AC 2010-878: SPECIAL SESSION: ASSESSING MORALITY, IDENTITY, ANDMOTIVATION IN A FIRST-YEAR MATERIALS ENGINEERING SERVICELEARNING COURSETrevor Harding, California Polytechnic State University Trevor Harding, Ph.D., is Professor and Chair of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, where he teaches courses in engineering design from a materials perspective. His research is focused on the educational outcomes associated with service learning and project-based learning with a particular focus on ethics education. He is also PI on several projects investigating the degradation of biomedical materials in physiological environments. Dr. Harding serves as Associate Editor of the
AC 2010-282: TRANSFORMING THE ACADEMIC WORKPLACE: ANEVALUATION OF THE ADVANCE PROGRAM IN COLLEGES OFENGINEERING (2001 - 2008)Anna M. Zajicek, University of Arkansas Anna M. Zajicek is a Professor of Sociology at the University of Arkansas. Her scholarship has been devoted to the intersectional nature of social inequalities, discourse, and social change. Her current publications focus on the intersectional nature of social inequalities and the integration of an intersectional perspective across different social science disciplines. Recently, she has been involved in interdisciplinary research projects examining successful strategies to institutionalize programs and policies aimed at the advancement
AC 2010-319: PROBLEM SET ZEROSteven Hart, United States Military AcademySteven Kreh, United States Military AcademyRhett Blackmon, United States Military AcademyNicholas Melin, United States Military Academy Page 15.986.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Problem Set Zero What these students were good at…was feeding back correct answers: they had mastered the arts of short-term memory and recall. The whole class was a wonderful example of what the British call “surface learning.” But very little “deep learning”—which comes with time, depth, practice, and reinforcement— seems to have occurred.1 This
AC 2010-441: "IT KIND OF CHOSE ME": AGENCY AND INFLUENCE INWOMEN'S DECISION TO MAJOR IN ENGINEERINGEleanor M. Jaffee, Smith College Eleanor M. Jaffee is a Research Associate with the Liberative Pedagogies Project at Smith College, and a doctoral candidate in Social Welfare at the University at Albany.Donna Riley, Smith College Donna Riley is Associate Professor of Engineering at Smith College. Page 15.2.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 “It kind of chose me”: Agency and Influence in Women’s Decisions to Major in EngineeringIntroductionMuch of the research regarding
AC 2010-447: MIDDLE-SCHOOL TEACHERS’ USE AND DEVELOPMENT OFENGINEERING SUBJECT MATTER KNOWLEDGEMorgan Hynes, Tufts UniversityDavid Crismond, The City College of New YorkBarbara Brizuela, Tufts University Page 15.873.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Middle-School Teachers’ Use And Development Of Engineering Subject Matter Knowledge: Analysis of Three CasesAbstractThis paper reports on a portion of a study of three middle school teachers (twomathematics teachers and one science teacher) as they taught a unit of engineeringinstruction. The study investigated the subject matter and pedagogical contentknowledge these teachers used and developed as they taught
AC 2010-526: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF MIXED METHODSSTUDIES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONErin Crede, Virginia TechMaura Borrego, Virginia Tech Page 15.22.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Content Analysis of the Use of Mixed Methods Studies in Engineering EducationAbstractThe complex phenomena studied by engineering education researchers frequently require thecomplementary use of qualitative and quantitative approaches. In light of these needs, manyresearchers are utilizing mixed methods designs to take advantage of the relative strengths andindividual merits of both quantitative and qualitative approaches. This article
Maldonado was born and raised in Puerto Rico. He graduated from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez where he obtained a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering. During the summer of 2010, Ricardo interned at Argonne National Laboratory in Chicago, IL where he developed a wind energy assessment project for Puerto Rico. He is currently pursuing a Master’s Degree in Power Electronics from the aforementioned university while working for an aerospace company (Raytheon Co.) in Arizona as an Electrical Engineer Circuit Designer. Ricardo has a couple of publications in the IEEE, his most recent publication, ”Simulation, Design, Hardware Implementation, and Control of a 9-level Flying Capacitor Multilevel Inverter with
Engineeringconcentration. Teaching this course sequence – one course during the sophomore year (EGR250) and one during the senior year (EGR 450) – I have found that the three core subjects –thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and heat transfer – lend themselves well to being taught in anintegrated fashion. However, while the integrated approach seems slightly more efficient thanteaching the courses separately, it is not feasible to cover all of the material from the 3 or 4separate courses. In addition, while great textbooks have been written for integrated Fluid-Thermal Science courses, providing good macroscopic overviews and breadth, they tend to lackthe level of depth desired to develop critical higher-level analysis skills.In 2010 I moved from a larger department
Team Build-Test-Redesign Project in an Engineering Statics Course,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-team-build-test-redesign-project-in-an-engineering-statics-course[13] X. Le, R. L. Roberts, A. R. Moazed, and A. W. Duva, “Applications of SolidWorks in Teaching Courses of Statics and Strength of Materials,” presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2012, p. 25.199.1-25.199.15. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/applications-of-solidworks-in-teaching- courses-of-statics-and-strength-of-materials[14] W. Johnson and P. Goeser, “AC 2007-906
can read. For instance, a flex sensor changes its resistance inresponse to flexing; reading this change can then trigger a signal to stop or start a motor. In thiscourse, students learned the fundamental principles of circuits and sensors, including Ohm’s lawand resistor, voltage, and current calculations. We also introduced them to various sensors and ac-tuators, such as potentiometers, temperature sensors, motors, and LEDs. To illustrate the practicalapplication of these concepts, students completed exercises like blinking an LED, which servesas the “Hello World” of IoT. Students can build upon this basic understanding in future projects,where they can use it to trigger web requests or control physical devices like water pumps. Addi
Development (Morgan and Claypool, 2010), and editor of Sociotechnical Communication in Engineering (Routledge, 2014). In 2016, Dr. Leydens won the Exemplar in Engineering Ethics Education Award from the National Academy of Engineering, along with CSM colleagues Juan C. Lucena and Kathryn Johnson, for a cross-disciplinary suite of courses that enact macroethics by making social justice visible in engineering education. In 2017, he and two co-authors won the Best Paper Award in the Minorities in Engineering Division at the Amer- ican Society for Engineering Education annual conference. Dr. Leydens’ recent research, with co-author Juan C. Lucena, focused on rendering visible the social justice dimensions inherent in three
Paper ID #33572”You Could Take ’Social’ Out of Engineering and Be Just Fine”: AnExploration of Engineering Students’ Beliefs About the Social Aspects ofEngineering WorkMr. Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan Robert P. Loweth is a PhD candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. His research explores how engineers engage and include diverse perspectives in their engineer- ing work. His findings have informed the development of tools and pedagogy that support engineering students in investigating and reflecting on the broader societal contexts and impacts of engineering ac
AC 2012-5232: EXPLORING IF AND HOW KNOWLEDGE OF A HU-MANITARIAN DISASTER AFFECTS STUDENT DESIGN THINKINGRyan C. Campbell, University of Washington Ryan Campbell is pursuing his doctorate through the University of Washington Graduate School’s inter- disciplinary Individual PhD (IPhD) program, in which he combines faculty expertise in the College of Engineering and the College of Education to create a degree program in the emerging field of engineering education. Campbell earned his M.S. in electrical engineering from Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea, and his B.S. in engineering science from Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colo. Camp- bell’s research interests include engineering education, ethics
AC 2010-2315: ENABLING AND EVALUATING COLLABORATION OFDISTRIBUTED TEAMS WITH HIGH DEFINITION COLLABORATION SYSTEMSRandal Abler, Georgia Tech Randal Abler received the BEE degree from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1986, and worked as a Research Engineer until completing his PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2000. Dr. Abler’s research spans computer networks, embedded systems, sensor networks, and collaborative and educational applications of those technologies. Modern computer networks such as the Internet are a sophisticated combination of computer hardware, network protocols, and user applications. Advances in each of these three components affect the nature of a network in
AC 2011-628: CLASSROOM TEACHER - ENRICHMENT TEACHER PAIRS:CO-TEACHING AS A MEANS TO IMPLEMENT ELEMENTARY ENGI-NEERING EDUCATIONPamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She began her career as process engineer, taught high school physics and pre-engineering, and has been involved in both Project Lead the Way and Project FIRST robotics. She was a Hub Site Partner for Engineering is Elementary (EiE) through their National Dissemination through Regional Partners program. As a pre-service teacher educator, she has added engineering to her elementary and early
AC 2010-576: GRADUATE TEACHING ASSISTANTS’ ASSESSMENT OFSTUDENTS' PROBLEM FORMULATION WITHIN MODEL-ELICITINGACTIVITIESAmani Salim, Purdue University Amani Salim is a Post-Doctoral Researcher in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from University of Minnesota Twin Cities, and her Ph.D. in BioMEMS and Microelectronics from Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. Her research focuses on problem formulation within Model-Eliciting-Activities (MEAs) with realistic engineering context.Heidi Diefes-Dux, Purdue University Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education
come to illustrate how self-imposed decisions at one time can constrain future ac-tions. We know from a long line of psychological studies that when we make decisions in themoment, they are not always well thought out and may in fact be detrimental to us in the fu-ture 8,9 . And even when we make a decision beforehand, if it is too easy to break that decisionwhen it matters, it is an empty decision. Constraining our future actions in such a way that wecannot change that decision has becoming known as a Ulysses Contract (sometimes also calledSelf-Paternalism 10 ). The canonical example comes from the therapy of addiction, where an alco-holic will pour their liquor down the drain in a moment of clarity to prevent drinking at a latermoment of
and evaluation. He earned his Master of Aeronautical Science degree with distinction in 2010 and started his doctoral studies in Education in May 2016 with a focus on human learning, training, and behavioral development in technology-mediated environments.Dr. Brian Sanders, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Worldwide Dr. Brian Sanders is an Associate Professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide. His experience includes basic and applied research in high temperature composite materials for gas turbine engines and hypersonic flight vehicles, multifunctional structures for energy harvesting, and unmanned aircraft system concepts, such as morphing aircraft. His current research focus is on the design and
ElectronicInstrumentationThe Setting/ProcessThe course addressed in this phase of the paper is Electronic Instrumentation (EI), which is themain electronics course taken by students outside of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Thecourse is offered each semester in two sections of approximately 60 students per section, one inthe early morning and one in the late afternoon. The course was developed in the late 1990s asone of the few general engineering courses implementing Studio-Based pedagogy with benchtopinstrumentation. Benchtop instruments were replaced by the Rensselaer Mobile Studio boardseveral years later and then to flipped instruction in 2010, again using the Mobile Studio asstudent-owned personal instrumentation. The flipped environment evolved with
AC 2012-3627: MENTAL MODELS ELEMENTARY TEACHERS HOLDOF ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESSES: A COMPARISON OF TWOCOMMUNITIES OF PRACTICEAnn P. McMahon Ph.D., Ann P. McMahon, LLC Ann P. McMahon is a STEM education consultant for grades Pre-K through 16. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from Washington University in St. Louis and a Ph.D. in science education from the University of Missouri, St. Louis. Her work bridges elementary education and profes- sional engineering communities of practice. Her research and consulting interests also include applying design thinking and system dynamics methodologies to improve systems and practices in Pre-K through 16 STEM education. McMahon served for eight years as the K
Paper ID #18458 Dirk Englund received his BS in Physics from Caltech in 2002. He earned an MS in electrical engineering and a PhD in Applied Physics in 2008, both from Stanford University. He was a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University until 2010, when he started his group as Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and of Applied Physics at Columbia University. In 2013, he joined the faculty of MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Englund’s research focuses on quantum technologies based on semiconductor and optical systems. Englund engages in developing new teaching methods for the STEM fields, for undergraduate and graduate students in engineering and engineering physics. Recent
McKilligan, Iowa State University Dr. McKilligan is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design. She teaches design studios and lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of different factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different univer- sities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site
AC 2012-4544: INOCULATING NOVICE SOFTWARE DESIGNERS WITHEXPERT DESIGN STRATEGIESDavid R. Wright, North Carolina State University David Wright earned his Ph.D. in computer science from North Carolina State University. He is currently a Research Associate in the Computer Science Department, overseeing the day-to-day operations of four different research projects. Wright has taught a variety of undergraduate courses at NCSU and other local institutions. His research interests include software design and engineering education, focusing on ways to help students think more like engineering professionals than students, as well as developing teaching and learning tools and strategies that help keep students interested in
AC 2011-599: APPROACHES TO ENGAGING STUDENTS IN ENGINEER-ING DESIGN AND PROBLEM SOLVINGAnn F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Ann McKenna is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering in the College of Technology and Innovation at Arizona State University (ASU). Prior to joining ASU she served as a program officer at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education and was on the faculty of the Segal Design Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering at Northwestern University. Dr. McKenna’s research focuses on understanding the cognitive and social processes of design and innova- tion, design teaching and learning, the role of adaptive expertise in
AC 2010-2280: LEARNING THROUGH ENGINEERING DESIGN ANDPRACTICE: IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACT OF A MIDDLE SCHOOLENGINEERING-EDUCATION PROGRAMTirupalavanam Ganesh, Arizona State University Tirupalavanam Ganesh, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Arizona State University. He has degrees and experience in engineering, computer science, and education. He has brought this experience to bear in previous research that examined the use of technologies in K-12 settings with diverse students. He has worked with the Children’s Museum of Houston on the development and implementation of Robotics-based STEM programming for urban youth. He is the Principal Investigator of the National