Ph.D. in Educational Policy and Planning from UT Austin. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Role of STEM Society Scholarships in Supporting the Retention and Persistence of Women in Engineering and Computer ScienceIntroductionProgress and innovation in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fieldsrely heavily on their ability to promote gender equality in all aspects of society [1]. Althoughstrides have been made toward achieving gender equality, there remains a noticeable gap when itcomes to the representation of genders in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics) fields – women constitute less than 30% of the graduates in these fields [2
curriculum.STEM career access is, in part, mediated by issues of equity that Blustein [1] categorize asstructural, psychological, and relational barriers. Specific barriers include factors likeinstitutional racism, and therefore a lack of role models for learners of marginalized racial,ethnic, and linguistic groups, and the unequal distribution of STEM resources. To promoteinterest and future choices around STEM careers, afterschool and other informal educationprograms have become key access points for students who may face greater challenges inentering STEM career pathways. Individual, environmental (including social), and behavioralfactors each interact in ways that can promote interest and access to STEM learning and careeropportunities or can limit
stewarding the world’s natural resources in sustainable ways, glorifying God, and advancing human and ecosystem health. She considers civil and environmental engineering as a space for Christians to meet the physical needs of our neighbors while showing Christ to the world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Sustainability as Stewardship Framework: A Revision of the Engineering for One Planet Framework for an Existing Civil Engineering Program at a Christian InstitutionIntroductionThe Engineering for One Planet (EOP) Framework [1] was developed from 2017 to 2022 by theLemelson Foundation, VentureWell, Alula Consulting and hundreds of individual
is all part of this understanding that students must attain. This is why visualaids seemed to be a necessity to enhance learning in the classroom.MethodsInitially, a storyboard was created that expressed a simple but comprehensive storyline thatexplained the role of dislocations in the process of strain hardening. The purpose of this storyboardwas to organize the effort of animating and to make sure students can easily follow the mainstoryline and that it is closely linked to the content covered in the lectures. In addition to this, the Figure 1: Plan for the current and future of the projectstoryboard outlines the figures and animations that will need to be developed such that the projectis done comprehensively
. Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida Kent Crippen is a professor of STEM education in the school of teaching and learning at the University of Florida and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Towards A Survey Instrument For Use In Proactive Advising This paper focuses on developing a survey instrument to support proactive advisingstrategies based on data analysis. Proactive advising strategies aim to identify at-risk studentsearly, as these students often delay seeking support, and engage them effectively in the supportprocess[1]. An advising curriculum can be created to provide structure for the
graduation rates. Also, the findings holdthe potential to serve as a benchmark for other MSIs nationwide seeking support and tracking ofBlack transfer students in engineering to promote their educational attainment.IntroductionUpward transfer pathways, which facilitate students' movement from community colleges (CCs)to four-year colleges and universities, are of significant national importance [1]. In science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM) programs, the upward transfer pathways increaseSTEM graduates and the capacity of the workforce [2]. In particular, these pathways are pivotalfor 1) Broadening participation in engineering, 2) Increasing the number of future engineers, and3) Promoting educational equity and workforce development in the
an online format, and many students struggled in this environment. Mathematics was one of the subjects most affected by online learning. At a large R1 university in the mid-Atlantic region, more engineering students than ever before entered their first year, placing in Pre-Calculus instead of Calculus 1, and were classified as pre-math-ready. Being ‘math ready’ and placing into Calculus 1 is critical for engineering students due to the engineering curriculum's reliance on mathematics and the barriers related to the subject. This study shares the experiences of 15 first-year engineering students who were behind in math during the 2022-2023 academic year. Most participants were in their
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Understanding the Influence of a Week-Long Electrical and ComputerEngineering Summer Camp on Middle School Students’ Interests in STEM(RTP)AbstractStudent interest in engineering at the K-12 level has been shown to predict whether students ofall backgrounds pursue engineering as a college major and career [1],[2]. Middle school is acritical time when student interest, identity, and career choices begin to solidify. Scientists havedeveloped a framework based on social cognitive theory for understanding three factors that arecritical in career pathway development in late adolescence and early adulthood, namely, "(1)Formation and elaboration of career-relevant interests, (2) Selection of academic and
sustainability education and its implications for their academic andpersonal growth.The emergent themes, categorized broadly under Knowledge, Skills, Behaviors, and Attitudes(KSBA), underscore the program's transformative impact, highlighting its role in shapingstudents' awareness, growth, and aspirations related to sustainability. Moving forward, theseinsights can inform program enhancements and curriculum development efforts to enrichstudents' learning experiences further and empower them to become effective agents of positivechange in their communities and beyond.1. The University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez CampusFounded in 1911 to offer advanced study in Agricultural Sciences and Mechanical Arts, theUniversity of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus (UPRM) is
comprises the following steps: 1) Identifying the research question 2) Identifying relevant studies 3) Selecting studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria 4) Charting the data, extracting key findings, identifying recurring themes 5) Collating, summarizing, and reporting the resultsThe ultimate objective of this paper is to provide a clear and descriptive summaryof the existing knowledge related to the research question: “What is the currentliterature landscape regarding the experiences of Queer engineering students transitioning intothe workforce in the United States?"This paper delves into the tools and framework employed for the study andprovides an overview of the current literature landscape. Our ultimate
(Instron 3369 ID3369B13598) to gather data. This data was exported into an MS-Excel worksheet categorizingthe different plastics into Stress-Strain plots. We learned from our mentor that testing a singlesample is not sufficient, and that at least 5 were required whereby an average was then used togenerate the plots. The raw data from the tests were then exported into an Excel worksheet. Theaverage value from the 5 samples of each material were then used for plotting the correspondingstress strain curves. Figure 1 shows the stress-strain curves for the different 3D printed plastics,with and without CF. We used the theory covered in a course that we took on Materials Scienceand Engineering to obtain the material and mechanical properties of our
to selectedstudents. In addition to the scholarship funds, S-STEM programs offer additional activities andresources [1]-[4]. For example, Southern Methodist University provided their S-STEM studentswith weekly seminars and block scheduling which positively impacted the students and theirability to excel academically. While various academic and support resources are included in theimplementation of the S-STEM Program discussed here, this paper’s focus is the impact ofweekly lunches on our students.Student retention is typically influenced by feelings of self-efficacy and inclusion in engineeringspaces [5]-[6]. Reasons for attrition include classroom and academic climate, grades andconceptual understanding, self-efficacy and self-confidence
for training socially responsible engineers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Wellbeing of Graduate Engineering Students: A Systematic Review 1. IntroductionRecent studies show that students in graduate school often face difficulty in terms of their mentalhealth and wellbeing which affects the quality of their learning and experiences. In this regard,Evans et al [1] found that graduate students face mental health challenges at a rate six times higherthan the general population. This increased mental health crisis among graduate students is linkedto specific aspects of their academic journey, such as difficulties in managing time, unclear andunpredictable academic processes, a feeling of
engaged with course content.IntroductionAssessment is a cornerstone of the educational process, deriving from defined learning objectivesthat outline how students should engage with course material. The importance of assessment tolearning is underscored by the recognition that it serves as a guiding force for both educators andstudents. The clear definition of learning objectives, as discussed in the literature [1-2], aidsinstructors in selecting appropriate course content, planning lectures, designing assignments, andwriting tests. The relevance of assessment to engineering education is further highlighted by therole of accreditation, particularly through the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET). ABET, as detailed in the
individuals on a series of questions (Appendix B). A specific setdescribed questions related to social justice orientations. Students were then asked to identify towhat extent they agree with each statement (on an anchored scale from 1-7 where 1= stronglydisagree and 7= strongly agree) about each member of their traditional and chosen familiesaligned with these traits. This process was repeated for each member individually. We computedthe average score on each question across each student’s traditional and chosen families. We thenused Welch’s two-sample t-tests to identify differences between the two kinds of support groups.In that, each trait that we compare is an average score across the members of that respectivetraditional or chosen family. All
STUDENT RETENTION AND SATISFACTION IN COMPUTER SCIENCE SERVICE COURSES WHEN USING COMPETENCY-BASED GRADING AND ASSIGNMENT CHOICEAbstractEnrollment in introductory engineering courses, for non-Computer Science majors, often evokesapprehension, particularly when faced with the prospect of learning programming. The presenceof peers with prior coding experience can further compound these concerns. This study,applicable to a broad spectrum of engineering service courses, centers on student assignmentchoice within an undergraduate CS-1 curriculum. Guided by Self Determination Theory, weimplement assignment choice as a mechanism for students to chart a tailored path, selectingassignments aligned with course
specialization in Medical Imaging and Devices. Her research interests include broadening participation in engineering, engineering pedagogy, and developing career pathways for Bioengineering/Biomedical Engineering students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work In Progress: Barriers to Developing Computing Identity in Community College Introductory AI CoursesAs students from diverse backgrounds including different genders, races, socioeconomic status, and agespursue higher education to enter the computing field, community colleges act as a key point of entry totheir education [1], [2]. These programs allow students exposure and experiences relative to thecomputing field to
their instructional practices. The proposed toolkitwill promote potential shifts in educational enacted practices grounded in evidence-basedstrategies and student narratives.Faculty classroom teaching preparation in STEM fields, particularly within engineering, is oftenseverely lacking [1]. Due to the research-emphasis within many doctoral programs, faculty havelimited training as it relates to high impact teaching practices and fostering inclusive learningenvironments [2]. Once in the professoriate, faculty reward structures often prioritize researchproductivity over teaching, leaving little incentive for faculty to hone their instructional skills[3]. While a lack of effective teaching practices is problematic for all undergraduates, there
their first two major-specific CHE courses. To ensure that the department is equipping our graduates with theappropriate skills and knowledge to thrive in the modern workforce, we first approached thedepartmental change through the lens of curriculum revision.Over our long history, we have made curriculum changes to meet the changing landscape ofchemical engineering and student needs, although the last major curriculum revision for ourdepartment was in 2015. However, with the evolving accreditation requirements from ABET [1]and other institutional demands, our curriculum has become increasingly rigid and difficult toadapt to individual student needs and timelines. The inflexibility of the curriculum becameparticularly salient after we returned
trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Development of a Survey to Investigate Engineering Faculty Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) Practices in Graduate Research Group EnvironmentsIntroductionDiversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) challenges in engineering education are moreevident at the graduate level where racial and ethnic diversity remains particularly low, and PhDattrition rates are extremely high for students from marginalized backgrounds [1], [2].Comprehending how to influence the culture of engineering education to successfully educate adiverse student
, manufacturing, and engineering design. I ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Evaluating Entrepreneurial-minded Learning in Course- based Undergraduate Research ExperiencesIntroductionEngineering challenges are increasing in scope, scale, and complexity. Now, more than ever,future engineers must be equipped with the skills necessary to ensure solutions to thesechallenges are impactful and scalable across the various facets of society [1]. Scale and impactare the main epistemological tenets of entrepreneurially-minded learning (EML) [2], [3]. EMLrepresents a specific kind of applied learning where one understands and connects a societal needwith an engineering solution that
, and Applied Sciences launched in the Fall of2019, with the first students to receive financial support and SPECTRA-based programming inthe Spring of 2020. Since then, the SPECTRA program has provided financial support to nearlyone hundred undergraduate Scholars who are transfer students in the college. While the Scholars have consistently reported the SPECTRA program’s main sellingpoint is its monetary value, other evidence indicates that transfer scholars in STEM often havemyriad unmet needs beyond financial assistance [1]. Our research has shown this to be accurate;Scholars have demonstrated that their primary appreciation of the SPECTRA program camefrom a need for additional funding, but other aspects also contribute. Similar to
. Currently, MiguelAndres is working on a framework to support and conduct undergraduate research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Testing a Pedagogical method to Develop Collaborative Entrepreneurship Competences for Technical Majors Blanca Esthela Moscoso1, Miguel Andrés Guerra2*1 Associate Professor, Universidad Central del Ecuador UCE, Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas. Quito, Ecuador.2 Associate Professor, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Programa de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.* Correspondence: Blanca Esthela Moscoso, bemoscoso
Cutting Test When Sampling Engineering Statics Students’ Spatial AbilityIntroductionSpatial ability is broadly defined as a cognitive ability to mentally create, manipulate, and retainspatial information [1], [2]. More specifically, spatial ability can be defined by a number ofconstructs including common constructs such as mental rotation, visuospatial memory, cross-sectional visualization, and navigation. [3], [4]. Applications of spatial ability are wide rangingand the number of constructs has not been formally agreed upon [5]. In this work, we refer tospatial ability as a quantification of performance on one or more specific constructs of spatialthinking assessed through a spatial ability test. This work specifically discusses constructs
Fort Smith, Arkansas 3 Anindya Kishore Debnath1, Suman Kumar Mitra2 4 5 1. PhD Student, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas-72701, 6 Email: akdebnat@uark.edu 7 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, 4190 Bell Engineering 8 Center, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, Email: skmitra@uark.edu 910 1. INTRODUCTION11 Affordable-accessible housing for working families is increasingly scarce in the U.S., in12 particular for small and mid-sized cities in rural areas. As many small and mid-sized cities offer13 only limited public transportation options, low-income residents living in those areas may14 struggle to access jobs
broadening participation in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work In Progress: Development of a Taxonomy of Undergraduate Engineering Admissions Practices and ProtocolsIntroductionUndergraduate engineering admissions has a profound influence on engineering participation asthe entry point to higher education programs but has been largely unstudied and unquestioned.This is particularly concerning because engineering has been plagued by an imbalance inparticipation across demographics at every stage from higher education to industry [1].Significant research has examined this issue in the context of engineering classrooms [2], majors[3], and other institutional policies
Regression, Experimental Design, Program Evaluation, and Survey Methods. Page 19.14.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 1 Engineering Leadership Development Programs: Universities Respond to Critical Needs in the US and InternationallyIntroduction In a world where technological innovation continues to accelerate, engineers need tocontinuously evolve and improve, just like the new technology they are developing. The need forengineers to be effective leaders and
Educational PartnershipIntroduction:Over the last three decades, the internet has accelerated interconnectedness. From thisinterconnectedness, the appearance of the “micro-multinational” or small to medium-sizedcompany that operates internationally has become a major contender. Given the highlyinternational level of economic activity now seen1, engineering graduates will likely be calledupon to navigate effectively in the global economy.In response to economic needs, post-secondary institutions have begun to address ways thatglobal competency can be integrated into engineering programs. Five educational methods thatcan be used to help develop global competency are listed below: 1. International enrolment refers to the traditional student
Engineering Education’s (ASEE), Going theDistance report, 53.6% Hispanics, 61.4% Native Americans, 61.7% African Americans and 49%Female students who enter engineering programs do not graduate in this major.1 This translatesto an engineering workforce that comprise of about 6% Hispanics, 0.3% Native American, 4%African Americans and 13% females according to the latest National Science Foundation’sreport.2 With such high attrition rates among minorities and underrepresented groups, changingthe current engineering workforce’s diversity portfolio is of grave national importance andrequires a plethora of high impact approaches. In the aforementioned ASEE report, over 60strategies and best practices were proposed. High impact practices included first-year
American universitiesbrings a variety of benefits to those institutions including developing international ties, securingfinancial resources, adding diversity to the intellectual pool of students and fulfilling a shortageof engineering talent in the US [1]. However, competition for recruiting these students hasincreased in the past few years with Australia, the UK and Germany attracting a large number oftalented students [1]. Several approaches have been reported to ensure the number of internationalstudents on campuses does not decline [2], including collaborations, increased efforts inrecruitment, and commitment to new funding for marketing and program promotion [3]. These aregood strategies, however, according to Srivastava et al (2010) “there