Paper ID #20033Characterizing the Alignment in Faculty and Student BeliefsDr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for nearly 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research
Paper ID #20388An Assessment Framework for First-Year Introduction to Engineering CoursesDr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Senay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. Her research focuses on teaching and assessment associated with key aspects of engineering design such as innovation and decision-making.Dr. Kerrie Anna Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Douglas is an Assistant Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on methods of assessment and evaluation unique to
Paper ID #20297Students’ Self-Regulation in Senior Capstone Design ProjectsDr. Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Dr. Oenardi Lawanto is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, USA. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa State University, his M.S.E.E. from the University of Dayton, and his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Before coming to Utah State, Dr. Lawanto taught and held several administrative positions at one large private university in In- donesia. He has developed and delivered numerous international workshops on student-centered
Paper ID #18517Unpacking Latent DiversityDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient
-structured interview, impacted the qualityand trustworthiness of the data. With this broader theme in mind, two more specific objectivesare the primary foci of this paper: • Objective 1: What do the reflection data and follow-up interviews make visible about engineering practice, including in terms of boundary spanning? • Objective 2: How do participants respond differently in the reflections and interviews, and how is this potentially related to personality or other individual characteristics?In support of these objectives we first consider the challenges of studying engineering practiceand how others have conducted such research. Second, we report on the types of reflectionprompts we developed, justification for their use
Paper ID #18061Engineering Students’ Misuse of Business Concepts: Understanding Prob-lematic Precursors to EntrepreneurshipMr. Todd Mathew Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Todd is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on entrepreneurship education as a component of modern engineering education efforts.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, As- sociate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center
Paper ID #18832How Six Assistant Professors Landed Their Jobs at Baccalaureate Collegesand Master’s Institutions: A Focus on Pathways and Teaching (Un)preparednessMs. Natascha M. Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Natascha Trellinger is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University. At Purdue, Natascha is a member of the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) and is particularly interested in teaching conceptions and methods and graduate level engineering education.Prof. Brent K
Paper ID #19637Approaches to Coaching Students in Design ReviewsDr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Mr. Tiago R. Forin, Rowan University Tiago Forin is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education and researcher at Purdue University affiliated with
involved the creation of interpretative codes to identifypatterns within and across EDSs’ interviews. For each participant, a mind map, or graphicorganizer, was generated after analysis to identify the relationships based on those identifiedcodes. This process ultimately led to the increased discerning of EDS phenomenon as theresearcher’s familiarity with the interview increased.11 IPA’s recursive process facilitated theunderstanding of EDSs’ salient identities as presented during their interviews by providinginsight into the successes and barriers students encounter on their way to graduation. This studyis a small portion of a larger project that seeks to understand how engineering graduate programscan be improved based on the development of
Paper ID #17767Examining Engineering Technology Students: How They Perceive and OrderTheir ThoughtsDr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring the performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies.Dr. Jennifer Drapinski Moss, Purdue University Dr. Jennifer Moss is
Problem-BasedLearning.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2):6-28.Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Sheppard, S., A. Colby, K. Macatangay & W. Sullivan (2006). “What is Engineering Practice?”International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3):429-438.Stevens, R, K. O’Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns & D. Amos (2008). “Becoming an Engineer:Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering Learning.” Journal of EngineeringEducation, 97(3):355-368.Stevens, R., A. Johri & K. O’Connor (2013). “Professional Engineering Work.” In A.Johri & B.M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research.Cambridge: Cambridge
another in public conversations about thetradeoffs involved in these projects, thereby modeling communication across disciplinarydifferences for the students.This process will be facilitated by an additional component of the course design. The authors areexploring a collaboration with an engineering program in Rwanda, and will use this course as anopportunity to challenge students to design payload concepts that account for Rwanda’s uniquetopography (mountainous terrain make roads unreliable), size (only 160 miles across at itswidest), and stage of development (strong economy and growing infrastructure). Having aconcrete case in mind will encourage students to focus their solutions, thereby increasing thechances that their concepts survive beyond
transformation in the field” (Atman, Turns, & Yasuhara, 2017). As individuals wholive in relationship with others, we find ourselves to be natural storytellers. As Cron (2012)described, “story evolved as a way to explore our own minds and the minds of others, as a sort ofdress rehearsal for the future” (p. 9). With this growing community practice of storytelling(Adams et. al, 2007), we seek to articulate our own pathway story into the engineering educationresearch enterprise, so we may engage others in our work, inspire future doctoral students, andprepare ourselves for future research and teaching practice.We adopted a theoretical and action-oriented approach to build our understanding of “our story”and to use inquiry sessions as an outlet for
Paper ID #19966Lessons Learned: Strategies for Creating and Mentoring Diverse GraduateStudent CommunitiesKatherine Elfer, Tulane University Kate Elfer is a Ph.D. Candidate in Biomedical Engineering at Tulane University. She researches novel fluorescence strategies for point-of-care diagnostics. While at Tulane, Kate has co-founded the a graduate student group, Women+ in Science and Engineering, and is currently the president of the graduate student government. She is also on the board of two New Orleans STEM Education non-profits. After graduation, she will seek positions that allow her to continue mentoring and
identity affords more experiences withwhich diverse individuals can identify20 and feel welcome as participants (i.e., “engineering isfor me, too.”). Similar to the BME example, an engineering identity that values both social andtechnical dimensions presents more values and premises with which individuals can identify thusleading to more “whole-minded engineers.”Research & Development PlanThis NSF-funded RFE study utilizes a design thinking approach to develop solution(s) thataddress our three interrelated objectives: to better prepare engineers for today’s workforce, tobroaden understandings of engineering practice as both social and technical, and to createand sustain more diverse and inclusionary engineering programs. We are involving
solution based on strengths and weaknesses anddecide whether their solution is good enough to meet the criteria and stay within the constraintsor if they need to use the feedback to redesign their solution. Our research looks at the intersections of solution generation and argumentation (i.e.,EBR). With the above frameworks in mind, we undertook our research on the question: Whatinitiates the need for middle school students to use evidence-based reasoning while they aregenerating a solution to an engineering design problem in a STEM integration unit?MethodologyThis research follows the naturalistic inquiry methodology25,26 with lenses of STEM integrationframework21, A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering24, and Toulmin’s Argument
studying these curricula, we noticed that studentscan be “hands on but not minds on”, in the process of solving the tasks. In particular, GuidedContent and Guided Practice tasks are lacking in the assessments. This implies that in realitystudents have limited opportunities to reflect or make inferences, given these items. In order tosolve problems in the context of applying engineering design in the science classroom, thestudents will need to have the opportunities to use the guided information to solve the problems,rather than being asked to simply record the observations or perform calculations. The intersection of TAGS and POD clearly demonstrated a lack of higher-level cognitivedemands in several important areas. For example, Evaluate
the risk ofcardiovascular disease significantly, which was the reason collaboration began between theCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences and the Mechanical Engineering department to patent aTai Chi (T-ball) design. T-ball design project is a part ofProgram proposed by Dr. Goh and his coworkers [3]. Tai Chi, a mind-body harmony exercise, is an ancient Chinese healing/martial art [4, 5],which is practiced by millions of people daily across the world. It is said that around 250 Millionpeople practice Tai Chi in their lifetime. If those who have ever practiced Tai Chi were thepopulation of a country, it would be the 5th largest country in the world by population after India,China, USA and Indonesia. Since the customer base of the T-Ball
Paper ID #19780What does an In-Class Meeting Entail? A Characterization and Assessmentof Instructor Actions in an Active, Blended, and Collaborative ClassroomDavid Allen Evenhouse, Purdue University, West Lafayette David Evenhouse is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. He graduated from Calvin College in the Spring of 2015 with a B.S.E. concentrating in Mechanical Engineering. Experiences during his undergraduate years included a semester in Spain, taking classes at the Universidad de Oviedo and the Escuela Polit´ecnica de Ingenieria de Gij´on, as well as multiple
Paper ID #18477Building Trust in Robots in Robotics-Focused STEM Education under TPACKFramework in Middle SchoolsDr. S. M. Mizanoor Rahman, New York University Mizanoor Rahman received Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Mie University at Tsu, Japan in 2011. He then worked as a research fellow at the National University of Singapore (NUS), a re- searcher at Vrije University of Brussels (Belgium) and a postdoctoral associate at Clemson University, USA. He is currently working as a postdoctoral associate at the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, NYU Tandon School of Engineering, NY, USA. His research
, educators havetried to design curricula that foster this associative learning —which, we know from our ownexperiences, is how we learn best outside of the classroom. Twenty-first century engineeringeducators have been mindful of ABET’s EC2000 student outcomes a-k, including ethicalunderstanding, the ability to communicate effectively, and “the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context.”2 Engineering educators who struggle to help students achieve these ABETlearning outcomes might consider working together with liberal arts faculty to integrateengineering with humanities understanding. What the environmental historian William Crononwished for liberal arts
2017 ASEE International Forum:Columbus , Ohio Jun 28 Paper ID #20752Virtual Teams in Engineering – Global PracticesAna Marcela Hern´andez de Men´endez, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Marcela Hern´andez de Men´endez received a B.Sc. in food engineering from Universidad Dr. Jos´e Mat´ıas Delgado, El Salvador, in 2004. She also got a M.Sc. in Marketing and a M.Sc. in Business Innovation and Technology, both from Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey, M´exico, in 2009 and 2011 respectively. Currently, she is Research Assistant at the Directorate of Research and Graduate Program of the School of
broad, science-based context. For example, the textbook beginswith the Big Bang, then spends three full chapters on the formation and evolution of theuniverse, the formation of our solar system and planet Earth, and the origin and evolution ofearly forms of life. The textbook will be extensively supplemented with additional material andguest lectures from various engineering faculty. In addition to engineering materials, broadtopics like power, water, and navigation will be considered. Student assessment will includedebates, group research projects, and oral presentations, as well as exams.Designed with engineering students in mind, the classes seek to establish patterns of thinkingaround complex issues and to provide meaningful case studies
careers – there may be more than one valid approach to solve aproblem and more than one “right” answer to that problem. With this challenge in mind, a“Signature Assignment” was developed to help students develop effective critical thinking skills.Here, a “Signature Assignment” as defined as a coordinated series of in-class activities andindividual assignments, collectively consisting of approximately 20% of instructional time and acorresponding percentage of the overall grade.Discussion of development of the Signature Assignment in this paper is intended to be useful forengineering educators in many different disciplines. The material presented was developed for agroundwater hydrology class for senior-level civil and environmental engineering
peers.Five FG engineering students with high quantitative belongingness were selected for aninterview. A semi-structured interview protocol based in interpretive phenomenological analysiswas used to elucidate the students’ experiences that fostered belongingness. Separate themesfrom each student were created from coding and then overarching themes unified a sharedexperience.The following overarching themes were prevalent among the participants: similarity toclassmates, recognition as an engineer by peers, limited questioning of belongingness, andbelongingness is a state of mind. The results depict that elements of engineering identity play apart in making students feel they belong (e.g., recognition), but in some cases, belongingness isdistinct from
organizations (student chapters and evendepartments) to be a part of and experience speakers, conferences, and community servicesurrounding the group’s basic needs. Some students look to socialize and begin to connect withlike-minded peers within activities and focused study areas for our veterans and active dutymilitary.References[1] Humphrey, J., “Getting Student Veterans Off the Sidelines,” accessed 5 February 2017,http://www.military.com/education/getting-veteran-students-off-the-sidelines.html[2] Kuh, G., et. al., Student Success in College, Josey-Bass, 2010.[3] Welch, R., Martin, A., Bower, K., Rabb, R., “Promoting Engagement through Innovative and PragmaticPrograms,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, New
Paper ID #19767Making Meaning through Art-Integrated EngineeringDr. Kerry Dixon, Ohio State University Kerry Dixon is a specialist in interdisciplinary education, with particular focus on integrating visual art into science, technology, engineering and math. Formerly a member of the curatorial staff at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, Kerry has also directed two education nonprofit organizations. As director of those organizations, she partnered with The Ohio State University on the creation of a national model for preparing future secondary teachers with a specialization in urban education. In that role, she
together. They decided upon relevant field trips andguest speakers in order to provide context to inform SABES.The community-based aspect of SABES was crucial for establishing in the minds of students,teachers, parents, and community members that STEM skills are relevant for their communitynow and in the future. Instead of being an academic exercise, each student engineering designproject was a practical attempt to envision the potential benefits to the community.For example, one school maintained a school garden. The fourth grade students decided to workon a composting project that would repurpose waste from the cafeteria. The students researchedcomposting, learned about composting from a guest speaker and field trip, and tested methods
simply because of the different majors, it was so interesting seeing how all our minds worked together to accomplish.• This program was awesome. I was able to truly see the real problems the world as a whole is facing now. I also understand now that there must be so much more involvement in the sustainable background to get things moving the way they are supposed to in order to have a safe and healthy environment for the future.Capstone Project for Engineering Technology StudentsThe work described in this paper was meant to be the capstone project for EngineeringTechnology students. Currently, the capstone course is being offered as a three credit hour courseand thus the project must be completed in a full semester’s timeframe
Paper ID #18919Life after University for Engineering GraduatesProf. Houshang Darabi, University of Illinois, Chicago Dr. Houshang Darabi is an Associate Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (MIE) at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). Dr. Darabi has been the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of MIE since 2007. He has also served on the College of Engineering (COE) Educational Policy Committee since 2007. Dr. Darabi is the recipient of multiple teaching and advising awards including the COE Excellence in Teaching Award