: n Peer assessment n Practitioner assessment How are the U.S. News Best Graduate Engineering Schools Ranking Weights Selected? w The selection of the engineering weights are based on several factors. They are: n 25+ years of experience in doing academic rankings n Education literature n Discussions with engineering educators n In the end U.S. News makes its best judgment ASEE is Very Important to the U.S. News Graduate Engineering Rankings 1. U.S. News uses ASEE’s exact same definition of research expenditures on the U.S. News engineering stat survey 2. In early January as part the yearly data collection cycle U.S. News and ASEE compare the U.S. News collected research
) 9Technology Investments to Spur Economic Growth* Technology Highlights in the 2011 Budget Promote the Commercialization of promising technologies: The Budget proposes $12 million in the National Science Foundation (NSF) for a new Innovation Ecosystem in which universities partner with other institutions to increase the impact of the most promising innovations through commercialization, industry alliances, and start‐up formation. *Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) February 1, 2010 10 Filling Gaps ENG overall
Directorate for Engineering FY 2011 Budget Request Thomas W. Peterson Assistant Director for Engineering March 16, 2010March 16, 2010 ENG Use of ARRA Funding • Young Investigators • Education and Workforce Development • High Risk / High Reward • Translational Research ENG Use of ARRA Funding • Young Investigators – 80 additional CAREER awards – 15 additional BRIGE awards – 16 additional GRF in addition to the 80 Women in Engineering (WENG) GRF Fellows funded annually by ENG – 1 additional IGERT in the area of energy • Education and Workforce Development – 40 Postdocs in Industry – 17 additional REU/RET awards – 76 additional Education awards
, Colorado State U, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U Colorado (Boulder) • Mechanisms: ? • Objectives: create and speed the commercialization of renewable energy technologies, energy management systems, and energy efficiency 30 References 1 AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program Guide to R&D Funding Data Historical Table 1 available at http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/guihist.shtml 2 “Federal Government is Largest Source of University R&D Funding in S&E; Share Drops in FY 2008”, Ronda Britt, NSF 09318 available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf09318/ 3 Map of DOE Laboratories from http://www.science.doe.gov
ERC Meeting and Engineering Ed and Centers March 16, 2010 Allen L. Soyster Brief History and Present Facts • EEC Division formed in 1992 • 50 ERCs (since 1984) • Four Foci üCenters (65% funding) üHuman Resources (10%) üEngineering Education (10%) ü(Stipend – GRF, IGERT, K‐12, Brige)(15%) • 138 million (Request for 2011) EEC Objectives for 2020 1. Enhance the K‐12 Pipeline and its Diversity; * 10% of all matriculates study engineering. 2. Promote the Success of the Undergraduate Learning Experience; * 3 of 4 students complete BS in engineering. 3. Improve the Pathway to Graduate Engineering Programs for US and Permanent Residents
, background noises, andpauses in conversation. Transcripts were then read and organized into coding categories using anemergent theme system.ResultsGeneral Student Responses to ProgramWhen asked to identify positive aspects of the research experience, students identified severalelements (Table 1). Responses given by the most students related to community (i.e., amongstudents and faculty) and beginning the process of research. All but two students felt theirresearch skills evolved during the summer. Students felt they gained valuable skills such asknowing how to work independently, to design and carry out a research project, and to thinkcritically. One of the two students who did not particularly like his research experience attributedthis to spending
provide real-time C++ code compilation and testing, we seek to ensure adequatecomprehension of the material presented in an introductory engineering/programming course.We have gathered statistically significant evidence that suggests a strong correlation between astudent’s performance on our automated gateway system and their upcoming exam performance.This indicates that the gateway assessment performance is indicative of overall courseperformance. We also present ideas for further adoption of our gateway system throughout theengineering education community.1. IntroductionCommon across many engineering schools, entering students are expected to complete a set ofcore courses, consisting of mathematics, science, physics, and computer programming
servicesThis paper is justified for the actual tendency of all major computer companies, including BEA,Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and Sun Microsystems that have adopted andsupported the SOC computing paradigm, its technologies, and its features. [1][4][5][6][7]Service-Oriented Robotics Computing is important not only in application software developmentbut also in education. SOC-based robotics programming is easier than traditional roboticsprogramming. Sponsored by the US Department of Education, a SOC-based robotics-computingcurriculum is developed for high schools in United States. [2] Page 15.401.2VPL provides an easy way to define how
engineering technology will beexpected to use unprecedented amounts of technology to assist in this realization as they enterthe workforce. While manufacturing is just one part of a product development process that isbecoming more and more important, it is a critical part that can lead to and affect significantinvestments. Conveying to students the role of technology (and its limitations) should beincorporated into manufacturing engineering and manufacturing engineering technologycurricula.There have been significant advances in computer simulation in recent years. Some havepredicted that computer-aided engineering will eliminate the need for prototypes [1]. There arenumerous simulation tools of varying rigor and complexity available for
. Page 15.613.2Enrollment in Engineering MajorsEnrollment data for students in engineering majors within the College of Engineering (CENG)and College of Architecture and Environmental Design (CAED) was acquired for the years 2004to 2008. The total number of students enrolled and the number of women students enrolled ispresented in Table 1. Engineering majors are abbreviated as follows: Architectural (ARCE),Aeronautical (AERO), Biomedical (BMED), Civil (CE), Computer (CPE), Computer science(CSC), Electrical (EE), Environmental (ENVE), General (GE), Industrial (IE), Materials(MATE), Mechanical (ME), Manufacturing (MFGE), and Software (SE). This data as well ashistorical data are presented graphically in Figure 1 for the CENG. Total enrollment data
beenmultiple measure assessments (pre-post). Some were designed to assess understanding of basicengineering and technology content (such as “What is Engineering?”), while others have focusedon measuring STEM learning resulting from student interaction with specific EiE units. Page 15.199.2Theoretical FrameworkThe main goal of the EiE curriculum is to help children to learn engineering and technology—not merely facts from and about these fields of study, but practices, habits of mind, and ways oflooking at the world through disciplinary lenses. At the dawn of the twentieth century, JohnDewey 1 advocated that progressive education should provide
engineering disciplines, this course was structured to focus on the grandchallenges as the context for discussions on the future of engineering. The course goalsincluded: 1. By investigating some of the "big" challenges predicted for this century, students will develop a perspective of great technological challenges facing society and how solutions are being formulated. 2. As we probe deeper into the challenges students will develop an understanding of how the different engineering disciplines contribute to solving these problems. 3. Within the context of the big societal challenges, students will start to understand the role engineers play in solving these problems; a role that requires engineers work together
andGallagher11 developed a web-based FE program as an aid in teaching deformable (Solid)mechanics course. There are several math tools and textbooks available12-21 in the literature thatcan be used to enhance the basic understanding of a typical FEA course. Other relevant literatureon this subject area are also included in the bibliography22-24.Common Course Learning Objectives (CLOs):The instructors teaching this course have identified the following common course learningobjectives which will facilitate using common assessment tools for this course.1. apply the knowledge of Matrix Algebra, Statics, CAE and Mechanics of Materials courses to a basic understanding of the Finite Element Method and its engineering applications2. understand the assumptions
collaboration of interdisciplinary faculty andguest speakers/panelists. The first course is a four unit lecture and the second course is a project-based four unit laboratory, intended to aid students who wish to collaborate with the purpose ofimplementing sustainability principles. The course enrolls 16 students and is used by ARCH,LA, and CRP.Most of the interdisciplinary efforts have been low enrollment electives. Because the ABETaccreditation criteria for engineering programs 1 requires that every student be able to functionon multi-disciplinary teams, a large enrollment default course was needed. The department headsultimately chose to build on CM 431. Two departments were already invested and it could
. Also, prerequisites knowledge test is veryhelpful to assess their concepts and to conduct any extra help sessions. Figure 1 and 2 inAppendix – I show charts of students’ overall grade in Statics and Solid Mechanics, respectively.Although many students did well in Statics course, few of these students had difficulty inunderstanding the difference between rigid body mechanics (Statics) and deformable bodymechanics (Solid Mechanics). This contributed to only a moderate performance on MachineDesign course.Conventional teaching methods (lectures, class work and team-home work, mini- and term-ending projects) are followed for this course. The final take-home project enhanced the students’understanding of the material covered in the entire course
. However, it is not enough that theproduct development process be effective, it must also be quick. Development lead time canaffect the commercial and financial success of a product 1 2 3. Some companies even use timeto market as a key product development metric 4. There is a potential conflict between trying tocomplete a development project quickly and producing a superior (or even acceptable) product.This conflict arises from the desire of technical professionals to engineer “perfect” products andthe business reality of needing to deliver those products in an efficient and cost effective manner.At most stages of the development process there are several alternative methods to determine theacceptability of a given design solution. These range
! ! ∀ # ∃ % ∃ & & ∋ ∀ # & ∃ ! ∋ & & ( )∗ +∗ ∀+# , & −./ −./ & . 0 . + ∀ # ∀ # 1 ! ∋ 2
environment of use. No one personor department would be expected to have all the needed information, thereby requiring aninterdisciplinary collaborative approach.This project involved a collaborative effort from three University departments, Engineering &Design (E&D), Disability Support Services (DSS), and the Center for Disability Studies andUniversal (CDS) Access. The CDS was created under the United States Department of Educationgrant entitled “Improving Education Success for Students with Disabilities in Higher Education”(Education4, 2008). The goals of CDS include: 1. To enhance the educational experiences of students with disabilities at Eastern Washington University. 2. To foster an environment in which students, faculty and
created using UGSNX 5.0 and then is meshed using HyperMesh 9.0. A stamping simulation is then performedusing HyperForm. A DOE is conducted on the results of the simulation and a brief description isprovided. Figure 1 – Component used in the analysisSolid Modeling 1. Open NX 5.0 - Open the CAD program NX 5.0 by going to the Start button in the lower left corner of the screen then All Programs then UGS NX 5.0 then NX 5.0 2. Create a .prt File - Go to File then New then in the File New window that pops up make sure Model is highlighted under the Templates section and then in the New File Name section name it something and save it somewhere you will
). "Technological literacy can be thought of acomprising three interrelated dimensions that help describe the characteristics of atechnologically literate person... (1) knowledge; (2) ways of thinking and acting; and (3)capabilities" (National Academy of Engineering11, 2008). "Technological literacy is the ability touse, manage, assess, and understand technology" (International Technology EducationalAssociation7, 2007). All of these definitions point to the knowledge and understanding oftechnologies."Common elements of technological literacy include knowledge about individual technologies, Page 15.1004.3the process of technology development, the historical
AC 2010-1013: "SURVIVOR" MEETS SENIOR PROJECTGlen Dudevoir, United States Air Force AcademyAndrew Laffely, United States Air Force AcademyAlan J. Mundy, United States Air Force Academy Page 15.3.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 “Survivor” Meets Senior ProjectAbstractWe have all seen the formation of tribes and cliques on the latest edition of the television hitSurvivor. Has Survivor mentality invaded your senior projects as well? For the last ten years orso, engineering programs nationwide have, with varying degrees of success, tried to incorporatethe ABET-required outcome of “ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.”1 Whilerecognizing
, specifically in relation to teamwork. This study is part of a larger NSF supportedproject engaged in the development of capstone design course assessment instruments.Therefore, a second aim is to examine the effectiveness of the instruments in facilitating studentand team reflective practice. The research questions for this study include: (1) What are theteamwork-related reflective practices of engineering capstone design teams and individuals?(i.e., what teamwork issues do they reflect on; for what purposes; how; what factors affectreflection; and what are the outcomes?), and (2) What impacts do “prompted” (instructorassigned) reflective assessments have on a team’s overall reflective practice?This qualitative study uses an analytic induction
challenged to be creative and innovative in their solutionsto the problems presented to them.This interdisciplinary course satisfies the University’s International Studies graduationrequirement. As a result, students from all disciplines across campus regularly take the courseleading to a great diversity of backgrounds and specialties. Perhaps this explains the widespectrum of opinions, comments and ideas expressed both in the class discussions and in thewritten essays.ObjectivesThe course has two main objectives: (1) promote awareness of technological development, and(2) provide a rudimentary understanding of the social, political, economic and cultural impact oftechnology. These two main objectives were then expanded to create a more comprehensive
theyseemed to be the most logical candidates for recruitment. However, many students were notacademically prepared to enroll in college STEM courses without remediation, often becauseprevious curriculum choices resulted in limited exposure to math and science in these students’programs of study. Other obstacles include students’ lack of awareness of engineering as apossible career because of unfamiliarity with the profession.1 One natural extension, then, wasto focus projects at the middle school level, where timely interventions would ideally lead toenrollment in classes that would better prepare students for the rigors of college STEM studies.Research, however, is increasingly indicating that that intervention efforts must begin as early
literacy.” Sinceour focus is on mathematical modeling in the context of engineering design, we usedGainsburg’s2 framework to structure our activities and data collection. (Other authors3-5 havepresented additional, similar frameworks for the creation of mathematical models.) Specifically,Gainsburg identified six steps for what mathematical modeling should include: 1. Identify the real-world phenomenon 2. Simplify or idealize the phenomenon 3. Express the idealized phenomenon mathematically (i.e., “mathematize”) 4. Perform the mathematical manipulations (i.e., “solve” the model) 5. Interpret the mathematical solution in real-world terms 6. Test the interpretation against realityShe studied the use of mathematical models in
platforms for self-expression, and they can bemaintained dynamically over time. Some e-portfolio applications permit varying degrees ofaudience access, so the same portfolio might be used for multiple purposes. There are benefits tousing an electronic portfolio over a traditional portfolio; they can hold a great deal of informationwhile taking up little space, they can be accessed with minimal effort, and they can includecollaborative student work. Additionally, e-portfolios can be enhanced by the addition of sound,music, pictures, graphics and even video, and can serve to enhance computer and technologyskills.In particular, we hope to achieve four fundamental objectives with our NDeP project: 1) engagestudents in their learning and allow students
increase participation amongfemale students in STEM fields entitled, Pathway to a STEM Baccalaureate Degree: ResearchTrends, Exemplary Practices, and Successful Strategies, funded by the National ScienceFoundation (Award #0507882). Having reviewed numerous support programs that are currentlyfunded by NSF to increase numbers of traditionally underrepresented student population inSTEM fields, the authors examine exemplary transfer programs that are specifically aimed toincrease participations among female students in STEM fields. The purposes of this study are:1) to understand how gender influenced learning experiences among female students in pre-engineering program at a community college; 2) to provide students the opportunity to reflect onand