. Her background in in K-12 education where she has served as a high school science teacher, Instructional and Curriculum Coach, and Assistant Principal. Her research and areas of interest are in improving STEM educational outcomes for Low-SES students through the integration of active learning and technology-enabled frequent feedback. She currently works as the Project Manager for the NSF faculty development program based on evidence-based teaching practices.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral candidate and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University. She is a third year student in the Educational Policy and Evaluation program. Her research interests focus on higher education
Paper ID #21276Research Experiences for Teachers in Precision Agriculture and Sustainabil-ity for Solitary STEM EducatorsBradley Bowen, Virginia Tech Bradley Bowen is an assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the School of Education’s Integrative STEM Education program. He has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and a Master’s of Civil Engineering and an Ed.D. in Technology Education both from N.C. State University. Using his work experience in both engineering and education, he specializes in designing Integrative STEM activities for K-12 students and implementing professional development programs for K-12
changing the status quo of higher education.Project-Based Learning (PBL) offers promise for providing engineering students an avenue forbridging this “disconnect” by providing practice solving complex, open-ended problems withsocio-technical contexts. PBL is a pedagogy that centers curriculum around projects that involvestudents in design, problem solving, decision making, and other investigative activities. Studentsengaged in PBL typically work autonomously over extended periods of time to create realisticproducts or presentations4. These assignments provide opportunities for students to solvecomplex, open-ended, socio-technical problems, and to practice serving specific groups ofpeople in our society3-6. In addition, PBL enriches students
, healthcare, residential, industrial, infrastructure etc.). The teams are formed basedon their listed interest (students with similar interest are grouped together). As further detailedlater in the paper, this problem-centered approach, is based on and consistent with theconstructivist educational assumption that encourages social and cognitive interactions [5], [6],[7] in the capstone class.Related literature discusses the concept of an integrated senior capstone course stressingparticipatory learning and creative problem solving [8]. In the past two years, senior capstonestudents have collaborated with the students from the Computer Graphics Technology (CGT)department. The CGT teams work with the design-build teams in a capacity of
perceptionof faculty on integrating entrepreneurship into capstone courses [11], the extent to whichengineering faculty value and practice entrepreneurship education [9], and the beliefs of facultywho teach entrepreneurship to engineering students on various dimensions related to EM and thecontent of entrepreneurship courses [7], [8], [10]. However, there is very little documentation inthe engineering education literature on engineering deans’ perspectives on this topic. A few insights have emerged from the few studies that have focused on this critical groupof stakeholders. In an ASEE paper describing Baylor’s KEEN Innovators Fellow program, Fryand Jordan [6] mention that the Dean of Engineering and Computer Science had publiclysupported the
, and is working with others on campus to establish a broader integrated context for innovation and design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Using a Flipped Lesson to Improve Information Literacy Outcomes in a First Year Design ClassAbstractDoes the presentation style of an information literacy assignment affect students’ use ofscholarly and authoritative sources in the completion of an engineering design project? Duringspring semester 2017, the information literacy team at the Colorado School of Mines piloted aflipped lesson on evaluating sources for the university’s first year engineering design course.Initial feedback on the pilot session was favorable and the
) present a true integration of science, engineering and technology [1]. This is anew approach to teaching science that will require new curriculum materials, professionaldevelopment and other supports for teachers, and new assessments [2]. Assessments aligned tothe NGSS are expected to require students to draw upon an understanding of core ideas inscience and cross-cutting concepts while engaging in engineering and science practices. Currentassessments were not designed to accomplish these goals and cannot easily be modified to meetthis expectation [3]. These new assessment requirements present challenges on many levelsincluding the development of complex tasks that integrate the three dimensions and that are bothequitable for a wide range of
cultural boundaries (e.g., Jamieson and Lohmann 2009; National Academy of Engineering2004). To prepare undergraduates to enter such an environment, colleges and universities havebeen seeking ways to expand students’ global competence through experiences at their homeinstitutions as well as abroad (Johri and Jesiek 2014). As Downey et al. (2006) described, theseinstitutional offerings within the undergraduate engineering context typically includeinternational enrollment, international projects, international work placements, international fieldtrips, and integrated class experiences. In this paper, we consider an international field trip,which is a highly structured short-term study abroad program organized by faculty members toprovide students
Summers earned her PhD in Rhetoric and Composition from Penn State University and joined the RHIT faculty in 2014. Her work focused on writing in the disciplines, particularly at the advanced undergraduate and graduate levels. She teaches courses in writing and engineering communication, in- cluding technical and professional communication, intercultural communication, digital writing, and grant writing.Mary Jane Szabo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Mary Jane (Janie) Szabo is currently pursuing her PhD in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Educational Technology from Indiana State University. In her current role as an Instructional Designer at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, she collaborates with
curriculum at the University of Pittsburgh asECE 1270 Special Topics. This is an optional one credit course that meets once a month open tojuniors and seniors that is mainly informational and is a precursor to a junior design course thatwill be a prerequisite to senior design. This development of SERC was used as part of the ABETaccreditation for showing continuous improvement in the department and for its support ofundergraduate education [8]. While SERC is not mandatory, it is highly encouraged forundergraduates to participate in by the electrical engineering department.Students are able to participate in SERC in three different ways. The first is through individual orsmall group sessions that allows for a deep dive into a particular topic and
Design Center (DC) Colorado in CU’s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State University, an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in education, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of retention, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering educa- tion. His current duties include assessment, team development and education research for DC Colorado’s hands-on initiatives.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi
of undergraduate researchaccording to the students. In addition, developing relationship with the faculty mentor and thegraduate student mentor is another positive outcome of the undergraduate research.Haddad and Kalaani [5] presented an undergraduate research model to integrate research into alecture- based curriculum through summer workshops, research-designated courses, andundergraduate research grants. The proposed model included establishing an Office ofUndergraduate Research, developing a research-integrated curriculum, and instituting arecognition system as an incentive to encourage participation. A set of minimum requirementswere set for undergraduate students participating in the research to achieve the status ofundergraduate
complement the firstcourse. In this endeavor, we collaborated with Keysight Technologies who has developed arobust IoT-specific educational platform. We evaluated the board as the main tool for the secondcourse in our curriculum. The evaluation was performed by a team of students under thesupervision of a faculty member. A number of experiments were conducted and the resultsindicated that the platform, when supervised properly, is a valuable tool to teach the conceptsand functionalities of the IoT technologies.Keywords: IoT, educational tools, curriculum upgradeIntroductionIoT being one of the technological ecosystems with an estimated market size of up to $11.1Trillion per year in 2025 (McKinsey Global Institute) [1] is becoming a prominent source
-affiliated institutionrespondents agreed that the solar food dehydrator service would be of interest.learning project was relevant in addressing this problemwhile 18% of respondents disagreed that the project was CONCLUSIONSrelevant. The Gannon community, including students, faculty, staff, Several questions were then asked to gauge the and administration plays an integral role in the health andwillingness of students to volunteer their time and/or future well-being of its university neighbors. With the support ofearnings
conceptions” or “misconceptions”[3]. Making errors is an integral part of thelearning process. However, misconceptions could lead to impairments in students’ ability tounderstand and learn new material [2].Two main forces are driving students’ transfer out of engineering: students’ lack of interest orloss of interest in engineering, and students’ difficulty in their math courses [4-7]. Helpingstudents succeed in their math courses is essential to improving the retention of students inengineering. This paper summarizes the results of a study aimed at improving students’ mathand engineering reasoning skills. In this portion of the study, the investigators evaluatedstudents’ misconceptions and issues related to solving math and engineering
been extensively used to understand student emotions in other STEM fields[11]. However, this theory has not been used extensively in the context of computerprogramming. A better understanding of student emotions may help educators designcurriculum and pedagogy to mitigate the effects of negative emotions, and to promote positiveemotions. This improved curriculum and pedagogy may eventually help students maximize theirlearning and performance in programming courses.2. Research QuestionsThe overarching objective of this study is to understand the emotions experienced by first-yearengineering students as they work on programming problems. Specifically, I ask the followingresearch questions: 1. What emotions do first-year engineering students
Information for Non-Engineers – A Case Study in Interdisciplinary Application of the ACRL FrameworkAs Washington State University becomes increasingly interdisciplinary, the need is increasingfor collaboration between librarians and instructors to introduce non-engineering students totechnical literature. Understanding technical literature is challenging even for the very engineerswho are versed in the vocabulary and procedures of their discipline. Hence, training non-engineer students to use this literature is a substantial challenge. Over the course of several years,the ACRL framework for information literacy in higher education has been integrated into theengineering curriculum. Over this time several core lessons have emerged: 1
Paper ID #21504Exploring Biomedical Engineering Students’ Self-Raised Motivations for En-gaging in Instructional DesignJacqueline Handley, University of Michigan Jacqueline Handley is a graduate student at the University of Michigan, in Science Education. Her back- ground is in Material Science and Engineering, with an emphasis on Biomaterials Design. She is inter- ested in, broadly, how best bridge engineering practice and education. More specifically, she is interested in access to and inclusion in engineering at the K-12 level.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan Aileen is faculty in Engineering Education and
paper draws on a qualitative dataset of student responses to biweekly “reflection questions”integrated into routine course activity in a pilot implementation of a Wright State-likeEngineering Mathematics course. Alongside auto-ethnographic data from the course instructorand coordinator, this dataset illustrates the transformations involved in the scale-making process,and enables tracing the consequences of these transformations for the identities of people andsocial collectives involved in the course.IntroductionThis paper reports on the results of a study of an implementation of the Wright State Model forEngineering Mathematics at one university. Consistent with the LEES call for proposals, weadopt a human science theoretical approach to the
would show much greater improvements in student learning.ReferencesAnwar, K., A. A. Shaikh, N. R. Dash and S. Khurshid (2012). "Comparing the efficacy of teambased learning strategies in a problem based learning curriculum." Apmis 120(9): 718-723.Conway, S. E., J. L. Johnson and T. L. Ripley (2010). "Integration of team-based learningstrategies into a cardiovascular module." American journal of pharmaceutical education 74(2):35.Dana, S. W. (2007). "Implementing team-based learning in an introduction to law course."Journal of Legal Studies Education 24(1): 59.Haidet, P., K. Kubitz and W. T. McCormack (2014). "Analysis of the team-based learningliterature: TBL comes of age." Journal on excellence in college teaching 25(3-4): 303.Loughry, M. L., M
engineeringknowledge for achieving the SDGs [3]. We respond to the call by introducing elements ofsustainable development and global citizenship into a major elective course in the InformationEngineering curriculum.Our contribution and significanceThe current work is amongst the early efforts in integrating the achievement of SDGs into theformal undergraduate engineering curriculum. In this paper, we present the correspondingpedagogical design, implementation, and evaluation in a regular undergraduate course offered inHong Kong. The course aims to introduce to students a wide range of concepts and techniquesrelated to social media analytics and human information interactions. We adopt pedagogicalstrategies in design thinking to foster engineering student’s
, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 MAKER: Face Detection Library to Teach Algorithm Basics in PythonAbstractThis paper describes an approach to teach face detection algorithms to beginner levelprogramming learners using a face detection tool built in Python. Learners are expected tounderstand and practice their Python coding skills
. She received her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her MS in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western while work- ing for Delphi. She completed her postdoctoral studies in engineering education at the University of Pittsburgh.Dr. Samuel J. Dickerson, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Samuel Dickerson is an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engi- neering. His general research interests lie in the area of electronics, circuits and embedded systems and in particular, technologies in those areas that have biomedical applications. He has expertise in the design and simulation of mixed-signal integrated circuits and systems that incorporate the use of both
Results of a Spreadsheet Tool,” is the first recorded use of “empathy” in theDesign in Engineering Education Division (DEED) of ASEE [17]. Like many of itspredecessors, Eggert’s paper only mentions “empathy” once when describingprofessionals’ interpersonal style, which includes “empathy, tolerance, honesty, trust, andpersonal integrity” [17]. As part of a person’s “style,” empathy is considered apsychological trait, one that reflects an engineering designer’s personality. The concept “empathic design,” coined by Leonard and Rayport, had gainedprominence prior to its presence in engineering education [18]. The first reference to“empathic design” in DEED appeared in 2011. Titus and colleagues called empathicdesign “the ideal form” of human
changing worldofferings. In contrast, disruptive technologies target low-end EXPLORE a contrarian view ofcustomers through products/services that are simpler, more accepted solutionsconvenient, and often less expensive than competitors. CONNECTIONS Both of these approaches to technology development are ENTREPRENEURIAL INTEGRATE information from many MINDSET sources to gain insightimportant for the marketplace; however, the majority of the ASSESS and MANAGE riskundergraduate (including freshman) engineering curriculum
center around education issues in general, and in particular on increasing access and success of those traditionally under-represented and/or under-served in STEM higher education.Dr. William L. Hughes, Boise State University William L. Hughes is an Associate Professor of the Micron School of Materials Science & Engineering at Boise State University. He also serves as the cofounder and Associate Dean of the College of Innovation + Design, as well as the Head of the Vertically Integrated Projects program at Boise State. He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science & Engineering from Virginia Tech and Georgia Tech. Prior to his current appointments, he was a National Academy of Engineering Postdoctoral Fellow
game-based learning. His funded research explores the nature of global competency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of engineering students. His dissertation investigated how best to design and operationalize effective global program- ming strategies within engineering curricula. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given presentations in global engineering education at several national conferences. He has a passion for data analysis and has taught classes in probability and statistics, and teaches Freshman Engineering Clinic at Rowan University. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally
project objective is to promote electrical and computer engineering technologyeducation in sustainability topics. The sources of sustainable power such as wind and solarsystems today primarily utilize power electronics as an enabling technology. Therefore, teachingpower electronics and associated technology in an engaging manner will eventually serve thisobjective. The proposed teaching methodology includes a portable lab bench, which is capable ofperforming various lab activities that support the lecture module sequence related tosustainability topics presented in the class. The lab activities are not intended to be exhaustivebut simple enough to stimulate student interest in the topic. The activities that are selected fromCUSP™ curriculum
expectations ofcollege level classes and specifically introductory mathematics courses. As a result, withoutappropriate support, most DHH students fail to succeed in introductory mathematics courses intheir first year.For this group of underprepared students, a transitional community and transitional engineeringcourse has been shown to significantly improve their academic success. This paper describes 1)how the establishment of a community of peers with an appropriate academic support structureimproves graduation persistence, 2) how a transition engineering program with an appropriatesupport structure improves success in succeeding in engineering and 3) resources available forinstructors who have DHH students in the classroom.IntroductionPhysical
and expectations of their discipline.However, with regards to professional training in engineering that was independent of thedisciplines, EC 2000’s architects defined a separate set of “student outcomes” that focusedprimarily on the professional skill sets--teamwork, communication, professional and ethicalresponsibility, designing systems that met social, political, and economic constraints, acommitment to lifelong learning, etc…--that were consistent with the “desired attributes” of anengineering graduate in the post-Cold War era. In its practical implementation, these becameCriterion 3 (student outcomes) and Criterion 4 (in the original version, now Criterion 5(curriculum)).This was an arrangement that recognized that the expansion in