the five hierarchical levels of the affective domain (seeTable 1 for details on hierarchical levels). Finally, participants were asked (Q11) which of thethree domains they preferred to learn with and why. It should be noted that this interview consistedof questions about all three domains, and the results were split into three papers to better emphasizethe findings related to each domain of learning. In this paper, we focus only on the affective domainof learning. Readers interested in understanding more about the research on cognitive andpsychomotor domain are directed to the other papers from this project [2-3].Q1: How do you perceive learning as a process?Learning is an integral part of our lives. Each one of us learns the same things
engineering and design work.Dr. Molly Y. Mollica, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Molly Y. Mollica (she/her) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). Dr. Mollica earned her B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Ohio State University (OSU), M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from OSU, and Ph.D. in bioengineering at the University of Washington. She also trained as a postdoctoral scholar-fellow at Bloodworks Northwest Research Institute. Molly’s wetlab research interests are at the intersection of engineering mechanics, mechanobiology, and health equity. Her educational research interests are in community-engaged learning, project-based
focus on social justice inengineering. In environmental sciences and engineering departments, such as those at Universityof California (UC), Berkeley and UC Davis, courses on engineering’s impact on the environmentare being developed. UC Berkeley has a course called “Engineering, Environment, and Society”where students read scholarly works on social justice, examine case studies for impact andinjustice, and work with community clients on projects developing solutions to environmentalissues that disproportionately affect members of historically marginalized groups [20], [21].Hendricks et. al., provided the structure and objectives for their course “Science and Engineeringfor Social Justice,” as a blueprint for other faculty. Their course is
Paper ID #38901Student-led program to improve equity in Ph.D. oral qualifying examsMeredith Leigh Hooper, California Institute of Technology This author was an equal first author contributor to this work. Meredith Hooper is an Aeronautics PhD student studying under Professor Mory Gharib in the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California Institute of Technology (GALCIT). Meredith is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, leader within the GALCIT Graduate Student Council, and Co-Director of the Caltech Project for Effective Teaching (CPET). Her PhD research uses a combination of machine learning and
took in Fall 2022 and additional dialogues with Asian and Asian-American Studies scholars. Jerry identifies as a gay East Asian-American cisgender man andengineering PhD student whose engineering education research centers on the intersections ofengineering and social justice. In developing this work, Jerry, drew on his experiences as anengineering student and personal conversations with other Asian-American engineering studentsto further sharpen the theory. antonio engages this project as a Filipino American man, highereducation scholar, and formally-educated and formerly-practicing engineer. antonio’sperspectives are derived from those identities and experiences. Sheri engages this project as awhite female academic whose is formally educated
article is to bring students’ viewpoints to the forefront in order to initiate aconversation with other entities, which will aid in the future in the construction of a “cultureof wellness” [29-30] for all.4.5 PositionalityThe first author is a cis-female international graduate student from a South Asian countrystudying in the College of Engineering. She has been working on this project for the past fewmonths, intending to increase awareness of the university and the support programs andservices. As an overseas student, she is unfamiliar with the university system, which has ledher to learn more about university support from engineering students, whom she consideredexperts in this issue. This intent likely contributed to establishing rapport and a
&M University. He is also the Assistant Lab Director at the Sketch Recognition Lab.Dr. Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University Dr. Thomas is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineer- ing at Texas A&M University. She is a member of the Engineering Education Faculty in the Institute for Engineering Education & Innovation at Texas A&M. She enjoys project-based learning and incorporat- ing active learning techniques in all her courses. She received her Ph.D. from Texas A&M University in 2010, focusing on developing robotic motion planning algorithms and applying them to computational biology problems including protein folding. She continued this work as
Colorado Springs Valerie Martin Conley is dean of the College of Education and professor of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She previously served as director of the Center for Higher Education, professor, and department chair at Ohio University. She was the PI for the NSF funded research project: Academic Career Success in Science and Engineering-Related Fields for Female Faculty at Public Two-Year Institutions. She is co-author of The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American Academy in a Turbulent Era.Dr. Clayton J. Clark II, Florida A&M University Dr. Clayton J. Clark II is a Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Florida Agricultural &
engineers are mostly likely tohave this attitude in the results section.MethodsThis section describes our process for classifying engineers according to their acculturationattitudes, as determined by their acculturation preferences, and exploring differences in theseattitudes based on their personal and job characteristics.Participants: Data for this study was collected as part of a larger research project administered inFall 2019 [46]. Nearly twelve thousand alumni who earned engineering degrees from a large,public university in the southwestern U.S. within the past 15 years were invited to participate inan online survey via an initial invitation email and two reminder emails sent over the course of atwo-week period. All participants had the
Berkeley’s public science center, where she evaluated STEM education programs for all ages. Several studies focused on expanding diversity, access, and inclusion in pre-college engineering education, with attention to changes in participants’ skills, attitudes, and career interests. She earned her B.A. in Anthropology with a minor in Education from UC Berkeley and an M.A. in Museum Studies: Specialization in Education and Interpretation from John F. Kennedy University. Her Master’s Project focused on culturally responsive evaluation practices.Ms. Gennie Miranda, UC San Diego Gennie B. Miranda serves as the Director of Operations in the IDEA Engineering Student Center, Jacobs School of Engineering at UC San Diego, with
. Fast forward through coast-to-coast moves to Boston, San Diego and finally Rochester, Kathy spent many years in the fitness industry while raising her daughter, wearing every hat from personal trainer and cycling instructor to owner and director of Cycledelic Indoor Cycling Studio. Kathy draws upon these many diverse career and life experiences while directing WE@RIT. In the spring of 2020, Kathy earned her Master of Science degree in Program Design, Analysis & Manage- ment through RIT’s School of Individualized Study, combining concentrations in Project Management, Analytics and Research, & Group Leadership and Development. An unabashed introvert, Kathy enjoys reading and spending time with her family
York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and
education and his areas of research include en- gineering design thinking, adult learning cognition, engineering education professional development and technical training. He is currently working on National Science Foundation funded projects exploring en- gineering design systems thinking and several GEAR UP STARS projects funded by the US Department of Education. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering education projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Department of Labor, USAID. Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Egypt, Macedo- nia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. American
me when I assign tasks for everyone to do, despite the fact I was elected teamleader. These are personal obstacles because there is nothing [that] I can do about them as afemale.” In this instance, the participant did not know how to change others’ behaviors in orderto fight a norm that women are undervalued in engineering.Avoiding. A few participants (n = 4) avoided HC. Minoritized women were slightly more likelyto use this strategy than majority women (4% vs 1%). A Hispanic/Latina industrial engineeringundergrad stated that she had “problems with team members due to lack of communication andrespect,” which she overcame “by analyzing if the team is a [good] fit for myself and doing abetter judgment for other teamwork projects.” The
Paper ID #34921Women Electrical Engineering Faculty: How do they Experience EEDepartment Climate and Promotion and Tenure?Dr. Dawn M. Maynen, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Dawn Maynen is the Project Coordinator/ Research Analyst for the Pennsylvania State Piazza Center for Fraternity and Sorority Research. She is responsible for client interaction, survey administration, data analysis and reporting of projects. Dawn is part of the Piazza Center research team responsible for mul- tiple publications and conference presentations. Dawn has a Ph.D. in Higher Education/ Student Affairs from Indiana University-Bloomington
personal experience for me to sharewith my students, which I did, and it had a very positive effect. I think the man who originallyasked the question even sent her a thank you note for taking the time to give such a thoroughresponse.Sometimes, somebody will say to me, or near-enough that I can hear, a comment which impliesthat women are differently-abled and that this explains some feature of their presence (or lackthereof) in engineering. for example, "women in the software engineering class tend to pickprojects that involve helping people because they're more nurturing than the men". "oh, I don'tknow Guy, don't you think they pick projects the same way most students do: which one will bethe easiest or most interesting?" (Guy is a generic
our knowledge-making in lived experience, dialogue, an ethic ofcaring, and personal accountability. It is tempting, of course, to design a large-scale study toaffirm, complicate, or deny the realities of our discussion here. And perhaps we will. Yet to doso would be to embrace an epistemological foundation that fails to serve this project well. Wework instead to answer a question: What kinds of foundational knowledge or interactions cansupport enduring relationships between Black women and white women? Or, what kinds ofrelationships are needed for Black and white women’s relationships to survive intersectingsystems of oppression?Allies --> Advocates --> AccomplicesAs might be obvious given our contemporary moment, the issues we’re
in Mathematics from International Christian University in Tokyo, Japan.Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. She works on the evaluation of several projects aimed at improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. She also conducts research on the social- psychological and institutional forces that contribute to the persistence of race and class inequalities in the United States. Emily earned a PhD and MA in Sociology from the University of Washington, and a BA in Sociology from Smith College.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington
drawings for fire alarm and automatic sprinkler systems, as well as construction design documents including fire protection reports, code equivalencies, and general code consulting for many projects across the nation and abroad. Additionally, she has valuable technical knowledge in smoke control analysis including the commissioning of smoke control systems. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Engineering Student Perceptions of their Generic Skills Competency: An Analysis of Differences Amongst Demographics Oklahoma State UniversityAbstract Assessment and accreditation are an important aspect in
instructors have been shown to support greaterengagement, feeling of connected and belongingness to a part of the community, and enhancepersistence rates [12][13-14]. Finally, research also shows that student demographic characteristicssuch as age, gender, ethnicity, etc. have influenced students’ success in online courses [8][15-18].This study is a part of a larger NSF-funded project studying the persistence of students in onlineundergraduate engineering courses [19]. The Model for Online Course-Level Persistence inEngineering (MOCPE) framework, posited by this project, includes factors related to coursecharacteristics and individual characteristics [20]. Lee, et al. (2020) gives a complete treatment ofthe framework [20]. In this paper, we study the
, University of Virginia Sarah Lilly is a PhD student in the Department of Curriculum, Instruction and Special Education at the University of Virginia. She holds a B.S. in Mathematics and English and an M.A.Ed. in Secondary Educa- tion from The College of William and Mary. Her research centers on STEM education, particularly using qualitative methods to understand the integration of math and science concepts with computational mod- eling and engineering design practices in technology-enhanced learning environments. Prior to beginning doctoral work, she taught secondary mathematics for four years as well as created and implemented an interdisciplinary, project-based mathematics, science, and principles-of-technology
to discuss “which courses they were going to be taking” and“possibly share class notes and were planning to work together on group projects”. Students hadacquired a sense of belonging and were more motivated to continue to be enrolled in engineeringcourses. One key aspect was that students were highly interested in conducting research which inturn they had already contacted some of the faculty members by the beginning of week one ofthe fall quarter. One student stated, “he allowed me to join his research even though I wasn'tofficially settled into school yet”. It appeared that their motivation level had seen an increasefrom when they initially attended the one-week program in comparison to their first week ofbeing enrolled at a four-year
), Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. Prior to attending ASU, Dr. ElZomor received a master’s of science degree in Architecture from University of Arizona, a master’s degree in Engineering and a bachelor of science in Construction Engineering from American University in Cairo. Dr. ElZomor moved to FIU from State University of New York, where he was an Assistant Professor at the college of Environmental Science and Forestry. Mohamed’s work focuses on Sustainability of the Built Environment, Engineering Education, Construc- tion Engineering, Energy Efficiency Measures and Modeling, Project Management, and Infrastructure Resilience. Dr. ElZomor has extensive professional project management experience as well as a
students perceived significantly more career barriers thanmen [46]. Women serving as role models might provide a more balanced view of the field andhelp in forming a realistic perception for students about engineering and careers in the field.Impact of Role Models and Perception of Female Students Studies were conducted to determine the impact of female role models’ visits to highschools and integrated science classes where female students were enrolled. The visits by femalerole models raised awareness about career options and possibilities for female students. At thatage, projecting themselves into a long-term career path may be very difficult for students. It maybe that female students need long term mentoring by female role models [47
ESL courses at Mada Walabu University for over seven years, where he also served the university assum- ing various positions such as being Quality Assurance Director, Teachers Development Leader, Pedagogy Trainer as well as English Language Center Coordinator. Atota was also a principal investigator of the project entitled ”Engendering Higher Education Curricula”, where he, along with four project members, investigated gender issues in higher education and devised comprehensive interventions in the form of training for students, academic, support and administrative staff as well as by writing guidelines for the university. Atota is interested in working to ensure equity and quality in higher education, particularly for
students to face the future, but practicing these topicswill give students a confidence to face the challenges that will occur on the road to graduationand after. For instance, Business Understanding is essential for a student to function in theindustry environment. How do companies operate? What is the role of engineering in acompany? What career paths are available? How would an advanced degree help or hurt mycareer? Is an advanced technical degree or a Masters of Business Administration appropriate?The answers depend on the career aspirations as often engineers become project managers in acompany. Understanding how a company operates will also help when new technologies areintroduced. Recognizing the impact of the technology on the work of the
, international accreditation will provide global mobility for many technical graduates from all over the world. ABET accreditation will increase the professional opportunities of graduates from ABET-accredited programs as they pursue employment, education, licensure and certification, and other opportunities at home and abroad (2).19We might note that this rhetoric, found in ABET’s 2008 annual report, has the tenor of acolonialist project, in promoting U.S. educational standards within a global arena.Indeed, from the standpoint of governance, ABET’s international expansion raises questionsabout representation and fairness. While foreign universities have begun to adopt ABET’s EC2000, ABET’s volunteer workforce has not yet
Paper ID #17782Scientists for Tomorrow - A Self-Sustained Initiative to Promote STEM inOut-of-School Time Frameworks in Under-served Community-Based Orga-nizations: Evaluation and Lessons LearnedMr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Chicago Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the outreach programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for To- morrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM
Paper ID #17900Specific, Generic Performance Indicators and Their Rubrics for the Compre-hensive Measurement of ABET Student OutcomesMr. Wajid Hussain, Wajid Hussain is an enthusiastic, productive Electrical/Computer Engineer with a Master of Science De- gree coupled with more than 15 years Engineering experience and Mass Production expertise of Billion Dollar Microprocessor Manufacture Life Cycle. Over the years Wajid has managed several projects related to streamlining operations with utilization of state of the art technology and digital systems. This has given him significant experience working with ISO standard