variousinterests related to them” [12]. A more concise description of DT was introduced by Luka (2019) as “ asystematic approach to problem-solving that involves the human perspective” [13]. Human CenteredDesign (HCD) has been used either hand-in-hand with DT [14] or used synonymously [15]. Empathizing,the first stage of DT, is considered the core of HCD [14], this highlights the focus on the human elementin the process of designing or solving a problem. Define is the second stage in DT, it is characterized byworking towards defining the problem at hand. Ideation is the third stage in DT, which can be defined asan iterative process to achieve a final design that addresses the user’s needs [16]. While having the capacity to work in cross-functional
Paper ID #41880Focus group analysis of engineering Collaborative Online International Learning(COIL+) compared to short-term study abroad programsJoshua E. Katz, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Joshua E. Katz is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, DELTA program, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where his research centers on collaborative learning in engineering education and other STEM disciplines. He obtained his B.S. in Technology and Engineering Education in 2019 and his M.S. in STEM Education and Leadership in 2021, both from Illinois State University
. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2023, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 4453. Amy Feldman, “Why the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire still burns hot today.” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyfeldman/2019/11/22/why-the-triangle-shirtwaist-factory-fire-still-burns-hot- today/?sh=2d4e8081704a (accessed September 29, 2022).4. “Triangle Shirtwaist Fire.” AFL-CIO. https://aflcio.org/about/history/labor-history-events/triangle-shirtwaist- fire (accessed August 30, 2022).5. Lib Tietjen, “The power of the purse.” Tenement Museum. https
classroom environments.However, while research trends indicate interest in studying faculty development, there is limitedresearch on faculty motivations specifically, as indicated by a 2019 search that identified 579publications for ‘faculty + development’ but only 87 publications for ‘faculty + motivation’ [24].Understanding faculty motivations for engaging in faculty development programs is essential fordesigning effective faculty development programs that align with faculty interests andinstitutional goals.Despite the recognized importance of CRP, there is limited research on the specific motivationsof engineering faculty to participate in faculty development programs focused on these inclusiveand equitable pedagogical approaches. This paper
they do not continue reproducing unfair neo-colonial practices andassumptions of past development practices. Here we explore how STS concepts have servedengineering students to develop critical praxis, a more robust and responsible understanding ofthe relationships between engineering faculty, students, and communities, and the materialand social worlds in which they are embedded, using community development projects relatedto artisanal gold mining, inclusive management of electronic waste, and water access forunderserved communities as examples.BackgroundAs shown in our 2022 ASEE paper [1], pedagogies of formation are explorations that implicatethe self in questioning “what engineering is for” and how answers to these questions begin toshow
] W. C. Lee, D. B.,Knight, A. Godwin, J. L. Hall, and D. Verdín, “Eager: Measuring student support in STEM: Insights from year two,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, June, 2019.[23] L. N. Fleming, S. E. Burris, K. C. Smith, L. B. Bliss, I. N. Moor, and F. Bornmann, Beyond persistence: Graduate school aspirations of Hispanic engineering students at HSIs, in 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN., June, 2014.[24] G. B. Willis, Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Sage Publications., 2004.AppendixBelow are the three main blocks of the survey.BLOCK 1: Undergraduate ExperienceLikert Items (7-Point; Strongly Agree to Strongly
that various forms of technology play in terms of student learning in physics and in engineering. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) for over 35 years. Dr. Larkin served on the Board of Directors for ASEE from 1997-1999 as Chair of Professional Interest Council (PIC) III and as Vice President of PICs. She has received numerous national and international awards including the ASEE Fellow Award in 2016 and the Distinguished Educator and Service Award from the Physics and Engineer- ing Physics Division in 1998. In January 2014 the Center for Teaching, Research and Learning at AU presented Dr. Larkin with the
fellow, a Sandia Campus Exec- utive fellow, and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research fellow. She was a Churchill Scholar at University of Cambridge where she received an MPhil in engineering, and she has a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. In 2018, ASEE named Dr. LeBlanc one of its ”20 Under 40 High-achieving Researchers and Educators,” and she received the National Science Foundation CAREER award in 2020.Dr. Erica Cusi Wortham, George Washington University Inspired by decades of work alongside Indigenous artists and activists, Dr. Wortham brings a concern for diverse, complex cultural and social contexts to her work at the Innovation Center, SEAS, George Wash- ington
, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)fields despite an increase in the number of women in graduate and professional schools and theundergraduate women population exceeding 50% [15, 47]. For electrical engineering (EE)degree attainment, the numbers are more dismal. In 2017-2018, 14.2% of all bachelor’s degrees;23.5% of master’s degrees; and 17.3% of doctoral degrees were awarded to women in electricalengineering [36]. Percentages for women faculty members in tenure positions parallelpercentages for degree recipients. In a report for the American Society for EngineeringEducation (ASEE), Yoder (2017) found the mean percentage of women tenured/tenure-trackfaculty in all engineering disciplines was 16.9%. That same year, only 14.2% of women facultymembers
where and if there is a problem hinderingtheir enrollment in such programs. Finally, the GEA office also relayed that based on theundergraduate graduating student survey for academic year 2018-2019, 25% of the studentsindicated their intention to apply for graduate studies post their undergraduate, and from thesurvey respondents 58% students maintained a GPA between 3.0-4.0, which reflects theirreadiness and possible eligibility to apply for the 4+1 program during their undergraduatestudies.The research attempts to identify the reasons why students aren’t applying during theirundergraduate career using a mixed research method design to evaluate student’s perception ofthe 4+1 programs. Student’s attitudinal feedback was collected through the
and PhD in civil engineering. Her interests are in quantitative and qualitative research and data analysis as related to equity in education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Mandatory but not Required: Examining Change in the Year Two Implementation of a Novel Engineering Mathematics CourseKeywords: Wright State Model, mathematics, math placement, institutional change, changemetaphors, change models, first-year programsThe Wright State Model (WSM) for Engineering Mathematics Education is a meaningful shiftfrom the traditional required engineering calculus sequence as it offers a one-semesterlaboratory-based immersion into the ways mathematical concepts—including
Summers is a doctoral student in the College of Education at the University of Washington, Seat- tle. Her research interests focus on the potential roles of socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, and other political identifiers in determining undergraduate engagement across a variety of majors, including engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration Among Women and Men Faculty in Engineering: A Self-Determination PerspectiveAbstractThe workplace experiences of faculty in engineering, physics, and computer science wereevaluated through the lens of self-determination theory (SDT), which posits three universalhuman needs
Paper ID #26300Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within anExperience as a Woman in EngineeringMs. Mackenzie Claire Beckmon, Harding University I am an undergraduate psychology major anticipating graduation in December of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in psychology through attending a graduate program for school or child psychology. It is my hope that these processes can lead to a career as both a researcher and practitioner.Dr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr
Paper ID #28951Self-Efficacy Development in Students in a Declared EngineeringMatriculation StructureDr. Racheida S Lewis, University of Georgia Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Educa- tion Transformations Institute (EETI) and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She has been recognized as a Gates Millennium Scholar, GEM Associate Fellow, New Horizon Scholar, and a 2019 inductee into the Bouchet Honor Society. She completed her doctoral work at Virginia Tech where she focused on the impact matriculation structures have on self-efficacy
, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, and faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers at several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is published in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals
Rico Mayag¨uez Campus and is a licensed mathematics teacher by the Department of Education in Puerto Rico. Kevin is currently a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education as well as a M.S. student in the School of Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. His interests currently lie in cultural identity, engineering culture, acculturation, transnational migration, decolonization, belonging, and inclusion of occupational migrants from the U.S. territories who are looking to pursue engineering degrees and work in the mainland U.S.Anne-Ketura Elie, University of Pittsburgh Anne-Ketura Elie earned a BS degree in 2019 in psychology from the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. She is
in engineering education. a review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 13, pp. 909–922, 2019. [2] Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT), “226 active learning techniques.,” March 2017. [3] A. M. Oliveira, “Simple ways so facilitate active learning in hands-on electrical engineering technology courses,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 26–1372, 2015. [4] A. Mouallem, M. Horowitz, and S. Sheppard, “The care methodology: a new lens for introductory ECE course assessment based on student challenging and rewarding experiences,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
. McDermott, "Assessing the Effectiveness of the GradTrack Virtual Mentoring Program," in Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2023. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--42681[2] K. Atkins, B.M. Dougan, M.S. Dromgold-Sermen, H. Potter, V. Sathy, and A.T. Panter, "“Looking at Myself in the Future”: how mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 42, August 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00242-3[3] A. Carpi, D.M. Ronan, H.M. Falconer, and N.H. Lents, “Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students
supported the efficacy of theapproach in achieving the stated goals of improving student learning and better preparing them fora career in the construction industry.AcknowledgmentsThe author gratefully acknowledges the General Education and Writing Across the Curriculumteams at New York City College of Technology for the valuable lessons provided throughworkshops and mentoring sessions.Reference 1. Kim, S., S. Chang, D. Castro-Lacouture. 2019. “Dynamic Modeling for Analyzing Impacts of Skilled Labor Shortage on Construction Project Management.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 1. 2. Levanon, G., B. Cheng, and M. Paterra. 2014. “The risk of future labor shortages in different occupations and industries in the
%202030. (accessed Feb. 26, 2023).[2] D. White, et al. “An innovative hybrid electric drivetrain concept and student project” in Association for Engineering Education - Engineering Library Division Papers, American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE, Honolulu, HI, June 2007, p. 12.212.1–.[3] K. Blair, D. W. Miller, D. Darmofal, C. P. W. Young, & D. Brodeur. Problem Based Learning In Aerospace Engineering Education Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, June 2002, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2—10974[4] “Velis Electro”. Pipistrel Velis Electro. https://www.pipistrel- aircraft.com/products/general-aviation/velis-electro/ (accessed Feb. 6, 2023).[5] “Joby completes second of four system reviews
] Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning: Summary of a Forum. doi: 10.17226/18254.[4] A. Wittig, “Implementing Problem Based Learning through Engineers without Borders Student Projects,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 4, 2013, Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076104[5] S. M. Kusano and A. Johri, “Developing Global Engineering Competency Through Participation in ‘Engineers Without Borders,’” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.500.1-26.500.14. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing-global-engineering-competency- through-participation-in
students who wouldparticipate in the classes with the fellows.Fellow Course Delivery Changed: The SPECTRA program was initiated (Fall 2019) just priorto the COVID-19 pandemic (beginning Spring 2020). As outlined by other groups (Washburnand Bragg 2022), the educational experience of students was impacted by stay-at-home orders.In South Carolina, this change started on March 16th when Governor McMaster announced theclosing of all schools in South Carolina through the end of the month including all universities,colleges, and technical colleges. This meant that much of the programming and interaction withthe fellows and scholars within this program became virtual that year. Scholars in the programreported difficulties transitioning to the online
, and R. L. Matz, “Supporting Equitable Team Experiences Using Tandem, an Online Assessment and Learning Tool,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2021, https://peer.asee.org/377872. P. Braveman, “Defining Equity in Health”, Health Policy and Development Journal, col. 2, no. 3, pp. 180-185, December 2004, https://www.jstor.org/stable/255699793. W. J. Jordan, “Defining Equity, Multiple Perspectives to Analyzing the Performance of Diverse Learners”, Review of Research in Education, vol. 34, pp. 142-178, March 2010, http://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X093528984. S. Marginson, “Equity, status and freedom: a note on higher education”, Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23-36, March 2011, http://doi.org
. 107, no. 4, pp. 556–582, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20234.[21] A. Boklage, B. Coley, and N. Kellam, “Understanding engineering educators’pedagogical transformations through the Hero’s Journey,” European Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 923–938, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1500999.[22] F. Tsuda-McCaie and Y. Kotera, “The Hero’s Journey: constructing continuity fromdiscontinuity in millennial career changers’ narratives,” Br J Guid Counc, 2021, doi:10.1080/03069885.2021.1936450.[23] N. K. Schlossberg, “A Model for Analyzing Human Adaptation to Transition,” CounsPsychol, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2–18, Jun. 1981, doi: 10.1177/001100008100900202.[24] M. L. Anderson, J. Goodman, and N. K. Schlossber, “Chapter 2: The
Communications in Japan., vol. 42, no. 24. IFAC, 2010. doi: 10.3182/20091021-3-jp-2009.00055.[11] V. Kovanović, D. Gašević, S. Joksimović, M. Hatala, and O. Adesope, “Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions,” Internet and Higher Education, vol. 27, pp. 74–89, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.002.[12] G. Sayeg-Sánchez, M. X. Rodríguez-Paz, and D. Valencia-Marquez, “Guided Learning Sequences as an e-Learning Enhancer During COVID-19 Emergency Conditions,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021.[13] F. B. Topu and Y. Goktas, “The effects of guided-unguided learning in 3d virtual environment on
, "Information technology, its impact on society and its future," in Advances in Computing 4.1, 2014, pp. 25–29.[2] M.J. Quinn, “On teaching computer ethics within a computer science department,” in SCI ENG ETHICS 12, 2006, pp. 335–343, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0032-9.[3] E. Milonas, “How Do We "Raise" Ethically Minded Computer Students?” In Proc. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020, https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-- 34730.[4] C. Lau, "A step forward: Ethics education matters!" In Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 2010, pp. 565–584.[5] A. Barnard, C. de Ridder, L. Pretorius, and E. Cohen, “Integrating computer ethics into the computing curriculum: A framework for implementation,” In Proc