design tasks were performed through manual calculations by followingtraditional lecture notes. The conceptual design was followed by more sophisticated three-dimensional design tasks using computer-aided techniques. Finally, the students were assessedcontinuously with respect to their technical contribution, working techniques and interactionwith their peer group at national and international level. They were also probed regarding theiropinion on various aspects of the project using interviews and forms. These surveys have beenevaluated together with the opinion of the academic staff in order to form future directions. For the planning the students had to consider the engine as a whole before distributing the tasksindividually. This enabled
family structure by introducingprofessional counselors and advisors that explain the new university policies and procedures tothe students, and act as the parent figure. However, it is also important to involve peer mentors inthe process and offer student success tips as well as survival tips that are used at the Universityof Pittsburgh.This paper is designed to give a brief overview of another important component of our first year Page 6.1008.1experience: peer mentoring. We use existing upper class students in this component to discuss Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
program criteria nowdictate that civil engineering programs must demonstrate that graduates have proficiency in aminimum of four major recognized civil engineering areas.This paper describes the old and new curricula, with a focus on how we expect the changes toimprove undergraduate experiences and how we intend to assess the efficacy of the program. Ofparticular interest to other civil engineering programs is how we intend to develop and assess theproficiency of our students in four major civil engineering areas. As part of the revision process,we informally surveyed several peer institutions to determine what elements of our programwere similar and to generate ideas for changes consistent with our institution mission and goals.The paper
precedinggenerations. In order to improve quality of life and increase work productivity, previous generationshave created a ‘throw away society’, a complex, yet easy-to-use equipment, devices that are difficultto disassemble and too costly to repair. As compared to peers of twenty years ago, not manyteenagers of today have repaired their own bicycle or watched a parent repairing a toy or a kitchenappliance. How many have repaired a car or measured pieces for precision fit while rebuilding anengine? These activities became substituted by computer games, hence many manual and simpletechnical skills do not have a chance to be developed. On the other hand, in today’s developedeconomies, people who are competent in high-tech areas and possess interdisciplinary
activities from different perspectives [3], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Differenttypes of student’s design assessments have been used by instructors including self, peer, and expertassessments of design reports, final product performances, open- and close-ended questions,videos of design teams, and students’ portfolios [10]. Measuring student design knowledge hasseveral complexities and each assessment has its advantages and disadvantages.By conducting a systematized literature review and summarizing some significant research studiesin this area, which are described in the next sections, we found that there is a need for acomprehensive rubric and approach to measure students’ design skills longitudinally andthroughout an entire curriculum, based on the ABET
their own surveys [10] - [12]. Instructors with large classsizes have turned to software assessment tools to measure the teamwork skills of individuals andthe roles within the teams. For example, CATME and TeamUP provide a survey to gather selfand peer evaluations from individual team members as well as instructors [13],[14]. For thestudy presented below, it was necessary to create a customized assessment tool to determine howindividuals fill functional or task-oriented roles in their teams and the impact of that process ontheir engagement and course experience.ContextIPPD is an educational capstone design program where students from thirteen engineering andcomputer science programs work in multidisciplinary teams for two semesters in designing
likely to participate in studyabroad programs than higher-income students [4]. This paper reports on a novel courseallowing students from the U.S. and Mexico to collaborate across national and lingualboundaries without leaving their home campuses, lowering the financial barriers typicallyassociated with international experiences. II. REVIEW OF RELEVANT LITERATUREThe need for engineers to solve complex problems with international peers has been reiteratedin many studies and reports. A most recent report by the United Nations Educational, Scientific,and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) highlights the importance of building engineeringcapacity across national borders for sustainable development of our global world [5
students also presented theirfindings as a group presentation to obtain the final grade for the project. A standard rubric was used for grading the student work, with 60% of the grade assigned to thecontent (quality and depth of analysis) and including the major aspects of the EOP framework. Theremaining 30% and 10% of the project grade were assigned for the presentation (clarity of expression,organization of ideas, and adherence to academic writing standards) and collaboration (peer evaluation ofthe group's collaborative effort, including communication, contribution, and teamwork), respectively.Furthermore, the students completed an indirect voluntary assessment using an anonymous surveyconcerning the EOP concepts. The survey was created
optimization for aerospace applications.Sohini Gupta, Wheeler High School Sohini Gupta is a junior high school student at Wheeler High School, a distinguished magnet program in Marietta, GA. She is passionate about STEM, particularly engineering. Committed to pursuing a career in STEM despite challenges faced by underrepresented groups, Sohini actively seeks opportunities to engage in hands-on projects and STEM-related activities. She aspires to inspire her peers by being a proactive role model in the scientific community.Dr. Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University Ibrahim H. Yeter, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at the National Institute of Education (NIE) at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Perception of Engineering Undergraduates Towards an Active Learning Pedagogy at a Minority Serving InstitutionAbstractExperimental centric pedagogy (ECP) which is an active learning approach has been reported toincrease student engagement, critical thinking, peer collaboration, as well as motivation inengineering related courses. However, little is known on the perception of students about thisActive Learning Pedagogy (ALP). This study aims to investigate the perception of minorityserving institutions (MSI) engineering undergraduates on the use of ALP as an active agentduring instruction. This study adopted a quantitative approach in a pre-post-test design. Theengineering
. •EPICS Supervisor •Research Advisor Managerial •Community Partners •Peer TAs •Collaborators TA •Mentees •Students Subordinate Figure 2. Top to down rank GTA’s navigate management in service-learning programs 3. MethodsThis exploration initiated with a curiosity about the distinction between GTA’s experiences inservice-learning relative to other courses, as well as their development relative to undergraduatestudents enrolled in the service-learning courses
activities and interaction with peers, instructors, and academic advisors, on 4-point Likert-type scale from not at all to 5 or more times. • FYS objectives on 5-point Likert-type scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree; and changes in confidence and motivation in educational and career areas on 5-point Likert- type scale from decreased greatly to increased greatly. • Pre- and post-FYS major choice.Non-Student Stakeholder SurveyA short survey about the current and future options for FYS courses was administered to 38 COEnon-student stakeholders identified by the Penn State’s COE Taskforce on First-YearEngagement. Specially, stakeholders were asked about their initial thoughts regarding convertingthe current 1
critical thinking skills. Gradually, the student will be able to apply the concepts learned processing from basic to complex skills through activities like laboratories with specific feedback with the sole intention for improvement. The application of the knowledge might also then lead to analysis by exploring connections and organizing information into meaningful domains similar to writing a report. This also might include discussing discrepancies in cases and the student might explore other personal variables through their increased critical thinking [17].The taxonomy introduces a new dimension, highlighting four types of knowledge—factual,conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive—aimed at addressing diverse
AC 2011-2419: TOOLS TO CRAFT ETHICAL BEHAVIORMartin S. High, Oklahoma State University Marty High is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. His aca- demic interests include teaching in all areas and at all levels of chemical engineering with a focus on instruction in thermodynamics and mass transfer. His research interests are in the areas of mass transfer in polymeric systems, corrosion modeling, equation of state development and refinery catalysis. Marty also writes in the area of sustainability and on the intersection of law, science and society. He received his engineering education at Penn State (B.S., M.S., and Ph.D.) and earned his law degree (J.D.) from the
new member. Inorder to obtain this required knowledge and skill base, students participate in lengthy degreeprograms and/or apprenticeships. During these experiences, students observe the behaviors,norms and attitudes that are prevalent among the profession’s practitioners. During this time,students begin to craft their professional identity by “trying on” possible images of themselves tosee how well they fit 11. One way these images are established is through the individual’sprofessional developmental network, and the relationships students have with members of theirprofession and learning community (e.g their department or research group) 12. Sweitzer12explored how other members of the student’s developmental network (friends, peers, and
withinternational peers. It is increasingly important for engineering students to develop a globalprofessional perspective during their training, and an international educational experience is anexceptional way to allow students to gain an understanding of engineering within the context ofanother culture. This paper describes the fourth edition of the annual SEAS/Poli-USPCollaborative Field Course, a joint program of Harvard's School of Engineering and AppliedSciences (SEAS), the Escola Politécnica of the Universidade de São Paulo (Poli-USP), andHarvard’s David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies (DRCLAS). This innovativecourse, which brought together 13 students from Harvard and 15 students from USP, was held inBrazil in January 2013 and focused
communication, as a two-way process, is paramount to anengineer’s success. Yet the emphasis on developing communication skills in manyengineering courses is limited to the one-way delivery of discipline-specific informationthrough technical writing and the occasional oral presentation, supported by text and imageson a screen. Oral communication in the broadest context is a learnable skill.[5] Despite this,studies from around the world reveal that it is the competency most frequently reported as Page 21.46.2being deficient in the engineering workplace. [6-8, 10]Oral communication, like many skills identified by employers as insufficiently developed
Shift the current focus of the group to a new subtask or tool. Maintenance Support group cohesion and peer involvement. Acknowledge Inform peers that you read and/or appreciate their comments. Answer yes/no questions.3-3-2. Data annotationTo measure the impact of ChatGPT on student interactions in CSCL, two experts familiar withCST manually annotated each message according to CST. As used in previous CSCL research[29, 30], we consider the complete message posted by a student as the unit of analysis, defining itas a single student interaction during a brainstorming session. Each message was categorized withone of the main skills in CST, and the
. The forums ofMOOCs represent a possible focal point for learners, providing a venue for tens of thousands ofindividuals to share ideas and insights around a common topic. In terms of learner intent, somelearners might be motivated solely by the availability of thousands of peers in a singlecommunity, and have no intentions to complete any of the course assignments. While thisappears to be a plausible reason to enroll in a MOOC, very little is known about how forumswith up to 100,000 students provide value to learners.To date, most research examining MOOC forums focus on the frequency of use and studentresponses to survey questions about the experience of using MOOC forums. One study
computerizedscoring of student work (Jordan & Mitchell, 2009) and computer-supported peer review (Wood,2009), and considerable success has been found by enhancing lecture time using an interactiveclassroom format and frequent in-class assessment (Hake, 1998; Knight & Wood, 2005).Instructors employing in-class assessment frequently turn to technology including audienceresponse systems (ARS) which are most often dedicated handheld transmitters often known as“clickers”, which include TurningPoint (“Turning Technologies,” n.d.) and iClicker (“iClicker,”n.d.). These approaches have been widely used and their impact on engagement and learning hasbeen presented widely.Clickers have been shown to improve student outcomes (Caldwell, 2007) such as improved
-term and long-term educational planning, and discussing time management. Advocating. Recommending or supporting the protégé. Examples: writing support letters for graduate school applications, serving as a reference for scholarship applications, and nominating the protégé for special recognition. Facilitating. Assisting to make processes easy to bring about an outcome. Examples: Guiding conversations in the classroom or laboratory, referring the protégé to a campus resource or office. Mitigating. Lessening the adverse effects of circumstances, undue burden, or mistakes. Examples: sharing tactics to deal with micro-aggressions, giving words of encouragement, and providing perspective
Undergraduate Studies, whichoversees a variety of offices as diverse as The Writing Center, a Regional ProfessionalDevelopment Center, the Freshman Engineering Program, and the Teacher Education Program.No separate budget is allocated for the faculty development center, but it is part of the overallbudget of the undergraduate studies office. Funding is limited to one staff person – a full-timecoordinator – and a small budget for events. Directing the Center is simply one more hat that thevice provost for undergraduate studies wears. A volunteer steering committee comprised offaculty and teaching assistants across various disciplines on campus helps direct the effort.Faculty development strategies that emerged in changing cultureAn initial task for this
years later, the GPA of students who took the course was 8 GPA points higher on averagethan those that did not take the course. Overall campus data has revealed that first year experiencecourses, including the College of Engineering’s FYE course, affect student’s GPA and retention in apositive way. Within both the lecture and the lab, student learning outcomes are assessed on a variety ofprojects and coursework including writing assignments about engineering and the campus community,interactions with engineering faculty, and group-level presentations. Student surveys are disseminatedfor both the lecture and the lab and results of both surveys consistently indicate that the learningoutcomes of the course have been successfully met. Students cite
existing programming in otheracademic and student services divisions so that we are not squandering resources to duplicatewhat already is happening on campus. We refer students to the multitude of resources on campussuch as the Counseling Center, Peer Connections (a tutoring and supplemental instructionresource), and Writing Center.Gaining Additional Financial SupportHaving such a robust and well-managed scholarship program has allowed us to leverageadditional support from a range of donors including corporate, individual donors, and familyfoundations. Being in the heart of Silicon Valley, SJSU and the College of Engineering havebeen fortunate to receive support from industry. We have designed the program so that insteadof a company being matched
studentschoosing alternate paths by encouraging students to pursue STEM-focused careers andcoursework [5]. Most literature has shown that summer STEM camps have positive impacts onbolstering interest levels in STEM whether a student has had any predisposition towards STEMcareers or not [1], [5], [6], [7]. STEM summer camps also provide students with the opportunityto interact with their peers both socially and intellectually. The interactions on a universitycampus can give students an opportunity to experience what a college experience will be if theychoose to attend college post-high school. This makes the interactions with staff, faculty, collegestudent counselors, and others on campus important. All these interactions can build self-confidence and
entities at the university that align with progression through a doctoral program. Examples of the modules include: ₋ Year 1: time management, success in graduate school ₋ Year 2: responsible conduct of research, data management, teamwork, ethics, mentoring, oral presentations, writing conference abstracts ₋ Year 3: writing academic papers, effective graphics for presentations, networking, responding to reviews, having difficult conversations ₋ Year 4
grading in the semester prior to the implementation of training versusthat of the semesters that used training. In the future, this data will be used to further modifygrading and training procedures, and data will continue to be collected and analyzed.References[1] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2017 - 2018,” 2016.[2] G. W. Clough, “The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century,” Washington, DC, USA, 2004.[3] P. E. Dickson, T. Dragon, and A. Lee, “Using undergraduate teaching assistants in small classes,” Proc. 2017 ACM SIGCSE Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ., pp. 165–170, 2017.[4] S. Ashton and R. S. Davies, “Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing
AC 2007-849: ASSESSING LEARNING OUTCOMES OF SENIOR MECHANICALENGINEERS IN A CAPSTONE DESIGN EXPERIENCEOlga Pierrakos, Virginia Tech Olga Pierrakos is currently a National Academy of Engineering CASEE AGEP Postdoctoral Engineering Education Researcher (PEER) at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Pierrakos holds an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her Ph.D. work pertained to vortex dynamics in left ventricular flows. She has served as faculty advisor to over thirty mechanical engineering seniors involved in biomedical engineering design projects and taught several mechanical engineering fluid mechanics
,they may implement it through an interface called the SpuPilot. Below, I provide a briefoverview of the interface so that when I present logs of student work, later in the article, thereader can understand what they are doing. Figure 6. GUI where students write mathematical equations for the thrust signal.One of the windows in the SpuPilot provides a graphical user interface (GUI) where students can Page 24.851.8write mathematical equations for the thrust signal to be sent to the spuCraft. See Figure 6.Variables that students can use to write their equations are: m, the spuCraft mass; mFeet, themass of only the feet of the spuCraft
IIIDesign of an Assembly for a Manufacturing Processes Laboratory ........................................... 507Best Practices for California Fundamentals of Engineering and Professional Engineering LicenseExams for Immigrant Engineers .................................................................................................. 517Training in Technical Writing for Engineering Graduate Students ............................................. 530Introduction to Technical Problem Solving Using MATLAB and LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT ....... 541Work-In-Progress: Enhancing Students’ Learning in Advanced Power Electronic Course Using aUSB Solar Charger Project