Portland, Oregon
June 23, 2024
June 23, 2024
June 26, 2024
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 13
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
Diversity
11
10.18260/1-2--47461
https://peer.asee.org/47461
78
Dr. James Huff is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Honors College Faculty Fellow at Harding University. He conducts transdisciplinary research on identity that lies at the nexus of applied psychology and engineering education. A recipient of the NSF CAREER grant (No. 2045392) and the director of the Beyond Professional Identity (BPI) lab, Dr. Huff has mentored numerous undergraduate students, doctoral students, and academic professionals from more than 10 academic disciplines in using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) as a qualitative research method to examine identity and shame in a variety of contexts. Dr. Huff serves as Associate Editor for Studies in Engineering Education, Journal of Engineering Education, and is on the Editorial Board of Personality and Social Psychology Review. He has a B.S. in Computer Engineering from Harding University, an M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.
Dr. Amy Brooks is a Postdoctoral Associate at the University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering. Her dissertation research broadly focused on global issues related to sustainable waste management and plastic pollution. After earning her PhD 2021 from the University of Georgia, Amy developed skills in qualitative research methods in engineering education at Oregon State University. As part of this training, she used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to examine engineering faculty well-being and collaborated on the development of a reflective tool for researchers to build skills in semi- and unstructured interviewing. Building on her postdoctoral training, Amy aims to merge her methodological interests to pursue research questions in the nexus of engineering education, sustainable development, and resilient communities.
Previous literature indicates that Black engineering and computer science students face unique challenges. However, we know little about the active and inactive ways that Black students engage in their interactions with faculty members. We present an interpretative phenological analysis (IPA) of five interviews of Black engineering and computer science students to answer the question: How do Black students experience faculty-student interactions in computer science and engineering education? Through our analysis, we present four themes that characterize the experiences of our study participants: (1) Experiencing painful isolation from faculty and peers, (2) Facing increased pressure to succeed, (3) Seeking and finding connection with faculty and peers when faced with isolation, (4) Understanding themselves inside their respective programs. By comprehending the pervasive and hidden storylines influencing the interactions between faculty and Black students in computer science and engineering, faculty members can gain insights into how their actions can contribute to the success of these students.
Shanachilubwa, K., & Huff, J. L., & Brooks, A. L. (2024, June), Faculty-Student Interactions as Experienced by Black Engineering and Computer Science Students Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--47461
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015