June 26, 2011
June 26, 2011
June 29, 2011
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
22.329.1 - 22.329.31
Classroom Teacher - Enrichment Teacher Pairs: Co-Teaching as a Means to Implement Elementary Engineering EducationCo-teaching is when teachers work together to prepare to teach, teach, and reflect on teachingand learning. This paper describes co-teaching by 28 classroom and 8 enrichment teachers from7 schools as they taught integrated science-technology-engineering (STE) units of instruction forthe first time to a total of 24 3rd grade and 19 4th grade classrooms. Mixed methods were utilizedto explore teacher perspectives on the nature and value of their co-teaching experiences.Background. The 36 teachers participated in the 2009-2010 pilot year of the “SySTEmicProject,” which aims to integrate one Engineering is Elementary (EiE) unit into one science unitin each of grades one through five for all children in a 40,000-pupil district by 2014. Enrichmentteachers (generally, one per school) were included to provide support to classroom teachers viaco-teaching. Enrichment teachers received two 9-hour long professional development sessionsfor the 3rd and 4th grade STE-integrated units, respectively. Classroom teachers attended a singlesession for their grade level only.Research Questions. This study was part of a larger investigation of teacher perspectives onfactors that support or hinder STE instruction. Research questions regarding co-teaching were asfollows:1. What were teachers’ perceptions about co-teaching in general and co-teaching the STE-integrated units, specifically? How did these perceptions change throughout the implementation process?2. What factors seemed to affect the nature and quality of co-teaching experiences?3. What were teachers’ perspectives on the essential actions enrichment teachers can take to support STE instruction?Methodology. This study was conducted in three phases. Phase I involved two co-teaching pairsin an early pilot (spring 2009) of the 3rd-grade STE-integrated unit. Co-teaching issues wereidentified via analysis of interview data and classroom observations. These issues informed thedevelopment of three survey instruments for Phase II. These surveys measured the 36 teachers’perceptions of co-teaching at three points during the 2009-2010 year. Response rates were: 1)pre-implementation, 100%; 2) mid-implementation, 92.9%; and 3) post-implementation, 94.4%.In Phase III, 21 of the 36 teachers were interviewed to add depth to the survey data.Findings. The paper describes the development of survey instruments from Phase I, as well asthe quantitative and qualitative findings from the Phase II surveys and Phase III interviews.Explored in depth is the importance of co-teaching during key parts of the engineering designprocess. These key parts require not only an “extra pair of hands,” but also the participation of anadditional informed person in the classroom who can ask probing questions to get students toexplain their thinking and design choices.Impact. By exploring the aforementioned research questions, co-teaching models in theSySTEmic Project can be shaped to meet the needs of children and teachers as the SySTEmicProject grows. Further, others engaged in efforts to teach engineering at the elementary level willbenefit from this work by being able to consider the strengths and potential problems of usingclassroom-enrichment teacher pairs as a means to implement elementary engineering instruction.
Lottero-Perdue, P. S. (2011, June), Classroom Teacher-Enrichment Teacher Pairs: Co-Teaching as a Means to Implement Elementary Engineering Education Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17610
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2011 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015