competitive edgein STEM [6].The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted the traditional residential REU experience atuniversities and colleges, halting many plans for summer undergraduate research. Studentslost jobs and internship opportunities. With a whole cohort of students and faculty at risk, theComputing Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions (CAHSI) researchers realized that theAffinity Research Group model [7] could be migrated to the virtual environment, providingfaculty and students with research experiences and opportunities that would otherwise be lost.During the summer of 2020, supported by a NSF grant, 51 students and 21 faculty participatedin a virtual REU (vREU) 8-week experience. The results from this work have been analyzedand are shared
thinking embeddedin the course activities (e.g. screencasts)? What were these changes?TAs and instructors pointed out that flexible structure in facilitating activities like prototyping,sketches, and cardboard design allowed students to think different aspects of the needs ofstakeholders. As observed by a TA, “before students think of stakeholders as “barriers” inengineering but now they integrated or internalized the needs of stakeholders in their designs, theimportance of the product and thus beginning to see stakeholders not as a barrier but a mediumto inform their plans and that describes more about empathy and digging deeper on the whyquestions.”Table 4. Students’ perception of systems thinking as perceived by the instructors and TAs
continues to be a challengeirrespective of the learning environment, either face-to-face or remote classrooms. Hence, educators haveto continue to find ways to strengthen team-work and team building among the students.IntroductionSeveral studies show that engineering students across educational levels are motivated in alearning environment that incorporates active learning instructional practices. Lesson plans thatemploy experiential learning activities that relate with the students’ daily lived experiencesincreases the interests of engineering students [1]. Teaching high school students engineering ischallenging because many things contend for the attention of the students. The attention span ofmost high school students today is short due in part
midwestern university to betterunderstand the immediate impact of the pandemic on retention of women in engineering.Review of LiteratureSelf-efficacy can be defined as “an individual’s perceived level of competence or the degree towhich she or he feels capable of completing a task” [8]. In an academic program, self-efficacyimpacts choosing a plan of study that aligns with a desired profession that you anticipate joiningafter obtaining your degree. In this way, self-efficacy has direct impact on the recruitment ofwomen into engineering programs of study, as women must first see themselves as a successfulengineer before committing to an engineering major. Additionally, self-efficacy is demonstratedin individual courses, as students choose classes and
process is divided into three phases: identification, planning, and implementation, with eachphase producing a deliverable [24]. Phase 1, the identification phase contains steps 1 - 3 of theevaluation process. This phase centers on understanding the evaluation program and its overallpurpose, leading to a statement of work (SOW). Next, phase 2, the planning phase contains steps4 - 6 of the evaluation process. This phase explores the program in more detail, deciding on datacollection, methods to use, and furnishes an evaluation proposal for the SEnS-GPS leadershipteam to review. Once the internal evaluation project proposal is approved, the evaluation teamconducts phase 3, the implementation phase. This final implementation phase contains
fashion designs that were desirable to clients. This skill is relevant to engineering as engineers consider clients’ specifications when planning designs.Later publications from this project expanded this work by elaborating on these findings andexploring other facets of Latinx youths’ funds of knowledge,11 for example, by focusingprimarily on funds of knowledge obtained in the context of workplaces.12Other scholars have offered different frameworks for understanding engineering-related funds ofknowledge. For example, building from Smith and Lucena’s research on first-generation, low-income undergraduate engineering students,13, 14 Verdín et al. created and validated surveymeasures to identify the
spring quarter events.January and March events were in person and attendance was not recorded (orange star).Our biggest challenge following the shelter-in-place orders was to adjust a larger event originallyplanned for April: a half-day symposium entitled "Teaching to Engage the Multi-PerspectiveClassroom", centered around themes of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Our planned formatconsisted of 2 talks followed by a lightning talk session with 4 speakers that would segue into apanel. It was already clear in April, after just one month working virtually, that “Zoom fatigue”was a very real phenomenon, now well-documented as the particularly exhausting nature ofvideo calls [7,8]. Therefore, a full-day event would not be a preferable format. We
/Planned: For our department, a final document (oral/writtencommunication) is required for the internships/research experiences that receive credit. To helpthe students obtain more content for their meetings, I started requiring the students taking theinternship and undergraduate research courses to perform the required presentation for this workat a chapter meeting. This provides a formal situation for the presentation; however, the studentaudience can be viewed as friendly. This approach then allows younger students to see futureopportunities while learning from the internship/research experience. Not every faculty specifiesthe chapter meeting for the document, but involving several faculty can quickly fill the meetingslots.For the current ABET
” says about the “I”) develops identity and can explain their What narratives do superstar elementary past and future actions [5]. teachers of engineering construct about their Figure 2: Model for Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Identity BIBLIOGRAPHY engineering teacher professional identity? RESEARCH PLAN 1 National Academy of Engineering, Building Capacity for
servo based on IEC61131-3 standards [4]. As planned, a standardhydraulic servo program was designed to meet most control requirements. In this way, the wholesystem program can be done only in Parker Automation Manager in the future. The hydraulicservo standard program was designed as below in Table 2. Figure 2. Configuration tool for PAC and Compax3FHuman Machine Interface was designed as shown in Figure 3 which includes following features: Power and Reset buttons For each cylinder: Enabled, Error, and Motion indicators to let the user know the status of each cylinder Jog Forward and Backward buttons to manually position the cylinders Home button to fully retract the cylinders Actual Position and Velocity
pressure.3. The following table shows the output of several common desalination processes. Complete the table with your data and analysis of the pros and cons of your system compared to other processes. How does your system compare to the others? Process mL/hr L/day Pros and cons Solar still 53 0.6 No active maintenance required; must remain at surface and sunny. Hand-operated reverse 946 22.7 Requires active work of pumping device; osmosis pump can run day and night Boiling desalination still ? ? ?Alignment to Next Generation Science Standards:HS-PS1-3. Plan and conduct
the impact of cooperative learning during the Spring2020 semester by studying team retrospectives written by students enrolled in a system analysisand design course.The pedagogical foundation for the system analysis and design course was cooperative learning.The course required students to work in teams to develop a software prototype. The project wasdivided into four milestones and each team was required to submit a team retrospective detailingoverall planning, task allocation, group processes, and strategies for improvement. The first twomilestones were completed during face-to-face instruction, while teams met online for the lasttwo milestones due to the shift to online instruction. To investigate team effectiveness, a rubricbased on the
on a combination ofselected online and mostly offline activities to develop students’ skills based on the DQ Institute’sDigital Literacy Framework. Details of the program content, results of the program and thesuccesses and challenges of this international education program will be shared in the paper.IntroductionThe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to be studied for years to come given thedisruption to our daily activities and its impact on the world’s economy and public health [1-3].While government and health authorities continue to reduce the large death rate suffered in thepast year [4] through vaccination plans, several developed countries will start to lift restrictions incoming weeks and months[5, 6]. On the other hand
Facilities personnel, andfaculty spent time planning for multiple Fall 2020 semester scenarios because of the COVID-19pandemic. University Facilities began by evaluating all classrooms and laboratory spaces todetermine maximum capacities. They also worked with departments to provide cleaning suppliesfor offices and classroom spaces.Mode of InstructionIn June of 2020 the university made the decision to offer as many face-to-face and hybrid classesas possible during the Fall 2020 semester. After University Facilities assessed all classrooms andlaboratories on campus to determine maximum room capacities, department administrators thenworked with faculty to determine their preferred mode of instruction for the fall semester.Faculty were able to adjust
. The program was designed to enable participants to build a supportive, professional network, creating cohorts that would continue well after the summer.3. The program was designed to build and assess participant gains not only in research experience but also in their professional development, mentor/cohort relationships, and plans for their career.4. The program was designed to have broad reach in who was impacted, with cascading impact because of the participants selected.The CISTAR REM program speaks to how we should be designing summer programs and isconsistent with the growing body of evidence, captured well in the following quote: “Empiricaldata suggest that, although students from underrepresented racial minority backgrounds
airway pressure mode (CPAP) Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP): 0-20 [cmH20]Plans include testing such that devices that do not comply with the above regulations shall berejected. Among the ventilators that follow these regulations, further criteria were established todetermine the most effective design, as well as its replicability. The manufacturing blockdiagram is provided in Figure 3.Corresponding important criteria for replicating the design of a positive-pressure ventilator (i.e.,one that pushes the air into the lungs) are given as: • Design for Manufacturing (DFM): The ability to ramp up the supply of parts is
. The timeline The timeline is clearly illustrates an The timeline is defined and developed. understanding of loosely defined and 2. Use Project The details are individual task lacks a clear Management Lacking a defined comprehensive; it requirements, understanding of Techniques for timeline. represents a plan with a potential bottlenecks time requirements Completion high probability for
anomaly detection cases in smart gridapplications. It was planned on running several hands-on activities in the class that introducessimple artificial intelligence and machine learning models to students through load and energygeneration forecasting and anomaly detection cases widely used in the smart grid environment.Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in fall 2020, the course was offered in online synchronousmode, and the hands-on activities had to be run remotely.4. Term Projects The purpose of this assignment is to design and analysis of a smart grid technology aswell as its application in a system, such as smart home/building, smart meter, smart distributionsystem, microgrid, communication infrastructure, distributed energy resources (e.g
kindergarteners to graduate students in the schools of the Lucia Mar School District, and at Cornell University, University of Cali- fornia, Irvine, and Santa Barbara City College. He has worked in informal STEM education at the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History and MOXI, The Wolf Museum of Exploration + Innovation. As MOXI’s first Director of Education, Skinner created the philosophical vision for the department, mapped out a five-year strategic plan, and built up an education staff of five full-time employees, 20 part-time employees, and over 100 volunteers. He planned, budgeted, and implemented a full slate of informal and formal education programs; collaborating with teachers and school administrators, university
Paper ID #33730Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Intention to Integrate Engineeringthrough a Multi-Disciplinary Partnership (Evaluation)Mr. Francisco Cima, Old Dominion University Francisco Cima is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Techno- logical Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovation practices in organizations, information and communication technology in organizations, knowledge management, and team processesDr. Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University Pilar Pazos is an
Fundraising Officer for Organizacion de Estudiantes Latino-Americanos. Among his numerous accomplishments and awards, Ulises was recently elected as a 2021 fellow for the prestigious Station1 Frontiers Fellowship (SFF). He plans to earn an MS in Structural Engineering to gain further insight into the field of engineering and to be able to teach introductory engineering courses where he can serve students who are at vulnerable points in their degree progression. Subsequently, Ulises wants to pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering Education to help diverse students navigate this challenging field, access resources, and increase their graduation and retention rates.Dr. Krishna Pakala, Boise State University Krishna Pakala, Ph.D
% Final Exam (comprehensive) 25% Total 100%Baseline Semester:In order to explore the efficacy of the recitation course, the plan is to examine the passing rate ofstudents with similar exam scores both with and without the course. In the fall of 2020, therecitation course was not offered to students and thus will serve as a baseline for student gradecomparison. Within the first 3 weeks of class an invitation was sent to all students throughoutthe 6 sections of Statics asking for participation in the upcoming study. If they consented, theywere asked to complete a short survey and their learning data was used for the study. At the endof the
full course was during the pandemic, a comparison couldn’tbe made to a traditional exam format to use as evidence to confirm an elevation of course equity.However, creative expression and the identification of gaps were realized. Students were not asenthusiastic about the approach in Fall 2020 and attributed this attitude to the ongoing pandemic.This lethargy is supported by the higher education literature describing mounting mental healthpressures due to the duration of the pandemic.Going forward, the author will not implement the assessment method again during the pandemic.However, there are plans for use as a better alternative to the occasional take home exam.Goal of the StudyThe goal of this study is to review the outcomes from other
-2016 and 2017-2020).Program objectivesThe program-level objectives of the ReNUWIt REU are (O1) to provide participating studentswith hands-on research experiences using cross-disciplinary, systems-level approaches, thatdirectly address the design of urban water infrastructure and key knowledge gaps in waterscience/engineering, and (O2) to increase undergraduate students’ interests in pursuing advanceddegrees in water science/engineering, with a particular emphasis on women and minorities.In addition to the program-level objectives, we identified five student-level outcomes thatprovide a framework for the assessment plan. We proposed that through participating in thisREU, students would: (S1) conduct independent research in water science or
brainstorm session. Lastly, students are given one hour to picktheir top three ideas, quickly prototype them and exchange feedback with peers.Project Week 4During this week’s lab, students first summarize the feedback they receive for their prototypesfrom the previous lab. Afterwards, they choose a list of criteria to evaluate their prototypes andconstruct a decision matrix to pick their top design solution. They then plan on how toimplement their top solution by creating a bill of materials and developing a Gantt chart.Project Week 5This week’s lab is for proposal presentation. Each student team gives a 5-min presentation topitch their project. Students are asked to use the Need, Approach, Benefits, Competition (NABC)template [23] to show how their
objectives for theMaterials Science and Manufacturing Processes courses were revised to incorporate CTelements. Instructional strategy (especially discussion and interactive sessions) was modified toinclude CT aspects. Assessment plans were amended to address the revised course learningobjectives. Relevant assessment rubrics were revised to include CT features, wherever needed.This paradigm, targeting learning experiences related to critical thinking, can also be applied toother engineering, science, and non-science courses.Keywords: Engineering education; critical thinking; CT models; materials and manufacturing;learning objectives; instructional strategy; assessment planIntroductionThe most important skill required of an engineer in the workplace
Teaching, Learning & Technology. Dr. Russell conducts learning analytics research to learn about how to promote the adoption of data- informed instructional practices that support successful student learning. Her research is focused on student learning, engagement and motivation, facilitated by teaching practices, and technology adoptions in various learning environments.Venanzio Cichella, University of Iowa Prof. Venanzio Cichella received his B.S. and M.S. in Automation Engineering in 2007 and 2011, re- spectively, from the University of Bologna, Italy. He got his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2018 from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, majoring in planning and control of multiple au
pencil and gliding magnets in a bowl of water.Contact: Tej Dalvi(tejaswini.dalvi@umb.edu)Project Team: Kristen Wendell (PI), Tej Dalvi(co-PI), Chelsea Andrews, Nicole BatrounyProject Link to full curriculum: https://bit.ly/connectionsengineeringThe ConnecTions in the Making project is supported by the NSF, ITEST-1657218 Day 6: Design Challenge - Plan What are important things to consider when solving a design challenge? The class revisits the design task, constraints, and criteria. Students in small groups sketch and discuss initial ideas for a functional scale model of accessible playground equipment. Day 7: Design Challenge - Build, Test, & Iterate How do we know if our design works? How can we use failures to improve? Student groups build
and plan for, absorb, recover from, and more successfully adapt to adverse events” (National Research Council, 2012). We measure the absorption and recovery aspects with a goal of informing future adaptation and
however, WEdoes not imply “writing intensive.” Certified WE courses are not meant to be “writing classes;”instead, writing should be one of several instructional focuses, as required by the new WEinitiative.Since this new initiative is taking effect in Fall 2021, the WE Committee has not established thefinal assessment criteria. The plan is to have each program submit an assessment processregarding the WE related learning outcomes.Literature Review:Writing is an important skill that all engineers should have. Its importance is reflected in ABETaccreditation criterion 3 for student outcomes, “an ability to communicate effectively with arange of audiences.”Wheeler and McDonald [1] stated that writing is a useful tool in engineering if developed