States.Communication in engineering continues to be an important element of engineering education,especially in terms of future employability. Universities are continually measured, ranked, andevaluated for performance-based funding based on their students’ employment numbersfollowing graduation. However, a divide exists between the level of communication competencyemployers expect from recent graduates versus their actual competency. Despite over twodecades of Communication (and English) faculty efforts, extensive research, and grantinvestment by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in engineering communication educationsince EC2000, the calls for universities to teach communication competence to engineeringundergraduates has only grown louder.At its core
within academic structures such as departmental siloing andconflicts in policies, procedures, and budget models across disciplines that often impinge uponinterdisciplinary student development [1][2][3].Previous findings based on faculty perspectives on facilitating interdisciplinary programs revealthe ways in which multiple differentiated layers of the academic environment impact graduatestudent development, but students’ perspectives have often been left out, leaving an incompletepicture. Additionally, existing literature tends to focus on levels of the academic environmentthat students interact with directly, with less attention to external influences at or beyond theinstitutional level that are also relevant to the interdisciplinary graduate
, couldhelp increase the retention of STEM degree attainment for every group [4]. Multiple theoriesand models deduce the factors associated with retention, success and learning [9]-[12].Numerous previous studies have used an Input-Environment-Output model, which uses students' 2sociocultural and personal background characteristics (sex, race, gender, values) to betterunderstand how students interact with faculty and peers within an academic institution. Fromthese studies, it was demonstrated that students' engagement in curricular and co-curricularexperiences with their peers and faculty has an impact on their general success and ability tolearn. Within
Paper ID #38710Linking Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Outcome Expectations,Interests, Career Goals, Self-Efficacy, Social Support, and Barriers inSingapore: A Social Cognitive Career Theory StudyMr. Tejas Gupta, Nanyang Technological University Tejas Gupta is an undergraduate student in his second year at Nanyang Technological University, majoring in mathematics. As a member of Dr. Yeter’s Research Team, Tejas is currently engaged in a study on social cognitive career theory. With a strong background in STEM education and data analysis, Tejas has gained a distinct insight into the influence of social and cognitive factors
method study that aims to explore the impacts of intergenerational familypatterns on engineering students academic and career decisions. The research setting was a large,public, predominately white (PWI) southeastern university that has a College of Engineering andComputing with six engineering programs: aerospace, biomedical, chemical, civil andenvironmental, computer, electrical, and mechanical. The research study was approved by theinstitutional review board (IRB) of the university and qualified for exempt review. The researchmethod utilized in this paper was qualitative case study to “… reveal an in-depth understandingof a case or bounded system, which involves understanding an event, activity, process, or one ormore individuals” [45
undergraduatecomputing students worked in teams to sketch and create ethics based decision making scenariosusing paper or blackboard. This scenario creation activity model was later refined and employedin different Ethics in Engineering courses as a means to increase engagement through gameplayand role playing.In 2022, this work was expanded by joining forces with engineering faculty from the Virtues andVocations initiative and the Ethics at Work project which included other computing faculty,faculty from Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, and faculty from Philosophy, where thegoal was to capture an engineering wide faculty and undergraduate student sentiment about ethicscontent in engineering. A multidisciplinary team of undergraduates, led by advising
the project. This change also resulted in a new faculty member and graduate student instructor joining the team from Clemson. Change 2: Addition of third-year civil engineering students from An-Najah enrolled in an introductory environmental engineering course. This more than doubled the number of students from this institution. It also engaged a second faculty member from An-Najah. Change 3: Implementation of cross-cultural dialogue sessions for IVE teams prior to the start of the project. These sessions were developed based on the feedback, observations, and lessons learned from the 2021 iteration of
school, lack of encouragement andreticence about asking faculty for letters of reference or research opportunities. Women studentswho applied to graduate school were more likely to be motivated by intrinsic factors (e.g., loveof learning, interest in their field) than male students, who were more motivated by furtheringtheir careers. The authors noted that personal outreach and encouragement to apply to graduateschool were more important influences on women’s decision making than men.Once they transition into graduate education, women contend with experiences of sexism, genderstereotyping, delegitimization, and isolation [9]. To mitigate these challenges, women often haveto depend on their own resilience and capacity to cope with these
Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, and the past editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and
EntrepreneurshipAbstractThis work-in-progress paper explores three different academic opportunities that introduceundergraduate students to innovation and engineering entrepreneurship. Courses focused on theexplicit teaching of knowledge, skills, and attitudes associated with innovation andentrepreneurship are inherently able to include learning objectives that align with many of theABET student outcomes, including how to: understand the context in which an engineeringdesign will be implemented, effectively communicate ideas, work in multidisciplinary teams, andparticipate in ethical decision making. The three academic opportunities offered at the Universityof Illinois Urbana-Champaign which are discussed in this paper include: 1) a semester-longintroductory course
paper, looking at workplace practices that promoteengineering graduates going out into the world and generating these new ideas. We call thisoverlap or nexus between innovation and entrepreneurship the “Embracing New Ideas” (ENI)space and identify self-efficacy and behavioral measures that capture its essence. We alsoconsider how to promote these associated behaviors in the workplace, situating our model in theframework of Social Cognitive Career Theory. Our associated research questions are: ● RQ1: How can Embracing New Ideas (ENI) be operationalized into measures of self- efficacy and behaviors? ● RQ2: What workplace, self-efficacy and personal factors relate to these behaviors in a variety of organizations?For organizations that
Paper ID #39472Board 113: Engineering Faculty’s Academic Influence on StudentPersistence: Faculty Use, Knowledge, and Comfort in ProvidingEncouragement to StudentsMs. Rachel Ziminski, University of Massachusetts Lowell Rachel Ziminski is a third year doctoral student in the Leadership in Education program at the Univer- sity of Massachusetts Lowell. Her research interests include understanding faculty influence on student persistence, faculty teaching preparation, and creating an environment of continuous learning in higher education. Her current research focuses on faculty influence on underrepresented minority student
Paper ID #38580Using Decision-based Learning to Develop Expert Information LiteracyBehaviors in Engineering UndergraduatesMr. David Pixton, Brigham Young University David Pixton is a subject liaison at the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University. In this role, he is responsible for providing research training and assistance to students and faculty within the majority of engineering and technology fields offered at the university. He holds degrees in Mechanical Engineer- ing and Library & Information Science. David’s current research is focused on improving learning in a library environment, including the
- Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and facultyDr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Stressors for Doctoral Students Questionnaire in Engineering: Year 2 of an RFE project on understanding graduate engineering
) industry, and discussesthe benefits of doing this when students graduate into industry. Harris and co-authors [5] notedthat relevant case studies could take the form of either newsworthy events or smaller, low-profilescenarios that introduce students to ethical dilemmas they might encounter in their careers. Thecurrent paper shares the goal of using realistic situated experiences such as case studies forengineering education, and specifically explores game-based interventions.Gamification is a pedagogical strategy that has been implemented across a range of settings.One example [10] was a gamified learning approach to introducing a library orientation tool thatmany engineering students had to use. The approach was found to be linked to an increase
opportunities for graduate school. As a result of these findings,we increased our outreach opportunities to allow students to discuss and explore the benefitsof graduate school to build the interest and self-efficacy of our target population. Further, weasked faculty members that work with the students to reach out to students individually andencourage them to apply. Using this approach, after identifying 79 eligible students, 38applications were received, 84% from our list of eligible students, and 63% from populationsunderrepresented in engineering.Problem One of NSF’s strategic objectives is fostering the growth of a more capable and diverseresearch workforce [1]. According to the recent National Academies of Sciences, Engineering,and Medicine
not to answer/Others 2 0 0 0Note: 1East Asian includes Chinese, Korean, Japanese, etc.; 2South Asian includes Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi,Sri Lankan, etc.; 3Fellowship/scholarship/grant indicates gifted monetary award that students do not need to repay;4 Self funded indicates personal finances and/or savings; 5Student loans indicate money borrowed from a financialinstitution that must be repaid; 6Others include money borrowed from family/friend with an expectation to repay orfrom parents, and foreign (non-U.S.) support.Data Analysis The first goal of this study—To understand similarities or differences in the student’sidentified stressors between engineering graduate student
context: an exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 13, 2015/08/18 2015, doi: 10.1186/s40594-015-0026-8.[14] J. Michael, "Where's the evidence that active learning works?," Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 159-167, 2006/12/01 2006, doi: 10.1152/advan.00053.2006.[15] E. J. Theobald et al., "Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 117, pp. 6476 - 6483, 2020.[16] K. A
Paper ID #37600Board 54A: Student Impacts from Outreach-based Flood Risk Research inRural Texas, USADr. Erick Butler, West Texas A&M Dr. Butler has graduated from Cleveland State University in Cleveland, Ohio with a BS in Environmental Science (2007), an MS in Environmental Engineering (2009), and a Dr. Eng. in Civil Engineering (2013). Currently, he is an Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering at West Texas A&M University in Canyon, Texas, an institution he has been working for since August 2013. He is a registered P.E. in the state of Louisiana. His research interests include geographic information
; domestic students organizational part of a group of life or its graduate students who members' provide each other with perception of academic support and/or and attitudes encouragement. towards those dimensions"Institutional 4 dimensions: motivation: bouncing ideas off each engineering alumni and no mixed: [63]climate" historical, mastery climate; other; support from current grad students interviews structural, faculty & peers
may not be obvious to faculty or career support specialists wanting tohelp them.In Gault, Redington, and Schlager, research on internships and career success and career skillpreparation was grouped into four categories: communication, academic, leadership, and jobacquisition skills [22]. Though their research provides valuable insight regarding career skillpreparation, it does not include measures to investigate students’ understanding of a moreholistic process of exploring choices, gaining skills needed for the job, and acquiring the job.Within our study, analysis of data from Career Decision-Making Socializers (CDMS), peoplehaving an impact on a student’s career choices, were reviewed for reasons given by CDMSs toencourage student
potential risks and developing strategies andpolicies to ensure ChatGPT is used as a supplement, not a replacement, for traditional teaching methods.Keywords“ChatGPT”, “engineering education”, “teaching strategies”, “technology in engineering education”,“faculty paper”1. Introduction The use of online and digital learning platforms has become increasingly prevalent in highereducation to increase access and flexibility for students [2]. This has led to the development of new toolsand technologies, such as AI-powered chatbots and virtual reality simulations, which can be used toenhance teaching and learning in a number of ways, including by providing personalized learningmaterials, interactive exercises and assessments, and instant feedback and
factor which can help sustainstudents through unconscionable and demoralizing experiences [4]. A study of an entire graduateacademic community at an R1 STEM department shows that communicating about science withpeers, talking about teaching hurdles, and engaging in mentoring relationships contribute heavilyto a sense of belonging [8]. Fostering community and creating channels for communication withgraduate students and their peers and faculty members could provide these opportunities tocirculate information about career opportunities, attract job recruiters, and lead to perceivedacademic success.To assess community needs, this study uses community-led, stakeholder-centric, participatoryresearch. Community-led, stakeholder-centric, participatory
dimensions of their work and to be ethical actors. While one approach to the ethicseducation of engineers involves separate courses in philosophy of ethical decision making, wecontend a better way to teach ethics to first-year engineering students might be to situate it in theeveryday decisions of engineers as they do their work in realistic scenarios while considering thepersonal and social consequences of their decisions by role-playing.Richly contextualized cases have been used to supplement the more purely philosophicalapproaches to engineering ethics education, but are often presented as third-person narrativesrather than as active first-person role-playing scenarios. Educational games have been shown tobe an effective teaching tool for complex
and industries, and employs an iterativeimprovement process to evaluate knowledge gained and promote effective communication and collab-oration. The primary goal is to equip graduate students with interdisciplinary skills and knowledge toprepare them for a diverse and dynamic workforce.Co-creation has been explored as a means of enhancing educational outcomes [2]. This approach aimsto transform the traditional view of students as passive consumers of education to active participantsin the learning and decision-making process [3]. The key features of this concept are collaboration inboth the process and output, transformative interaction, learner empowerment, a sense of communityand partnership in learning, and value. These findings are
. Extended community members included students, children, anduniversity technology officers. These participants discussed how they were motivated toparticipate in STEM EEPs when a member of their extended community explained how STEMacademic entrepreneurship aligned with their career interests. When Dr. Wu was asked why sheparticipated in a STEM EEP, she noted, “My research has always had the bench towards that application, even though there's a lot of fundamental work that I also do as well. But I've never really thought about actually taking technology to the market until my son said, "No, mommy, have you thought about..." I said, "Well, I could explore it. Let's explore it."Dr. Wu explains how her decision to pursue a
University of Florida, 2George Mason UniversityAbstractA metacognitive approach to engineering education, including inquiry-based collaboration, canimpact and prepare STEM graduates for a modern workforce that requires high levels of criticalthinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills. This exploratory study examinedgraduate STEM students’ perceived metacognition as they worked together to develop andimplement applied research in both online and in-person learning environments. It developed andimplemented online learning modules for four graduate engineering courses for researchquestion development, literature reviews, and conducting research. Students self-evaluated usinga survey at the end of each course. For all course sections and
, University of Michigan Megan Ennis is a master’s student in aerospace engineering and a research assistant with the SHUTTLE Lab at the University of Michigan. After completing a B.S. in aerospace engineering at the University of Michigan, she spent a year at University of Cambridge for a master’s in gender studies. She returned to Michigan and is now enjoying her time as a graduate student instructor. Beyond being involved in the lab’s macroethics work, Megan’s research interest is to apply feminist theories to engineering education.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him/his) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering
. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her primary areas of research include engineering ca- reer pathways and decision-making, undergraduate student persistence, professional engineering practice, and faculty mentorship. Brunhaver graduated with her B.S. in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Perceived Advisor Support and Thesis Self-Efficacy: An Instrument DevelopmentAbstractThe path to degree completion for graduate students in engineering disciplines is fraught withchallenges, but one factor that
faculty member for the Scientista Foundation and ASEE student chapters at Binghamton University.Mr. Koenraad E. Gieskes, State University of New York, Binghamton Koen Gieskes currently serves as the Watson College Interim Assistant Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Interim Director of the Engineering Design Division. He is also director for LSAMP and co-director for STEP and UBMS. Koen first joined the Engineering Design Division at Binghamton Uni- versity as a graduate student in 2004, then, in 2009, he was hired on as a full-time lecturer, in 2017 he became the Assistant Director, and in 2022 began serving as the Interim Director. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023