Engineering Education, and is a member of the editorial board of Learning and Instruction. In 2006 she was awarded the U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER grant award and received the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from the President of the United States. She has conducted and advised on educational research projects and grants in both the public and private sectors, and served as an external reviewer for doctoral dissertations outside the U.S. She publishes regularly in peer-reviewed journals and books. Dr. Husman was a founding member and first President of the Southwest Consortium for Innovative Psychology in Education and has held both elected and appointed offices in the American
), freshman students begin their studies within theirchosen major, typically taking an introductory engineering course specific to their discipline.For undecided engineering students, they have the option to start in a general engineeringprogram to help them select a major. FIT has had great success using this general engineeringmodel to improve student retention and time to graduation; however, improvement can be madein preparing students to be innovative, entrepreneurial-minded professionals. The purpose of thispaper is to describe the activities focused on exposing students to the entrepreneurial mindset andpreparing them for engineering careers. An introductory course in the General Engineeringprogram comprises both a lecture and a lab component
include Computational Mechanics, Solid Mechanics, and Product Design and Development. He has taught several different courses at the undergraduate and graduate level, has over 50 publications, is co-author of one book, and has done consulting for industry in Mexico and the US. He can be reached at Karim.Muci@sdsmt.edu.Dr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the faculty of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology for over 5 years before joining
participate in thestudy. The interviews of five participants are used in this preliminary analysis (Table 1).Table 1. Participant key demographics. Interviewee Degree Career/Position (Pseudonym) Daniel Technology Design Engineer Jack Aerospace Engineering Research and Development Lola Chemical Engineering Product Researcher Matt Mechanical Engineering Senior Materials Engineer Ronald Chemical Engineering Senior material Product DeveloperInterviewsThe participants were interviewed about the tools and techniques they use to solve
survey. Nearly one-third of them left comments describing relatedexperience at their workplace. We also interviewed a number of senior female engineers whoshared their experiences with implicit bias during their career. We conducted statistical analysis(ANOVA, regression analysis) and text analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data. Findingsfrom both data sources showed that women and people of color experienced more implicit bias atwork than white men.Regression analyses showed that, after controlling for age, education, workplace seniority, andacademic status, women still reported more Prove-It-Again, Tightrope, and Maternal Wall bias,and Asian and African-American engineers reported more Prove-It-Again and Tightrope bias,than their
% lower than males at LSU. The same confidence issues that ethnicminorities feel might explain this small decrease. The stigma that engineering is a maledominated career field can subconsciously affect female students by reducing their confidenceand self-efficacy, and a correlation clearly exists between self-efficacy and success in STEMfields (11, 12).2.3 The LSES Minority Students of low socioeconomic status (LSES) have to overcome many barriers to gettingan education that other students do not face. These students are often solely responsible forpaying their own way through college, having to work full-time jobs while taking a full load ofdifficult classes. These students often have additional financial burdens that can make the path
treat- ment processes, and water education. She is involved in outreach programs for K-12 students to increase the participation of Hispanic female students in STEM fieldsDr. Gerri Cole, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017An Innovative Approach to Recruit and Retain Historically Underrepresented Students in EngineeringAbstractThe Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) fields do not usually attract firstgeneration, low-income, and minority students (such as women, Hispanics, and AfricanAmerican, etc.). There are various ways to increase the number of minority students’participation in STEM careers, but one of the most frequently
also earned a Master of BusinessAdministration degree from Wake Forest University.Prior to his academic career Mr. [Last Name] spent 14 years in the plastics manufacturing, andnatural gas distribution industries. While at Tyco Electronics in Greensboro, NC he designedmold tooling and injection molding processes for electrical connectors used in the automotiveand communications industries. As the Service Supervisor and Engineer for Kansas Gas Servicein Pittsburg, KS he was responsible for designing commercial and residential distributionsystems for all of SE Kansas.[Names removed for Double Blind submission]
embark on engineering careers, do not explicitlysoft skills through conflict resolution. Currently as know about ABET soft skills such as proper communicationstand-alone course sessions embedded within and partnership conflict management. Often, whenengineering classes, exposure to ABET’s soft skills as engineering students engage in group projects, their focuswell as conflict resolution techniques, can dramatically and assessment are on the final product instead of both theimprove student understanding and collaborative product and the process of product creation. To gaininteractions. The researchers propose utilizing these understanding of the collegiate
Career & Networking Expo. She holds a M.Ed. in Higher Education and Student Affairs from the University of South Carolina. Previously she worked as a Student Success Adviser and focused on early intervention initiatives. She has taught courses including First Year Seminar, Keys to Student Success and University 101.Dr. Emily Kate Book, The Citadel Dr. Emily Book is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Citadel. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University, her M.B.A. from Clarke Col- lege, her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wisconsin, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina State University. Her research and
-class subjects including: learning stylesassessments and application, emotional intelligence, career development and goals setting, self-awareness, course planning and GPA calculations, academic planning and advising, employinginterdependence, and developing an academic recovery plan. Engineering staff felt the first iteration ofthe course was lacking in applicable content and focused too much on reflection alone. The seconditeration (spring 2010) of the course content was much more developed, included more structure, in-class assignments and homework and more applicable skills such as stress management.As we assessed the course in its new and improved form over the years we continued to look for areaswhere our students struggled and how we
. Building and structures were by far the most common type of responses for both parents (83%) and staff (77%). Staff members weremore likely to associate engineering with planning and problem solving, math, and engineering-related values, while parents were more likely to associate the terms with careers and planningand problem solving.Table 1. Frequency of most common associations with the terms “engineer” and “engineering” Parents StaffCategories (n=79) (n=19) ExampleBuilding, structures 83% 77% Construction sites, buildings.Planning, problem
graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. Dr. Borrego is Deputy Editor for Journal of Engineering Education and served on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education as Chair of Pro- fessional Interest Council IV. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Dr. Arturo A Fuentes, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley Arturo Alejandro Fuentes
ensure successful transformation of classroom practices.The anticipated outcomes of the RET site program are as follows:1. Teacher Outcomes a. Greater knowledge of content aligned with research activities in their field b. Transformation of classroom practices resulting in more frequent STEM and engineering education teaching techniques c. Long-term collaborative partnerships with university faculty and industry representatives2. Student Outcomes (indirectly from their teacher’s experiences) a. Students having more positive STEM influences which encourage them to pursue careers in these areas b. Students being more engaged in the classroom due to better developed authentic classroom
sustainable energy area. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the Florida International University. He has been member with prestigious Honor Societies such as Tau Beta Pi, Phi Kappa Phi, Sigma Xi and Golden Key. He has published number of conference, Journal papers and book chapters in energy and sustainability area. He is a reviewer of several Journals in energy efficiency area. He is a member of the Editorial Board of ASME Early Career Technical Journal. Raised in Tehran, Iran, Dr. Rayegan now lives in Houston. He has served as an instructor at Semnan University, Iran for 5 years. He was selected as the best teacher of the Mechanical Engineering Department by students during 2002-2003 academic year and the
A&M in 1973 with a B.S. Degree in Indus- trial Engineering-Industrial Distribution. For most of my career I worked with Industrial Supply Houses engineering electrical systems, mechanical systems, fluid power systems, and conveyance systems. After that I spent seventeen years with Dow Chemical developing new products (R&D) for Dow customers. I just retired as the Department Chair for the Career and Technology Education Department at Porter High School. I was also the lead teacher for the Engineering House. Currently, I work part time for the Tomball I.S.D.Dr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A
Paper ID #17762MAKER: Generations of NC Machining through Laboratory WorkDr. Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan, United Arab Emirates University Dr Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan – Siva is a Srilankan by birth and a citizen of the United Kingdom. His experience in Sri-lanka started with an year’s post-graduate apprenticeship in the manufacturing shops of the Government Railway and nine years in the Cement Industry. He graduated as a Mechanical Engineer from University of Srilanka, and obtained his Masters from the University of Aston and PhD from City University of London, both in the UK. He started his career in the UK as the
addressthe tremendous challenges facing our state and nation. It is increasingly clear that teachers haveprofound and lasting impact on students’ learning. However if K-12 teachers are to help preparethe engineers of tomorrow, they themselves need to be supported to have their own experiencesin engineering and to develop ways of bringing that knowledge back into the classroom.This awarded NSF Research Experience for Teachers Program at Oakland University aims tobring the excitement and knowledge developed in engineering research from the lab into theclassroom so that teachers can move their students to envision engineering as an attractive andimportant career opportunity.It is our belief that in order for such an RET program to be successful, it
United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Ally Kindel Martin, The Citadel Ally Kindel Martin is the Director of Student Engagement, Projects & Finance in the School of Engi- neering. In her position, she has worked with the Supplemental Instruction program, launched STEM Freshmen Outreach initiatives, created an Engineering Mentor Connection program, and revitalized the Engineering Career & Networking Expo. She holds a M.Ed. in Higher Education and Student Affairs from the University of South Carolina. Previously she worked
conversations reported by the faculty indicate that students begin sharing informationthey did not know would help them in their engineering careers. The third course in the sequence being more of a team design course, employs methodsfrom other design courses from FYE institutions in contact with our team (Adams, 2002; Atmanet al., 2007; Crismond & Adams, 2012; Turns et al., 2006). One engagement protocol that mixesbest practices from Adams’ work and is similar to the liberative ones employed by Riley is usedby one faculty member who requires all students to stand while discussing an element of designfrom the project, and the next speaker must amplify the previous student’s statement in terms ofhis own. Students in this scenario must engage
% Heavy course load 26.79% 47.83% Unhappy with instructor 21.43% 28.26% Unsure of major 17.86% 8.70% No clear career goals or plans 16.07% 8.70% Poor class attendance 16.07% 19.57% Housing/roommate issues 16.07% 15.22% Trouble making friends 16.07% 13.04% Homesickness 12.50% 6.52% Working too many hours 12.50% 17.39% Family issues
2 belowand in Jawaharlal et al. (2016)1. This redesign was motivated by two concerns: (1) The generalinformation discussed in the old version of ME 100L, such as career options, library resources,and teamwork, is covered in a college-level introductory engineering course and hence wasredundant; (2) The course’s technical content was outdated, with the old version of ME 100Lculminating in a rubber band car competition.Additional motivation to update the course came from viewing engineering education from abroader perspective. Many educators in engineering also have introduced innovative freshmanengineering courses focused on engaging and motivating students at an early stage2-9. Freshmanstudents currently entering universities are referred
configuring Synopsys toolsand their application for the design, verification and testing of VLSI circuits in the course. Thecareer field of VLSI verification and test offers excellent opportunities for fresh engineeringgraduates. Training students to apply theoretical concepts with verified industry tools allowsthem to gain a deeper level of knowledge of VLSI design, verification and testing. Therefore,enabling them to become career ready upon graduation. This pedagogical experience of coursecovering the fundamentals of VLSI test process and automatic test equipment (ATE), testeconomics, faults, fault modeling and fault simulation in conjunction with the empirical learningof Synopsys tools for ATPG will be discussed in the body of the paper along
valued engagements, involving experiences abroad,volunteering to help new engineering students, writing papers and presenting posters. GrandChallenges Scholars also found that involvement has given them greater awareness of globalissues and non-engineering factors that are important. One student remarked that it has beeneye-opening to see different situations in the world outside of the US and how people are tryingto cope and find solutions.In sum, it appears that the Grand Challenges Scholars Program offers an opportunity to morefully expose engineering students to a global perspective that can shape their career choices inthe field. An area where students have noted that they have not attained as much benefit as theyhad hoped is in learning
Engineering Education, 2017 Upper Division Students Teaching Engineering Skills to Lower Division Students through Underwater Robotics Andrew Hostler, Bridget Benson Electrical Engineering Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis ObispoAbstractMany engineering students just starting out in their undergraduate career face problems with gaininghands on skills relevant to today’s workforce. The plethora of math, physics, and general educationcourses students take in their first two years of college often precludes students from obtaining hands-onengineering experience until their junior year. This paper describes a
2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic SectionSpring Conference: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland Apr 7 Paper ID #20832Laser Music - Authentic Engineering Product Development for a Real Cus-tomerDr. Peter Raymond Stupak, Raritan Valley Community College Peter Stupak enjoyed a 22 year career in the optical-fiber manufacturing industry living and working in 7 countries where he held a variety of hands-on technical and business-management positions. Starting as a R&D Engineer, Peter became fascinated by how a manufacturing business operates and made successive steps into engineering and manufacturing management culminating in
conference, while others modified their presentationsinto a poster format. (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 3: Final project, (a) display of model cars, (b) peer-evaluation, (c) and (d) SCUPI Derby.This conference experience is crucial for students’ future career. They got a taste of what aprofessional conference looks like. Not only did they learn how to present their ideas andfindings, but also how to defend them. Earlier exposure to this setting better prepares them forfuture success. (a) (b) Fig. 4: Sophomore conference, (a) slide show
of creativity development of enginnering students in the USA and Europe.Mrs. Nailya Sh. Valeyeva, Kazan National Research Technological University I am a Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Socio-Technical Systems; Head of Department of Social Work, Psychology and Pedagogics; Deputy Director of Institute of Innovation Management in Kazan National Research Technological University; and Honored Scientist of the Republic of Tatarstan. I received my specialty in Physics in 1975 at Kazan State University and PhD in Pedagogics in 1990. Since 1998 I am a Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences. My professional career covers: teaching at undergraduate, graduate and post-graduate level; planning, developing and managing project in
, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Krishna Madhavan is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. In 2008 he was awarded an NSF CAREER award for learner-centric, adaptive cyber-tools and cyber-environments using learning analytics. He leads a major NSF-fundedprojectcalled Deep Insights Anytime, Anywhere (http://www.dia2.org) to characterize the impact of NSF and other federal investments in the area of STEM education. He also serves as co-PI for the Network forComputationalNanotechnology (nanoHUB.org) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #20540
academia and therefore do not have any real world work experienceto share. This is a major problem as it creates a disconnect between what they can teach and howit will connect to the main reason why the majority of their students are in college in the firstplace – to be prepared for a career outside of academia. Therefore, engineering faculty withoutprofessional experience outside of academia who plan to use storytelling in their courses, mustmake an extra effort to find stories that are relevant to their course topics.3 They may borrowcourse-related stories from colleagues who do or have worked in the field, from professionalpublications, and from professional society meetings. However, answering student questionsabout these borrowed stories may