has set four specific objectives. • O1: Designing and bringing curricular and pedagogical changes in the earliest computing courses that integrate considerations of social responsibility into computing assignments (i.e. CS 0, CS 1, CS 2). • O2: Introducing a new intervention in computing courses that focuses on creating a different kind of student experience focused on community driven computing projects. • O3: Building faculty learning communities to help train, orient and support instructors of this curriculum. • O4: Employing a cross site collaboration structure using a collective impact model, allowing variance for each site while working towards a common goal.Our alliance brings together six campuses
critical thinking components, withthe goal of attracting and retaining a more diverse student population.The research hypothesis for this program is that “Positive outcomes can be achieved in anengineering program through strategic curricular and co-curricular modifications that integrateand embrace STEAM program development. Outcomes targeted include innovation, creativity,collegiality, entrepreneurship and broadening of the STEM talent pool [1].”The team has made significant progress in the first and second years of the program [2-3]. TheA+E team has advanced into the third phase (approximately halfway through the three-year award)of the NSF IUSE grant. Notably, the program has reinvigorated the curriculum, including theformation of two new
deconstruct the experience and surface students’ personalvalues among trusted peers.References 1. Planning Committee for the National Summit on Developing a STEM Workforce Strategy, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (PC). (2016). Developing a National STEM Workforce Strategy: A Workshop Summary. National Academies Press. 2. The Coalition for Reform of Undergraduate STEM Education (CR). (2014). Achieving Systematic Change: A Source Book for Advancing and Funding Undergraduate STEM Education. Washington, D. C.: The Association of American Colleges and Universities. http://www.aacu.org/pkal/sourcebook3. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High
. Forour project, we define spatial skills or spatial ability as abilities to mentally manipulate 2D and3D objects that one can acquire through formal training [1], [2]. Research in the past decade hasshown that spatial skills can predict STEM success among students, with findings showing thatspatial skills can have a role in increasing the likelihood of obtaining advanced STEM degrees[3]. Sorby and colleagues have also found that improving spatial skills through interventioncourses can impact the introductory STEM course grade performances of students who take theintervention courses [1]. Specifically, the study has shown such impact on grade performance incourses like Physics and Intro to Engineering, in addition to impact on STEM course GPAs [1
attention over the recent decades [1], [2], [3]. Engineering fundamentally revolvesaround tackling intricate challenges, and developing long-term solutions to societal problems.Yet, the effectiveness of these solutions greatly hinges on their ability to encompass a spectrumof perspectives, experiences, and skills from the global community. It falls upon engineeringeducators to foster inclusive environments where every voice matters, diversity is celebrated as adriver of creativity, and fairness guarantees equal access to opportunities for everyone. However,despite efforts to broaden participation and make engineering more equitable and inclusive, westill fall short of attracting and retaining students and faculty members from
three campuses which each have large commuter populations, having to work while inschool also reduces the amount of time that students can spend engaged in other activities, suchas networking with peers, attending student organization meetings, or studying in student groups.These campus interactions, whether academic in nature or social, are very important forestablishing community and helping students develop STEM identity and sense of belonging. Infact, networking activities can prove to be more impactful on student success than academicinterventions [1]. Developing a sense of belonging and community within the major is crucialfor retention and academic success, in part because students that are connected to a network ofpeers and faculty are
motivation.We have identified the following research questions regarding students in a Discrete Mathclass in an introductory CS sequence:RQ1: Do students’ expectations to do well, value of the course, and time spent studyingcontribute to their course outcome?RQ2: Can students who do not expect to do well in the course when they first enter it, cannevertheless engage in study behaviours that lead to positive course outcomes?2 MethodsWe surveyed students in a Discrete Math course at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaignthree times during Spring 2022. Survey 1 was used to get information about students’ mo-tivation and belonging as they enter the course in the first week of the semester. Surveys 2and 3 were given in the middle and at the end of
Datastorm challenges. We also plan to host annual full-day Datastormevents, which should provide visibility and outreach opportunities to other undergraduate studentsat our institution as well as highlight the relevance of the Computer Science program to thegeneral public.IntroductionComputer Science and computing based majors in general suffer from a variety of issues at theuniversity level.One of those issues is high drop out rates. The level of attrition in Computer Science is reportedto be between 9.8% [1] and 28% [2]. This represents both a direct loss in terms of students notcompleting the major as well as an indirect loss in terms of students not encouraged to pursue itbecause of a perceived difficulty given its high withdrawal rates.Figure
senior year, they havemastered the art of designing a logic primitive, e.g., a CMOS inverter or a simple circuit, e.g., afull adder. With this knowledge, they have the foundation to pursue graduate studies in VLSI de-sign, which, depending on the university, includes a course that introduces them to logic synthesisand physical design. This approach to teaching VLSI has a lot of shortcomings: (1) students withthe desire to design a microprocessor from scratch have to delay gratification for several years, (2)students must appreciate and have a strong aptitude for each step of the VLSI design process insequential order, (3) most universities do not offer the full sequence of courses needed, and (4)exposure to skills needed is usually not available
fall 2023 section ofCSC 101 piloted a pre- and post-survey to measure their SoB and ASC. Additionally, studentswere interviewed about their experiences on the CoLT course. This survey will be implemented inthree sections of the CSC 101 course in spring 2024. This paper presents the overall researchdesign and preliminary survey responses from fall 2023. Preliminary results demonstrate a positiveimpact on SoB and ASC for students. These results provide encouraging motivation to furtherinvestigate how CoLTs may impact student retention and academic performance in computingmajors.1. Introduction and BackgroundComputer Science and Computer Programming and Information Systems are complex subjectsthat require critical thinking and problem solving for
Engineering Education. He is also selected as an NSF SIARM fellow for the advanced research methods for STEM education research. Dr. Menekse received four Seed-for-Success Awards (in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021) from Purdue University’s Excellence in Research Awards programs in recognition of obtaining four external grants of $1 million or more during each year. His research has been generously funded by grants from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), Purdue Research Foundation (PRF), and the National Science Foundation (NSF).Ali Alhaddad, Purdue University, West Lafayette ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in progress: A
data science, bioinformatics, and applied computing for the social sciences.These programs are designed to provide students with both domain knowledge and computingskills to better prepare them for today’s increasingly digital world. To benefit from theseprograms, however, students first need awareness that these opportunities exist. Furthermore,students majoring in non-computer science/engineering fields are often not provided withlearning experiences that foster their self-efficacy in pursuing computing courses, thus limitingtheir future educational and career choices [1 - 3]. Students from historically marginalizedcommunities, shown to be enrolled at higher rates in community colleges than in 4-yearinstitutions, are particularly affected by
thatassume minoritized students lack coping skills (for e.g., how to balance work and classes), and these canbe provided for them, for example, through intervention programs. However, there is a general lack ofunderstanding regarding how these students cope from an assets-based lens. This study reports on thecoping strategies of 31 minoritized students, and is guided by the research questions: 1) what personalcoping mechanisms do minoritized undergraduate students use to navigate STEM fields? and 2) how domentees leverage assistance from mentors in order to navigate STEM fields? The data was examinedthrough critical race theory and mentoring frameworks. Preliminary results indicate that the participantsused various forms of coping strategies
, thereby contributing to a more gender-balanced representation in STEM-related fields. Prior studies by the authors of this paper[Delson et. al 2023] described a controlled trail to evaluate the benefit of increased sketchtraining in a in a freshman introduction to mechanical design class. This publication evaluates thedata from this study to discern the impact by gender. This paper explores the benefit of sketchingin in a freshman introduction to mechanical design class and explores the following researchquestions as it impacts male and female students: 1. Does adding additional sketching instruction to a class with CAD and hands-on design have measurable benefits? 2. Do the benefits of sketch training extend beyond improving
the involved faculty. The resulting radio telescope projectprovides university undergraduate students with the ability to learn the basics of radio astronomythrough the easily accessible small-scale radio telescope system.IntroductionThis project was developed as an extension of a collaborative project between studentengineering and astronomy clubs. The members of the capstone team took on the design of thecontrol system and coordination of the overall project. During the initial development of theproject, a system block diagram was established as shown in Figure 1. This block diagram givesan overview of the major components of a radio telescope system. It was divided into threemajor sections, which were then assigned to task teams. In this
. This paper describes the campdevelopment and activities, the relationships and interactions between thepartnering organizations, and presents key takeaways from multiple years ofrunning the camp.1. IntroductionSummer STEM camps have been shown to be an effective means of introducing middle and highschool students to STEM disciplines [1]. Many STEM camps are used as a means to attractwomen and minority students to STEM fields [2] [3] [4] [5]. STEM camps have even been usedto introduce and encourage cross-cultural relationships and experiences [6]. Frequently, theseSTEM camps are developed and run by academia [5] [7]; however, there are a growing numberof camps that are developed and run by partnerships between different organizations
thecoming semester.IntroductionIn first-year design courses, undergraduate teaching assistants (UGTAs) have had positiveoutcomes on student learning. and the use of undergraduate teaching assistant programscontinues to grow [1-5]. As UGTAs are often the first points of contact for students, they play akey role in fostering a sense of belonging in the classroom, which has been tied to improvedstudent performance and retention.Recently, educators have recognized the need to equip UGTAs in STEM with training in how toapproach their jobs as inclusive peer educators [6-11]. We thus set out to formalize inclusiveteaching training for UGTAs in our program by providing foundational knowledge of globalinclusion, diversity, belonging, equity, and access
education encouragingstudents to have an experiential learning component in community, whereby they practiceengineering design in communities. Yet, this happens rarely with the appropriate training andwith no partnership with community-based scientists. For example, in this case from theAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers [1] , the team identified thechallenges of distribution of aid in agricultural development projects and, using stakeholderanalysis, outlined the essential voices as the engineer, funder, government, and the internationalNGO. While this is a strong team of voices, they were missing important insight fromstakeholder who were immediately impacted by the design of these engineering solutions. Thisoversight, in
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 DEI Task Force Accomplishments: The DEI Scholars Program and its DEI Elective OptionMotivation and BackgroundThe purpose of this practice paper is to share new accomplishments made by our Diversity,Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Task Force in the Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics(MEAM) Department within the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) at theUniversity of Pennsylvania. This paper aims to enable others to implement similar changesadapted to their own contexts. Previously, we shared the process of forming a DEI Task Forcewithin a Mechanical Engineering Department [1], [2] and described initial efforts atprogramming and engaging students
– Curriculum, the following statement appears: Baccalaureate degree curricula will include the application of integral and differential calculus, or other mathematics about the level of algebra and trigonometry, appropriate to the student outcomes and the discipline [1].If a department offers baccalaureate degrees in the area of electrical and electronic engineeringtechnology, the criteria for that area states that The ability to utilize differential and integral calculus, as a minimum, to characterize the performance of electrical/electronic systemsis a requirement for the curriculum [2]. Differential and integral calculus is also required forprograms in mechanical engineering technology [3].In the author’s
survey methodology, with a questionnaire deployedthat includes short answer questions. The responses are inductively coded and reported in thiswork. Moreover, lessons learned from designing and assigning original dynamic systems physicalexperiments to mechanical engineering undergraduate students are highlighted.1 IntroductionMECH-431, Dynamic Systems with Controls Laboratory, is a required course in the MechanicalEngineering (ME) undergraduate curriculum at Kettering University (KU). It is the companionlaboratory course to MECH-430, Dynamic Systems with Controls, which is a lecture course.Both courses feature topics in classical control theory. Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID)controllers are emphasized, as they are commonly used in
charge controller allows for the charging process to be more efficient [1]. Ourapproach involves utilizing an MPPT solar charge controller to enable the efficient draw ofpower and charging of LiFePO4 batteries from the PV panels. Human control withmicrocontrollers is an important consideration. When a microcontroller is combined with a webserver, it provides an opportunity to develop a user-friendly interface that can be accessedthrough a local network. Such an interface facilitates convenient management, access, andmonitoring of the system environment for users [2]. A microcontroller presents an efficientapproach for managing solar energy systems. With controlling and monitoring featuresintegrated into a microcontroller, users can bypass the
, more importantly, puts their lives in greatdanger.Keywords: Construction Trades, Informal Construction, Natural Disasters, Resilient Post-Disaster Reconstruction, Underrepresented WorkforceBackground and MotivationGlobally, 7,348 natural disasters have been recorded over the last twenty years. These disastershave caused $2.97 trillion in economic losses and 1.23 million deaths. They have impacted 4.2billion people through damage to human health and injury, loss of income, destruction ofinfrastructure systems, damage to property or homelessness, displacement, as well as reducedsupply of food, electricity, and water (FEW) [1]–[3].Natural disasters severely impact all countries and communities. However, developing countries,and particularly low
math and physics at Santa Fe College, and was the Teaching Assistant for Astrophysics 1 at the University of Florida.Dr. Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida Dr. Nancy Ruzycki, is the Director of Undergraduate Laboratories and Faculty Lecturer within the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida Herbert Wetheim College of Engineering. Her focus is on developing curriculum baHajymyrat Serdarovich Geldimuradov, University of Florida A native of Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, Hajymyrat grew up in Bolivia and moved to the United States in 2012. Since the beginning of his computer science studies and after obtaining his bachelor’s in computer science at the University of Florida, he has gained
abilityto enable experimentation from any location with an internet connection, thus eliminatinggeographical constraints and offering scheduling flexibility [1–5]. They also alleviate financialburdens associated with setting up and maintaining physical lab infrastructure. Furthermore,remote labs contribute to equitable access, expanding opportunities for students fromlower-income and underrepresented minority backgrounds, especially through communitycolleges [6, 7].However, while remote labs offer these benefits, they also present challenges, as they necessitateaccess to stable internet connections, modern devices, and proficiency in using online platforms,potentially widening the technological barrier for certain groups and triggering digital
learner-centered multidisciplinary engineering pedagogy which centers onthe key question: how do we motivate engineering students of different backgrounds from aneuro-inspired perspective?IntroductionIn today’s society, the majority of encountered challenges are complex, open-ended, and hard toeffectively categorize into any single particular discipline [1], which requires cross-fieldcollaborations. To effectively facilitate both multi- and intra-/trans disciplinary collaboration,engineers need to access and understand the grounded concepts from other fields to tacklecomplex challenges. For instance, construction engineers are now facing the challenge ofhighway, railroad, and infrastructure design in response to climate change risks. As such
at Buffalo. He is the Division Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) for the American Society of Engineering Education 2024 annual conference. His research interests include engineering and human-centered design, advancing research methods, and technology innovations to support learning in complex domains. He has a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Toward an Integrated Framework of Empathy for Users among Engineering Student DesignersIntroductionEmpathy refers to how one understands, feels with, or reacts to others [1–3]. In engineeringdesign, empathy manifests when a designer
[1], [2]. We have developed a junior-level Clinical Observations andNeeds Finding course as a pre-requisite to the Senior Design course. Our course is designated asa service-learning course, as it requires students to complete immersive, clinical visits with localhealthcare and industry partners. In a previous study, the efficiency of this course was evaluatedthrough pre—and post—course surveys that utilized Likert scale and open-ended questions. Itwas determined that the course was successful in increasing students’ self-efficacy as it relates tothe engineering design process, their ability to make connections with customers, and theirunderstanding of value creation. The field of biomedical engineering manifests demographics that are
online instruction [2]. However, this assumption of courseflexibility as a necessary characteristic of online education has recently been challenged asproblematic, and in fact prohibitive of an optimal learning experience [9]. For example,asynchronous learners often feel confused, requiring additional self-evaluation efforts to helpmitigate said confusion [1]. The identification of what synchronous elements matter most can helpinstructors to decide how to allocate their scarce time resources when designing and running onlinecourses, and help students to succeed at learning while avoiding lower-impact synchronousobligations in online coursework.Further, while online education has the potential to improve access to STEM learning forhistorically