population [22]. In 2008 and 2012, the COE completed the PACE(Project to Assess the Climate in Engineering) project funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundationto identify issues that affect persistence among engineering undergraduates at 22 schools, whilepaying specific attention to the intersection of race, gender, and academic experience [23]. Whenasked to share their personal experiences within the COE, many students indicated that theclimate for women and URMs was not positive and could potentially be detrimental to theireducational experience. For example, some of the comments included the following:“I’m a female, and I've had both professors and students make derogatory comments in jestabout women in engineering.”“Never have I been singled out by
ToE. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research. She is on the USD team implementing ”Developing Changemaking Engineers”, an NSF-sponsored Revolutionizing Engineering Education (RED) project. Dr. Lord is the 2018 recipient of the IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020The Final Straw: Incorporating accessibility and sustainability considerations into material selection decisionsAbstractEngineers are called upon to balance and adapt to the competing demands of industry, theenvironment, and society to develop sustainable and equitable
professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now a professor of integrated engineering at Minnesota State Univer- sity, Mankato, where she is helping to build the Bell Engineering program, and the managing partner of Kaizen Academic.Dr. Donna M Riley, Purdue University at West Lafayette Donna Riley is Kamyar Haghighi Head of the School of Engineering Education and Professor of Engi- neering Education at Purdue University.Dr. Thomas A De Pree, Bucknell University Thomas De Pree is postdoctoral researcher at Bucknell University for the project, ”Developing Human Social Networks to Identify and Develop Data-Driven Metrics and Methods for Expanding
gender in engineering, I was very familiarwith this question and presumed my research participants would be as well. It was supposed tobe an easy question, a way for me to get participants talking about something familiar, and tobuild rapport between us. I realize now this question was also an implicit invitation to tell astory, to give me a sense of who they are, and to provide me a roadmap of what kind of questionsmight be useful to ask later in the interview.For most participants, it accomplished all of these goals. I was surprised by how naturally thesenarratives rolled off their tongues, how rehearsed women’s stories were about how they came tobe involved in engineering. As my research project went on, this became a narrative that I
complete picture of students’learning/proficiency, so assessment method will include, at a minimum, individual and groupquizzes/tests, authentic performance tasks, portfolios (and possibly projects), observations andinterviews. The most relevant types of assessment in this case are formative (multiple timesduring the instruction process), summative (to be focused on student’s comprehension), andinterim assessments. The idea of explaining STEM material in visual and intuitive ways is not new. Forexample, Tyler DeWitt [1] taught high school students the topic of isotopes. He explained thatisotopes are basically the same atom using an analogy involving similar cars with minor changes.There are a few calculus textbooks that include visual
thestudents graduated on time, thus making sure that they were kept on track, emphasizing more ofan academic advisory role focused on what students were doing rather than a mentoring onewhich emphasizes who the students are and what they need more holistically.Another outcome of culture of doing is that students are treated as employees rather than humanbeings learning in a scientific environment. The data spoke specifically to this when a programdirector indicated that the student needed to be able to work independently with minimaldirection from them. In other words, they were only concerned with the students ability tocomplete the project and not the process which includes the learning component that isassociated with the project. This construct
sections of EGG 101 Introduction to Engineering to satisfymultimedia content to learners, managing discussions, the requirement. EGG 101 introduces students to engineeringorganizing collaborative and problem-based learning and the UNLV engineering curriculum while developingactivities, and conducting assessments. This project skills essential for academic success. The course currentlyutilized a LMS to provide digital content to students in a consists of a 1 semester-hour lecture portion and a 1 semesterface-to-face lecture course and improve the efficacy of hour laboratory component with smaller sessions. This studyearly warnings to struggling
design and project work, student experiences in engineering design, the transition from engineering school into the workplace, and also efforts for inclusion and diversity within engineering. His current work is in related understanding how students describe their own learning in engineering, and how that learning supports transfer of learning from school into professional practice as well as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Mr. Marvin K. Karugarama, Virginia TechDr. John J. Lesko, Virginia Tech Jack serves as the Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in VT’s College of Engineering, Professor of Engineering Mechanics, and is a cofounder of PowerHub
and Aerospace Engineering department and the Assistant Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research interests include energy and thermodynamic related topics. Since 2007 she has been actively involved in recruiting and outreach for the Statler College, as part of this involvement Dr. Morris frequently makes presentations to groups of K-12 students, as well as perspective WVU students and their families. Dr. Morris was selected as a Statler College Outstanding Teacher for 2012, the WVU Honors
departmental BPC plan focusing on increasing women and underrepresentedminority’s participation in our programs. The committee will also work with faculty to supportBPC component in research proposals and projects. The committee co-chair is also the facultyadvisor for WiCSE, was given course releases in fall 2017 for organizing trips to Grace HopperCelebration and in spring 2019 for BPC efforts by the department. The department also providesadministrative support for coordinating industry mentoring luncheons and trips to diversityfocused conferences.The CSE department started the Computing Partners Program (CPP) in 2018 to enable industriesto develop close working relationships with students and faculty. The industry partners joiningthe program get
opportunities relevant tounderstanding the social, cultural, economic, legal, policy, and political contexts ofenvironmental engineering challenges” (p. 80). That said, interdisciplinary work is notnecessarily straightforward in the academy as historically designed. As colleagues andepistemologies from different disciplines come together in a variety of ways, the interface can beboth productive and complex [2], [9].Researchers also point to community partnerships and service learning experiences inundergraduate civil and environmental engineering curricula that reflect both systems andinterdisciplinary problem-based frameworks. They describe positive outcomes and challenges ofsuch community-engaged project work, such as students’ expanded opportunity
watch the lecture ahead of time and then use class time for extensive examples or activelearning activities. Flipped instruction can be particularly helpful in control-related courses byensuring that students still receive adequate instruction in control theory while making time forchallenging experimental projects. As reported by de la Croix and Egerstedt, students who aregiven challenging projects but not enough instruction in control theory often create complexcontrol algorithms that are not sound 15 . Conversely, students who receive control theory but arenot given experimental projects often have a difficult time implementing the theory they havelearned.Flipped instruction can be particularly powerful when augmented by low-cost, easy-to
Bolha, TE Connectivity Mechanical/Project Engineer. Sara is a robotic automation project engineer in TE Connectivity's Global Technology group. She is responsible for design and implementation of flexible automated cells for TE Connectivity's 80+ North America and EMEA production facilities. “Experiences of Female Civil Engineers in the Workplace” by Ms. Amanda Hess, Senior Project Engineer; and Ms. Kate Aulenbach, Hydrologic and Hydraulic Engineer, Gannett Fleming, Inc, a civil engineering company in Central Pennsylvania. “Real Challenges Engineers Face in the Workplace - Working with People,” by Ms. Ms. Rachel Smithers. Area Manager, ArcelorMittal Steelton, LLC. Ms. Rachel Smithers
from practices and experiments, from praxis. Because of the need for further praxis inliberatory engineering education as a pedagogical imperative, and the limited, almost nonexistentengagement between the topics we place in conversation (pedagogy, critical thinking, liberationpraxis and theory), this paper aims to initiate and catalyze attention on the subject matter, but itwill not aim to resolve some of the questions it opens. Rather, we emphasize the importance ofliberatory theory and praxis for contemporary engineering education and, then, suggest somecriteria that might guide praxis and broader shifts in pedagogical strategies. To that end, weintend for the project to prompt further research and discussion on these topics.Engineering
silenced or sanctioned. We recognize the wealth of bodies ofknowledge, skills, and practices that Latinx adolescents bring to the classroom. Our work viewsNepantla as the state that leads to new knowledge, and acknowledge that framing engineeringproblems with a different worldview is not a “deficient” understanding of engineering in general.On the contrary, we suggest that recognizing Latinx adolescents’ unique perspectives of viewingengineering has the potential of creating opportunities for culturally responsive engineeringeducation.Context of the StudyThis project took an ethnographic approach to qualitative research14 to investigate how Latinxadolescents became nepantleros and nepantleras as they worked in community-basedengineering challenges
equity and inclusive social justice.ResultsWe have three stories to share: Lorena writes about her experience as an undergraduate studentexperiencing microaggressions in a group explicitly designed to foster and model inclusivepractices; Devlin writes about his experience as a faculty member trying to facilitate that groupand address those microaggressions, and; Christina writes about her experience as a graduatestudent collecting and reporting her colleagues’ negative experiences in a positive and productiveway.LorenaThe purpose of the project I was taking part in was to create and implement inclusive groups forstudents These groups are intended to benefit students who feel excluded or uncertain in anunfamiliar environment. The group met for
) and adaptive learning system (AL) are centrallymanaged by the University. The integration of engineering content with the LMS/AL requiredfrequent coordination between the engineering faculty and the University’s project manager.Using PowerPoint and teleconferences provided project managers an explanation of how theengineering content should be taught and delivered. For example, Figure 1 provides one visualrepresentation on how to deliver and integrate the engineering content with the University’s ALsoftware. Figure 1 consists of PowerPoint slides to create the flowchart. The University’s ALplatform is a presentation and analytics tool to track student progress for the educator. The ALsoftware was successfully applied for trigonometry and pre
to make soundjudgments about the credentials of a person with whom this professional shares a specialrelationship by considering but not being “distracted” by such a relationship. As Confucianistshave argued, “juxian bu biqin (selecting virtuous people does not avoid relatives).”Second, scholars in engineering management tend to emphasize cultural differences inimplementing and managing specific engineering projects. A vast majority of their theories andmethods are often drawn from the literature in international business and management. Forinstance, Wang and Thompson compare cultural differences in business ethics in Europe, US,and Asia.13 They have found that business organizations (e.g., companies) have variedunderstandings of: (1) moral
universitaria professionale della Svizzeraitaliana (SUPSI).II.2.4. Evolution As the Global Perspectives Program has grown within Virginia Tech and gained externalrecognition [5], a variety of projects and programs have been initiated. Additional GPPexperiences from Virginia Tech have been started to Chile and Ecuador. Universität Basel, andmore recently Universität Zürich, have developed successful Global Perspectives Programs, asdiscussed previously. Learning of the Global Perspectives Program of the Virginia TechGraduate School has aided Texas Christian University in developing the Global Outlooks inEducation program [6], and a partnership with GPP Ecuador has led to the 21st Century FacultyInstitute at the Universidad San Francisco de Quito
Costs-benefits with engaging in socially responsible behavior, 0 such as service.Study design and processThe research was executed in three phases: instrument design (Phase I), validation (Phase II),and full survey launch and data analysis stage (Phase III). Phases I and II focused on tailoring theresearch instrument to be appropriate for both the research objectives and populations of interest.Phase III focused on answering the research question and laying the groundwork for futureresearch. The phases for this research project are described herein.Pilot phase I: Survey developmentA survey to identify social responsibility based on the PSRDM was developed using the DillmanTailored Design method [19
Paper ID #25588Students’ Experience with Collaborative Engineering Design Challenges in aMiddle School Engineering Course (Evaluation)Dr. Jessica D. Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jessica Gale is a Senior Research Scientist at Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Sci- ence, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on project-based learning, STEM integration at the elementary and middle grades levels, design-based implementation research, and fidelity of implementation. Dr. Gale has a particular interest in project-based engineering in elementary school communities and the socio
collaborate on multidisciplinary teams addressing real world challenges and with industry engagement. College signature programs include the Texas A&M I-Corps Site, Ag- giE Challenge, INSPIRES, and two annual Project Showcases. Magda is the Principal Investigator of the Texas A&M University I-Corps Site grant and has been active in promoting entrepreneurship both at the local and national level.Dr. So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University So Yoon Yoon, Ph.D., is an associate research scientist at Institute for Engineering Education and Innova- tion (IEEI) in College of Engineering at Texas A&M University and Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station (TEES). She received a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology with
NI ResearchThis section presents excerpts from a Narrative Inquiry project with an SVSM undergraduateengineering student named Cooper (self-selected pseudonym). Cooper’s stories of becoming anengineer are being documented within a narrative inquiry project to understand the experiencesof “nontraditional” [71, 72] undergraduates in engineering [73, 74]. Examination of Cooper’sstories of becoming are important for the field of engineering education; they provide rare andvaluable glimpses into the knowledge, skills, and assets that returning veterans bring to theengineering profession, as well as the unique ways in which veterans experience formalengineering education. I share practical understandings gained about veteran student experiencethat
Paper ID #26270Practice Exam Program Impact on Student Academic Performance and Stu-dent RetentionMs. Dawn Patterson Shew M.Ed., University of Kansas Dawn Shew is the Director of Undergraduate Academic Services at the University of Kansas School of Engineering.Dr. Lorin P. Maletsky, University of Kansas Dr. Lorin Maletsky joined the Mechanical Engineering faculty at the University of Kansas in 2000. He is currently a full professor and serving as the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs in the School of Engineering. He has created and taught a project, team-based freshmen course in Mechanical Engineering as well as
Research in 2006,” Des. Res. Q., Sep. 2006.[2] E. Sanders, “An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research,” Interactions, pp. 13–17, Dec. 2008.[3] IDEO, The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. 2015.[4] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, “Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28–59, 2012.[5] I. Mohedas, S. Daly, and K. Sienko, “Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 888–900, 2014.[6] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, J. Liu, and K. H. Sienko, “Assessing Needs in a Cross-Cultural Design Project: Student Perspectives and Challenges,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 2, pp
programs that work to bolster invention and entrepreneurship maypositively impact both students and teachers in their personal and professional growth and alsoinfluence the well-being of rural communities more broadly. Despite the symbiosis between rural areas and entrepreneurship, past attempts to expandthe K12 InVenture Prize program to rural regions have not been successful. A first strategyattempted was to provide travel stipends for students to travel to Georgia Tech for the statefinals. This offering, however, did not address the anxiety that students and teachers have aboutpresenting a project at an elite university. The leap from school competition to state competitionfelt too large for many schools. A second strategy was to
better matched their strengths and/or interests. Someof the students with the “biggest ideas” around advancing novel, environmentally-friendlydesigns were disappointed that the engineering courses seemed to be focused on teaching currentpractice rather than creative solutions. Given these findings, it might be impactful on retention tohave EnvE students take a course specific to environmental engineering and/or one that allowsthem to be innovative in envisioning solutions to problems of their interest (such as a project-based course that allows students to select a project of interest, and significant latitude increatively exploring solutions).Students who felt that their education should be more balanced between technical and societalissues
manufacturing-focused courses. Sarah’s research interests include aspects of project-based learning and enhancing 21st century skills in undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Adam Lenz, Oregon State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring students’ and instructors’ perceptions of engineering: case studies of professionally-focused and career exploration courses Work in ProgressAbstractPrevious work developed a working definition of engineering professional identity (EPI), definedas the degree of internalization of the norms, behaviors, language, values, and practices ofengineering. This EPI
Paper ID #21703#EngineersWeek: Broadening our Understanding of Community Engage-ment Through Analysis of Twitter Use During the National Engineers WeekDr. Aqdas Malik, George Mason University Aqdas Malik is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology, George Mason University. His multidisciplinary academic and industry experience spans two key disciplines: Human-Computer Interaction and Social Media Communication and Analytics. He is currently engaged in a number of research projects funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). In some of his recent projects he has applied
division bylaws;• developed and circulated newsletters on Diversity Committee efforts;• worked with the ASEE Board of Directors to get Figure 1. Example of Footsteps from approval for and to institutionalize the ASEE Best 2017 Annual Conference Diversity Paper;• piloted the footsteps project, where large stickers were placed on the floor throughout the convention center in Indianapolis in high traffic spaces (see Figure 3);• created the call for papers and an assessment tool for the ASEE Best Diversity Paper; and• worked with ASEE information technology staff to identify potential papers within the paper review