, focusing specifically on the role of race and racism in shaping access to andparticipation in team-based learning opportunities. While the broader study includes 29participants, this paper centers the perspectives of these eight students to provide a detailed,contextually rich analysis of their experiences at this critical stage in their engineering education.Participants reflect the multifaceted nature of Blackness, shaped by distinct personal, academic,cultural, and linguistic backgrounds, as well as diverse career aspirations. Their perspectiveshighlight both shared and divergent experiences, emphasizing the importance of a nuancedapproach to understanding how racial identity influences teamwork dynamics. Thus, thisresearch was guided by the
Engineering, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland. Pelumi got his BSc and MSc degree in Physics from Obafemi Awolowo University, where he also served as a research assistant at the Environmental Pollution Research unit, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. As part of his contribution to science and engineering, Pelumi has taught as a teaching assistant both at Morgan State University and Obafemi Awolowo University. With passion to communicate research findings and gleaned from experts in the field as he advances his career, Olaitan has attended several in-persons and virtual conferences and workshop, and at some of them, made presentation on findings on air pollution, waste water reuse, and heavy metal contamination.Dr. Oludare
Paper ID #48812WIP - UDL in STEM Higher Education: A Synthesis Literature ReviewAutumn Cuellar, Utah State University Autumn Cuellar is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education. Her undergraduate and master’s careers were both in Computer Science. She believes that everyone can achieve their goals, regardless of physical ability. This is why Autumn strives to make engineering accessible for everyone.Dr. Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor at Utah State University who leverages mixed-methods research to explore neurodiversity and identity and motivation
in Architectural Acoustics from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and a PhD in Education (Curriculum and Instruction) from the University of Maryland. Prior to his academic career, Stephen was an acoustical consultant for 5 years. His education research has focused on culture and equity in engineering education, particularly undergraduate contexts, pedagogy, and student support. Through his work he aims to use critical qualitative, video-based, participatory, and ethnographic methods to look at everyday educational settings in engineering and shift them towards equity and inclusion. He also leads the Equity Research Group where he mentors graduate and undergraduate students in pursuing critical and action-oriented
. Möhring, and J. Váncza, “Artificial Intelligence in manufacturing: State of the art, perspectives, and future directions,” CIRP Annals, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 723–749, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.101.[8] S. J. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Pearson, 2016.[9] L. Da Xu and L. Duan, “Big data for cyber physical systems in industry 4.0: a survey,” Enterp Inf Syst, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 148–169, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1080/17517575.2018.1442934.[10] Z. Slimi, “Systematic Review: AI’s Impact on Higher Education - Learning, Teaching, and Career Opportunities,” Tem Journal, 2023, doi: 10.18421/tem123-44.[11] A. T. Capinding, “Development and Validation of Instruments for Assessing the
can succeed in aSTEM career (mean = 4.45, SD = 1.63). These findings suggest that while students may feelneutral about their social connections within the classroom, they do perceive a positive impact ontheir overall academic engagement and motivation when they feel included and supported withinthe academic community.9Table 3- Sense of Belonging Measures Peer Panel A Support Std. Variables Observation Mean Min Max Dev. Peer Help
homeless fishing to develop career skills for the area’s large fishing industry, and classrooms for developing understanding of ecosystems and conservation. The makerspace is an industrial kitchen that will be used to cook caught fish. 3 Shelter for runaway kids in Seattle, WA in a waterfront area surrounded by gardens and farmlands 4 Provide the homeless with shelter and amenities and a venue for meetings and classes. The design contained a makerspace (for learning) with an accessible green roof, a dormitory building with restrooms, and a building with laundry, kitchen, and
communitycontinues to discuss what qualifies as “rigorous” qualitative research. Qualitative methods can bemet with dismissiveness, perceived as less valid data sources than quantitative approaches. Somebelieve qualitative methods are by definition subjective and biased and therefore less useful thanquantitative methods, yet that is not the interpretation I learned in my nontraditional career pathstudying with Indi Young in her advanced training and Tom Tullis on the job at FidelityInvestments. Bias infers a partialness or a singular belief. Subjective refers to data rooted in oneperson’s experience or interpretation of events. The criteria for qualitative methods outlined inMiles and Huberman’s Evaluative Criteria [2] include, as noted by the Robert Woods
K.A. Searle, “Using veteran critical theory to understand the experiences of student veterans: The role of buddies and camaraderie along the road of higher education,” J College Stud Dev, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 292–308, May 2023, doi: 10.1353/csd.2023.a901170.[21] A. Eggleston, R. Rabb, R. Welch, C. Mobley, “The Veteran, the Myth, the Legend: Preparing for Engineering Curriculum and Career,” Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Baltimore, MD, June 25-28, 2023.[22] A. Eggleston, A. Minichiello, A. Miles, H. Wilkinson, S. Shaw, R. Rabb, J. Dahlberg, B. Crawford, O. Barton, M. Sheppard, “Transition to the Civilian Workforce: Themes and Lessons from Military Service and
to pursue engineering as a future career more so than non-First-Generation students. Items D and P in Table 5 represent the “Positive” and “Negative” elements of the Social Capital dimension. Item D prompted respondents about their having a group of older working professional friends who offer them advice about challenges in engineering while Item P prompted respondents about their having a sense of being on their own when it comes to their engineering pursuits. Table 6. Item analysis between White Students (n = 47) and Students of Color (n = 26). Italicized items and means have been negated; and italicized, bolded font indicates a result with statistical significance. White Students Students of
Past President and Wise Woman of the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language, and Gender. She has received career achievement awards from ICA, NCA, the Central States Communication Association, and Purdue University where she was a Distinguished University Professor in communication and engineer- ing education (by courtesy) and Endowed Chair and Director of the Susan Bulkeley Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. Her primary research areas are organizational communication, career, work-life, resilience, feminist/gender, and design. Her grants have focused on ethics, institutional transformation, and diversity-equity-inclusion-belongingness in the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Sean M
Paper ID #33385Teaching an Immersive Experiential Introductory Biomedical EngineeringCourse in the Land of Covid (AKA: An Old Dog Has to Learn New Tricks)Dr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University IEEE Life Fellow, AIMBE Founding Fellow, U.N.E.S.C.O. Academician. Director, Center for Rehabilita- tion Engineering, Science, and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. (Retired) Senior Rehab Research Career Scientist, VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical
in shifting student bias towards inclusion in the three interventions. The mostpromising approach is student-led, where senior students worked to change the student culturedirectly.Introduction and BackgroundImproving diversity in STEM fields is an important goal and has been widely studied. It is well-known that students and professionals in STEM careers in the USA do not reflect the generalpopulation of the country [1]. For example, white men make up 31.6% of the general populationwhile they make up 51% of scientists and engineers. Black men make up 6% of the populationand 3% of the STEM workforce. The percentage of non-white and non-Asian people in the USAis 31.3% while the percentage of this sub-population working in STEM is just 12%. In
. [45]–[48]Engineering is Advances in knowledge are so rapid that even the [2], [3], [24],constantly evolving. fundamentals of engineering are no longer fixed. [41], [45]–[48] Engineers need to continue learning throughout their careers to keep up with changes in technologies and the contexts in which they are used.Engineering is about Engineers solve complex problems by synthesizing [2], [3], [9],synthesizing and information and approaches from STEM and non- [24], [41]–[49]integrating knowledge. STEM disciplines.Engineering makes the The goal of making the world better for all people [2], [3], [41],world a better
and/or in- crease energy saving behaviors. Dr. Lang’s current research interests focus on identifying, assessing, and developing key skills, knowledge, attitudes, and other intrinsic and extrinsic factors required for engineers to effectively lead others, particularly other engineers and across cultures.Dr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Meg Handley is currently the Associate Director for Engineering Leadership Outreach at Penn State University. Previously, Meg served as the Director of the Career & Corporate Connection’s office at the Smeal College of Business at Penn State University. Meg completed her PhD in Workforce Education at Penn State, where she focused on interpersonal
Paper ID #21233But How Do You Feel?Mr. Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College Werner Zorman is the Associate Professor and Annenberg Chair of Leadership at Harvey Mudd Col- lege. Before he joined Harvey Mudd, he was the Associate Director of Leadership Programs at Cornell’s College of Engineering from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Zorman received his M.S. degree in computer science from the University of Technology in Vienna. He worked for 23+ years in the telecom industry in Europe and North America as engineer, leader, mentor, coach and leadership development professional. After a long and fulfilling customer-facing career, Mr
co-directs Project EPIC, an NSF-funded project since 2009 that investigates how members of the public make use of social media during times of mass emergency. Professor Anderson leads the design and implementation of a large-scale data collection and analysis system for that project. Prof. Anderson was a participant in the first cohort of the NCWIT Pacesetters program, a program de- signed to recruit more women to the field of computer science and encourage them to pursue their careers in technology. As part of his Pacesetters efforts, Prof. Anderson led the charge to create a new BA in CS degree at CU that allows students in Arts and Sciences to earn a degree in computer science. This new degree program
of empathy within design, innovation and sustainability; synthesizing the influence of societal and individual worldviews on decision-making; assessing STEM students’ learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability; and exploring the impact of pre-engineering curriculum on students’ abilities and career trajectories.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research
earning1.” (p.34)Learning communities help students make the sometime difficult transition from high school tocollege. By the 1990’s, universities across the country were experimenting with various types oflearning communities. The learning communities including residential communities can all varywidely in structure and involvement with faculty and staff. Alexander Astin5 defined learningcommunities as: Such communities can be organized along curricular lines, common career interests, avocational interests, residential living areas, and so on. These can be used to build a sense of group identity, cohesiveness, and uniqueness; to encourage continuity and the integration of diverse curricular and co-curricular
continuing effort to assess the degree to which a particulareducational intervention (see description of the ASCEND program below) can be successful inenabling participants to practice and demonstrate STEM-linked abilities applicable to careers insustainable design and development for the emerging green-tech economy. An initial review ofdata collected during a two-year pilot quickly led to the realization that attempts to evaluate theeffectiveness of the intervention and assess learning outcomes would be limited by the kinds ofinstruments readily available. Instruments including exit-interviews and surveys that rely onretrospective participant “self-report” data can be helpful for evaluating changes in participants’assumptions, attitudes
education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), student preparation for post-graduation careers, and innovations in research-to-practice.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Dr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is a Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the Univer- sity of Washington. She is
(B.S.) in civil engineering from the University of Costa Rica. Dr. Rojas is also a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Michigan. Throughout his academic career, Dr. Rojas has led numerous research studies in modeling, simulation, and visualization of construction engineering and management processes; engineering education; and construction economics. He has served as prin- cipal investigator or co-principal investigator in more than 20 different projects. These studies have been sponsored by government agencies and private sector organizations such as the National Science Founda- tion, the U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Army, the KERN Foundation, the Construction Industry Institute, the New
, elementary, and middle school curriculum and teacher professional development. Her recent book, Engineering in Elementary STEM Education, describes what she has learned. Cunningham has previously served as director of en- gineering education research at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Educational Outreach, where her work focused on integrating engineering with science, technology, and math in professional devel- opment for K-12 teachers. She also directed the Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) project, the first national, longitudinal, large-scale study of the factors that support young women pursu- ing engineering degrees. At Cornell University, where she began her career, she created
Paper ID #42151Accountability, Ownership, and Satisfaction: An Innovative Approach toTeamwork in Engineering EducationSydney Kropp, University of OklahomaDr. Doyle Dodd, University of Oklahoma Industrial & Systems Engineering Capstone Coordinator ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Accountability, Ownership, and Satisfaction: An Innovative Approach to Teamwork in Engineering Education Abstract Teamwork skills are essential for engineers to be successful in their careers. Engineersoften work in teams to solve complex problems. Unfortunately
higher education research. The types of transitions include Transition as Induction (T1), Transition as Development (T2), and Transition as Becoming (T3). 1, Transition as Induction, describes the pathway that students take by moving into higherTeducation. This often describes the transition from high school to college, but other circumstances could be considered. Students who experience this type of transition must navigate the structures, systems, and policies of the institution. From here on out, this will be referred to as “Transition to the University.” T2, Transition as Development, describes students' life stage and their transformation from one identity to another (i.e., major, career, etc.). Students who
global challenges requires collaborationbetween diverse individuals. However, STEM careers remain inaccessible to individuals withdisabilities, who make up 29% of the U.S. population but account for only 3% of employedscientists and engineers [2], [3]. Unequal access to and satisfaction in STEM jobs for disabledpeople are worse for those also holding intersecting minoritized identities such as gender, race,ethnicity, and LGBTQ+ status when compared to white, non-disabled, heterosexual men [4].Inequalities in access to STEM jobs can be caused by systemic barriers–such as the absenceof accessible facilities and curriculum adaptations, and the presence of societal biases–thatexclude people with disabilities from training needed for STEM fields [5