). Crosshairs indicate the average standard error on the mean.Matz, R. L., Koester, B. P., Fiorini, S., Grom, G., Shepard, L., Stangor, C. G., Weiner, B., & McKay, T. A. (2017). Patterns of genderedperformance differences in large introductory courses at five research universities. AERA Open, 3(4), 2332858417743754. 6One of the first courses that may negatively shape experiences is in programming. 7 We define the difference in academicoutcomes as an equity gap because
across different demographics[37]. This was some of the groundwork for Main et al.’s conceptual model used in this study. Cruz & Kellam found that enjoyment of tinkering, a desire to be creative, and a need for multiple career options were predictive of engineering major choice along with math and science interest[11]. he decision to study engineering and succeed in the major is rarely separated from an interest inTmathematics and math class placement. Due to the impact COVID-19 has had on students' academic readiness, there is a need to understand more about pre-math-ready students pursuing engineering. Pre-math-ready engineering students have different math competence compared to their peers, and their
/5597e10c27ddb4430a61deb20101a1ec4b2b5421• Issapour, M. and K. Shepard, “Evolution of American Engineering Education,” CIEC Conference 2015.• Pines, D.J., “Democratizing Engineering for Every High School Student,” Issues in Science and Technology, March 16, 2022.• Margulies, S., Pearson. Y., and Barabino, G., Presentations at NAE Workshop on Public Understanding of Engineering, April 2022.References• Arnaud, C., “Weeding out inequity in undergraduate chemistry classes,” Chemical & Engineering News, 98 (34), September 2020.• Issapour, M. and K. Shepard, “Evolution of American Engineering Education,” CIEC Conference 2015.• Greenstein, D., “Greenstein: ‘Time is Not our Friend’ in Solving the Enrollment Puzzle,” February 2022, https://www.wccsradio.com/2022/02/22/greenstein
: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/[4] K. C. Aquino, E. Kim, C. Bilen-Green, C. M. Ray, and C. Anicha, “Working it backwards: student success through faculty professional development,” in Disability as Diversity in Higher Education: Policies and Practices to Enhance Student Success, 1st ed., New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2017, pp. 122–137.[5] S. Bassler, “‘But you don’t look sick’: Dismodernism, disability studies and music therapy on invisible illness and the unstable body,” Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy, vol. 14, no. 3, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.15845/voices.v14i3.802.[6] S. Lindsay and K. Fuentes, “It is time to address ableism in academia: a systematic review of the experiences and impact of
the programimproved from 2018-2020, several areas of improvement are still needed, such as more visibleand impactful resources for underrepresented students in engineering. Overall, we are excited tocontinue moving forward with improving and promoting DEI in engineering.References[1] National Academy of Engineering, "Introduction to the Grand Challenges for Engineering," [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/16091.aspx. [Accessed 7 October 2021].[2] L. Hong and S. E. Page, "Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 101, no. 46, pp. 16385- 16389, 2004.[3] C. Diaz-Garcia, A. Gonzalez-Moreno and F. J
abstracts and/or full texts. It is equally valuable to examine potential motivations for thesepapers to simply mention Asian American students and what goal(s) these quick mentions serve.It is interesting to see that quite a few of these papers often address concerns of other minoritystudents, such as Latinx students or African American students, while at the same time equatingAsian students with white students. This again plays into the model minority myth, whichwrongly places Asians as the “standard” for what minorities “should” strive for [7] [8] [9][10]. At least 18 papers include language in their abstracts which equate Asian and whitestudents, thus contradicting the claims in other papers which cite Asian Americans as a minoritygroup. While
* 2Therefore, we set out to better understand the source of this disconnect bymapping-out graduate student conflicts and their potential resolution pathways.Ultimately our hope is to provide students with the much-needed informationthat will give them the agency to navigate their conflicts and concerns.-----------------------------------------------------Attrition Citations:1. C. M. Golde, "The role of the department and discipline in doctoral studentattrition: Lessons from four departments," The Journal of Higher Education,vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 669-700, 2005.2. R. Sowell, J. Allum, and H. Okahana, "Doctoral initiative on minority attritionand completion," Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools, vol. 1, 2015.3. J. L. Lott, S. Gardner, and D. A
, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.78.3.210 ○ Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F., & Hastings, J. T. (1981). Evaluation to improve learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.9 Source Material: ● Nilson, L. & Stanny, C. J. (2015). Specifications grading : restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time. Stylus Publishing. ● Inoue, A. B. (2019). Labor-based grading contracts : building equity and inclusion in the compassionate writing classroom. The Wac Clearinghouse. ● Blum, S. & Kohn., A. (2020). Ungrading : why rating students undermines learning (and what to
(revised),” New York: Continuum, 1996. [4] A. Strauss and J. M. Corbin, Grounded theory in practice. Sage, 1997. [5] E. A. Cech, “The (mis) framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices,” in Engineering education for social justice. Springer, 2013, pp. 67–84. [6] K. Arrow, S. Bowles, and S. N. Durlauf, Meritocracy and economic inequality. Princeton University Press, 2000. [7] E. A. Cech and M. Blair-Loy, “Perceiving glass ceilings? meritocratic versus structural explanations of gender inequality among women in science and technology,” Social Problems, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 371–397, 2010. [8] M. Young, The rise of the meritocracy
Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education, 1st., E. Seymour and A. B. Hunter, Eds. Springer, 2019, pp. 87–114.[3] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences. Westview Press, 1997.[4] H. J. Passow, “What competencies should engineering programs emphasize? A meta- analysis of practitioners opinions informs curricular design,” presented at the 3rd International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, MA, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/what-competencies-should- engineering-programs-emphasize-meta-analysis--0. [Accessed: 02-Jul-2020][5] M. M. Chemers, E. L. Zurbriggen, M. Syed, B. K. Goza, and S. Bearman, “The role of efficacy and
developspatial skills and interest in engineering through play, which may ultimately encourage them topursue engineering pathways in the future.IntroductionThere are many research reports and studies that highlight the gender gap between men andwomen in engineering fields [1]. In 2018, 22.2% of bachelor’s degrees in engineering wereearned by women [2]. Additionally, in 2019, among those with science and engineering (S&E)degrees, 15.98% of women worked in S&E occupations (compared to 35.38% of men) [2]. Thegap between the number of women and men earning engineering degrees as well as the numberof women pursuing science and engineering careers suggests the need to improve and supportwomen’s participation in engineering fields.One factor that may
: Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 115-131, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.28945/1167. [Accessed April 16, 2020].[11] P. Bourdieu, "The forms of capital (1986)," in Cultural Theory: An Anthology, I. Szeman and T. Kaposy, Eds. West Sussex: Wiley, 2011, pp. 81-93.[12] D. Swartz, Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.[13] A. Portes, "Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology," in Knowledge and Social Capital, E. L. Lesser, Ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 43-67, 2000.[14] J. Anyon, "Social class and the hidden curriculum of work," Journal of Education, vol. 162, pp. 67-92, 1980.[15] J. Nahapiet and S
Mississippi State University. As a 2015 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program, Hall obtained her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech.Hannah Glisson American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022In this session we will think about the latter stages of a transfer student’s journey. Much research has focused on pre‐transfer and the first semester post‐transfer, but in this session we will think about students’ experiences beyond that initial semester. We will be drawing on a set of interviews with transfer students who participated in an NSF‐funded S‐STEM program.The project is a collaboration between Virginia Tech
Paper ID #40703Adapting the Gender Based Analysis Plus (GBA+) to Engineering: A DigitalTool to Aid Inclusive DesignMiss Audrey Anne Blanchet, Universit´e de Sherbrooke Audrey Anne Blanchet (M.A e` s Art) holds a master’s degree in political science and pursued doctoral studies in political sociology. She is currently Coordinator of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) at the Universit´e de Sherbrooke’s Faculty of Engineering, and Co-President of the R´eseau interuniversit´e qu´eb´ecois en e´ quit´e, diversit´e et inclusion. Her expertise lies in the inclusion of women, cultural minori- ties, and youth (aged 18-35
conferenceproceedings for the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the European Journalof Engineering Education, and Studies in Engineering Educationi. In this study, we bring attention to the literature that has quantitively assessed a student’srecognition through two primary questions. These studies have made significant contributions tothe field but have focused mainly on the aspect of being seen (recognized) as an engineer and havemeasured this concept through a student’s self-reflection and through their recognition of howmuch the people in their lives see them as an engineer: • “Parents/Relatives/friends see you as a physics person” and “Science teacher see[s] you as a physics person.” (Hazari et al., 2010
Research, A. Johri, Ed. Routledge, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003287483.[8] J. Cicek, S. Masta, T. Goldfinch, and B. Kloot, "Decolonization in engineering education," in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri, Ed. Routledge, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003287483.[9] P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder, 1970.[10] M. A. Meyer, "Holographic Epistemology: Native Common Sense," China Media Research, vol. 9, pp. 94-102, 2013.[11] S. Nadler, "Baruch Spinoza," in The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), E. N. Zalta, Ed. Standford University, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives
-ton [23]. III. DEI S TUDENT A MBASSADOR P ROGRAM AT S EATTLE U NIVERSITY In this section, we first give background about our institution, followed by a summary of our previouswork. We then describe the organization and structure of the DEI Student Ambassadors program. Weconclude the section with details about the specific events and activities that the DEI Student Ambassadorsorganized.A. Seattle Unviersity Seattle University is a small, private, religiously-affiliated and mission-driven institution located inSeattle, WA. Our urban campus is home to eight colleges and schools. One of them is the College ofScience and Engineering (CSE) which hosts eight departments. CSE is in the midst of a multi-yearproject to develop programs
concepts they do not understand [13]. Therefore, the formation of home-culture studygroups could be considered an oppositional behavior because many of the faculty do notencourage it.Another example of community conformism occurred through teaching assistants’ office hours.Students found that TAs were more approachable than professors because they were morewilling to help and were more like peers. At TA office hours, students not only received helpfrom TAs, but also found help and community among other students there who were working onthe same assignments. The final example of community conformism was Student 5’s effort torecruit more minority students to undergraduate research opportunities, thus helping them adapt.We observed one example of
]. Available:https://www.neads.ca/en/about/media/CombinedReport_Nov28.pdf[3] M. Lizotte and S. Clifford Simplican, “Doctoral Students With Disabilities: Challenges InGraduate Programs And Research Methodology,” J. Study Postsecond. Tert. Educ., vol. 2, pp.181–193, 2017, doi: 10.28945/3900.[4] S. A. Smith, E. Woodhead, and C. Chin-Newman, “Disclosing accommodation needs:exploring experiences of higher education students with disabilities,” Int. J. Incl. Educ., vol. 25,no. 12, pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2019.1610087.[5] R. Vergunst and L. Swartz, “‘He doesn’t understand that he’s struggling with the way Ifelt’ – university students, psychosocial disability and disclosure in the Western Cape, SouthAfrica,” Disabil. Soc., vol. 36, no
participation as meeting with their mentor(s) at least twicea semester and attending at least two program events in the Spring and an additional event in thesummer. Sustaining program participation by URM graduate students in STEM can bechallenging due to the demands on the student’s time for coursework and research. The Covid-19 pandemic also raised the barriers to recruit students and sustain engagement. Many of ourGREATS graduate students are first generation in STEM or come from lower socioeconomicstatus with limited financial resources. Therefore, we originally built in several incentives to recruitstudents and help promote their participation through the duration of this grant. The first incentiveis the opportunity to participate in the program
psychobiology and political science from Wheaton College in Massachusetts.Dr. Shernita Lee Dr. Shernita Lee is the Assistant Dean and Director of the Graduate School’s Office of Recruitment, Di- versity, and Inclusion at Virginia Tech. She holds a bachelorˆa C™s degree in mathematics from Alabama State University and a doctorate from Virginia TechDr. Nina Parshall, The Ohio State UniversityMs. Alissa Sperling, Drexel UniversityDr. Jacqueline E McDermott, Purdue University Dr. Jackie McDermott joined the College of Engineering at Purdue University in August 2018 and is the Associate Director of Graduate Diversity and Inclusion. Jackie completed her Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Biology from Brandeis University and has over
Dr. Bilec is an associate professor in the Swanson School of Engineeringˆa C™s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Dr. Bilecˆa C™s research program focuses on the built environment, life cycle assessment, sustainable healthcare, and energy im ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Establishing and Sustaining Inclusive Learning Communities for Supporting Faculty Creating More Inclusive Engineering Classrooms Jessica M. Vaden1, April A. Dukes PhD 1, Amy Brooks PhD 1, Kristen Parrish PhD 2, Amy Hermundstad Nave PhD 3, Amy E. Landis PhD 3, Melissa M. Bilec PhD 1 1University
presence and work in the engineering field allowed humanity to take that next step to achieve either energy independence from non-renewable energy sources or anything that will improve the quality of life of everyone. Ultimately, I hope to enjoy the process and be proud of the outcome once I reach it, however hard, tedious or stressful it may be.The three authors worked collaboratively throughout this study in all aspects, and they operatedunder the guidance of two senior researchers. The former is a mixed-race woman of color from aclinically trained biomedical engineering background. Her research in designing medicalsolutions for health disparities led her to the field of social sciences to study the root cause(s) ofinequities
advocacy around hidden curriculum in engineering,” in SEFI 47th Annual Conference: Varietas Delectat... Complexity is the New Normality, Proceedings, 2020, pp. 1566–1575. Accessed: Sep. 07, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10162378[2] F. D. Kentli, “Comparison of hidden curriculum theories,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 2009.[3] S. Nieto, Affirming diversity: the sociopolitical context of multicultural education. Longman, 1992. [Online]. Available: http://lp.hscl.ufl.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&Auth Type=ip,uid&db=cat04364a&AN=ufl.023212249&site=eds-live[4] I. Villanueva, L. Gelles
Decision Short-Term Decision MakingNote. Adapted from Where to Go from Here? Toward a Model of 2-Year College Students’Postsecondary Pathway Selection,” by K.R. Wickersham, 2020, Community College Review,48(2), 107-132. MethodsThe current study forms part of a broader investigation into an S-STEM program designed toenhance the academic success of engineering transfer students transitioning from communitycolleges to bachelor's degree programs. This initiative aimed to establish stronger connectionsbetween two community colleges and a partnering 4-year institution. We employed a qualitativeresearch approach to examine the influence of the pre-transfer program, referred to as VirginiaTechs Network for