Paper ID #32762What Strategies do Diverse Women in Engineering Use to Cope withSituational Hidden Curriculum?Dr. Victoria Beth Sellers, University of Florida Dr. Victoria Sellers is a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida. Her current research is focused on determining how engineering students respond to hidden curriculum. Victoria has previously served as an editorial assistant to the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, as well as the communications intern for the Journal of Engineering Education. Victoria received a PhD in
widespread in industry, however it is not widespread incomputer science education. According to a corporate survey, the 13th Annual State of AgileReport[1], “97% of respondents report their organizations practices agile development methods.”This development process is a missing skill set for most computer science undergraduatesentering industry. Given the nature and scope of most coursework, undergraduate computerscience students naturally learn to develop using a waterfall design process which is an antithesisto agile software development processes. Studies have shown that active learning promoteslearning[2], so this work integrates active techniques to completely focus the course on thereal-world engineering process using agile methods. Ultimately
Division Forum. Dr. Furterer is an author or co-author of several academic journal articles, conference proceedings and 4 reference textbooks on Lean Six Sigma, Design for Six Sigma and Lean Systems, Lean Six Sigma Case Studies in the Healthcare Enterprise. She is a co-editor for the ASQ Certified Quality Improvement Asso- ciate Handbook (2020), and the ASQ Certified Manager of Quality / Organizational Excellence Handbook (2020). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Incorporating a Unique Lean Six Sigma Learning Experience by Integrating Graduate and Undergraduate Students Across Two Lean Six Sigma Courses in the Engineering Technology and
4th, 5th, and 6th grade studentsover a period of two years in several school districts across Missouri. We surveyed 129 studentswith pre- and post-instruments. We found that students reported high positive attitudes towardmath and science. Males and females did not differ in attitudes toward math and science. Toassist teachers with understanding the relatively new engineering and science standards, we areadding specific standards to the curricula. We provide such an overview of standards below forboth engineering and neuroscience. We also note that the comparative theme of human(brain/body) and artificial (Lego) robotics used in the curriculum is not only interdisciplinary andengaging, but also enables inclusion of science, mathematics
in the Program in Computers, Communication, Technology, and Education at Teachers College, teaching courses on methodologies for researching technology in education and on online schools and schooling. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 FOUNDATIONS – Integrating Evidence-based Teaching and Learning Practices into the Core Engineering Curriculum: Retrospective on the Progress of Teaching-Track Faculty ParticipantsIntroductionImproving the quality of teaching and learning in higher education is an ongoing challenge particularly forfoundational courses [1]. Although a large body of research indicates that active and collaborativeinstruction [2] coupled
Paper ID #33016Exploring Engineering: Peer-sharing Presentations in First-yearEngineering CurriculumDr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. She is the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition.Ms. Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University Abigail Stephan is a doctoral candidate in the Learning
Paper ID #35523Full Paper: An integrated engineering/history/ethics first-yearexperience at Boston CollegeDr. Jonathan Krones, Boston College Dr. Krones is an Assistant Professor of the Practice in Boston College’s new Department of Human- Centered Engineering (HCE). Before starting this position in 2021, he was a Visiting Assistant Professor of Environmental Science and Environmental Studies at BC, where he introduced engineering-style ped- agogy into the first-year Core Curriculum and helped to establish HCE. In addition to engineering educa- tion, his research focuses on industrial ecology and environmentally
Session XXX 2-2 The Integration of Physical Experimentation Based on NI ELVIS System into an Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Program Jerry K. Keska Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisiana Lafayette, LA 70506 AbstractThis paper reports the results of the development and implementation of hands-on laboratoryexperiments in a newly developed
which have linked the goals ofhumanitarian engineering with experimental research, engaged students through the pursuit oftheir passions, considered the wider context of technical solutions, and enabled partnerships withother service-learning initiatives. This research also provides an opportunity for the integration ofinterdisciplinary educational experiences that combine liberal arts, science, and engineeringaspects of an undergraduate engineering education. The first section of this paper will provide anoverview of the global problem in water quality. The second section will describe severalundergraduate experiences related to improving global water quality and share some studentperceptions on these experiences.Overview of the Global Problem
engineering students.To incorporate changes, it was important to understand the challenges and potentialopportunities, so our team, comprising the course instructor and teaching assistants, explored theexisting literature and supporting information prior to developing the modified Design Thinkingapproach. Current instructors are seeing a massive difference in the atmosphere between onlineand in-person modes of instruction. Many students find the online class settings daunting due toa lack of social interactions and difficulties concentrating [23]. They face additional challengesas many instructors are not properly trained to adapt their curriculum to an online setting [16].To combat inefficient classroom settings many researchers have studied the
at minority serving institutions. For example, at the historically Black collegeand universities University of the District of Columbia, an elective biology course forjunior-level biology majors integrates the physiological determinants of health and socialdeterminants of health (SDOH) via seminars with guest speakers who research HD [10].At City College of New York, a Hispanic serving institute, their undergraduatebiomedical engineering program engages students in HD challenges with establishedcurricula on HD modules, undergraduate research initiatives in HD, and design projectsfocused on HD [11], [12]. Often, these two disciplines include students on a premedicaltrack, which has also encouraged exposure to HD and SDOH in medical curriculum
Paper ID #34542Design Across the Curriculum: Reinforcing the Design Process in aChemistry-for-Engineers CourseProf. Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver Katherine Goodman is assistant professor at the University of Colorado Denver, and curriculum lead at Inworks, an interdisciplinary innovation lab. Her research focuses on transformative experiences in engineering education. She is currently division chair of the Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE).Ms. Susan Garver Stirrup, University of Colorado Denver Susan Garver Stirrup is a full time Instructor in the College of
ofsociotechnical thinking into the course curriculum, Professor B did not have the same interactionwith other faculty members because it was the only section of the course taught each semester.Although this was not a direct insight but rather an indirect one, it seemed to have addedadditional challenges to Professor B, which may contribute to faculty burnout and an increase inimposter syndrome. The other key difference in both faculty reflection logs includedsociotechnical integration teaching techniques, where Professor A had a more project-basedtechnique, while Professor B’s teaching technique included more prompts/anchors to theirtechnique. It should be noted that although both techniques were different, both seemed to haveresonated on some level with
research and course work is one method of developing a new type of researchprogram.At this time there are approximately 400 undergraduate and 30 graduate students in the NDSUECE Department. Contained in this group of students are very talented and bright individualscapable of thinking independently, taking initiative, and leading groups of people. One methodof challenging these capable students is to integrate active research programs directly into thecourses currently being taught in the ECE curriculum. Over the past few semesters, the authorshave been working to bring research activities into the courses in electromagnetics that werementioned earlier. In particular, research topics associated with flexible antennas, microwavecircuitry, and
Paper ID #33584Inclusivity in Engineering Curriculum in the Age of Industry 4.0: TheRole of Internet of ThingsDr. Shuvra Das, University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Shuvra Das started working at University of Detroit Mercy in January 1994 and is currently Pro- fessor of Mechanical Engineering. Over this time, he served in a variety of administrative roles such as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair, Associate Dean for Research and Outreach, and Director of International Programs in the college of Engineering and Science. He has an undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
at Harvey Mudd College. His research interests include experi- ential and hands-on learning, and integrating mechanical, chemical and quantum devices into circuits and communication links. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Engineering Identity, Slackers and Goal Orientation in Team Engineering ProjectsAbstract -- This research paper will describe the results from a qualitative investigation oflong-running, team-based engineering projects at a small liberal arts college. Long-running,team-based engineering projects are projects in which groups of students perform an engineeringtask over three or more weeks
professional emails, communicating with team members, keeping minutes fora meeting, or summarizing a meeting with little or no formal instruction. When communicationeducation is included, it is included as an add-on and often only addressed at the level ofproficiency of the instructors (who are typically not experts in professional communication).The purpose of this paper is to outline a multi-course effort at Michigan State University tomeaningfully integrate a professional communication curriculum into their core engineeringclasses. The paper outlines the development of a multi-course syllabus and leveraging anexisting communications education solution. Careful work is done to integrate communicationeducation into the course objectives and
professionals in systems engineering and related fields that have integrated DEIinto their work to provide recommendations for how DEI principles can be integrated intoengineering education. Participants were recruited online and through snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 15 participants either over the phone or on a videochat platform. These interviews were analyzed through inductive content analysis, which yieldedthree themes related to integrating DEI into systems engineering education: curriculumdevelopment, course design, and educator development. The results from this study align withrecent calls in higher education to decolonize the curriculum. Beyond strategies like ensuringrepresentation in class readings and
Paper ID #32901Augmenting Traditional ME Curriculum with Digital Badge Microcreden-tialsDr. Andrea Gregg, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Gregg is the Director of Online Pedagogy and an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Penn State Me- chanical Engineering department. She facilitates faculty development to maximize teaching and learning efficacy throughout the ME curriculum, with a primary focus on online learning. She is also respon- sible for leading quality instructional design for residential and online offerings; facilitating an activity community of practice for Mechanical Engineering faculty dedicated to
from M.E.T.U. in Turkey. Her technical research interests are in structural and characterization of TiO2 thin films and magnetic nanoparticles along with pedagogical research interests in improving engineering physics curriculum and seeking solutions to gender bias.Dr. Ashley J. Earle, York College of Pennsylvania Ashley is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical and Civil Engineering department at York College of Pennsylvania. She received her B.S in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and B.A. in International Studies from Lafayette College. She then pursued her passion for neuromuscular disease research at Cornell University where she received her PhD in Biomedical Engineering. At York, she is passionate about
Integration. Paper presented at the National Association of Industrial Technology (NAIT). 3. Lin, Johnathon, 2006. MastercamX Mill and Solids. Ann Arbor, MI: Scholar International Publishing Corp. 4. Walker, John, 1998. Machining Fundamentals. Tinley park, IL: Goodheart-Willcox Publishing Company.FARZIN HEIDARIDr. Heidari currently serves as an Associate Professor of Industrial Technology at Texas A&M University—Kingsville. Dr. Heidari has twenty years of teaching experience in CAD/CAM courses. He has numerouspublications related to this topic. He is currently serving as the Graduate Coordinator for the Industrial ManagementProgram. Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
increasingly difficult to facilitate due to the COVID-19 pandemic, is an integral component of any comprehensive engineering education program. Aproject-based approach using low-cost, pre-made kits offers practical experience in teamworkand collaboration, system design and implementation, problem solving and refinement ofinterdisciplinary skillsets through projects that can be completed at home or in the classroom.Robotics instruction and experimentation provides a means to achieve robust interdisciplinarylearning outcomes, facilitating long-term retention of engineering concepts by illustrating theconnections between theory and practice. This paper aims to establish the need for designintegration throughout the undergraduate curriculum, identify
first year, a course in the second year focusing on measurement andfabrication, a course in the third year to frame technical problems in societal challenges, andculminates with our two-semester, client-driven fourth-year capstone design sequence.The impetus to create a design thread arose from preparation for an ABET visit where weidentified a need for more “systems thinking” within the curriculum. Here systems thinkingrefers to understanding abstraction and its relation to system decomposition and modularity;students having difficulty making engineering evaluations of systems based on data; andstudents’ difficulty transferring skills in testing, measurement, and evaluation from in-class labscenarios to more independent work on projects. We
models in a differentway when communicating with peers rather than with teachers and instructors, resulting inpotentially different forms of engagement and learning [11].The goal of this paper is to understand how peer comparison can influence the quality ofconceptual models within an engineering design task in elementary classroom contexts. Weinvestigate the effects of structured peer comparison to help students develop conceptual models.We explore the changes in quality of conceptual models and students’ thoughts about the peercomparison activities in a post-activity interview. By exploring how elementary students developconceptual models during a 4-week engineering design curriculum unit, we aim to inform thefield as to how to support
Stanford University forover half a century and has engaged students in an immersive yearlong (nine months) coursesequence with industry-sponsored projects focusing on various phases of integrated designthinking through engineering fabrication. Through transitions in the teaching team, projectsponsors, and paralleling the evolution in modern and innovative engineering practices andchanging societal needs, ME310 maintains a pedagogical emphasis on helping student teamsmeet defined process milestones in order to produce a refined functional prototype that ispresented to the broader design community at the end of the year [8]. In ME310, many alumni,as practicing professionals in industry, come back to the course to serve as project advisors,sometimes
systems can be designed andcreated to provide an integrative learning environment via a theme that connects and transfers theknowledge across a curriculum. The paper will focus on the results of the project from twoperspectives: technological and educational. The technological perspective will describe theresearch efforts of automatically generating virtual environments using the reinforcementlearning (RL) approach while the educational perspective will summarize the results on theeffectiveness of the CLICK approach on students’ motivation, engineering identity, and learningoutcomes.IntroductionThis paper presents the results of our NSF project entitled Leveraging Virtual Reality (VR) toConnect Learning and Integrate Course Knowledge (CLICK) in
areas of international development: technical support forcommunity development, capacity building, and the engineering design of humanitarian technologies. Thetransition of the service-learning program into a college center, creates new opportunities to provideresearch services to partners and coursework related to sustainable development. The integration of researchand curriculum includes a graduate level concentration in International Development as a part of an MS inSustainable Engineering program, and an undergraduate minor in Humanitarian Engineering. 11.2 Program Development Whereas, the center was only recently established, the engineering program at Villanova University hasa long
learning quickly - for example, you might review new curriculum, prep for the lesson, and teach, all within a short period of time. Do you think your development in these areas will be of benefit in the future, either as a student or in your career? ● In our previous conversations, you spoke about the teaching and learning environment in university - and how it can be quite limited and uninspiring in its focus on transmission-based lectures. In contrast, you described your work with (outreach program) as reflecting a broader set of teaching and learning activities, giving you an opportunity to explore subject matter and your understanding of it in different ways. Can you speak a little more to this
and engineering: A multi-year study,” in 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Albuquerque, NM, June 24-27, 2001, pp. 6.182.1 – 6.182.8[6] P R. W. Hendricks, & E. C. Pappas, “Advanced engineering communication: An integrated writing and communication program for materials engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, pp. 343 – 352, 1996[7] G. G. Lowry, “An integrated physics-chemistry curriculum for science majors,” Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 46, pp. 393-395, June 1969.[8] F. J. Buckley, Team teaching : What, why, and how? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000.[9] D. C. S. Summers, and G. A. Bohlen, “Team teaching an interdisciplinary course: Lessons
Paper ID #33372The Benefits of an Engineering Field Trip for Women StudentsDr. Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Dr. Kerry Meyers holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (B.S. & M.S. Mechanical Engineering) and is specifically focused on programs that influence student’s experience, affect retention rates, and the factors that determine the overall long term success of students entering an engineering program. She is the Assistant Dean for Student Development in the College of Engineering at the University of Notre Dame. She is committed to the betterment of the undergraduate curriculum and is still actively