineering Majors’ Spatial SkillJaclyn Kuspiel Murray, University of Georgia Jaclyn Kuspiel Murray is currently a research scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology in the depart- ment of biomedical engineering. In May of 2016 she graduated with a doctorate of philosophy in science education from The University of Georgia. She earned a bachelor of science in mechanical engineer- ing from Georgia Institute of Technology and a master of science in biomedical engineering from The University of Tennessee Health Science Center and The University of Memphis. After a brief career in
enriching learning experiences as will be evident in the followingcase study. The students and mentors involved in this process volunteer a significant number ofhours to EWB@MSU meetings and fundraisers. This affords students an opportunity to developtheir own solutions to diverse, multi-cultural problems with their peers and mentors. Thisinductive style of learning inspires students to engage in the process2. The project-based andproblem-based learning model provides an opportunity for increased engagement not only instudents’ respective studies, but in developing the strong communication, leadership andlife-long learning skills that are required for success both in their careers and EWB@MSUprojects. Inductive methods promote a deeper approach to
tests to assess participant learning. This methods will include oraltests, drawing and illustrations, and participant demonstrations. The authors hope that by revisingthe training program for clarity and having multiple assessment methods, the program will bemore effective in reducing the risk of injuries and fatalities among structural steel workers whoparticipated in the study and make the structural steel industry safer for all. The authors alsohope that the results of this research increase the understanding among construction engineeringand management students about the demographic characteristics and learning profiles ofstructural steel workers that they may encounter during their professional careers and how toprovide effective trainings
highest grade point average (GPA) students. The other group seems to experience great difficulty with the open-ended learning and the independent problem solving that is needed for successful project completion. Sometimes they struggle greatly to carry their part of the work for the team to completion. This group does not necessarily correspond to the lower GPA students. The department hopes to explore further how to facilitate better open-ended problem solving earlier in the students’ careers. Perhaps this reflects the need for a combination of the triplet of Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes necessary for successful civil engineering practice. • There continues to be some confusion with the multiple
Poster Abstract Draft 4 Seminar: Research Ethics Research Report #3 Annotated Bibliography 5 Seminar: Career Options for MS and PhD Recipients Research Report #4 Networking Lunch with Faculty Member Research Paper Outline 6 Seminar: Graduate Programs & Application Processes Research Report #5 Research Poster Symposium Registration Poster Title & Abstract
, Nittany Lion Club, ASEE, ASME, AIAA, AKC, GRCA. He has been honored with a LMC/KAPL Lead- ership Award, GE Phillippe Award, PSEAS Outstanding service award, Jaycee International Senatorship, and an ESM Centennial Fellowship.Mrs. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Meg Handley is currently the Associate Director for Engineering Leadership Outreach at Penn State University. Previously, Meg served as the Director of the Career & Corporate Connection’s office at the Smeal College of Business at Penn State University. Meg is a PhD candidate in Workforce Education at Penn State, where she is focusing on interpersonal behaviors and their impact on engineering leadership potential. Meg is a
research interests within computational intelligence include ensemble systems, incremental and nonstationary learning, and various applications of pattern recognition in bioinformatics and biomedical engineering. He is a member of IEEE, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi and Eta Kappa Nu. His re- cent and current works are funded primarily through NSF’s CAREER and Energy, Power and Adaptive Systems (EPAS) programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT OF A WORKSHOP ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION IN BIOMETRIC SYSTEMSABSTRACTBiometrics is the science of recognizing and authenticating people using theirphysiological features. The global biometrics market has a compound annual
market, and theoutstanding Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) education and disability benefits, and youhave a robust and rising student veteran population. Even with the low veteran unemploymentrate of 3.9 percent5, veterans are moving from trade-style jobs toward a career they feel matchesthe leadership, business, intellectual and people skills they have acquired and honed in themilitary. In order to accomplish this transition, veterans must return to school and earn a degree.Until recently, most of these veterans aspiring to return to college faced a huge hurdle, the costof tuition. Even with the traditional Montgomery GI Bill, these students would struggle to meetpublic university cost obligations, let alone covering the tuition at any
training and profes- sional development as well as various federally-funded STEM-focused programs at the post-secondary level. She has extensive experience in all phases of data collection (such as instrument development and administration, observations, focus group and individual interviews) as well as experience in site recruit- ment, developing logic models, quantitative and qualitative data analyses and reporting, and presenting results to a variety of audiences.Dr. Rebecca Eddy, Cobblestone Applied Research & Evaluation, Inc. Dr. Eddy received her doctorate in Applied Cognitive Psychology and has spent her career focused on ap- plying the principles of learning and cognition to evaluation of educational
on Creativity and Innovation in theEngineering Design Process. 1. The trip to [the external training organization]! But not just because of how much fun it was, but because of what we learned and what privileges we were provided. 2. The exercises we did to promote better creativity. 3. The entire course and especially the trip was more than just seeing behind the scenes at [the external training organization]. 4. I feel so confident in my abilities to be creative and successful in my engineering career. 5. Learning about the inner workings of [the external training organization] and how to apply it to life everywhere. 6. I honestly didn’t believe creativity could be taught or worked on…. I have been
engineering concepts can flow to a child allows us to see theconnection these abilities have to the child’s growth in knowledge of engineering and the child’spotential growth into a professional engineer. Analysis of the toys children are put in contactwith can help us gain a better understanding of how best to prepare children for potential careersby developing the skills most relevant to that career using toys. And although formal education iscertainly the primary avenue through which students will learn these ideas, the complementaryeffect of learning through play shows children how these normally-abstract topics can be appliedin real life.Research QuestionsWhile this study is primarily meant to explore how gender bias in the purchase of
Paper ID #11315Developing ”Critical Thinking Skills” in Graduate Engineering ProgramDr. Shekar Viswanathan, National University Dr. Viswanathan is a Professor at the Department of Applied Engineering at National University, Cali- fornia. Dr. Viswanathan is an educator, researcher and administrator with more than twenty-five years of industrial and academic experience encompassing engineering and environmental consulting, research and development, and technology development. Career experience includes teaching at the University level, conducting fundamental research, and developing continuing educational courses.Mr. Ben D
made by preparing a wider array of supplies such as different sensors, various motors andchassis building materials. This would allow high school students to have more options duringthe robotic design and implementation process, which would result in more demandingbrainstorming sessions. Exposing students to challenging concepts will make it easier for themto solve more complex problems when they move on to college to pursue a career in engineering.Introduction Many educational researches show that students will be better prepared for rigorous studyin engineering sciences if exposed to engineering concepts in the years prior to college oruniversity study 1, 2. Through a pre-college engineering program, high school students can havean
interests include gender in engineering education research, interdisciplinarity, peer review, engineers’ epistemologies, and global engineering education.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State UniversityDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts. Page 26.680.1
26.686.7 responsibility? • [B] How can safety/ethics be communicated across cultural and socio-economic divides? • [A] How can ethical and safety standards keep up with a rapidly advancing scientific forefront? • [B] How do engineers best approach the unknown unknowns of new technologies when employed in consumer products?Use of Risk Assessment During the early discussions, students reported high levels of satisfaction with thetechnical descriptions of the catastrophes and the discussions of the underlying ethical choices.Engineering students early in their student careers generally possess good black/white criticalthinking skills on technical issues17. However, since almost all of the case studies occurred in
example, the outcomes of this study created several lab activities forthe students. During their research, students get to see firsthand the relative merits of the projectand get to use some of the new technologies one-on-one.Instrumentation and energy knowledge and projects are important to prepare students to becompetitive for careers in the growing fields of instrumentation, automation & control, energy-related engineering, science, and technology. Preliminary projections from the Bureau of LaborStatistics state that the number of expected energy related green jobs is expected to increase by11% by 2016, and most of it in environmental or energy-related sectors [23-24] . Edgar Dale’scone of learning shows that participating in discussions
behavior Product development economics, Essay on professional Week 10 financial analysis and project planning development Essays on technological impact Week 11 Project management, MS Project and societal impacts Industry expectations, career paths, PE Report on financial model Week 12 license Week 13 Prototype development Page 26.1074.4 Week 14 Prototype development Alpha prototype
London, both in the UK. He started his career in the UK as the Senior Research Assistant at the SERC Engineering Design Centre. He joined Brunel University in 1995 where he worked for 18 years before joining United Arab Emirates University in August 2011. During his stay at Brunel he has worked with many British industries. Dr Sivaloganathan is a keen researcher in Design and was the Convenor for the Engineering Design Conferences in 1998 and 2000. He has published more than 75 papers in reputed journals and conferences.Mr. Hayder Zulafqar Ali, University Instructor Hayder Ali is working as an ’instructor’ in mechanical engineering department, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU). Before joining UAEU, he has been
of the 17 students, ofwhom 8 are women and 9 men. A feature of this area is that it teaches students from differentdisciplines of engineering. The sample has students from the following careers: 2 fromengineering in sustainable development, 2 from engineering in mechanics, 2 from bio-technology and 10 from chemical engineering. This subject is taught in 4th semester as acommon core for engineering at the Tecnológico de Monterrey.Learning Objectives for the PBL activityThe learning objectives planned by the teacher for the application of this PBL were: 1) theapplication of energy balances at an industrial plant, 2) the identification of the thermodynamiccycle that is used in the processes, 3) the development of the competence of ethics and
dimensions in Engineering Technology Education.I. IntroductionThe traditional EET Capstone Senior Project course at DeVry campus exposes students directlyto employers and the professional world, thus catalyzing preparation for a career in their chosenprofession. Students are required to do a “real-life” senior project and/or develop a forward-looking research prototype, grounded in the reality of the market pull from end-users in thebusiness and private sectors. Feedback from our local Industry Advisory Council has offeredonly praise for benefits of the capstone design experience. Furthermore, ABET requires that“Baccalaureate degree programs must provide a capstone or integrating experience that developsstudent competencies in applying both
humanoids, emotion,teaming, ethics, machine learning, natural language processing, robot control, safety, userinterfaces, user-centered design, social behaviors, the Uncanny Valley, and HRI metrics.Murphy et al. states that one challenge in creating such a course is identifying a cost-effectiverobot and case studies to illustrate these key principles of HRI2.The HRI Young Researcher Workshop was part of the inaugural ACM/IEEE Conference onHuman-Robot Interaction (HRI’06)3. This workshop provided a means for young HRIresearchers to present their current research and provide students with the opportunity to presentwhat they feel are challenges to a career in HRI. This allowed for the formation of collaborativerelationships across disciplines and
application to practical situations related tostudents’ future career. This is extremely important because the acquisition of theoreticalknowledge does not necessarily guarantees the likelihood of success in applied settings.Instructors should also implement continuous assessment throughout the semester to monitorstudents’ retention or maintenance of new concepts. The ultimate goal of teaching is to prepareour students to be successful professionals capable of using the acquired knowledge in theircareer.A second practical implication refers to the use of a web-based polling system during instruction.Our data indicates that students perceived the use of a polling system as motivating, facilitatingacquisition and generalization of newly taught concepts
students with the international student groups and communities though groupactivities, team project, discussion and other activities. Based on the data presented, theproposed course modifications greatly enhance students’ understanding about globalengineering problems, how to develop socially justified sustainable solutions and be a globalcitizen. The course project significantly challenge students’ critical thinking skills and help themunderstanding engineering and technology related practices, standards, specifications, safetyoutside USA. This will ultimately increase students’ employability and advance their career inglobal economy.VI. Limitation of the Study and Recommendations
withthe needs, experience levels, and career intentions of their students.The proposed framework attempts to address and create a bridge between two major debatesconcerning entrepreneurship education for engineers. It seeks to demonstrate and describe four majortypes of entrepreneurial learning based on the degree to which venture creation is an expectedoutcome of the learning, and the level of uncertainty in the value proposition of the opportunity.Given that entrepreneurship takes on vastly different forms depending on these two dimensions, it islittle wonder that researchers and practitioners in the field confront difficulties in defining majorideas, identifying best practices, or measuring and comparing programs’ success.Rationale for the
classes such as Statics–a course in which physical intuition isdeveloped and utilized over the course of one’s career. This paper describes the creation andcomponents of a hybrid learning environment in a Statics course where a variety of pedagogieswere implemented. Notable activities included the use of an interactive online textbook, peerinstruction, in-class group problem solving sessions, video examples, and instructor led numericproblems. To investigate the effectiveness of the course, and where applicable the individualcontributions of unique activities, a number of feedback mechanisms were implemented over theduration of the course. These mechanisms included isomorphic questions to measure theeffectiveness of peer instruction, the use of
26.1685.12 transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews,” Studies in Higher Education, pp. 1–14, 2014.[3] C. Pickering and J. Byrne, “The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 534–548, May 2014.[4] S. Conrad, T. J. Pfeiffer, and T. Szymoniak, “Preparing Students for Writing in Civil Engineering Practice,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2012.[5] P. Brereton, “A Study of Computing Undergraduates Undertaking a Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Trans. Education, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 558–563, November 2011.[6] M. Lavallee, P.-N
can really help these girls either get ahead in their planning for school and career. • It has given me a fresh perspective on the challenges the students go through during their first year. • I feel like a great role model. I feel respected and praised for the work I do. It makes me feel like a vital piece to the COE and this university as a whole. • I really enjoyed meeting the younger female students and feeling like I was making a difference for some of them. I like to believe that it was encouraging to them to talk to someone who has been where they are now and made it through the frustrations of transitioning from high school to college life and the