innovative teaching and learning practices derive directly from the outcomes assessment plan that he helped devise and implement as ABET Coordinator. Address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad del Turabo, PO Box 3030, Gurabo, Puerto Rico, 00778. Tel. 787-743-7979 x 4182 E-mail: jcmorales@suagm.eduDr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student misconceptions and how to increase the adoption of research- based instructional strategies by college instructors
Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He
robot to be used in the class Planning and project status. The project involves the manufacturing floor simulation. Program Development – construction and programming of robots robot using LabVIEW. Report out weekly Freshman, Fall to simulate a manufacturing floor. via oral presentations and at project end via a technical memo. EASC 1112: Methods 3 technical memos reporting on projects Calculate hydrogen storage and flow for a of Engineering done in course. Projects involve fuel cell powered vehicle. Analysis – Freshman, developing a computer solution for an Design optimal pipe
fabrication of the Berkut UAV for Geneva Aerospace, and engine fairings for the U.S. Army. He was the test conductor during the UltraLight Sensor Platform project, which was a research initiative to develop an ultralight sensor platform by creating an optionally-piloted aircraft system. As test conductor he wrote the flight test plans, flight test cards, and supervised the flight test team during test missions. He advises the Student UAS Team. He teaches the capstone aircraft design course, aircraft flight dynamics, and aircraft advanced performance. He has since left Raspet and transitioned to the aerospace engineering department. He is also developing the unmanned aircraft system engineering curriculum
was addressed by adding morecontextualized problems to the homework sets. In addition, having an extra year to plan and gaininsight helped improve integration. Although analysis of the data from Fall 2015 has not beencompleted at the time of this writing, our hope is that the problem of students not recognizing therelevance of social justice will have been addressed through these and other improvements.After the conclusion of the Fall 2014 semester and completion of the analysis, the lead instructorwrote the following remarks about the experience: “I think my biggest takeaways from this initial integration are (1) that it is more time- consuming than I ever expected, and (2) that I am more bothered by a small number of nay- sayers than
interest in engineering; 86% reported moderate to greatgain in confidence that they understand the material; and 83% indicated moderate to great gain inunderstanding how engineering helps people address real world issues. Figure 2 provides asummary of responses to the questions related to student affect.Class impact on your attitudes 3. As a result of your work in this class, what GAINS DID no gains a little gain moderate gain good gain great gain not applicable YOU MAKE in the following? 3.1 Enthusiasm for the subject 3.2 Interest in discussing the subject area with friends or family 3.3 Interest in taking or planning to take additional classes in this subject 3.4 Confidence that you understand the material 3.5 Willingness to seek help from
), the process (the activities and work done to create the product), and softwareengineering management (“planning, coordinating, measuring, monitoring, controlling, and reportingactivities to ensure that software products and software engineering services are delivered efficiently,effectively, and to the benefit of stakeholders”, SWEBOKv3, 7-1). Performance assessment falls withinthe area of software engineering management (SWEBOKv3, 7-9). To relate the idea that softwareengineering includes assessment of the product, process, and performance to education, we consider thelearning objectives for a course to be the product, the teaching techniques employed as the process, andthe individual student’s learning to be performance.In both disciplines
train teachers on how to encourage students, especially girls and minorities incomputer science and engineering education has been noted9. In addition, financial support wasproven to play a large role at student success related with participation in robotic teams10.FIRST robotics is one of the most expensive competitions. Therefore, there is a need for studentsto develop computer skills for writing fundraising presentations, trip and team budgets, andbusiness plans as they search for sponsors to fund their team’s needs. Many Title I students areunable to accomplish these tasks without mentors that can provide the support and answertechnical questions as they arise.The objective of this study is to find how robotics and the participation in
3.67 5. I felt comfortable asking questions or getting help during the Math Review Sessions 4.28 6. I plan to continue using academic support services (such as SI, Math Lab or STEM Lab) for the Math Course I’m currently taking 4.41 7. My Math skills improved during this time due to the evening Math Review Sessions 3.64 8. My Math skills improved during this time
sophomore level. Our major renovation to this class is engaging students in asemester-long group project, which includes formal presentations, research, team work andmultiple active learning exercises. The semester-long group project consists of four phases:communication and planning, modeling, construction, and deployment. Through the four phases,students gradually gain communication, ethics, and teamwork professional skills. Comparisonamong data collected from the four phases show significant improvements of the students’professional skills, particularly presentation skills and teamwork skills.ABET student outcomes and performance indicators ABET student outcomes describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by thetime of
andcreeds. This paper reports on our progress to date and our plans for future studies.IntroductionA core principle of the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) holds that theknowledge and skills possessed by an engineer are to be used to the advancement and benefit ofhuman welfare 1 . The Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) has adopted themission of fostering “technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of humanity” 2 . Mostengineering programs concentrate on the development of knowledge and skills, with littleemphasis on how those skills will be applied to benefit humanity. Some critics of the codes and ∗ eljacobs@memphis..educreedal statements of engineering’s professional societies have even
the knowledge and tools necessary for being successful in this course. 5 Work effectively as a member of a team. Teamwork 6 Use written, oral, and graphical communication to convey methods, results, and Communication conclusions. 7 Demonstrate a capacity for self-directed, lifelong learning, including goal Lifelong Learning setting, decision-making, project planning, resource discovery and evaluation, personal development (autonomy, self-motivation, self-confidence, self- reflection). 8 Develop and apply attitudes and skills for creativity within the context of Creativity materials science and engineering. 9 Develop
procedures for quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis, as wellas some possible limitations to our approach. We additionally discuss the novel, ambitious, andcomparative nature of this project given that its collaborators and research subjects are drawnfrom four U.S. engineering schools, and we review our progress to date and plans for bringingthe project to completion over a five-year timeline. This paper will likely be of particular interestto scholars who teach and/or research engineering ethics, social responsibility, and allied topics.Social and Ethical ResponsibilityOur project is focused on social and ethical responsibility, broadly construed, and primarily inthe context of engineering education and professional practice. On
review at that stage. Thetext in the lower half of each box indicates the topics they should discuss at that stage. Forexample, Figure 3 depicts that the building’s primary materials (e.g., steel, concrete, masonry orwood) should be discussed during the concept design because some materials have higher risksthan others.9 It is also important that opportunities for prefabrication be discussed during theconcept and 30% design phases because prefabrication typically reduces site injuries28 but ismore difficult to achieve if not enabled by the detailed drawings and technical specifications.Figure 3 therefore provides educators with an example of how effective collaboration duringdesign often requires an intentional and planned process that is goal
was illustrated through in-class entrepreneurship simulation. The complexityinvolved in entrepreneurial activities in academic setting requires an equally complex set ofactivities to facilitate the acquisition and understanding of the requisite entrepreneurial abilities(Robinson and Malach, 2004). In his work, Drummond (2012), linked team-based learning and 9critical thinking skills to effective entrepreneurship education while Gibbs (2002) categorizedvarious forms of experiential education as case analysis and writing in-class and out of classexercises and simulation, projects, interviews, business plan writing, consulting, among
of mechatronics and computer aided engi- neering. Her research Interests are: mechatronics,digital manufacturing, product lifecycle management, manufacturing systems, and engineering education.Megan Mize, Old Dominion University Megan Mize is currently a Doctoral Candidate in English Studies at Old Dominion University, pursu- ing the Literary/Cultural Studies and Rhetoric concentrations. Her dissertation, Constructing an Early Modern Queen: Gender, Authority, and the Rhetoric of Identity, explores the intersection of the history of female educational models and mimicry as a rhetorical strategy for Elizabeth I. As a Special Projects Graduate Research Assistant, she has served on the Quality Enhancement Planning
act as a bootloader and memory controller,loading old proprietary software onto the Zilog. The group did not anticipate how much effortwould be required for this project, and ultimately failed budget enough time. In the future, I planto take two steps to rectify the problem. First, I will work with students interested in reverseengineering a system to ensure that they understand how difficult such tasks can be. I also plan toinstantiate weekly in-class chats with each group to track progress and ensure that groups aresticking to a realistic project schedule.The other problem came up is that while several groups chose projects involving image andvideo processing, the process to read in video through the Zybo’s HDMI port proved moredifficult
the role of engineer starters’ early academic experiences,including participation in project-based courses, on retention. Future work will broaden bothpredictors and outcomes. In particular, we plan to assess engineer starters’ attitude toward STEM(e.g., interest, self-concept, self-efficacy) and academic performance and retention. Future workwill include pre-tests and post-tests to control for pre-existing differences in attitude and interestby course enrollment. We will also examine the impact of other early academic experiences onretention, including research experiences and participation in other courses with hands-onlearning components.IntroductionIn order to remain competitive in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM
. Many of the university’s STEMdegree programs, including seven engineering programs, computer science, and chemistry, arehoused within the College of Engineering, Mathematics and Science (EMS), which has anenrollment of approximately 2,700 students.In 2013, with a desire to improve retention and persistence of students in the college, aninterdisciplinary team of faculty and staff obtained a National Science Foundation STEM TalentExpansion Program grant. The primary purpose of the grant is to increase undergraduate studentengagement and to plan, market, and advance programs that support recruitment and retentionefforts in STEM with special efforts toward women and underrepresented student populations.As part of achieving this purpose, a study
use a software interface that wouldsolve the problem in real time as the instructor speaks and not just highlight the content while thevideo progresses. Equations needed little more attention and explanation. Overall, the short videoshelped students in this pilot study not only to prepare for the final exam but also to learn at theirown pace and understand key concepts of Statics. We plan to address these challenges in the futureresearch.Student Evaluations for Fall 2015Figure 6 shows student evaluations (scale 1 to 5; rescaled to compare different averages) for theinstructor of ENGR 2110 for the Fall 2015 semester. Generally, the instructor is evaluated bystudents based on following categories: (i) Presentation Ability, (ii) Organization and
empirical evidence of the effectiveness of games as learning environments[7-9], and thelack of literature on how to design, develop, and implement effective games for learning. In2006, NSF organized a National Summit on Educational Games with the specific objective ofdiscussing “ways to accelerate the development, commercialization, and deployment of newgeneration games for learning” [9]. Among reasons cited for the U.S. need to focus on digitalgames for learning, is that video games “require players to master skills in demand by today’semployers” (p. 4) – strategic and analytical thinking, problem solving, planning and execution,decision-making, and adaptation to rapid change. They also identified several attributes of videogames that are
abstraction across different objects to recognize that they fit into categories (abstraction). As students are sorting these items, they are learning about physical properties and deepening their understanding of what it means if all of the items in a pile are red or soft or strong (EDP – learn). After students have learned about these physical properties, they do an activity where they ask a series of yes or no questions about the properties of an object in a mystery bag until they are able to identify that mystery object (algorithms and procedures). Lesson 4 STEM+C – Test Materials & Plan Design: Students prepare for the design challenge by thinking like engineers while they test the materials that they will be using in their toy box organizer
viewpoints of the device that include product dissection, competitive analysis, intellectual property, financial forecasting, marketing, sales, distribution, industry standards, project planning and sociocultural impacts. The canvas is then used again in a forward pass, where students project forward alternative future value propositions for the device and then make a recommendation to the company on the best direction to take with the product. Creative Systems Design The Creative Systems Design course blends entrepreneuriallyminded topics such as creativity, ideation, and value with mechatronic systems design. Students gain practical familiarity with microcontrollers, sensors, and actuators while learning systematic ideation techniques to
meet the recommendation for MET capstone experienceis the project should ideally be multidisciplinary in nature, must be project based and includeformal design, implementation and test processes. Because of the program curriculum plans, theEET students were involved in the project for two semesters. The MET students had a onesemester project course; this enabled one group of MET students to design the mechanicalsystem, document their work, and pass it on to a second team for implementation. This wasconsidered a positive based on what is typical in industry, where engineering groups areconstantly interfacing. The project management skills and Design for Six-sigma methodologyrequired to coordinate three different semester syllabi (two MET
hypothesis 1D. Develop a research plan 2. Collect information 2A. Gather existing background information on the topic from literature and other relevant sources 2B. Synthesize existing information 2C. Perform a critical review of a research paper or article 3. Define a research methodology 3A. Identify protocols, strategies or methods for investigation 3B. Select and combine appropriate research methodologies 3C. Construct and describe a research methodology 3D. Identify necessary resources to carry out the methodology 3E. Identify assumptions of the research methodology 3F. State the limitations of the research methodology 4. Follow a research methodology
large K-12 professional networks. LinkedIn ismonitored by AltMetric and Kudos, so the altmetric tools available were identified at the sametime as the dissemination plan was developed. The faculty member was signed up for a Kudosaccount, and was shown the altMetric badge. The altmetric badge works for the universityrepository because individual deposits are assigned a DOI. Therefore, the faculty member hadmultiple altmetric tools to monitor the impact of the educational materials she was marketing viaLinkedIn to the K-12 networks.With a plan in mind, the faculty member was able to focus on crafting short messages forLinkedIn to catch the eyes of K-12 faculty members and direct them to either MERLOT or theuniversity repository. If someone were
challenges surrounding providing potable water.The instructor plans to repeat this activity with a heavier emphasis on reflections and have thestudents report on their drinking water technology in a more formalized fashion. Also, theinstructor plans to require students to research common contaminants as another bridge to thewater quality portion of the course. Additional plans include some different drinking watertreatment methods such as the addition of alum as a coagulant and possible integration of thethree-pot water treatment method.As an alternative, this activity could be used in the first week of class a way of introducingcourse content or prior to a water unit in an Environmental Engineering class. It also could beadapted for an outreach
personality, experiences, skills and values. This frame can provide insight into the ways that adult engineering students build their sense of professional identity through multiple modes. Successful development of an engineering identity is reflected by professional persistence. Work by Lichtenstein et al found that a minority percentage (42%) of seniors definitively planned on 12pursuing an engineering related career following graduation. Undergraduate engineering programs must try to do better to foster engineering identity development so that professional persistence is improved and the workforce is provided a steady stream of capable degreed engineers from a variety of
importance of testing activity and are aware that testers are responsible andaccountable for the product quality. The percentage of such students is 17% as against theprofessionals 50%. We can apprise students of the complete product life cycle through real-life projects and exposure to industry processes.The major issue is on the con side. The students are aware that the profession is relegated tosecond-class citizenship and vote that as the most critical issue. However, only 36% of thestudents believe so, as against 73% of the professionals. If students are exposed to this reality,many more may get distracted from the testing profession. The industry has to take care ofthis issue. While they may not have planned for this situation to occur, they
comparing alternative solutions can learn more than those instructed by the singlesolution. Osakue [12] published an instructional method on teaching solid modeling skills withAutoCAD. The method proposes that, at a planning stage, decomposing complex solid modelsinto segments and sketching each segment isometrically helps students learn the extrusion opera-tion concept of CAD software, as well as Boolean operations. The feedback from students showsbreaking down complex solids into segments helps students understand solid modeling principlesand such principles will be helpful in the use of other CAD software. However, there are few ITSsthat are developed to teach students solid modeling skills. There are also few empirical studies inthe literature