Paper ID #45200Impact of Generative AI Technologies on Blind and Visually Impaired Students:A Case StudyMr. Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University Lance White is a Ph.D. student at Texas A&M University in Interdisciplinary Engineering with a thrust in Engineering Education. He is working as a Lecturer in the Engineering Academic and Student Affairs unit teaching first-year engineering in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M UniversitySara Amani, Texas A&M University Sara Amani is currently a doctoral candidate in the Multidisciplinary Engineering Department at Texas A&M University. She has
Paper ID #36412Advocates and Allies Across Multiple Institutions – A Discussion ofBest-Practices to Support Gender EquityDr. Cristinel Ababei, Marquette University I am an Associate Professor in the Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Marquette University. I received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, in 2004 and the M.Sc. (signal processing) and B.S. (microelectronics) degrees from the Technical University ”Gh. Asachi” of Iasi, Romania. Prior to joining Marquette University, from 2012 to 2013, I was an assistant professor in the Dept. of Electrical
students face early on can help boost retention and the quality of students’ overallexperience in the long term.Background and ObjectivesThe college enrollment process is a complicated journey for many students, filled with confusionand stress, but also excitement and hope. Some may have known their dream school since theywere children, whereas others are only beginning to explore their options as they complete highschool. A plethora of factors influence prospective students’ enrollment intentions. Rising costsare a concern for many students, either limiting their options to in-state universities or makingthem feel locked out of a system they are otherwise academically prepared for [1]. The financialchallenges are further amplified by mixed
bebeneficial for supporting virtual collaboration: idea boards (or whiteboards) that come with alarge selection of templates (diagrams and flowcharts); colorful “sticky notes” that allowcollaborators to emulate face-to-face low-fidelity design synthesis processes; a real-time displaythat indicates active team members; empathy-mapping templates to assist teams in mapping endusers’ attitudes, behaviors, needs and pain points; and journey-mapping templates to assist teamsin capturing their design process. Unlike many of its competitors, Miro supports both discreteand continuous brainstorming processes, meaning that users can visualize either independentsteps and thoughts throughout the process or a continuous flow. These features allow theplatform to
Paper ID #34273Engaging Women Engineering Undergraduates as Peer Facilitators inParticipatory Action Research Focus GroupsDr. Susan Thomson Tripathy, University of Massachusetts Lowell Dr. Susan Thomson Tripathy received a Ph.D. in Anthropology from Harvard University in 1989. Her doctoral research was funded by a Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation grant, and utilized ethnographic fieldwork in rural Bihar, India, to analyze the politics and artistic development of a local dance form. From 1995-2007, Tripathy taught behavioral sciences at Middlesex Community College (MCC), where she was an active participant and
-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100017, 2021.[16] P. Johanes and L. Lagerstrom, “Adaptive learning: The premise, promise, and pitfalls,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[17] C. Richardson, “Council post: The next revolution in global e-learning,” Jul 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/07/25/the-next-revolution-in-global-elearning/?sh=66f38d357c25[18] Y. Niu, L. Ying, J. Yang, M. Bao, and C. Sivaparthipan, “Organizational business intelligence and decision making using big data analytics,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 58, no. 6, p. 102725, 2021
Paper ID #39179WIP: Using Human-Centered Design and Data analytics to improve studentaccess and success in an undergraduate pre-engineering programMr. Aishwary Pawar, University of Michigan - Dearborn Aishwary Pawar is a doctoral candidate in industrial & systems engineering at the University of Michi- gan–Dearborn. His research is focused on investigating the factors that influence undergraduate enroll- ment, retention, graduation, and dropout. For his Ph.D., he plans to incorporate human-centered design and data analytics to promote student success in undergraduate engineering programs and to support higher education
and then as a graduate student performing his doctoral research at the UK Center for Applied En- ergy Research (CAER) and at the University of Alicante (Spain). After obtaining his Ph.D. in 2008, he worked as a postdoctoral fellow at Utrecht University (The Netherlands) prior to returning to UK, where he now holds the positions of Program Manager at CAER and Adjunct Assistant Professor at the De- partment of Chemistry. His current research focuses on the application of heterogeneous catalysis to the production of renewable fuels and chemicals, with emphasis on the upgrading of algae and waste oils to drop-in hydrocarbon fuels. His synergistic activities include participating in a number of K-20 educational
course is meaningful and useful to an audienceof engineering education researchers. We are curious to see if this process of mapping outalternate scales will find resonance in a broader communication community, one outside ourlocal context (Walther, Sochacka, & Kellam, 2013). Rather than seeking to generalize from thesefindings or make definitive policy changes based on how alternate educational scales are made orlived, we wish to highlight their existence and comment on their divergence or convergence ascompared to existing educational scales whose spatial and temporal features have gone largelyunexamined in engineering education in the context of curricular reform.FindingsDrawing on the five aspects of educational scale as defined by
development.Ms. Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno Indira Chatterjee received her M.S. in Physics from Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio in 1977 and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah in 1981. Indira is Associate Dean of Engineering and Professor of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno, NV.Ms. Mackenzie C. Parker, University of Nevada, Reno Mackenzie is a doctoral student at the University of Nevada, Reno in the Department of Engineering Education. She received a Master of Science degree in Materials Science and Engineering from the same institution in 2018. Her research explores facets of engineering graduate student
Paper ID #41791Navigating Grief in Academia: Prioritizing Supports for Women Scholarsthrough Informed ApproachesMrs. Enas Aref, Western Michigan University Mrs. Enas Aref is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Industrial Engineering Program at Western Michigan University. Mrs. Aref is a certified Associate Ergonomist. She is also a researcher at the HPI and a doctoral Teaching Assistant in the Industrial and Entrepreneurial Engineering and Engineering Management Department at Western Michigan UniversityDina Idriss-Wheeler, University of OttawaJulia Hajjar, University of Ottawa ©American Society for Engineering
ReferencesBlackburn, H. (2017). The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017. Science & Technology Libraries, 36(3), 235–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2017.1371658Bryson, T. C., & Grunert Kowalske, M. (2022). Black women in STEM graduate programs: The advisor selection process and the perception of the advisor/advisee relationship. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 15(1), 111.Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039Collins, P. H., Da Silva, E. C. G., Ergun, E., Furseth, I., Bond, K. D., & Martínez-Palacios, J. (2021
Computer Science from University of Portsmouth, UK in 2006. Aamir was also a Visiting Scientist at MIT, USA in 2010-11 where he worked on the award-winning Cilk technolgy. Aamir’s research interests include designing and implementing parallel software on high-end computing platforms. Aamir is an architect and the main developer of an MPI-like library called MPJ Express (http://mpjexpress.org).Prof. Ala Al-Fuqaha, Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU) Ala Al-Fuqaha received Ph.D. degree in Computer Engineering and Networking from the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City. He is Professor at Hamad Bin Khalifa University. His research interests include the use of machine learning in general and deep learning in
identities and intersectionality.Madison Natarajan, University of Massachusetts Boston Madison Natarajan is a doctoral student in the Counseling Psychology Ph.D. program at University of Massachusetts Boston. Madison received her MS. in Clinical Mental Health Counseling at Lipscomb University in Nashville, TN. Her research and clinical interests stem from a feminist/intersectional per- spective looking at religion and sexuality, evaluating how religious identities and morals influence self- concept in the areas of sexuality, sexual expression, self-esteem, and sexual agency.Anushka SistaDr. Kerrie G Wilkins-Yel, University of Massachusetts - Boston Kerrie Wilkins-Yel, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Counseling Psychology
engineering journey of a Black male engineering major,” J. of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, forthcoming.[6] E.O. McGee, “Devalued Black and Latino racial identities,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1626–1662, 2016.[7] M. Ross and A. Godwin, “Engineering identity implications on the retention of Black women in the engineering industry,” in 2016 Proc of ASEE Annual Conference Exposition, Jun. 2016.[8] K. Griffin, “Voices of the “Othermothers”: Reconsidering Black professors’ relationships with Black students as a form of social exchange,” J. of Negro Edu., vol. 82, no. 2, 2013.[9] C. B. Newman, J. L. Wood, and F. Harris III, “Black men's perceptions of sense of
.[2] Council of Graduate Schools, “Ph. D. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Data,” 2008.[3] R. Sowell, J. Allum, and H. Okahana, “Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion,” 2015.[4] K. H. Hunter and K. Devine, “Doctoral Students’ Emotional Exhaustion and Intentions to Leave Academia,” vol. 11, pp. 35–61, 2016.[5] B. E. Lovitts, Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study, vol. 32. 2001.[6] B. E. Lovitts and C. Nelson, “The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph.D. programs,” Academe, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 44–50, 2000.[7] C. M. Golde, “Should I Stay, or Should I Go? Student Descriptions of the Doctoral
internalization of certain valuesover others.IntroductionGraduate students engaging in research education are vying for admission to a community ofscholars, learning to operate within specific requirements, regulations, and expectations in eachfield of study [1]. Shifts in how doctoral students view themselves and their peers, their mentors,the field, and generated knowledge occur throughout the research education process.Simultaneously, students proceed through the process of taking on or rejecting values and valuesystems (axiology) that are proliferated and perpetuated in their professional field of study. Inaddition to messages conveyed from graduate development within engineering environments,graduate students also bring their beliefs about knowledge
a PhD from Northwestern University.Dr. Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University Dr. Vimal Viswanathan is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at San Jose State University. He earned his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University. His research interests include design innovation, creativity, design theory and engineering education.Dr. Chitra R. Nayak, Tuskegee University Dr. Nayak joined Tuskegee University as an assistant professor in Physics in 2014. After completing her Ph.D (2009) in the area of nonlinear dynamics from Cochin University, India, she worked as a postdoctoral fellow in the interdisciplinary field of bacterial biophysics and immunology at Dalhousie University and
Francisco Chapter (2018-present), an Associate Editor of the IEEE Inside Signal Processing E-Newsletter (2016-2018), an Outreach Co-Chair of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) Golden Gate Section (2017-2018), a Co-Chair of the Doctoral Consortium at 2014 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, a Program Committee Member of various international conferences, and a regular reviewer of a variety of journals and conferences in related fields.Dr. David Quintero, San Francisco State University Dr. David Quintero received B.S. degree from Texas A&M University, a M.S. degree from Stanford University, and a Ph.D. from the University of Texas at Dallas all in mechanical engineering. He is now an Assistant
normal, even in terms of identity development. The authors in [28] stated that“Latino immigrants face multifaceted racialization in the news media and that this racializationshares substantive similarities with African American racialization processes.” Other problemshave to do with Latinx being educationally, socially, and economically oppressed and sufferingstigmatization as people with less intellectual value [29]. d) Experiential - women self-thinking on their role as engineering studentsWomen's perceptions of themselves as engineering students can vary. Chachra and Kilgore [3]noted that women perceived themselves as less confident in their math skills despite finishingtheir engineering degree in four years comparable to their male
. Silliman, K. Smith. “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp 119-131. 2012.[8] D. Means, C. Beatty, R. Blockett, M. Bumbry, R. Canida, T. Cawthon, “Resilient Scholars: Reflections from Black Gay Men on the Doctoral Journey,” Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, vol. 54, no. 1, pp 109-120. 2017.[9] E. Tate, M. Linn, “How Does Identity Shape the Experiences of Women of Color Engineering Students?” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 14, no. 5-6, pp 483-493. 2005.[10] J. Dugan, M. Kusel, D. Simounet. "Transgender College Students: An Exploratory Study of Perceptions, Engagement, and Educational Outcomes," Journal of College
in engineering, where onlyone in seven engineers is a woman. Though “women earn about half the doctorates in scienceand engineering in the United States [they] comprise only 21% of full science professors and 5%of full engineering professors” [14]. A comprehensive study of multiple processes playing a rolein these disparities showed that there was a cumulative effect of advantages for men anddisadvantages for women that built over time to produce highly gendered outcomes by the timethey reached the advanced stages of the education pipeline [15].Thus, the solution to the gendergap in STEM must reach deeper than retention efforts aiming at the college population.Also, a significant gap exists in pay among men and women, even when controlling
apply formedical and law school entrance exams due to their unsteady citizenship status, and otherstudents noted the changing nature of immigration policymaking that threatened undocumentedstudents with temporariness. In another study, a participant, Alysa, said “‘I heard about thewhole graduate school and Ph.Ds. and all that, and I’m like yeah, I want to be a doctor. But thenI’m like ‘wait, what if DACA gets taken away?’” [46] (p. 327). Her question, along with others,highlighted the effects of political threats on a displaced students’ liminal legality andprofessional identity; they reified one’s in-between status, espouse its temporariness, and madelooking for work seem futile [21]. These students’ experiences also showed that, liminal
interviews was designed to understandstudents’ background and pathways into engineering. The second round of interviews involvedasking the students to complete a journey map to guide the interview focused on understandingtheir identity trajectory. This journey map documented the “high points” and “low points” of astudent’s experiences over the previous semester and was used as a reflective tool and datacollection artifact to guide the narrative interviews. The third round of interviews continues to usejourney maps and students’ stories to understand their development in engineering.The interviews were used to develop “restoryed” case summaries. A restoryed case summary is ashort version of each student’s pathway and highlights. In addition to these
Paper ID #29977Student Perspectives on Navigating Engineering PathwaysDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for