remotelyand experience hands on operation to train muscle memory.The advancement of novel technology in virtual reality (VR) in the game industry and medical fields [1]–[5] enabled users to experience immersive environments to simulate real life like scenarios. Additionally,clinical studies have shown significant improvement in human health recovery with the assisted VRmotor trainings [6]. Virtual environments can serve as a mediator between the human operator and therobotic arms to improve perception of the equipment. In this study we explore the effectiveness of a VRsimulated Fanuc robotic arm as a remote learning tool. We replicated the existing robotics laboratory inthe VR environment to provide realistic experience to the students in the
develop moral reasoning andintuition longitudinally across three cultures/countries: the United States, Netherlands, andChina. We hope that findings in this paper can be useful for engineering educators to reflect onand design subsequent ethics education programs that are more responsive to students’backgrounds and needs when they start their first year in engineering programs. 1 IntroductionMost engineering programs in the United States and other Western countries, such as Australia,have created first-year engineering programs dedicated to teaching fundamental engineeringcompetencies and cultivating a
results from a survey conducted among the total population of 510 students from year 1 toyear 4 undergraduate students in three different universities. The students responded to aquestionnaire examining the factors that motivate them to work hard on their studies. Motivation,concentration, and learning are highly complex aspects of a student’s behavior. The relationshipbetween student concentration in a class and learning has been a prominent research topic ineducational studies.BackgroundMotivation is an important key to a student’s success [1-3]. Therefore, every learning-orientedentity aims to investigate the factors that affect the motivation of students to concentrate andlearn better. Many researchers have been widely studied motivational
classes unprepared for the open-ended, team-based workexpected. While students have learned to solve a variety of engineering problems within specificdisciplines, they have not learned to follow an engineering process to identify and formulate areal-world problem and to apply their disparate problem-solving skills to that problem.The engineering process comprises six well-established steps: 1. Define the problem to be solved to ensure a common understanding and to avoid later scope creep. 2. Specify system-level requirements following the SMART model: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-constrained. 3. Conduct trade studies to identify the concept that best meets the requirements. Brainstorm a range of potential
Understanding of Rigid Body KinematicsIntroduction Rigid body kinematics is the study of the motion of non-deforming objects. In atraditional American university or college, students are taught this subject of dynamics primarilythrough one-sided lectures, with a large emphasis on descriptive mathematics [1]. Feedback frompanels, blue-ribbon commissions, and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technologysuggests that these methods of instruction lack efficacy in engineering education [3]. Studieshave shown that students study harder and develop greater skills with the material when they areinterested in the subject matter and believe there is a reason to understand the concepts [3].Cognitive studies have also shown that people often learn
format questions.The students’ questions were graded based on 3 criteria: quality, completeness/accuracy, andcomprehensiveness (Brink 2004). After the course’s final exam, the students were split into 3groups: group 1 included those who had a final exam grade above 75, group 2 included thosewhose final exam grade was between 65 and 75, and group 3 included students whose final examgrade was below 65 (Brink 2004). Group 1 had an average question quality of 75.46, group 2 hadan average question quality score of 68.12, and group 3 had an average question quality of 61.67 2(Brink 2004). The results suggest that student problem generation is a more
analysis, academic outcomes, clustering1 IntroductionBased on the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, the six-year graduation rate forstudents who initiated their college education in 2012 is only 58%, with 42% of students eitherhalting enrollment or taking longer than six years to graduate [1]. Halting college is broadlyunderstood to impose irreversible mental, financial, and time losses to students [2].To date, numerous reasons have been identified to explain why students choose to halt theireducation; they include: financial problems, lack of interest in studies, lagged behind in studyprogression, and inadequate information and guidance [3]. In many cases, the reasoning is relatedto academic performance; however, the determination to
societyIntroductionCommunity engaged learning (CEL) involves students interacting with community groupsthrough a partnership which provides benefits to the community group and furthers studentlearning. Within literature service learning is one common form of CEL. There is a rich historyof CEL in engineering curriculum [1]. CEL has been found to provide a number of benefitsincluding motivation for social engagement [2], communication skills development[3] andacademic benefits [4], [5].Given these benefits, CEL was integrated into a second-year chemical engineering design coursein order to enhance skill development in students and with a particular focus on EngineersCanada Graduate Attribute (GA) development [6]. In particular we focus on GA 9 being theimpact of
design and practice. The new PEOswill result in a modern CE/ENVE curriculum that helps students develop the knowledge andskills needed to address the contemporary challenges facing the world.1.0 IntroductionThe bulk of engineering education upholds a narrow technical focus [1], [2]. Even thoughengineering products have consequences on society and the environment, engineering coursesseldom provide students with a deep understanding of the complex societal and environmentaldimensions of engineering practice [1], [3]. The insufficient education on matters of social andenvironmental justice can compromise the ability of engineering graduates to adequately servethe needs of their stakeholders, especially vulnerable communities. Thus, higher
. Results of theseanalyses are shared.IntroductionThe typical learning experience of students reinforce their perceptions of the teachers asauthority figures. The students thus strive in general to respond to their teachers’ questions withanswers that they think the teacher is looking for. Thus, in their understanding, a question or aproblem has either a right answer or a wrong answer. This binary world view of the students andtheir subsequent transition to a more nuanced understanding, was studied by Perry [1]. Heidentified nine positions of a young adult’s understanding of the world, dividing it into fourmajor grouping of dualism, multiplicity, relativity and commitment. Dualism is the belief thatevery problem is solvable, and the correct answer
, and bothteam and individual reflection on team performance. The instructors emphasize the value ofdiversity, such as the need for each student’s voice to be sought, heard, and respected. Theprofessional skills developed in the course include project management, both formal andinformal presentations to varied audiences, formal documentation, budgeting, business cases, andconsideration of ethical issues related to their specific project.By emphasizing not just the project itself and the technical skills, but also focusing onprofessional skills in interdisciplinary, diverse teams, the course structure touches on aspects ofeach of the ABET 1-7 student outcomes.While it is a struggle to keep the workload manageable, employers and alumni frequently
students present a variety of perspectives on theirexperiences. Challenges around creating inclusive spaces are highlighted. Suggestions forimproving the climate in co-curricular groups include expanding existing training aroundinclusion to encompass all group members rather than only group leaders as well as continualtraining.KeywordsDiversity, inclusion, engineering leadership, safe spaceIntroductionLeadership development has long been a topic of educational interest [1]. Specifically inengineering there have been calls to supplement technical skill development with social,organizational, and professional skill development [2]. Intercultural and equity drivencompetencies are an important part of this development [3]. Giving students an ability
provided by phasor measurement units, integration of distributed and renewable generation, power system short- and long-term stability, and engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022Multidimensional Design Process for Modern Engineering Applications: A Smart Grid Design Case Study Yuri R. Rodrigues, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, United States 1. Introduction The design of new services and products based on technological advancements is one of thegreatest challenges in engineering. This process has been traditional performed consideringreduced realities of complex system using