incorporated into the draft curriculum. A key to the student-centered process we took was to start from the perspective of howmany student contact hours each of our current (quarter) courses have–broken down by lectureand laboratory. When putting together options for the courses, we calculated the new studentcontact hours and compared them to the quarter hours. The accounting of hours is a moreaccurate representation of the conversion from quarter to semester and took out some of theuncertainty of the conversion. For example, the direct conversion of a 3-unit lecture quartercourse is a 2-unit lecture semester course (3 times 2/3). On the surface, a 2-unit course soundslike and can feel like a loss when in reality both have the same number of
estimated value of all non-personnel financial support providedto the new hire. Following this logic, we sought to identify high-level, relatively universalcomponents to faculty startup packages that may critically influence a faculty member’srecruitment and pathway to success (e.g., salary, laboratory space/equipment as warranted byresearch field, graduate student and/or post-doctoral researcher support, and teaching load).Additionally, the University offers pre-tenure leave, as guaranteed in the faculty handbook, andoffered COVID-19 related tenure clock extensions; thus, we also wanted to assess the equity inuse of these guaranteed supports. Because the same staff and administrative personnel would haveaccess to that information, it was concluded
Oklahoma State University. Right now, Mohammad is working in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV) as a Lecturer 2. He started this position in the fall of 2022, right after he got his Ph.D.Dr. R Ryan Dupont, Utah State University Dr. Dupont has more than 35 years of experience teaching and conducting applied and basic research in environmental engineering at the Utah Water Research Laboratory at Utah State University. His main research areas have addressed soil and groundwater bioDr. David K. Stevens, Utah State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Assessing Engineering Students' Behavioral Engagement and
students, either asteaching assistants or as mentors during a semester. In this latter role, we are tasked with guidingstudents through research endeavors and giving them an introduction to engineeringinvestigations. While in some instances this can be a straightforward task, there are times whenthe role of a mentor can be physically, mentally, and emotionally taxing. Some students have aharder time being able to grasp the research method or process, and it can lead to moredrawbacks than benefits to the project. But what of the instances outside of the laboratory?Certainly, our role as a mentor is to guide students and give them advice and mentorshipregarding their research endeavors. Do we just tell them that their problems are outside of
-doctoral fellowship at Lawrence National Laboratory focusing on com- putational analysis for nonlinear seismic analysis of Department of Energy nuclear facilities and systems. After joining SFSU in 2016, she established an active research lab at SFSU with a diverse group of under- graduate and Master’s level students. For her engineering education research, she is interested in exploring how to use technology such as virtual reality and 3D printing to enhance student engagement. She is an active member of ASCE, ASEE, and SEAONC.Shah Rukh Humayoun, San Francisco State UniversityKhanh NguyenYongjian Pan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reinforcing Human-Technology Interaction Theory
not limited to, embedded technology, autonomoustechnology, edge and end-point technologies. Compared to cybersecurity in general, however,cyber engineering still requires further refinement in its curriculum coverage. The currentcurriculum for the cyber engineering program at our university is centered on cyber physicalsystems (CPS) and their security including device-level security, boot security, and attack-resilienthardware/middleware. As an engineering curriculum, cyber engineering also requires a variety ofhands-on laboratory-based learning as well. To better facilitate hands-on learning in a curricularsetting, we have been developing a 1/5th-scale autonomous vehicle as a framework of cyberphysical systems for a set of cyber engineering
methods to solve the system ofnonlinear differential equations that govern fluid flow and heat transfer, with some initial andboundary conditions. However, due to the limited computational resources available for classroominstruction, the problems used for illustration and laboratory assignments are limited to simplecanonical types. This means that students will not be able to analyze realistic problems withpractical applications, which are inherently complicated, computationally expensive, and requirehigh-performance computing (HPC) clusters that take advantage of massive parallelization. In thispaper, a course in the curriculum that addresses this issue is proposed. In this course, thefundamental theories of high-performance computing will
good example of this occurred at the University of Tennessee in the late 1990s [3]. At theUniversity of Tennessee [3] the two first-year courses were redesigned in response torecommendations of an industrial advisory board and ABET. The result was a FYE programwhich was deemed the “Engage Program”. The first semester course was a non-calculus-basedapproach that focused on computer programming, graphic skills, and problem solving. Thesecond semester course focused more on calculus-based content with emphasis on statics anddynamics. Basic concepts would be presented in a one-hour lecture and the concepts werereinforced during low-tech, hands-on laboratory exercises. Additionally, students would meetwith graduate teaching assistants in a
Paper ID #37798Research & Development of a Decentralized Battery Management System forModern AutomobilesDr. Cyril B. Okhio, Kennesaw State UniversityDr. Theodore Orrin Grosch, Kennesaw State University Dr. Grosch earned his BSEE in 1982, MSEE in 1987, and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at The Penn- sylvania State University in 1993. He have worked at Hughes Aircraft, General Electric, M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory two start-ups. Dr. Grosch has taught at University of Maryland, University of Massachusetts, and is now an assistant Professor at Kennesaw State University.Dr. Austin B. Asgill P.E., Kennesaw State University Dr
Paper ID #38816Design and Evaluation of Modules to Teach PLC Interfacing ConceptsDr. Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution and a member of the Graduate Faculty at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. His research interests include automation, robotics, cyber-manufacturing and Industry 4.0; optical/infrared imaging and instrumentation; micro/nano manufacturing; and design of technology for engineering ed- ucation. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory at Texas A&M
Press, 2018.[2] Y. Liu, "Design of instructional tools to facilitate understanding of fluid viscous dampers in avibration and controls class and course assessment," 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access, 2020.[3] C. C. McDaniel and G. C. Archer, “Full-scale Mechanical Vibrations Laboratory,” In 2013ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 23-628. 2013.[4] A. Danesh-Yazdi, Y. Wu, and O. Onipede, “Interactive Simulation Modules (ISMs) inVibrations,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[5] T. M. Ericson, “Lessons for Effective Use of MATLAB and Simulink to Explore AdvancedTopics: Application in a Vibrations Course,” 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference ContentAccess, 2021.[6] A. Rezaei and A. Davari, "Teaching
in experimental mechanics, piezospectro- scopic techniques, epistemologies, assessment, and modeling of student learning, student success, student team effectiveness, and global competencies He helped establish the scholarly foundation for engineering education as an academic discipline through lead authorship of the landmark 2006 JEE special reports ”The National Engineering Education Research Colloquies” and ”The Research Agenda for the New Dis- cipline of Engineering Education.” He has a passion for designing state-of-the-art learning spaces. While at Purdue University, Imbrie co-led the creation of the First-Year Engineering Program’s Ideas to Inno- vation (i2i) Learning Laboratory, a design-oriented facility
the creation andmanagement of user accounts as well as the process of logging in to the Lab Container. Thismodule comprises three key components: the Login page, the Signup page, and the ForgotPassword functionality. The Login page enables users to securely enter their credentials. TheSignup page provides a convenient and straightforward process for creating new user accounts.The Forgot Password functionality allows users who have lost or forgotten their password toreset it in a secure and efficient manner.Dashboard UIThe Dashboard UI module pertains to the frontend pages of the student and course staffdashboards within Lab Container. The student dashboard provides an interface for students tomonitor their progress on laboratory assignments
Paper ID #37740Board 393: Supporting Student Internships with the Nsf Hsi Program at aMedium-Sized Hispanic-Serving InstitutionDr. Alberto Cureg Cruz, California State University, Bakersfield Dr. Cruz is an Associate Professor of Computer Science, Principal Investigator of the Computer Percep- tion Laboratory (COMPLAB), and board member of the Center for Environmental Studies (CES) at the California State University, Bakersfield (CSUB). He has received a few grants from the National Science Foundation and local agencies to support research in applied machine learning, vision algorithms and engineering education.Dr. Dennis
makerspaces also offer greatpotential in serving broader goals of education [36, 40-42], such as the critical goal ofaugmenting first-year engineering retention. Some institutions utilize makerspaces as a means tooffer training and/or teaching new skills and/or knowledge [43]. For quite some time now, manycolleges have provided makerspace-analogous functionalities, including assembly/testing areas,machine shops, Computer Aided Design laboratories, and/or classrooms. What universities oftenlack is the inclusion of all of these elements in one location [44]. For campuses that doimplement such centralized accommodations, the majority of these makerspaces are utilizedpredominantly for informal settings rather than as a required program course.However, in
their career. The essential(E) and advanced (A) skills are still important, but they are not pre-requisite material for othercourses. If a student is able to master all the fundamental skills, they will have a C- and they willpass the class as shown in Table 2. While students who only pass the fundamental skills may notget as much practice with the essential and advanced skills, they will still be exposed to theseskills on instruction days and through homework and laboratory exercises. By achieving masteryon the fundamental skills, students should have a full understanding of these topics which theycan apply to future engineering courses. This is where mastery based learning and traditionalgrading differ—mastery-based learning prioritizes
STEMresearch experiences in defense relevant research areas and to teach the participants about careeropportunities in the Naval civilian research enterprise, as well as other research career pathswithin the defense industry. In addition to gaining hands-on research experience and mentoring,the students received training from each university's Office of Undergraduate Research in topicsrelated to the nature of research, the ethics of researchers, and the mechanics of writing andpublishing research.Initially the program also included travel for both the student veterans and their faculty mentorsto the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington D.C., to meet their NRL mentors in person, andto present on their summer research. COVID-19 prevented these trips
Fall 211 5 2023 Spring 156 5Course Goals and StructureThe course goals are for students to learn: (1) to analyze data in the context of engineeringproblems, (2) programming using MATLAB, (3) to work effectively in teams, (4) to prototypeusing hand tools, basic CAD, and 3D printing, and (5) to articulate differences and overlapsbetween engineering disciplines and practices. These course goals are stated on the syllabus.Students in ENGR 130 meet in two 75-minute laboratory sessions and a single, combined 75-minute lecture per week. In the lab, students complete two-week modules that combineMATLAB programming and hands-on design projects, working in teams of three or
Paper ID #38464Tips for Creating a Functional Personal Knowledge Management System inAcademiaDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State
, one male and one female during the competition. Each year MTSUstudents participate in the “NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge” a half-mile simulatedlunar terrain course that includes "craters", rocks, "lava" ridges, inclines, and "lunar" soil. Thestudents are aware of the challenges they face during the competition, so they design the Roverto withstand the deterioration the vehicle could undergo. The design and construction of theRover is completed in three different laboratories located on the MTSU campus in the VoorhiesEngineering Technology building. More than 80% of the parts are designed and manufactured bythe students alone. This hands-on method is a great advantage for students to learn from theirmistakes and be equipped if any
architecture project, that provides safetylevels to the users according to the different codes appliable to the structure according to itslocation and use.The best way to get related with the structure and its elements is at the construction site,even tough the laboratories are really helpful, is in the action field at the construction sitewhere we can live and understand the structure and its behavior. The construction site visitsare a fundamental tool in the development of the competencies that the university is tryingto develop in the students.It is also necessary that the students identify the reason why, the designs that come from astructural analysis, must be feasible to be constructed and adapted to the available systems,tools and procedures in
] Parasiliti, Francesco, and Paolo Bertoldi, eds. Energy efficiency in motor driven systems.Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.[4] Vogelesang, Hans. “Energy consumption in pumps–friction losses.” World Pumps 2008.499(2008): 20-24.[5] Latchoomun, L., et al. “Quantifying the Pumping Energy Loss Associated with Different Typesof Leak in a Piping System.” International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical,Electronic and Communications Engineering. Springer, Cham, 2016.[6] Parr, Andrew. “Hydraulic Pumps and Pressure Regulation.” Hydraulics and Pneumatics(2011): 31-49.[7] Love, Lonnie J., Eric Lanke, and Pete Alles. "Estimating the impact (energy, emissions andeconomics) of the US fluid power industry." Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak
fluid physics that surrounds us in our daily lives. Despite being aradical departure from typical engineering curricula, the course was very successful in attractinga diverse group of graduate and undergraduate students, particularly women studyingengineering. One of the key outcomes of the course was the recognition by students of theaesthetic value of fluid physics and the motivation it provided for life-long learning.Course Objectives and DescriptionThis course offers a unique blend of scientific and artistic techniques for visualizing fluid flowsin the laboratory and in everyday life. Through hands-on exploration, students learn to use dyesand particles to create visual representations of the physics of fluid flow. They also gain
effectiveness, and global competencies He helped establish the scholarly foundation for engineering education as an academic discipline through lead authorship of the landmark 2006 JEE special reports ”The National Engineering Education Research Colloquies” and ”The Research Agenda for the New Dis- cipline of Engineering Education.” He has a passion for designing state-of-the-art learning spaces. While at Purdue University, Imbrie co-led the creation of the First-Year Engineering Program’s Ideas to Inno- vation (i2i) Learning Laboratory, a design-oriented facility that engages students in team-based, socially relevant projects. While at Texas A&M University Imbrie co-led the design of a 525,000 square foot state-of-the
"mathematization of space" in relation to making graphs. Fenner andO'Neill [10] had similar results from a project aimed at improving engineering students' abilitiesto analyze, interpret and communicate data. Their study found that engineering students in alinear circuits laboratory collected experimental data correctly but frequently failed to synthesizeand summarize the findings. Hadley and Oyetunji [11] found that engineering students maypossess the mathematical procedural knowledge associated with numeracy but are notnecessarily able to employ these skills in specific engineering contexts. While this researchexplores the QL of engineering students, no current instruments are specifically designed tomeasure the QL of engineering students.This work-in
Paper ID #37219Student Success in 4-D (SS4D): Toward a Holistic Understanding ofEngineering Student Success in Motivation, Curricular Attainment andExperiential Opportunities across Educational StagesSamantha Splendido, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sam Splendido is a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She is cur- rently a graduate research assistant under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL). She earned her B.S. in Biomedical and Mechanical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Andrea Gregg, Pennsylvania State
teamsPreliminary ResultsThe authors have opened this opportunity within their respective classes for three past years:Springs 2019, 2020, and 2022 and currently 2023. As Spring 2021 was a completely onlinesemester for the University (except for laboratory classes), it was skipped. The number of designteams and juniors that participated in this venture is summarized in Table 1.Table 1: Number of Design Teams and Interns participating 2019 2020 2022 2023 Design Teams 14 8 9 11 Interns 19 16 24 15In Figure 2, we compare the scores received by juniors
), Applications of SolidWorks in Teaching Courses of Statics and Strength of Materials Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--20959[11]. Northrup, S., & Burke, J. (2008, June), Continuous Improvement In Electrical Engineering Student Outcomes Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2—4114[12]. M. Budhu, “Virtual Laboratories for Engineering Education”, Proceeding of International Conference of Engineering Education, Manchester, UK, August 18-21, 2002.[13]. P. Bhargava1, C. Cunningham, M. Tolomeo, and A. Zehnder, “Virtual Labs, Real Data for Statics and Mechanics of Materials”, ASEE 2003 Annual Conference
blended project based learning (sbpbl) model implementation in operating system course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(5): 202–211, 2020.[19] Divya Kundra and Ashish Sureka. An experience report on teaching compiler design concepts using case-based and project-based learning approaches. In 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), pages 216–219. IEEE, 2016.[20] Marc Dahmen, Luis Quezada, Miguel Alfaro, Guillermo Fuertes, Claudio Aballay, and Manuel Vargas. Teaching artificial intelligence using project based learning. Technical report, EasyChair, 2020.[21] D Anitha, C Jeyamala, and D Kavitha. Assessing and enhancing creativity in a laboratory course with
using a system thinking approach to support teachers and develop professional learning experiences around cre- ating conceptual models, designing coaching systems, developing frameworks and lessons, and preparing professional development. Her research interests include STEM education, system thinking, conceptual modeling, and coaching.Olivia LancasterDr. Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida Dr. Nancy Ruzycki is an Instructional Associate Professor, Director of Undergraduate Laboratories, and the Principal Investigator on the EQuIPD Grant at the University of Florida within the Department of Materials Science and Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering. She has received over 7 million dollars in