knowledge sharing to facilitate achieving profoundchange in undergraduate education. They are to achieve this by understanding and enactingtenets of anti-racism and decolonization through the four recurring stages of Participatory ActionLearning and Action Research (PALAR), plan-act-observe-reflect.This paper assesses the lessons learned from an active community engagement project fromthe initial stages of grant development to the first year of a four-year government-funded grantfrom a faculty member and two students' perspectives. The lessons learned include investingtime at the beginning of each phase to outline roles and responsibilities and make spacefor all voices.Project SummaryBy design, this project is centered on the students involved
-quality engineers becomes an essential andfundamental prerequisite to support the national strategies, for which the NEE initiative leads toresearch and practice in developing plans for new engineering development in the future and inexploring more student-centered training mode [1]. Preparing enough high-quality engineering graduates requires insight and input from allrelevant stakeholders, to name a few, involving Chinese government (especially the Ministry ofEducation (MOE)), higher education institutions and their administrators, faculty, and staff,industry (including corporations and industry associations) both in China and globally, researchinstitutions, and finally undergraduate and prospective students (especially engineering
) program. Pilot teachers (n = 10) participated in focusgroups to share their perceptions of readiness to implement the blended e4usa+FIRST curriculum. Datawas analyzed using open coding and constant comparison methods. Most teachers reported confidence inteaching the blended offering, shared their plans and expectations, and brought up concerns regarding timeand sustaining student interest especially during a time of pandemic. This project has implications for pre-college engineering education efforts as it could provide a foundational understanding of how twosuccessful programs can be blended, playing a critical role in educating high school students in underservedcommunities to experience engineering.IntroductionPre-college engineering education
University of Maryland, further equipping her with knowledge of organizational theory and behavior, strategic planning and implementation, and process and outcome evaluation. Her creative problem-solving approach to association challenges, strong leadership and communication skills, and commitment to constant growth and improvement will be an asset to ITEEA. Prior to joining the association world, Kelly completed her bachelor’s degree in architectural engineering and practiced as a structural engineer for 5 years. Kelly is licensed as a Professional Engineer (P.E.) and actively pursues professional development opportunities through organizations such as the American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) and Toastmasters
the camp’s schedule.The MTI camp was initially designed to include junior and senior-level secondary students froma chosen set of county K-12 school systems. Participants were to be recommended by teachersand counselors in these school systems, and recruitment had begun in earnest in the late fall of2019, along with planning for housing and enrichment activities such as science demonstrationsduring the camp. However, after the cancellation of the camp in the summer of 2020 and shifts tovirtual learning in the spring of 2020 due to COVID-19 restrictions that continued into the fall of2020, a different approach to the recruitment of participants for the camp was attempted. In anattempt to streamline the process of student recruitment and
significant undertaking that requires properplanning and commitment. The planning phase is crucial in defining the scope of the work andsecuring the necessary resources for the project. During this phase, I used the followingquestions to guide my thought process. • Why is this open textbook project important? • What features are essential and are of pedagogical significance? • What resources are required for this project in terms of time commitment, funding, and team support? • What open platforms will be used to host the book? • How to maintain the book in the post-publication stage?As of 2019-2020, there were limited OER on thermodynamics [8-10] and on relevantengineering subjects in general. The proposed open textbook aims to
the course LMS, meet with the instructor to discuss the approach to the course, student discuss the approach to the course, student challenges and issues and plan for observed lessons. challenges and issues and plan for observed lessons. Section B: Flipped Classroom Observation Section B: Classroom Observation Tool Tool This tool includes observation items in areas This tool includes observation items in eight major areas: Lesson Organization, Content related to instructor-student interactions and Knowledge & Relevance
dispositional changes in STEM self-efficacy and identity.Students completed surveys and reflections at multiple points throughout their internship,including a retrospective pre/post survey capturing dispositional shifts during the experience.The results of the internship experience on student intern participants educational andprofessional plans at the 3 sites are evaluated in this paper. Results show significant gains onitems related to professional discernment (desire to work in a STEM field, use technical skills,on open ended problems for the betterment of society) for participants at all sites. Additionally,there are differences by gender.OverviewBeginning in 2015, the College of Engineering researchers and staff at UNIVERSITYdeveloped, piloted
important.The interview protocol was designed to correspond with Experiential Learning Theory’s (ELT)learning cycle (A. Y. Kolb & Kolb, 2009; D. A. Kolb, 1984). The learning cycle is composed offour parts: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and activeexperimentation. During the cycle an individual experiences an event (concrete experience),reflects on said experience (reflective observation), congeals said reflections into abstractconcepts (abstract conceptualization), and plans on using the concepts in future situations (activeexperimentation). The theory was selected to frame how/if students are learning professionalskills experientially through their participation in engineering project teams. Since project
follows: the next section presents an overview of the powerengineering curriculum redesign and motivations behind it; section III describes the situativepedagogy strategies that have been implemented; section IV presents the evaluation tools used toassess the effectiveness of the curriculum redesign; section V then presents and compares selectresults from the control and the test groups; finally, the paper concludes in section VI with asummary and a discussion on ongoing work and future plans. II. Power Engineering Curriculum Redesign Most courses in electric power engineering have remained unaltered in decades and are failingto deliver relevant information with respect to current energy needs and industry practice [1]-[7].Traditionally
canaddress them. In this stage, research scientists can collaborate with applied scientists,economists, and data scientists depending on the action that is being taken in the productexperience. In all cases there is engineering work required to make the desired changes, integratethe product with additional features, or setup the infrastructure to pilot new experiences.These product innovations are accompanied by an evaluation plan to measure the causal effect ofthe changes or new features on the outcomes of interest. The goal of the evaluation plan istypically to determine if the customer problem has been solved, which is often the definition ofsuccess. Economists and data scientists typically lead the causal inference part of the scienceworkflow.It
. Contemplation: People recognize the need for change and consider the reasons why, but they are not making changes. 3. Preparation: People take small steps to move toward change, which could include but are not limited to activities like (a) attending a learning session about change opportunities or (b) developing skills that could help with change. 4. Action: People actively engage in change. 5. Maintenance: People put in effort to maintain the changes that they have made. 6. Relapse: Inevitably, some people revert to their old ways and must relearn or re-engage with change efforts.With the expectation that the project starts with department members atdifferent stages of readiness for change, we plan to
critical. Aiming at the issue of cultivating the scientific researchliteracy of college students, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology proposed the“Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program” in 1969 first. To address the uncreative ofundergraduates, the “Berkeley University Model” divides the undergraduate scientificresearch training program into two parts, including “The Undergraduate Research ApprenticeProgram” established by the university and proposing a project plan by the studentsthemselves. There are two main modes of knowledge application in engineering education;one is a mode based on academic research training; the other is a problem-solving-oriented,interdisciplinary research mode [1]. Project-Based Learning (PBL) is a mode of
efficacy of each session. Thesurveys serve as a method to collect feedback on topics that participants would like to seeaddressed in future sessions, and we use the response to make improvements to future sessions.In addition to the session feedback surveys, we have implemented an engagement survey, asocial network survey, and semi-structured interviews that will be reported on in future work.Although not in our initial plans, we used participant feedback to develop asynchronous contentdelivery via a series of short, downloadable information sheets on a variety of topics related tonavigating proposal and grant management processes and the ASEE conference. Called Practicesin Engineering Education Research (PEER) Guides, these short documents
Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education3 ENTC 303: Fluid mechanics GEEL xxx: General electives ENTC 320: Quality assurance ENTC 361: Solids modeling ENTC 363: Design I ENTC 376: Strength of materials ENTC 380: CAD/CAM ENTC 383: Manufacturing systems IDIS 300: Industrial electricity ENTC 313: Welding (elective) ENTC 381: Electronics manufacturing (elective)4 ENTC 370: Thermodynamics ENTC 412: Product and inventory plan ENTC 402: Metrology
than expected will also be discussed.Student reviews of the course were conducted at the end of the semester. The format of thereview process and the results of the review will also be examined. Freshman Engineering at UTAPre Fall 2003Prior to the fall of 2003, all freshman engineering students at the University of Texas atArlington enrolled in their own department’s introductory course. This plan allowed students tobe introduced to discipline-specific course content, and at the same time to be introduced to thedepartment itself. The College of Engineering at UTA, made up of five departments withundergraduate majors, thus taught five separate introductory courses. These courses varied Proceedings
initially hesitant to engage with us on this project due to the logistics of kitcirculation and concerns with how kits would fit within their existing structure of their summerreading program. To allay the library’s concerns, we worked out a plan to utilize their existingactivity registration system to sign families up and their main branch for distribution. Our teamresponded to all email inquiries from the participants, provided weekly online Q&A sessions,and restocked used materials in kits. The library maintained control over registration andcommunication with families, including all personal identifying information. Our library partnersnoted that they appreciated that we worked within their parameters of lead time for planning ofthe summer
indicate thatthe PADS has potential to measure program efficacy. In order to ensure that participating campsand after-school programs provided high quality instruction, a separate team conductedstructured observations of the Study 1 research sites. For each participating site, a trainedobserver rated two one-hour samples of sessions using the Dimensions of Success (DoS)instrument [4] that is sensitive to good engineering instruction. This team also surveyed programfacilitators to determine the overall instructional plan, and administered the Common InstrumentSuite (CIS) as a post-test to measure attitudes towards engineering among youths and facilitators[5]. This data was summarized and shared with researchers to contribute to the analysis.We are
from the lawsuits. Also, some things just can't be measured in terms ofdollars, and that includes human life.b) Good vs. profit challenge to you as a designerThis situation happens when a design feature increases the revenue by shortening theproduct life or decreasing capacity, while increasing cost, environmental damage or otherharm to the customer or consumer. This is a constant issue for most engineers becauseprofitability often depends on more frequent purchases, such that engineered obsolescence isa powerful tool, yet one that is costly for the consumer and very damaging to theenvironment. There are several different ways companies introduce planned obsolescence intheir products [9]. They may use inferior materials in key components
and Automation As program faculty began researching existing robotics platforms and software toimplement in these courses, it became immediately apparent that a wide gap exists between whatwe define as “robotics toys” and “industrial robotics.” The realization of this educational chasmsparked an entire new set of pedagogical challenges and research. This paper chronicles ourjourney from concept to initial implementation.Pedagogical ApproachCurriculum development for the RAM course sequence began with an overall plan of increasingpedagogical complexity throughout the course sequence. The idea started with a progressionfrom simple robotics fundamentals in the introduction course (ETSC 277), to more complextopics in the advanced course
stakeholders called IDEA Teams (Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, andAccess). Professional development sessions focus on engineering project implementation andcreating equitable and inclusive STEM environments. As outcomes of the initial 10-day trainingsession, members of these teams develop action research for equity projects (AREPs) in theirhome schools with the purpose of creating more equitable and inclusive STEM environments.Additionally, they plan for the implementation of informal STEM-enrichment clubs in theirschool settings. Networked Improvement Community (NIC) meetings were held virtually eachmonth throughout the first school year to allow IDEA Teams to discuss their progress onimplementation of their AREPs and STEM clubs. In addition to the
collaboration. Dr. Khan is the Chair of ASEE Midwest Section.Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim, Arkansas Tech University Mohamed Ibrahim, PhD Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction College of Education Arkansas Tech University (479) 964-0583 ext. 2452Dr. Syed Ali Haider, State University of New York at Fredonia American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Performance Prediction of Computer Science Students in Capstone Software Engineering Course through Educational Data MiningAbstractEducational data mining has been extensively used to predict students’ performance in universitycourses to plan improvements in teaching and learning processes, achieve academic
institutes. Professionaldevelopment facilitators have been forced to rethink the model for STEM focused professionaldevelopment. Virtual professional development with a STEM focus faces challenges that are notencountered in traditional face to face settings. These challenges require creative practices toovercome obstacles faced during implementation. (Brasili and Allen 2019)Program DetailsSTILE-Ed Summer STEM Institute provided teachers with five days of interactive instruction onusing the virtual Harvard LabXchange simulation platform for Biology and Physics, and alsoincorporated 3D Design & Printing and Computer Science. On the sixth day, teachers prepared aLabXchange pathway to use as a lesson plan for their students. Fourteen teachers
surveys by students deciding whether to apply to TPP, 53% were“exploring teaching” and 27% professed “to go into teaching after working in industry,” and13% said they were “interested in becoming a teacher immediately after graduation.” In contrast,out of the current TPP students interviewed, 13 of the 16 students (81%) intend to teachsecondary school at some point. In fact, four TPP students indicated that they had matriculated toWPI because of the TPP. With these data, we see that the students who end up doing the TPP arequite committed to teaching. Because many of our TPP students plan to wait before becoming teachers in the classroom, itwas important to understand why. They were asked in the interview what they wanted to learnfirst before
Swarms with Distributed Swarm Control 3. Enhancing Security of Cloud-Connected UAS ServicesStudents were placed onto teams based on their prior course experiences and the projectrequirements. Common resources were provided for all students to train them in conductingresearch. Teams were then tasked with developing a more comprehensive research plan for theirspecific project and carrying out that plan throughout the 2020-2021 academic year.Students completed a pre-survey at the start of the project and a mid-project survey shortly afterthe winter break. The surveys combined project specific skills questions as well as relevantquestions from the Undergraduate Research Student Self-Assessment (URSSA), an NSF-fundedassessment tool to measure
Andriessen’s[4] dual purpose of DBR model as illustrated in Figure 1. The focus of the program design isprogressive refinement through the problem statement; defining the design and learningobjectives; planning (project management) of the curricular design, development of thecurricular ideation and selection of a design for initial implementation; and ultimately acontinuously reformed model with a curricular model improvement process. The focus of theresearch design is to establish the research questions; identify the learning theories applicable tothe research work; design of the research work that influences the curricular implementation andimprovement; and ultimately to disseminate what is learned and add to the body of knowledgeon engineering
Grainger College of Engineering. Sara performs undergrad- uate research in soft robotics and engineering education funded by the IDEA Institute at UIUC. Sara is interested in pursuing a career in Engineering Education as well as furthering her education upon gradu- ating.Mrs. Ilalee Harrison James, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ilalee Harrison James is the Associate Director of The Hoeft Technology & Management Program. She serves as a lecturer in addition to leading the strategic plan for the program’s co-curricular outcomes. She is a first-generation college graduate who is passionate about improving career outcomes for underrepre- sented students in STEAM.Prof. Holly M. Golecki, University of
, renewable energy and micro-manufacturing. His current research interests include robotics, CIM, sustainable manufacturing, micro machining and engineering and tech- nology education. He has published several papers in these areas in various national and international conferences and journals. He has worked in heavy and light manufacturing industries, manufacturing pumps, motors, and CNC machine tools in the areas of system design, production planning, and control and manufacturing. Edinbarough also served in paramilitary forces and in the Air Force. He is a Life Member of the ISTE, a senior life member of the IE (India), a member of ASEE and SME, and a licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.) in the state of Texas.Dr. Jesus
. Graduates will beconferred a bachelors degree in mechanical engineering. Students execute one to two projectcycles per semester.During the proposal stage, students, in collaboration with faculty and clients, develop two plans:a design "work plan" which details the entire execution of the deliverable to the client; and a"learning plan" which addresses professional learning objectives, technical learning objectives,and the learning modes that will be employed to meet the objectives (self-directed learning, peer-directed learning, faculty-directed learning, and external expert-directed learning as well asmethods for formative assessment and reflection). Entering Establish Learning
lesson plans. Figure 1. Summer PD program’s first-week CS/CT content course schedule.2.1.2. Course 2The second-week course was held at a local school district conference center. The course wastaught by four different CS teachers—a college professor, a high school teacher, a middle schoolteacher, and an elementary school teacher. Presentations were arranged so each instructor had achance to talk about teaching the concepts of loops, variables, conditionals, and functions at theirrespective grade level, allowing teachers to understand curricular progressions across the K-12grade span.An outline of the course schedule can be found below in Figure 2. Daily reflections werecompleted online at the end of each day and were graded for completion